DONT SHOP AT RALPHS, VONS, OR ALBERTSONS UNTIL THE STRIKE IS OVER!
by chantel g. Sunday October 12, 2003 01:47 AM
liveiranlive [at] riseup.net . .
Ok so the grocery stores here in Southern CA went on strike and managment has locked out workers from sister stores.. also they have put letters in all paychecks telling union workers how to resign from their job and ALSO how to resign from the union.. ugh..
So once agian if you live Anywhere where there is a Ralphs, Vons, or Albertsons please be sure to not go through the picket line and shop at those stores until the strike is over.. Go to Trader Joes, Wild Oats, Gelsons, Bristol Farms, or your local farmers marekt! if anything gather up some friends, pack some snacks and take it down to the picket line, they will be striking 24 hrs. a day.. they need support.. remember these are people who you see everyday when you go to the store, the cashiers who help you out, the baggers who help carry your stuff out, the people who help you in the deli.. and it's EXTREMLY hard for them to decide to go on strike, and the least we could do is support them right now..
THE WORKERS UNITED WILL NEVER BE DEFEATED!
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/news/101203_nw_grocery_strike.html
Clerks at Kroger Co.'s Ralphs, Safeway Inc.'s Vons and Albertsons grocery stores went on strike late Saturday after negotiations between union representatives and store officials broke off, with health care coverage a key sticking point.
The companies operate about 900 stores from San Diego to Santa Barbara and control 60 percent of the Southern California market.
Officials with the United Food and Commercial Workers union initially said strikers would only target Vons and urged the companies not to lock out workers from the other stores.
The supermarkets, however, said a strike against one company would be considered a strike against all three. In a joint statement, they said Albertsons and Ralphs would lock out employees during the dispute.
Plans were in the works to "ensure that stores remain open and staffed," the statement said. Sandra Calderon, a spokeswoman for Vons, said those plans include using temporary workers.
Many of the union's 70,000 clerks began picketing outside Vons markets after last-minute talks involving a federal mediator broke down.
The chains want workers to pay more for health benefits, citing a sluggish economy, rising health care costs and increased competition from nonunion rivals such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
Vons president Tom Keller said the proposal does not call for wage reductions and asks employees to pay $5 a week for individual health care coverage and $10 to $15 a week for an entire family.
The union called on Southern Californians to honor picket lines and shop elsewhere. Under their contract, warehouse employees and truck drivers can also choose not to cross picket lines, said Paul Kenny, president of Teamsters Local Union No. 630.
Grocery clerks work a minimum of 24 hours a week, with 70 percent working part-time. They earn, on average, about $15 an hour, said Rick Icaza, president of UFCW Local 770 in Los Angeles and one of the negotiators.
The union wants the companies to maintain health care plans and provide raises of 50 cents an hour the first year and 45 cents an hour the following two years, Icaza said.
The last time the grocery workers went on strike was 1978, with the walkout lasting less than a week.
she was on her way to saying something really dumb and I wanted to read all of it.
The reason we are going against the companies we work for is because they want to take in more profit. That is why they are not helping us pay for medical.
Albertson's made over 19 billion last year and doesn't want to help workers. Why do we want to work for a company like that?
It's about employers taking care of their employees. the ones who help them earn their millions and billions of dollars of profit.
And because unoin employees do make a fair wage they are able to help the economy in your local area and state. they are able to eat in your restraunts, buy your products and services and in general help the local economy.
where companies like walmart actually do harm to the economy because they do not pay a decent wage to their employees. they take the profits and run.
if they were to pay union scale and benefits then this would help the economy greatly.
and working in a grocery store may seems easy till you do it. But, try standing up all day. and putting up with all the different kinds of customers for 8 hours.
plus, constantly being watched and evaluated to see that you are indeed working fast enough. which according to management no one is ever fast enough.
ever.
and no one seems to mention the two tier system they want also.
this is just a way for the owners to slowly force the higher waged expierenced people out of their jobs.
so this issue infact is more of a concern than just the pay something for your health care issue.
this alone is enough to say no way and strike till this issue is pulled from the contract.
how would you like to work for someone who makes millions of dollars of profit a year and then tells you he can't pay for your medical benefits. And that he will only be able to pay you a raise of say 25 cents a year.
but then you will have to pay more than the raise he gave you to cover your medical benefits.
so, with inflation and now paying for your own medical
benefits you are actually bring home less dollars now than you did before.
It is also about principals. about taking care of your people that actually helped you make all this money.
And the fact that you can be fair to them while still making a profit for yourself.
but, when greed becomes the only motive and at the cost of the people who helped you make it; well, this isn't fair/nice/polite/ or the the right thing to do.
And it is bad in the long run for all concerned.
and it hurts everyone by being bad for the economy of the local area and the state too.
when people have money to spend on food, clothing, housing and some for extras it helps create jobs and puts tax dollars into the general fund to come back and help everyone in the area.
so you see it is about more than just paying for mediacl benefits.
it's about being fair and smart and doing what is good for all and not just being greedy or concerned about how you can make more money at everyone elses expense.
and just because one person or company or chain does something doesn't mean it's right or that you need to do it too.
if all the companies went union and paid fair wages and medical and pensions to their employees then the whole economy would be better off.
and the companies would actually make more money because more people would be working and making enough to spend more.
and if you are not working or not making as much as a
clerk at the stores then i do feel this would help you out too.
for if all the chains were union and and paid a fair scale to their employees plus, their medical and pensions then their business would increase. and they would have to hire more employees.
maybe, even build more stores. or increase the size of the stores they now have.
this would create more jobs all around. and you could eventually get a job say at one of the chains and make more yourself. plus, you'd get medical and pension too.
with all this money going around the employers would make millions more , the employees would make more, and the other businesses would make more as the employees spend more, and more taxes would be collected to go into the general funds to pay for the scholos and roads and such.
so everyone would win.
rather than the current case happening now.
the employers make more by cutting wages and getting rid of their most valuable expierenced employees.
these now former employees must now get help from the state. they actually take money from the general funds. there are fewer jobs . and thus less peolpe spending money and fewer taxes being collected and more money being paid out instead.
so yes the employers make more money but at everyone elses expense.
so a few make a lot more money while the majority suffer because of it.
so you can see that unions actually help everyone in the long run.
think about it.
Besides our bevefits being cut by 50%, they want a wage freeze of 2/3 years, and they want to freeze our pensions!
To add to all of this, they want to instill in a two tier contract, meaning an entirley different contract for new hires. that means lower wages for them and even lower health beneifts for them. Essentially, Vons will turn into another local WAL-MART, min. wage, no benefits, without your prices going down!
WE ARE WILLING TO COMPROMISE! But they arent. they're attitude is TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT!
Have you heard of CORPORATE GREED?
It's about employers taking care of their employees. the ones who help them earn their millions and billions of dollars of profit.
And because unoin employees do make a fair wage they are able to help the economy in your local area and state. they are able to eat in your restraunts, buy your products and services and in general help the local economy.
where companies like walmart actually do harm to the economy because they do not pay a decent wage to their employees. they take the profits and run.
if they were to pay union scale and benefits then this would help the economy greatly.
and working in a grocery store may seems easy till you do it. But, try standing up all day. and putting up with all the different kinds of customers for 8 hours.
plus, constantly being watched and evaluated to see that you are indeed working fast enough. which according to management no one is ever fast enough.
ever.
and no one seems to mention the two tier system they want also.
this is just a way for the owners to slowly force the higher waged expierenced people out of their jobs.
so this issue infact is more of a concern than just the pay something for your health care issue.
this alone is enough to say no way and strike till this issue is pulled from the contract.
how would you like to work for someone who makes millions of dollars of profit a year and then tells you he can't pay for your medical benefits. And that he will only be able to pay you a raise of say 25 cents a year.
but then you will have to pay more than the raise he gave you to cover your medical benefits.
so, with inflation and now paying for your own medical
benefits you are actually bring home less dollars now than you did before.
It is also about principals. about taking care of your people that actually helped you make all this money.
And the fact that you can be fair to them while still making a profit for yourself.
but, when greed becomes the only motive and at the cost of the people who helped you make it; well, this isn't fair/nice/polite/ or the the right thing to do.
And it is bad in the long run for all concerned.
and it hurts everyone by being bad for the economy of the local area and the state too.
when people have money to spend on food, clothing, housing and some for extras it helps create jobs and puts tax dollars into the general fund to come back and help everyone in the area.
so you see it is about more than just paying for mediacl benefits.
it's about being fair and smart and doing what is good for all and not just being greedy or concerned about how you can make more money at everyone elses expense.
and just because one person or company or chain does something doesn't mean it's right or that you need to do it too.
if all the companies went union and paid fair wages and medical and pensions to their employees then the whole economy would be better off.
and the companies would actually make more money because more people would be working and making enough to spend more.
and if you are not working or not making as much as a
clerk at the stores then i do feel this would help you out too.
for if all the chains were union and and paid a fair scale to their employees plus, their medical and pensions then their business would increase. and they would have to hire more employees.
maybe, even build more stores. or increase the size of the stores they now have.
this would create more jobs all around. and you could eventually get a job say at one of the chains and make more yourself. plus, you'd get medical and pension too.
with all this money going around the employers would make millions more , the employees would make more, and the other businesses would make more as the employees spend more, and more taxes would be collected to go into the general funds to pay for the scholos and roads and such.
so everyone would win.
rather than the current case happening now.
the employers make more by cutting wages and getting rid of their most valuable expierenced employees.
these now former employees must now get help from the state. they actually take money from the general funds. there are fewer jobs . and thus less peolpe spending money and fewer taxes being collected and more money being paid out instead.
so yes the employers make more money but at everyone elses expense.
so a few make a lot more money while the majority suffer because of it.
so you can see that unions actually help everyone in the long run.
think about it.
I have been walking right through the picket lines to get food. I think this is crazy and selfish. Last night, i went down the street to get milk for my daughter and people shoving signs in my face because you all want more money and better healthcare. I think everyone needs to get in touch with the Lord.
Also, i know a lot of people that aren't with a Union and has already had their health benefits cut already and you don't see them whining about it.
This is another example of a union forcing employees to lose more money than they stand to gain.
False. In FY2002, Albertson's made $485 million. Compare this to net earnings of $801 million in FY1998.
> Many workers have to pay some of the cost of their health benefits.
True. 90% of working Americans pay some portion of their health benefits premiums.
BOYCOTT WALMART AND OTHER NON-UNION SUPERMARKETS!
These "corporate leeches" (I imagine you are speaking about the owners and the managers) are the reason these business exist -- literally. The striking union workers are simply cogs in the machine created by the management. The fact that replacement workers can come in and train in such short time is a reminder of the low-skill nature of this work.
Why? The biggest weakness of honest liberals is their faith that they can ultimately awaken the conscience of bigots and oligarchs. They are convinced that everyone has a good heart, that injustices in society derive from misunderstanding, and that they must always strive for consensus with those who simply want to rule and exploit others. That's simply not true. There are people in society who have no conscience, and who delight in the misery of others if they think it contributes one iota to their own comforts. Face the truth and get over it. Stop thinking that you have to get such people to "understand"; stop thinking that you have any common bond or common ground with these scum. They don't have any with you. They are your enemy. They hate you. They hate you because you are a worker and they fear you. They see their own fortunes in life as inexticably tied to the immiseration of workers, and so they develop an unbridled contempt for workers while at the same time constantly fearing the prospect of workers organizing and fighting back. So stop worrying about what they think. Fight back.
I'm encouraged. It's nice to see some unions getting off their knees and fighting back for a change. The rank and file members need to keep a fire under the union leaders and not let them sell out the struggle. You cannot waiver. You have to win this strike.
Don't get discouraged at right-wing chauvinists who lash out with anti-worker hate speech. Shut down their businesses. Shut down their mass transit. If the workers are united and geunuinely fight to win, they can defeat their enemies. And a fighting labor movement that starts beating back the assault on workers will win new allies to its cause. So let the pathetic wannabe attack dogs of the oligarchy scream and whine. It's a sign they are scared, and that is plenty of reason to be encouraged.
Really,now,the job you do is worth only what someone will pay you for it.I would rather know that I can be proud of my accomplishments in the world because I deserve to be,not that I am getting more benefits than I deserve[and than most other Americans get]because someone is strong-arming my employer.That flies directly in the face of every principle this country was founded on.........
I hope the markets get the hint.There are a lot of people out there ECSTATIC to get a job for $12 an hour[I believe thats what the non-union employees are making] even without benefits,like most of the rest of us,and I hope they remain.All you union people should do the upstanding thing.If you don't like the terms of your employment,type up a resume like the rest of us and hit the pavement!
without the bourgeosie there is no proletariat; without the proletariat there is no bourgeosie. they exist in a dialectical relationship, both forging and forged by capitalist social relations.
the negation of capitalism is the negation of both the proletariat and the bourgeosie.
once that 's accomplished, we'll never again hear that a grocery store can't exist without exploiters and parasites.
I say - from the quality of your grammar and spelling (including your name!) it is quite evident that you fit the "no brainer" stereotype. The average grocery store grunt is quite young and immature and inexperienced. You proved it for us. Go back to school and pay attention next time. Good grief, I have noticed that as I walked past you in the picket line and gone into the store that the efficiency is improved! reality sucks huh?!
You meant to say:
Good grief, when I walked past you in the picket line I noticed that the store's efficiency has improved!
(It's still a stupid and poorly-conceived comment, but improved considerably.)
So, "bc," what was that you were saying about education?
an old berkeley tactic is too actually go into the store, stock your basket until it's overflowing and get to the scab checker and say "Oh gosh, I left my wallet in the car" and walk out and don't come back until at least a half hour later. just one old tactic. not crossing the picket line is better, but with so many scumbags doing so, creating gridlock at the checkout line is just as relevant.
remember joe hill:
AN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL
fuck, was it just joe who said that--or every wob?
DON'T CROSS PICKETS--OR ELSE GREVIOUS BODILY HARM.
Guy
Grocery store jobs are not meant to be able to support a family.
If liberals support American workers, stop immigration. What do we expect corporations to do when their competitors are hiring cheaper employees? Do you think they will charge more for their product so they can give their bag boy a pension plan? Why should American families who buy groceries support this untenable scenario the union seeks?
Here is the question you all should be asking yourself: how come my grandfather who graduated with a bachelor's in 1916 Nebraska was able to have a 3 storey house, five kids with good clothes, a maid, stay at home mom, car etc. during the Great Depression, as he worked as a traveling paper products salesman at drug stores and department stores.
Now, after years and years of technological productivity boosts like electricity, computers, machines that do lots of our work, and, many more people have college degrees, people definitely live in smaller houses, have fewer kids, perhaps 2 cars, and *two earners per household* (which you think would double the productivity and standard of living), and lots of people can barely afford to buy a house in California (top 20% can afford median house in San Fran), lots of people can't afford health insurance, and we feel like everything is constantly getting more and more expensive.
And the people in this thread act like grocery workers who want to stay at the same level of earnings are 'greedy', even though agriculture has especially had lots of productivity and mechanization boosts. How come the farmers and the lower level sales employees don't benefit when it is much cheaper to make food and to transport, package and sell it now? The prices at my local grocery store certainly are as high as ever, and if consumers, farmers and store workers aren't making this money, that $$ gap between the cost of production and sales is going somewhere.
In ecology, there is a paradox called the 'green world' question. All herbivores, such as insects, rabbits, deer, mice etc. are able to reproduce very quickly, if they have unlimited resources. Yet in very few natural areas- grasslands, forests, marshes etc. do you see a situation where all the plants have been chewed down due to huge numbers of herbivores. In fact, plants are not controlled or limited from the top by herbivores- they are usually limited from the bottom by lack of space or of a nutrient in the soil.
Why don't herbivores explode, in natural situations? They are controlled from the top-down by predators. When aphids reproduce, ladybugs reproduce and eat lots of aphids. Mountain lions eat excess deer, so in real natural situations, it is rare to see a deer.
In agricultural areas, the amount of plant life lost to herbivores can *far exceed* that of natural situations because the mountain lion will be removed so deer can eat everything, and bird predators on insects are often driven away because they would take some of the crop too, and pesticides can kill the bugs that eat the herbivore aphids. The herbivores get a 'release' from the predator, and so they can be far more 'productive', in terms of gathering and keeping as much energy from plants as they can. When the predator is added to the situation, the increase in productivity from the plant level always filters up to the predator.
Compare this to people. The grocery store workers and farmers are the herbivores. They are doing the work, being the actual productive part of the equation.
When the grocery store workers use a machine or work harder and are more productive, if the owner doesn't pay more, the owner gets to keep the increased profit. If workers get an increase in wages (picture San Fran during the dot.com boom), the landlords at the top will start asking for and getting higher rents, so the increase profit goes to the landlord, while the employee still keeps the same small paycheck at the end of the month.
this is how things work. for every increase by workers, the higher class is able to take it away from them until the point where many workers would start to reach collapse such as homelessness or inability to be efficient at work any further due to health.
This is exactly the kind of destructive, insulting, class warfare mentality that will keep Unions and Leftists in general out of serious discussion about labor issues and other problems. When union employees view their employer as 'the enemy' they achieve nothing other than to lay the foundation for future problems. Get over your victim mentality and grow up.
Further, simply because some people disagree with the stiking workers doesn't mean they hate workers.
Your name calling does no work for you either.
Grow up.
The worker-owned, worker-self managed workplace is the wave of the future. Work to make it happen sooner or get the hell out of the way.
See:
http://www.sfbg.com/nessie/38.html
http://www.indybay.org/news/2002/06/135212.php
I’m 55. When I was twenty, I had an entry level job, file clerk, that paid 5% over minimum wage. I worked sixty hours a week. I could afford a modest one bedroom apartment on Manhattan. My wife stayed home with our baby. We ate out a couple nights a week. On Saturday we’d hire a sitter and go to a show. We still managed to save up enough to buy a car.
Try that today. Today it takes most families two to three jobs to break even. On 5% over minimum wage, you can’t afford to move out of your momma’s house. What changed? Union membership declined, the working class became weaker and, predictably, the the ruling class screwed us over.
What needs to change, is the class nature of society.
the bosses you assist today don't give a shit about you, don't respect you (why should they?), and will fuck you over the minute they deem it in their interest to do so.
as to the living standard's of american workers:
with the exception of the 1995-2000 speculative boom years (which saw only small aggregate wage increases), american real wages have been declining for almost thirty years now: the working class is more indebted then ever; housing, health, child care, and education eat up a much greater percentage of our wages than in the 70's, fewer have real pension plans, social programs have been hacked apart, and the average work week is longer than it's been in decades.
so, to all of you boot-licking workers who like to absorb these attacks without EVER fighting back, all I have to say is: GET THE FUCK OUT OF THE WAY.
Oh, this is rich. Clearly, "Reality Check" needs a reality check. You might want to pull your head out of your ass and take a hard look at reality. The unions and leftists are today completely shut out of "serious discussion" precisely because of how surrender monkeys like you have sabotaged the left for decades. The labor unions were built by militant class struggle, not the sort of craven liberal treachery you peddle. The fact is there is a class war going on in society, but its one-sided because the labor unions are beholden to liberal bureaucrats more interested in protecting their own cushy salaries and stumping for votes for the Democrats then in fighting for their own union members.
You show your true colors by having nothing to say about the hate-spewing worker-bashing, but are so deeply offended by someone who sticks up for workers. You are not fooling anyone. We know what side you are really on. Your liberalism has delivered a world where there is an unrelenting assault on workers, and an unbridled militaristic juggernaut sending soldiers abroad to die for a global dictatorship of Capital.
People like you are just dogs of the oligarchy. To the degree that you push "leftist" reforms, you are like a dog tugging at the leash of its master. You get the master to yield a bit and take a few steps, and you hail your "victory". But when the master steps back, yanks the leash and says "Heal!", you dutifully heal, salute your "command in chief" and rail against the "class warfare" leftists, being the good attack dog of the oligarchy that you are. Those who refuse to be dogs and insist on standing up for their own rights and interests rather than those of the oligarchy draw your ire far more than the bosses, because when it comes right down to it, you are really on the bosses' side.
The workers didn't start the class war, but there is only one way to end it. Not by surrendering as fake-left traitors like you preach, but by fighting back and winning it.
Oh, this is rich. Clearly, "Reality Check" needs a reality check. You might want to pull your head out of your ass and take a hard look at reality. The unions and leftists are today completely shut out of "serious discussion" precisely because of how surrender monkeys like you have sabotaged the left for decades. The labor unions were built by militant class struggle, not the sort of craven liberal treachery you peddle. The fact is there is a class war going on in society, but its one-sided because the labor unions are beholden to liberal bureaucrats more interested in protecting their own cushy salaries and stumping for votes for the Democrats then in fighting for their own union members.
You show your true colors by having nothing to say about the hate-spewing worker-bashing, but are so deeply offended by someone who sticks up for workers. You are not fooling anyone. We know what side you are really on. Your liberalism has delivered a world where there is an unrelenting assault on workers, and an unbridled militaristic juggernaut sending soldiers abroad to die for a global dictatorship of Capital.
People like you are just dogs of the oligarchy. To the degree that you push "leftist" reforms, you are like a dog tugging at the leash of its master. You get the master to yield a bit and take a few steps, and you hail your "victory". But when the master steps back, yanks the leash and says "Heal!", you dutifully heal, salute your "command in chief" and rail against the "class warfare" leftists, being the good attack dog of the oligarchy that you are. Those who refuse to be dogs and insist on standing up for their own rights and interests rather than those of the oligarchy draw your ire far more than the bosses, because when it comes right down to it, you are really on the bosses' side.
The workers didn't start the class war, but there is only one way to end it. Not by surrendering as fake-left traitors like you preach, but by fighting back and winning it.
"with the exception of the 1995-2000 speculative boom years (which saw only small aggregate wage increases), american real wages have been declining for almost thirty years now: the working class is more indebted then ever; housing, health, child care, and education eat up a much greater percentage of our wages than in the 70's, fewer have real pension plans, social programs have been hacked apart, and the average work week is longer than it's been in decades."
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
another thought:
to argue that because most grocery store workers don't have an advanced degree they shouldn't complain about the conditions they face is the exactly the same thing as arguing that 75% of the American adult population (the % of the US adult pop. without advanced degrees) should accept any and all demands the bosses place upon them.
it's precisely *because* grocery work doesn't require an advanced degree--most work doesn't, truth be told--that the question of a diploma is a moot issue. the only fact that matters is that the owners of grocery stores absolutely NEED workers to make the grocery store run. no grocery store workers, no grocery store. period.
what makes this "argument" even more asinine is that, as we speak, thousands and thousands of people with PhD's are UNEMPLOYED. of course, these clowns making this brain-dead argument are disingenous toads: they wouldn't support workers however much education they have under their belt (were you asswipes out on the picket line with the graduate students at UC last year?).
On another point, I despise the entire process of contract negotiations between unions and companies. It seems just like what happens when you go to a dealership to buy a new car. One side comes in with a low-ball offer, the other side has a ridiculously inflated price. Eventually after LOTS and LOTS of going around and around, they meet in the middle. It's unfortunate but important to note that regarding unions and management, BOTH sides play these games. Lots of propaganda comes from each side. I'm tired of hearing how grocery workers are the innocent victims here (c'mon, you guys have to admit you have it pretty darn good as it is for unskilled labor), and I'm tired of hearing about companies needing to reduce benefits to be competitive (why don't they look at cutting the executive salaries, getting rid of excess middle management, etc?)
That's my .02
this just the same as berkeley bowl, I tell manager that i work for 25% less than other workers and bingo!
I have new job, I also get brother hired in same deal
I drive a cab at night but if safeway strike comes here
brother will drive my cab and i get a job at safeway.
good deal! i love america!
The fact that you think 'erudite' is an impressive word, coupled with your chimp-like, cliched-ridden understanding of the present social/economic/political situation says alot about your level of erudition.
Anyway, enough doin' the dozens on a big zero...let's get down to bidness.
<<Your use of terms like "the bosses" reeks of 1930's resentment>>
i've never heard that before: "1930's resentment"--that's a good one.
<<(a time when it was actually justified).>>
oh, don't flatter yourself, "rc". you would have been as much of boot-licking cretin in the 30's as you are now in 00's.
<<Further, "the bosses" are people, such as your manager (in the very unlikely event you actually have a job)>>
the rightist's obligatory "get a job" comment.
you get an 'F' for originality, 'rc"
<<Does your manager know he/she is one of "the bosses"?>>
in a word: yes.
<<Have you told your "boss" that they "don't give a shit about you, don't respect you" ... ? Have you???>>
no, i'll leave that to the idle whiners.
<<Do you have the guts to live by your words?>>
well, i did help lead a five day wildcat strike back in 2000 (January 12-18) that won us an approximately 60% wage-hike, plus a lot of respect. (DMS Corp. was the victim)
<<The "working class" is more inbebt than ever because the 'working class' is SPENDING more than ever.>>
about two weeks ago a report came out by two business researchers (a mother-daughter team) who looked into the massive escalation of debt and found that not to be the case. by their own admission, they expected to find that the debt explosion was due to profligacy and frivolous shopping habits, but found, instead, that the combined force of housing, child care, health, education, and car costs were the real culprit. i'll try to dig up that report and post.
<<You also mention a litany of other financial woes for 'the working class' and offer no actual numbers, making it all to easy to dismiss your claims. You need to learn that when making claims about economics you'd better have some numbers on the table. >>
okay, here goes. these are just what i could bunch together after a quick search; it's just the tip of the iceberg, really.
since most of this data is at least a year old (indeed, a good portion of it is from the late 90s when the bubble economy was allegedly spreading the wealth around generously to everyone) it really doesn't reveal the extent of the present malaise. things are only getting worse, after all......
1. Between 1990 and 2002, average American household
credit-card debt increased from $2,985 and $8,562,
according to the National Foundation for Credit
Counseling.
(Seattle Times, “Steeped in debt: Good times end;
spending doesn’t,” 10/13/02)
2. The share of American workers with company pension
plans has progressively slipped in each decade--from
almost 40% at the beginning of 1980 to about 20% now.
(Fortune, “Bye-Bye Pension: Soon hundreds of
corporations may slash pensions by as much as half,”
3/3/03)
3. After adjusting for inflation, the average tuition
at a four-year public university increased 117%
between 1981 and 2001. The rise at private
universities was 123%.
(Wall Street Journal, “Economic Squeeze Has More
Students Working Overtime,” 11/5/02)
4. Eighty-two percent of employers expect to raise
retirees' contributions to health insurance premiums
over the next three years, and 22 percent say they are
likely to drop coverage for future retirees, according
to a survey of large employers.
(Chicago Sun-Times, “82% to raise retirees’ costs for
health care,” 12/6/02)
5. Home prices rose 45 to 52 percent between 1991-2001
in the United States.
(CNNMoney, “Homes out of reach,” 5/20/02)
6. “Health care costs are rising while the economy is
sputtering, and it looks like workers are going to pay
the price” -- Drew Altman, Kaiser Foundation
7. Requests for emergency shelter by families with
children in 25 US cities increased by an average of
17% between 99-00. 27% of request for shelter by
homeless families were denied due to lack of
resources. Families with children account for 36% of
the homeless population. (US Conference of Mayors,
2000)
8. The number of people officially classified as poor
increased 41% between 1979-90 (US House of
Representatives, 1992)
9. Between 1970 and 1994, the typical state’s AFDC
benefits for a family of three fell 47%, after
adjusting for inflation AFDC was repealed and
replaced by Temporary Assistance to Needy Families.
TANF benefits and food stamps combined are below the
poverty rate in every state. (Greenberg and Baumohl,
1996).
10. With the end of AFDC -- 675,000 people have lost
health insurance in 97, including 400,000 children.
(Families USA, 1999)
11. Subsidized housing is so limited that fewer than one
in four TANF families nationwide lives in public
housing or receives a housing voucher. (Families USA,
1999)
12. New York Times, 8/30/01, “Boom of the 1990’s Missed
Many in Middle Class, Data Suggests”
Census analysis conducted by the NYT shows that median
family income between 90-00 clearly declined in NY,
CA, Conn, and Washington DC. In NY -- declined to an
estimated $52,313, down $2,876; California declined to
$53,037, down $3,288; Conn -- declined to $64,502,
down $3,821; Wash DC -- declined to $45,943, down
$4,406.
13. San Francisco Chronicle, 6/25/02, “Cost of Bay Area
homes still rising”, pp B1
The most expensive was Marin at a median sale price of
$588K and SF second most expensive $571K, San Mateo
$532K, Santa Clara $461K, Alameda $391K.
you work part time you get health care and you are complaining?
really people you live in CALIFORNIA how about joining the rest of the state, WE ALL PAY UP THE ##S FOR EVERYTHING
so get back to work I need someone to push my cart back up to the front of the stoor and mop up the jar of pickles I dropped in isle 2b, thanks gbye
Please do not misunderstand me. Unions have and do a lot of good. They also can be hurtful by putting personal interests ahead of the companies. Von's has three choices right now:
1. Not turn a profit. (this will end up eliminating all jobs)
2. Cut jobs.
3. Cut benefits.
Basically guys, I wish you would get back to work. Things suck all over right now. The economy is crap. We are all suffering. Deal with it.
You need to face it. You've all lost your jobs because you are no longer competitive in the free market. This is called capitalism. If you don't like it, move to China. If anything you should be upset at and picketing, it's the illegal immigrants and immigrants coming to the USA driving up housing costs and driving down wages. It's these immigrants that have cost you your jobs, but you refuse to acknowledge this and pretend that you can keep on living the same despite the fact that Manuel and his 25 roomates has moved into your neighborhood and will do your job for 1/4 of what you demand for it.
Get back to logic class--quickly!
Lots of emotion,but vey little else.
Unless grocery clerks have been spirited from Ireland as indentured servants, the decision to seek and remain in their positions, is theirs.
I have seen my insurance premium contributions raised consistantly over the past several years. My contribution for medical-dental is now about $325.00 a month. I have also seen my employer's contribution to retirement shrink significantly. I left a more prestigious and better paying position for the one I now have,
because I enjoy what I do and the flexibility it offers me.
Companies have left the state in droves because of the high cost of doing business here. Before the Teamsters are looked upon as the great protector, one should cast one's eyes to Detroit, to Pittsburg, and of late, Sacramento. The unions are businesses, just like politics, and just like politicians, the first goal of any union is its survival, not the well being of its members.
Corporations are responsible to their stock holders, not their employees, pure and simple, so the rhetoric regarding profits would no doubt have played better in the the old Soviet block than in the thinking mans free market society.
I'm sure the truth about actual management offers and union demands lies somewhere in the middle of what we've seen and heard, and I'm equally sure the grocery clerks should count their lucky stars that teir jobs can't be exported...but what out for those sell-scanners!
This country is under so much economic stress because of people from other countries and here you are adding to it because you don't want to pay a portion of your benefit costs? You don't have to like it but you either have to deal with it or find another job that will give it to you for free. No one made you take this job and no one is making you keep it either. You act like these people owe you. Why do they owe you? Just because you worked for a company for a length of time doesn't make you there family. They are a business just like anywhere else and it is there right to make any changes they see fit. From what I read, the contract was up. At this point, they can do anything they want. They don't owe you the same contract and terms as before. As for the fact of new people coming in and not getting paid as high, well I don't think the employers are going to lie to them and tell them they are going to get paid more that they are so they will know exactly what they are walking into.
Things change...Situations change and if companies do it within their rights then you either need to decide to take it or leave it. If your not happy with your job, then maybe it's time to learn a new one and move on. I'm sure there are many people out there that would be happy to make what you make or less for that matter and be able to have benefits for their children at a VERY affordable rate. Just to put things into perspective for you, I pay $220 a month for myself and my 3 children through my work and I'm not complaining. At least it's cheaper that have to pay for everything for a broken arm or god forbid surgery for one of my kids one day.
Insurance benefits are high and are only getting higher. So if you want to make a stand on something, why don't you try making a stand on the rising cost of benefits, not the fact that you actually have to pay a little for some now. I challenge each one of you to do some research and find out what the average cost of benefits for a family with at least 2 kids and see if you can find anything less that $60 a month either through a job (beside the freebies) or through a private party.
Well, I think I've said it all and now I got to go grocery shopping. I'll make sure to bring my pay stub so if anyone wants to try to stop me, I'll make sure to show them what an average person pays for the thing they are complaining about.
What are you crying about?
I have 11 employees that work under me "3 of them for 8+years" and they make between $7-9.00 per hour paying $65.00 per month for their own insurance, and we work for the worlds 4th largest auto loan company, you know they have the money.
take a look @ reality boys and girls, it isnt so bad.
hope you get what you want, but I still dont understand why the crying.
The worker-owned, worker-self managed workplace is the wave of the future. Work to make it happen sooner or get the hell out of the way.
Plllllease tell me you are not so stupid as to realy believe this line of BS!!!
Labor is preformed by those who lack the skille to make it on their own. you employer supports you not the other way around. Left to your own devices you would starve!
2. Slavery
3. Avarice
4. Superior weapons technology
personal shots ring hollow when not coupled with an intelligently articulated view-point.
capiche?
"Oh poor me, Aaron hurt my feelings injecting reality into my delluded fantasies..."
*wah* *wah* *wah*
You can't refute a thing he has said, so you pull out the "hate" card. And this is after people here have been calling the strikers lazy bitches? Looks like YOU are the bitch, doesn't it?
Hang in there guys, i know things are getting tough right now, and they may get even tougher, but our union is 70,000 strong and what these people fail to realize is that the reason we have such good pay and benefits now is because we have a strong union. I dont know where These selfish, greedy people have been getting there information but they are obviously misinformed. I cant help but to realize the incredible amount of underappreciation we have received from these vile and bitter people, they try to feed us all of these numbers, and figures to us like it is an excuse for these still extremely profitable businesses to take away everything we have worked so hard for! And YES! it is hard work! We make penny's compared to these corporate slobs who get paid an ungodly amount of money to sit in a private office and make unmoral greedy decisions to benefit themselves. These people already have 6 houses and to many cars to count on your hands and feet, and yet they have the nerve to put 70,000 people out of job just so they can have 3 turkey at the dinner table every night! I would love to see one of these businessmen put on a meat apron and go digging through the rancid meat buckets every day! You know what, im sick of wasting my time trying to convince these thick skulled people to show a little more respect for the working class! the bottom line is that there are some people who are born slightly less intelligent than the upper class, and this is no reason to deprive them of a decent life where they can raise a decent family! generally speaking we are not lazy, unmotivated people..... A food clerk used to be a good job where one could look forward to raising a family and retiring, now you either have to be of near genius intelligence or born into wealth to live a decent life. It's sad that these people cannot show a little more sympathy for the middle class
Hang in there guys, i know things are getting tough right now, and they may get even tougher, but our union is 70,000 strong and what these people fail to realize is that the reason we have such good pay and benefits now is because we have a strong union. I dont know where These selfish, greedy people have been getting there information but they are obviously misinformed. I cant help but to realize the incredible amount of underappreciation we have received from these vile and bitter people, they try to feed us all of these numbers, and figures to us like it is an excuse for these still extremely profitable businesses to take away everything we have worked so hard for! And YES! it is hard work! We make penny's compared to these corporate slobs who get paid an ungodly amount of money to sit in a private office and make unmoral greedy decisions to benefit themselves. These people already have 6 houses and to many cars to count on your hands and feet, and yet they have the nerve to put 70,000 people out of job just so they can have 3 turkey at the dinner table every night! I would love to see one of these businessmen put on a meat apron and go digging through the rancid meat buckets every day! You know what, im sick of wasting my time trying to convince these thick skulled people to show a little more respect for the working class! the bottom line is that there are some people who are born slightly less intelligent than the upper class, and this is no reason to deprive them of a decent life where they can raise a decent family! generally speaking we are not lazy, unmotivated people..... A food clerk used to be a good job where one could look forward to raising a family and retiring, now you either have to be of near genius intelligence or born into wealth to live a decent life. It's sad that these people cannot show a little more sympathy for the middle class
Health care is one of the issues..... they want the workers to pay half of their bennies. How many of you have like a 20 dollar co-pay now...? How would you like if the next time you went to the doctor they made you pay for half of the entire visit.?
there are half a dozen things at stake that workers are striking about and the media has only mentioned the health care.....?(how absolutely pathetic).... What has the media been bought off by Big Daddy? To down play the REAL issues and the Main issues .....for somethign that is lesser?
The media needs to cover the Whole story.... how absolutley abysmal. Figures.
Ex-president Bill Clinton gets a blow job and the media gets us every nasty detail they can.
When it comes to the CEO's of Vons/Safeway/ Ralphs/Kroger raping their faithful employees for pensions and other beniefits they were hired with and have worked their asses off for......they cant even get the facts they are reportign correct. Much less ALL of the facts. (duh)
Health care is one of the issues..... they want the workers to pay half of their bennies. How many of you have like a 20 dollar co-pay now...? How would you like if the next time you went to the doctor they made you pay for half of the entire visit.?
there are half a dozen things at stake that workers are striking about and the media has only mentioned the health care.....?(how absolutely pathetic).... What has the media been bought off by Big Daddy? To down play the REAL issues and the Main issues .....for somethign that is lesser?
The media needs to cover the Whole story.... how absolutley abysmal. Figures.
Ex-president Bill Clinton gets a blow job and the media gets us every nasty detail they can.
When it comes to the CEO's of Vons/Safeway/ Ralphs/Kroger raping their faithful employees for pensions and other beniefits they were hired with and have worked their asses off for......they cant even get the facts they are reportign correct. Much less ALL of the facts. (duh)
hope this fixes the scrolling crap
oops maybe this will work
And they don't cover Everything. I just shelled out 5000. to pay for my child to have dental work needed, and she is a handicap child. So I think you should pay the money and go back to work.
Just remember there are people out the that would love to work, and can't because their to old, and the Homless.
plus, constantly being watched and evaluated to see that you are indeed working fast enough. which according to management no one is ever fast enough."
I pasted your quote above. Here is my response:
You knew when you filled out your application that the job required you stand on your feel all day. Fast food workers, beauticians, toll booth workers, etc also work standing on their feet. As far as putting up with customers, you knew that as well. If you don't like it, go look for another job!
"how would you like to work for someone who makes millions of dollars of profit a year and then tells you he can't pay for your medical benefits. And that he will only be able to pay you a raise of say 25 cents a year.
but then you will have to pay more than the raise he gave you to cover your medical benefits.
so, with inflation and now paying for your own medical
benefits you are actually bring home less dollars now than you did before"
It's called capitalism! If you don't like it, you can either move to a country where they have socialism or you can stay here and start your own business. Don't cry to me over how hard you have it. My job requires either a degree or minimum 5 years experience. Unless I work 40 hours per week, I am not entitled to ANY benefits. My current monthly medical premiums are almost $500 per month. I only receive overtime if I work over 8 hours per day or over 40 hours per week.... so cry me a river!
Clearly, the grocery store community is not "whining" about $20 a month. There are, in fact, other issues in dispute. I refuse to shop at these stores now out of principle. I don't think it's right to take advantage of workers. I implore the non-supporters to remember on whose backs profits are built. Certainly, a grocery store is nothing without the customer. However, who stocks the shelf (I know I'm not going to). Who rings up the groceries (again, I'm not going to do it myself). Finally, who bags them (once again, not me). These are hard-working Americans who deserve job security, benefits, and fair pay. These are people with families to support. I will not cross the line. Taking a stand by gauging into corporate's pocketbook is what the language they understand.
Additionally, if Von's, et al., succeed with this abysmal contract, what's next? What kind of an example does this set for the rest of corporate America? How secure is anyone's job?
Just food for thought (I purchased at Trader Joe's yesterday).
And they don't cover Everything. I just shelled out 5000. to pay for my child to have dental work needed, and she is a handicap child. So I think you should pay the money and go back to work.
I think you should wise up, unionize, and get your fair share.
Fact Sheets and Backgrounder
UFCW In the News
Media Sign up Form
Press Releases 2000
Press Releases 2001
Press Releases 2002
you are here: Home » Press Room
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 10, 2003
CONTACT:
press [at] ufcw.org
CORPORATE GREED VS. HUMAN NEED
UFCW Statement on Southern California Retail Bargaining
Human Need Vs. Corporate Greed--Facts and Figures (pdf)
UFCW Members Vote to Authorize a Strike
Consumer Handbill
Over the past several days, Southern California supermarket workers have been voting on a contract offer from three of the largest supermarket operators in the country.
They have been confronted with a stark choice: give up health care benefits for not only themselves and their families, but also, for future generations of supermarket workers.
In unprecedented numbers, Southern California supermarket workers turned out to vote and sent a clear message: we will fight for affordable health care.
They delivered a mandate to their union that they will strike, if needed, to save health care for their families and strike to save health care coverage for the next generation of workers.
These workers are heroes. They are willing to make the sacrifice to take up the fight to save health care.
This is a fight for all Southern California workers. It is a fight for all supermarket workers—union and non-union—here and across the country because if these three supersize, super-profitable, supermarket chains can cut benefits here, then every worker is at risk.
The UFCW is announcing that on October 11, workers will strike one of the supermarket chains. We will limit our job action to a single chain, so we will limit the inconvenience to our customers.
We are asking the employers to also respect our customers and not to take retaliatory action against workers through a lock out. There should be no lock out.
After all, the customers are the ones that we depend on for our jobs and the companies for their profits.
Following today’s meeting with the companies and the federal mediator, we will announce the time and the target of the strike.
We will make an effort to avoid a strike but, workers will not give up on health care. We are not asking for more, we are asking to keep the benefits that we have.
There is information on this website about company profits and health care costs.
Employers’ profits have risen 10 times faster than their hourly contribution to worker health care.
Their profits overall have gone up 91% since 1998.
We have contained health cares cost. The increased costs for health care for these employers have been significantly below the national average.
This is a battle between corporate greed and human need and, we are asking our communities to stand with us. We are your friends and your neighbors. We serve you everyday in your local supermarket. We ask for your support.
If the supermarket giants win, Southern California loses. These companies would drain over 328 million dollars a year from Southern California because when they cut health care for workers, they rip off California.
###
The 1.4 million member United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) is America's neighborhood union representing workers in neighborhood grocery stores across the country. UFCW puts dinner on the table for America's families with members working in meatpacking and food processing. UFCW gives a voice to care with representation for nurses, medical technicians and nursing home workers.
according to the Bureau of National Affairs . . . 96% of all employers now require some form of cost sharing . . . Of those, 89% require co-payments, 87% require deductibles, and 73% require premium contributions. (para. 4). In casual conversation with my neighbor, a Kaiser Permanente administrator, I learned that even she does not receive free health care coverage
according to the Bureau of National Affairs . . . 96% of all employers now require some form of cost sharing . . . Of those, 89% require co-payments, 87% require deductibles, and 73% require premium contributions. (para. 4). In casual conversation with my neighbor, a Kaiser Permanente administrator, I learned that even she does not receive free health care coverage
according to the Bureau of National Affairs . . . 96% of all employers now require some form of cost sharing . . . Of those, 89% require co-payments, 87% require deductibles, and 73% require premium contributions. (para. 4). In casual conversation with my neighbor, a Kaiser Permanente administrator, I learned that even she does not receive free health care coverage
I worked at Krogers and didn't like it so I moved on got and education and a better job. Do the same if you are unhappy.
I worked at Krogers and didn't like it so I moved on got and education and a better job. Do the same if you are unhappy.
at 7-11 you will have to the clerks can't do math! and most cannot read as well
but at Ralph's we can both read and write that is why we are paid more
I am not affected because I am non-union and on salary. The people on strike or striking for more then the so-called $15 per week insurance co-pay.
The new contract offered would freeze their wages for two years ( they have not had a raise since 2001).
Also, their health insurance would be cut by 50%.
They will also have to pay a $1,500.00 deductible for office visits and then pay a $40.00 co-pay. In other words a family of 4 would pay 100% for every visit if they are healthy because they would not meet the deductable. God forbid they are sick or need surgery because there is an annual cap of 10,000 per family. One emergency or surgery for one member and that's it. Anything else would be the employees responsibility. Then their is the issue of no dental or vision insurance, and a perscription deductible and co-pay that amounts to $25-40. I estimated with one worker who has a medical condition that it will cost her over $600.00 per month more. With no pay raise. She is part-time and I doubt she could find new insurance with her pre-existing condition. These so called no brain workers have dedicated 10-20 years to the companies they work for. They have been working toward their pension which the company also wants to freeze.
They also want to cut the already retired employees pension by $700.00 per month and cut their health care dramatically. These workers are drug tested and they are smart. We are like a family and I can't wait to have them back. Run a search on Steve Burd, Vons-Safeway CEO and see what his plans are for the future of the company. He wants to squeeze out the 15-20 year employees with buy-out packages so that he can replace them with the new two-tiered, lower wage, no benefits employees. The employees who earn the top scale of $17.90 have been with the company for more then 12 years and very few of them are full time. Not every one can get a college education, some have felt that they have missed that boat or simply can not afford it and what they can afford they are using it to send their children to school. If you also take the time and read the whole story it was Albertson's and Ralphs who locked out their employees. Vons was the targeted strike store. That is what the Union offered to lessen the inconvenience of shoppers, but Albertsons and Ralphs said no. So even if the workers wanted to lay down and quit so that they could make YOUR lives easier they can't because they are LOCKED OUT. I admire the strikers for fighting for a just cause. This is a tremendous hard ship on them and their families.
I also noticed posts where people said they should quit and get another job. Who is going to hire a 40+
person at the wage of $17.90 that took them over a decade to reach. They would also loose their pension.
Just so you know there are also many employees who are attending college part time or have graduated, but they cannot find work in their feild of study. These workers are fighting for themselves, their families, retired workers and new employees. If they don't you will see people earning less and less with no health benefits, and no money to go too college. For those of you who think the workers are lazy, I would like to see you marching and holding a heavy sign for 6-9 hours a day. I admire their will and their strength to fight for what they believe they have earned. I miss you guys and can't wait to have you back. As far as temporay workers , they will be let go the minute the strike is over. Also, these strikers cared so much about their stores that they actually trained the replacement workers so that the store would be in the best shape possible. They did not have to do this but they did it because they care. All I ask is before you post negative remarks, do some research see how much profit these stores make, look at the 2 million dollar bonuses the CEO's make. Please excuse the typos and fragments, but I have been working 14 hour days because these temporary workers are not the best of the bunch. Most of them drift from job to job and it is because of their lack of commitment that they are here. Most of them could'nt hold a job for more then 6 months. Be strong on the picket line, the local managers are behind you 100% and if it was up to us you would be back.
You claim to be a Christian. I doubt it.
Have you heard about compassion, or As I have Loved you Love One Another. Your the one that needs to soul search and pray. It is really easy to say you are a Christian but you sure don't sound like one. I also think not passing judgement on others is one of your Lords teachings. Unless you think you are God, because he is the one that is suppose to judge. Why don't you show a little charity and get your milk elsewhere. These people on the line are fighting for health care if they don't they will loose 50% of what they have and pay $250-1,000's of dollars a month.
Go to the Union web sites and get all the facts.
Be a good Samaritin and help instead of hurt.
You claim to be a Christian. I doubt it.
Have you heard about compassion, or As I have Loved you Love One Another. Your the one that needs to soul search and pray. It is really easy to say you are a Christian but you sure don't sound like one. I also think not passing judgement on others is one of your Lords teachings. Unless you think you are God, because he is the one that is suppose to judge. Why don't you show a little charity and get your milk elsewhere. These people on the line are fighting for health care if they don't they will loose 50% of what they have and pay $250-1,000's of dollars a month.
Go to the Union web sites and get all the facts.
Be a good Samaritin and help instead of hurt.
You claim to be a Christian. I doubt it.
Have you heard about compassion, or As I have Loved you Love One Another. Your the one that needs to soul search and pray. It is really easy to say you are a Christian but you sure don't sound like one. I also think not passing judgement on others is one of your Lords teachings. Unless you think you are God, because he is the one that is suppose to judge. Why don't you show a little charity and get your milk elsewhere. These people on the line are fighting for health care if they don't they will loose 50% of what they have and pay $250-1,000's of dollars a month.
Go to the Union web sites and get all the facts.
Be a good Samaritin and help instead of hurt.
You claim to be a Christian. I doubt it.
Have you heard about compassion, or As I have Loved you Love One Another. Your the one that needs to soul search and pray. It is really easy to say you are a Christian but you sure don't sound like one. I also think not passing judgement on others is one of your Lords teachings. Unless you think you are God, because he is the one that is suppose to judge. Why don't you show a little charity and get your milk elsewhere. These people on the line are fighting for health care if they don't they will loose 50% of what they have and pay $250-1,000's of dollars a month.
Go to the Union web sites and get all the facts.
Be a good Samaritin and help instead of hurt.
You claim to be a Christian. I doubt it.
Have you heard about compassion, or As I have Loved you Love One Another. Your the one that needs to soul search and pray. It is really easy to say you are a Christian but you sure don't sound like one. I also think not passing judgement on others is one of your Lords teachings. Unless you think you are God, because he is the one that is suppose to judge. Why don't you show a little charity and get your milk elsewhere. These people on the line are fighting for health care if they don't they will loose 50% of what they have and pay $250-1,000's of dollars a month.
Go to the Union web sites and get all the facts.
Be a good Samaritin and help instead of hurt.
You claim to be a Christian. I doubt it.
Have you heard about compassion, or As I have Loved you Love One Another. Your the one that needs to soul search and pray. It is really easy to say you are a Christian but you sure don't sound like one. I also think not passing judgement on others is one of your Lords teachings. Unless you think you are God, because he is the one that is suppose to judge. Why don't you show a little charity and get your milk elsewhere. These people on the line are fighting for health care if they don't they will loose 50% of what they have and pay $250-1,000's of dollars a month.
Go to the Union web sites and get all the facts.
Be a good Samaritin and help instead of hurt.
You claim to be a Christian. I doubt it.
Have you heard about compassion, or As I have Loved you Love One Another. Your the one that needs to soul search and pray. It is really easy to say you are a Christian but you sure don't sound like one. I also think not passing judgement on others is one of your Lords teachings. Unless you think you are God, because he is the one that is suppose to judge. Why don't you show a little charity and get your milk elsewhere. These people on the line are fighting for health care if they don't they will loose 50% of what they have and pay $250-1,000's of dollars a month.
Go to the Union web sites and get all the facts.
Be a good Samaritin and help instead of hurt.
You claim to be a Christian. I doubt it.
Have you heard about compassion, or As I have Loved you Love One Another. Your the one that needs to soul search and pray. It is really easy to say you are a Christian but you sure don't sound like one. I also think not passing judgement on others is one of your Lords teachings. Unless you think you are God, because he is the one that is suppose to judge. Why don't you show a little charity and get your milk elsewhere. These people on the line are fighting for health care if they don't they will loose 50% of what they have and pay $250-1,000's of dollars a month.
Go to the Union web sites and get all the facts.
Be a good Samaritin and help instead of hurt.
You are all a bunch of selfish people who should go back to work and say I am sorry to everyone, Becouse you are hurting everyone.
I don't know why it is so hard for these company's to understand that if they expect their employees to treat their customers with the utmost respect and do whatever it takes to make them happy, they should set a proper example and treat their employees with the utmost respect and do whatever it takes, within reason, to make their employees happy. As I see it, these companies have done nothing to foster a relationship of respect with their employees. Why should we just except that we must take these pay cuts and benefit restrictions???? We shouldn't!!!! They owe us the respect we have earned for our years of hard work. Until they realize that they must give respect to get respect, I will fight them in their attempts to make us bow down to them. They simply aren't worthy of respect from the wonderful people that work for them.
have stood against unuinization becouse of the corruption and organized crime associated with them.
unions also stand for exploitation of poor laborers in support positions for union jobs (poor doing the real work - union workers making the money) this has been the history of the union experience in this country for over a century!
a true Anarchist would not consider supporting a union for any reason.
Just because people dont trust large labor unions doesnt mean we cross picket lines. if an anarchist crosses a picket line or acts as a scab they are not an anarchist.
You bet it is. So if employers wont pay for insurance, how do people pay for healthcare?
Right now many people who cant afford health insurance rely on emergency rooms and the end cost is much higher than if either the state paid for universal healthcare or if it were paid for by employers.
Its a loss for everyone. If you look at the actual costs, the amount in taxes supermarkets have to pay that ends up going for the current healthcare mess is probably more than if they just gave their workers real health coverage.
As for people claiming they supported the strike until they found it was over healthcare, I cant quite buy that. Are you saying that unskilled workers somehow dont deserve to be able to take care of the medical needs of their children. You would have supported the strike if it was over pay but now that you have found out that people might waste the money on healthcare you oppose the strike?
Everyone deserves to be able to work at a job where they can support their basic needs. In most countries (even poorer countries) there are public health systems that takes care of many of the publics needs. Public health is a common good. New strains of TB that resist drugs emerged from people who did not continue taking their antibiotics (probably for monetary reasons). Diseases by their very nature spread and to not treat the poor seems more stupid than even greedy.
Ultimately healthcare should be paid for by the state. But until it is employers need to provide some level of basic coverage. With new strains of diseases emerging and the risks of bioterrorism becoming more well recognized, real healthcare for the entire population will be needed one way or another (if someone who didnt have healthcare was one fo the first people infected with smallpox the initial spread of the disease before detection at an emergency room would be a lot higher than if they were able to go in to a doctor earler on). If employers cant cover employee healthcare costs, thats the clearest proof I can see that a pure free market system doesnt work (countries with 1/5 the average income as the US manage to provide basic coverage to the entire population...).
I am currently retired and my co-insurance costs me much more than they are being asked to pay.
Their mentality may well be revealed in the many posts that I read her. I see numerous misspellings, wrong word usage, and grammatical errors.
If you think you have a reasonable cause to espouse, at least learn the proper spelling and grammar of the language you are using.
Ok so why shouldnt the employers pay if its such a small amount?
You diagree with a strike because the employees are demanding something too small and then somehow say that their demands will hurt employers? Thats contradictory.
So how much do you make and how much do many of those on strike make? Most people I know who work low paying jobs without health insurance end up having no health insurance. People could pay $100+ a month for individual health insurance but when you are struggling for rent... As employers move away from providing health insurance the main effect has been that the number of people nationwide with no health insurance has skyrocketed. You can blame poor people for not paying for insurance but you wont be laughing when you start getting sick more from the growing portion of the population that now prefers to try to wait out most illnesses since they cant afford treatment.
You must not ignore the multiples when you argue a point. Consider this. You could likely afford to pay the $5 per week but i doubt you would be able to do it for all your union brothers. When you add it all up, it's big bucks.
Smart unions know the employers costs since businesses going under put unions out of business too. I trust the unions know what they are doing and the employers attempts to badmouth the unions are also out of principle (rather than over an amount that could actually hurt the ability of the grocery stores to run). I saw a study a few years ago in Scientific American over business profits when businesses unionized (I'll try to find a link if its online). Interestingly they went up. Empowering workers and having formal rules for pay scales and promotions prevents favoritism that often impacts the bottom line as well as employee morale.
It may well all be the fault of the legal system. That rests with the judicial appointments made by the residing President of our country.
So, let's not blame management nor try to make them liable for what the politicians have created. Let's rally behind reform and push for some reasonable caps on punitive damages and a new assement of personal responsibility.
It may be amusing to read about how someone has received a millon dollars for dumping a hot cup of coffee in their lap but remember, that cost will be reflected in the Big Mac we buy so we'll all hurt in the end. (No pun intended)
Anyway, let's encourage the grocery workers to get back to work and quit crying about paying what the rest of us have been paying for years.
You can blame poor people for not paying for insurance but you wont be laughing when you start getting sick more from the growing portion of the population that now prefers to try to wait out most illnesses since they cant afford treatment.
end quote.
This is a separate problem and not related to the grocery strike. The problem you portray is caused by the influx of illegal aliens who bring the diseases with them and expect to get free treatment in the good old U.S.A.
We can't even afford to provide treatment to our legal citizens so why would they think we should bend over and ...well, you know.
Bottom line..keep them out of here and let them petition their native government for relief.
Can you offload a truck, Rose? Can you operate a forklift, or scan in merchandise? Do you know how to stock groceries or build displays and fixtures? Can you cut meat, bake, cook, operate a computer or a cash register? Are these not real job skills to you Rose? What do you consider to be "real" job skills, Rose?
Why do you, and so many others seem to believe that retail/grocery store workers aren't "worthy" of making a living wage, because they aren't as educated? Why are you so hostile to the concept of unions, something that's as much a part of (US) history as the Civil War, or the Revolutionary War for that matter?
Unions are necessary.
Unions are part of the reason why there are health codes and safety regulations. People fought for better healthcare, fought for fair wages, pay, and hours. Fought for safety in the workplace, fought for all of these things, so others could benefit from them, even you. Yes even you, Rose, even though you spit at their efforts, even though you have no thought or caring for their struggles, or even the slightest clue of why those battles were and are necessary.
Rena-
The reason I assume, as you say so many do, that grocery store work is not highly skilled labor is for several reasons. First of all, no higher education is required for this type of work. Second af all, I have a friend who took advantage of the opportunity to get herself a job while all of you others are on strike. The whole entire training process encompassed a total of four hours,and,truth be known, she checks me out just as quickly and efficiently as the girls that have been doing it for years.
As far as your question regarding what I am capable of, I can scan merchandise. I can bake. And cook, too. I do know how to stock shelves, inventory merchandise, even drive a truck. I can cut meat, I use a computer daily- and I can operate a cash register and balance to the penny. I have years of experience in management. As far as off-loading a truck or driving a forklift, these are jobs that require strength, however, no formal education or training whatsoever. How do I know this? My husband can do both, and he never went to school to learn how! Amazing,isn't it!
I think you misunderstand me. I think you are worth whatever the market will pay you. If that is $8.00 an hour or if that is $80.00 an hour. That is not the issue. The issue is the fact that you are trying to get your way by strong-arming your employer and threatening instead of marketing your skills. You are banding together like the mob, or like street thugs, to intimidate the company that was kind enough to give you a job into bending over for your demands. I don't disagree that on an individual basis some MIGHT deserve what you are asking. But I don't think there is anything about what you do that makes you irreplaceable,gives you the right to threaten your employer,gives you the right to stand outside and intimidate customers, or how about this! I will even go one step further. I think that you hide behind the union and do a half-assed job, thinking the union will make sure you don't get fired!!! Is that the kind of employee that deserves rewards for accomplishments and company loyalty? I don't think so!!! As far as retaining the benefits you already have, as far as I am concerned, you have so much more than most you should sit back and count your blessings. When you were given those health benefits, the cost to your employer was about one-third of what it is now. It is fair for them to ask you to absorb some of the increase.....
As far as your comment on why I hate unions when they are a part of U.S. history- I think that was a ridiculous comment. Other things that are a part of U.S. history
Vietnam War
Charles Manson
Ted Bundy
Slavery
etc.........
I could go on and on, but I think I made my point. California is an "AT Will" employment state. That means that your employer can fire you or change the terms of your employment for any reason other than prejudice or discrimination AT ANY TIME. I think that if you didn't have a union you would all be working harder to prove your worth instead of the half-assed job because you think you can't get fired. Then maybe the good ones would get paid even more than they're asking- but because they're WORTH it, not because they threaten their bosses. And, by the way, the legal system is also a part of our history. Of course, you can't win this one in court, because you are asking for something that most of you don't deserve and you don't have a legal leg to stand on. When you can explain to me what the difference is between you and organized crime................
Rena-
The reason I assume, as you say so many do, that grocery store work is not highly skilled labor is for several reasons. First of all, no higher education is required for this type of work. Second af all, I have a friend who took advantage of the opportunity to get herself a job while all of you others are on strike. The whole entire training process encompassed a total of four hours,and,truth be known, she checks me out just as quickly and efficiently as the girls that have been doing it for years.
As far as your question regarding what I am capable of, I can scan merchandise. I can bake. And cook, too. I do know how to stock shelves, inventory merchandise, even drive a truck. I can cut meat, I use a computer daily- and I can operate a cash register and balance to the penny. I have years of experience in management. As far as off-loading a truck or driving a forklift, these are jobs that require strength, however, no formal education or training whatsoever. How do I know this? My husband can do both, and he never went to school to learn how! Amazing,isn't it!
I think you misunderstand me. I think you are worth whatever the market will pay you. If that is $8.00 an hour or if that is $80.00 an hour. That is not the issue. The issue is the fact that you are trying to get your way by strong-arming your employer and threatening instead of marketing your skills. You are banding together like the mob, or like street thugs, to intimidate the company that was kind enough to give you a job into bending over for your demands. I don't disagree that on an individual basis some MIGHT deserve what you are asking. But I don't think there is anything about what you do that makes you irreplaceable,gives you the right to threaten your employer,gives you the right to stand outside and intimidate customers, or how about this! I will even go one step further. I think that you hide behind the union and do a half-assed job, thinking the union will make sure you don't get fired!!! Is that the kind of employee that deserves rewards for accomplishments and company loyalty? I don't think so!!! As far as retaining the benefits you already have, as far as I am concerned, you have so much more than most you should sit back and count your blessings. When you were given those health benefits, the cost to your employer was about one-third of what it is now. It is fair for them to ask you to absorb some of the increase.....
As far as your comment on why I hate unions when they are a part of U.S. history- I think that was a ridiculous comment. Other things that are a part of U.S. history
Vietnam War
Charles Manson
Ted Bundy
Slavery
etc.........
I could go on and on, but I think I made my point. California is an "AT Will" employment state. That means that your employer can fire you or change the terms of your employment for any reason other than prejudice or discrimination AT ANY TIME. I think that if you didn't have a union you would all be working harder to prove your worth instead of the half-assed job because you think you can't get fired. Then maybe the good ones would get paid even more than they're asking- but because they're WORTH it, not because they threaten their bosses. And, by the way, the legal system is also a part of our history. Of course, you can't win this one in court, because you are asking for something that most of you don't deserve and you don't have a legal leg to stand on. When you can explain to me what the difference is between you and organized crime................
you're saying that the strikers are being like a mob, to unjustly try to get the owners to pay them more?
It's a fact, and not mere speculation that our economy is centrally controlled by the U.S. government and the associated Federal Reserve Bank in a way which benefits owners and investors, and works against low level employees.
If unemployment goes below 5%, Alan Greenspan of the Fed. will raise interest rates to drive unemployment back up again. He does this to keep wages down or "keep the economy from overheating" in his words. So there will always be this group of unemployed people fighting against the currently low-paid grocery store baggers, so they can never bargain up. The government also signs trade deals so that jobs are exported overseas, so workers have to compete with people being paid $5/day.
This is mob behavior.
A
KucinichWatch Original 29 minutes < Speech
Only 12 min. > |
|
OK you could do that but keep in mind the effects on your country and other countries.
Hmm strikes dont seem to help either of these problems anyway.
There is an even bigger problem if this union is broken. All those other unions out there better watch it if this one is broken. The unions for other laborers will get broken next. For example, ILWU for starters.
The other problem is would all of you "college" grads do these types of jobs for $8 an hour. I don't think so, because I bet you think it would be beneath you.
These individuals are just trying to get by. Which most Americans are doing now a days. All they are asking for are things to stay the same. Nothing more, nothing less. They are not lazy, they are not stupid, and they are definitely not deaf.
If any of you decided to fight for your rights as an employee, I'm pretty sure you would want support.
Like I said before, what ever happened to having a heart? Show these people that you care for them. Would it hurt you that much? Even if you don't agree, then keep you snide remarks to yourselves.
If you do not like what your employer offers you, then get better educated and start higher up the ladder or switch to a company that has benefits that are more tailored to your needs/wants.
And if the area that you live in is too expensive for your pay rate, then it is up to YOU to fix that, not your employer.
These are not "snide" remarks. These are called "facts" and "personal responsibility". If you don't haev both those, then YOU LOSE!
I have served my county for 10 years for your FREEDOM... the Freedom of Choices .. I choose to shop anywhere I want to. As I walk in the store to get my food from WIC... I am called "Bitch, Respect the picket line..." That is all uncalled for and I hope that KARMA comes back to all of you that choose to say those kinds of things to the customers. In the End all of you will loose this battle... Good luck with your future endveours. Sorry ... thats life.
but im sure you will say oh blah blah blah but who cares go back to you cubicle or meeting kissing your bosses ass and maybe you'll be invited to the company x-mas party , go on then go on boy get out of here you self inflated ZERO .
also when this strike somehow ends do you see yourself 20 years from now working there having the best benifits? The future holds many advances and some of those are already in procession take for example have you ever gone to KMART? have you seen those self checkout lines? sooner or later that will be in every grocery store so it reduces the time and many cashier jobs will be dropped. What will you do then. Many technology advances will take the job of simple tasks and jobs will be lost so if your thinking of staying where you are you might as well keep up with the times because they can be the next thing that will make life more easier. Stick to a job where you arnt rallying about your upsets and move on in life.
It's Thanksgiving - the season to help your fellow human...
I suggest we ALL show solidarity with the Von's workers (and broaden the dialog) by making our own, general pro-health care signs, and show up at every local Von's, anytime on Weds., Nov 26th, the day before Thanksgiving. Go before work, after work, during a break, whatever.
We only have a couple of days, so if any activists out there see this, please post it everywhere. Let's get it going !
Right-winged republicans need to just fall off the face of the earth. It's really sad and embarrassing that we have people like you living in America. Your anger doesn't discourage me from what I believe in. I hope that when you need something one day, I will be the one to say "well, how does this affect me?" and kick you in the stomach while i'm at it.
for god's sake grow up, if you can't follow the issues then ask one of the more educated posters to explain the topic to you (off -list) so it doesnot interupt the flow of information
I work for Safeway Stores, Inc, proudly too, but when you say you gladly pay $500 per month for your health benefits, I wonder what is your monthly salary to afford this contribution to your benefits? You must make a considerable wage, or you're lying. I would have no problem contributing to my heatlh benefits as Safeway has proposed, but there is a discrepency in this offer, otherwise So. California would not be on strike. I am sure that my union brothers and sisters would have no problem with the $5-$15 a week contribution to health care to offset the company health care costs.
I work for Safeway Stores, Inc, proudly too, but when you say you gladly pay $500 per month for your health benefits, I wonder what is your monthly salary to afford this contribution to your benefits? You must make a considerable wage, or you're lying. I would have no problem contributing to my heatlh benefits as Safeway has proposed, but there is a discrepency in this offer, otherwise So. California would not be on strike. I am sure that my union brothers and sisters would have no problem with the $5-$15 a week contribution to health care to offset the company health care costs.
I work for Safeway Stores, Inc, proudly too, but when you say you gladly pay $500 per month for your health benefits, I wonder what is your monthly salary to afford this contribution to your benefits? You must make a considerable wage, or you're lying. I would have no problem contributing to my heatlh benefits as Safeway has proposed, but there is a discrepency in this offer, otherwise So. California would not be on strike. I am sure that my union brothers and sisters would have no problem with the $5-$15 a week contribution to health care to offset the company health care costs.
And with a little seniority--like several years--you might work up to the standard 25 hours a week. So even if you're making what approaches $20 an hour, it's similar to the amount of money as someone working 40 hours a week for minimum wage.
So Marquez-dipshit, what makes the job so appealing and so different from flipping burgers at McD's or working the counter at 7/11?
The difference is that you have basic healthcare, which EVERYONE is this society should have.
Learn the issues before you start having scabbing fantasies.
The Saint
Yes, scabbie, slavery seems to be your choice. Enjoy!
Vince the Saint
I just found this side and it's getting pretty ugly on here. I'm a flight attendant for one of the largest airlines in the world. 3 years ago our pilot where up for a new contract. It was a nasty summer and we lost most of our business passengers, which make up for the majority of the airlines profit. Then 9/11 happened. Over 100.000 airline employees have lost there job. For us lucky once who put enough years in with the company times where changing fast. Our pilot's took a 25 %pay cut, we flight attendants took a 8% cut and also have to pay for medical insurance now.
We are glad to still have a job, a strike would have been unthinkable. The difference beetween a checker and a flight attendantant is that you guys are replaced in no time as your job takes no skills and anyone can do it.
Just for your references a clerk at Vons makes more money then some flight attendants do. Why in the world would anyone stay with a company as a clerk for a long time anyway? I was born in Germany and compared to Europe this is still the land of oportunity.
And it is not all about corporate greed, look at your union leaders that still make an average of $80.000 a year. They are only keeping there jobs as long as there is work for them, as longer the strike as better for them. Buy the way our union use to be very strong as well but with so many flight attendants without a job we just had to merge with another union because our union was broke. So tell me where do you the people who work as a checker see yourself in 5 or 10 years? Why don't take this time of strike to move on to better and bigger things in life?
I'm sure it is not that easy, the economy is bad, most of you have no education or are just getting one. Where in CA can you make $17.90 an hour without any skills?
Did you ever think what will happen once this strike is over? Vons lost so much business because of the strike it will take them a while to recover. Where will you be in the mean time? Don't you think the same thing will happen to you that happened to us airliners? There will be major lay offs for a while. But uhh maybe it's not too bad after all, at least then you can spend your time collecting unemployment and not walking up and down the parking lot anymore.
I think the smart people are the once who crossed the line to work for Vons during this strike to make some extra $. At least they are taking the opportunity this country offers to all of us.
Good luck.
I'm not being serious, you say? Then the brains to be a flight attendent is in remembering the emergency procedure announcement right before the flight. Right?
And AJ flygirl, maybe Germany doesn't have such a good education system after all, as demonstrated by your spelling, grammar and logic. You probably aren't intelligent enough to be a grocery store checker. Remember genius, there are lots more things in the store. But I guess that Phd. comes in handy when you have to ask:
"The chicken or the beef dinner, sir?" or "Would you like some peanuts?" or "What would you like to drink?"
Oh my, it must be so hard to remember what the passenger ordered. Even flight attendents with masters degrees have a tough time with that, right?
And if you know flight attendents who make less than grocery clerks, well logically shouldn't that quit such a mentally demanding job in the airline industry and take the easy job as a grocery clerk? Then if the strike does succeed, they'll have more pay for such easy work, decent health care and pensions and won't have to worry about all those onerously difficult duties on the plane--and for more money to boot.
Hey AJ--or can I just call you dipshit 2?--why don't you just quit such a hard job and show that you're NOT human and become a scab. And hopefully some righteous striker will give you the justice all scabs deserve--a good kneecapping!
The Saint
But if I was walking the picket and I saw his/her punk ass trying to cross it, she/he wouldn't live to regret it.
And anyone with similar proletarian class consciousness and a healthy dose of class hatred would do the same.
Vince the Saint
I was locked out! Figure it out! This means that I can not work in the store even if I wanted to.
I was fine with the contract that we already had.
Lets face it, Corporations are not looking out for their employees nor the good of the shareholders. Look at Enron for just one example.
I have remained in the business as a result of the promise of a decent retirement and medical coverage.
I am also a sole proprietor. My guess is that you do not earn my $200 per hour for consulting.
I am a conservative! I do not always agree with what the Repblicans do. I am tired of losing friends in the Middle East. I have lost two friends already.
My neighbor was called to active duty the day after Christmas.
I want our people home. There will never be peace in that region! We already did what we needed to do, get our guys and gals home!
I WOULD LOVE TO GO TOE TO TOE WITH YOU ON VIRTUALLY ANY BUSINESS TOPIC.
OH YES, THERE ARE MANY OF US THAT ARE EDUCATED.
LOOK AT THOSE PEOPLE WORKING AS SCABS! DID YOU KNOW THAT THESE ARE PEOPLE THAT HAVE JUST RECENTLY BEEN RELEASED FROM OUR LOCAL JAILS? IT TAKES THREE OF THEM TO DO THE JOB OF ONE OF US.
I HAVE SEEN THESE FOOLS KICKED OUT OF THE STORE AFTER SPENDING TIME ON THE LIQUOR AISLE.
IF THIS IS THE TYPE OF SERVICE YOU WANT, GO AHEAD AND SHOP THERE. BE CAREFUL. MOST OF THEM PROBABLY HAVE AIDS FROM SPENDING TIME WITH BUTT BUDDIES IN JAIL. HOPE THEY HAVE NOT CUT THEMSELVES AND THEN STOCKED THE STUFF YOU PURCHASED!
SCABS AND THOSE THAT CROSS THE LINE...YOU WILL GET WHAT YOU DESERVE..KARMA.
IF YOU WANT TO BRING IT...KNEE CAPPING...I SAY BRING IT. I WOULD LOVE TO SEE ONE OF YOU BOZOS EVEN TRY!
BRING A LUNCH!
I AM QUITE SURE THAT I HAVE MUCH MORE EDUCATION THAN YOU . I CAN SAY THIS WITHOUT ANY DOUBT. I AM ALSO A CLERK! I SET UP THE COMPUTERS IN MANY OF THE STORES IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA.
I AM ALSO A CLERK....GEE WHIZ HOW CAN THIS BE?
MAYBE YOUR BRAIN WAS NOT DECOMPRESSED.
MAY HE BRING IT!
YOU SUCK! NO REALLY! LOVE TO HAVE YOU COME THROUGH MY LINE!
BEEEOOOOCCCHHHH
Were are the consensual sacrafices made by Management ??
Company Cars?
Private Jets for quick over views ?
Before the respect of the employees can be achieved, there must be some type of proof that over haul of management also happens.
An employee should not fear that they are not Perky enough to take the custumers CASH, SMILE, and ask for their VONS CARD!!!!!! !
http://sfbay.indymedia.org/news/hidden.php?id=1541239#1670891
All i can say is, after months of trying to educate the snobish customer base in southern california, i'm having a hard time respecting my community, which found it all too easy to blame the pawns in this game instead of the generals. The union or the company.... fight them, don't fight me. the union gets the votes it wants to get, decides what it wants to decide, and will gladly stick it to all of its members to save itself. the company would also send every one of us to hell before seeing a profit loss of a hundredth of a percent.
And for everyone who bagged on us for being uneducated bananna scanners etc., i'm sorry my mommy and daddy couldn't pay to send me to college. i'm sorry when i moved out at 18 i had to fight for survival in this armpit of an economy. I'm doing the best i can to get by, so thanks for all the compassion.
so next time you are walking into a store and a worker is going home, remember that look in his eyes is dissapointment in his fellow man. you know, the ones he tries to serve all day long... the ones he won't let leave until they are happy. and i hope you are proud of yourself.
It is our job to stop whatever we are doing to assist you and I think we all do a good job. The customers at the Ralphs I work at seem genuinely friendly, but I wouldn't doubt that a lot of them feel superior. Oh well, people will always think that way.
fixed now.
If you look at albetsons site directly, you will see that total sales income was 8.7 billion.
I am working at albertsons, I have a BA in Computer Science and Technology with a minor in Electrical Eng and Communications.I have been unable to find a job in my field for 7 months after getting laid off.
So shut the hell up about stupid people working at Albertsons and us being lazy or not wanting to get educated.
Your an idiot with a child like mentality unable to think about anything outside of what effects you directly. Have a drink and go play in the street.
I will never understand why a union grocery worker is paid more than an employee who works for Target or any other non-union retailer. I can hear it now, the union supporters will say that the non-union retailer is entitled to the same pay and benefits they are. Think about it, if that happens, the retailer will have to inflate their prices in order to compensate for the higher pay and benefits.
Here's my major gripe. You go on strike because you're not happy with the new contract. You request the customer take their business to a non-union store. How does that make any sense? It's not consistant. You want us to only patronize your employer when you're satisfied with your contract but boycot them when you're unhappy? Union employees constantly complain about the unfair treatment of non-union employees, particularly at Walmart. But when you go on strike you ask the customer to patronize the very stores you complain about.
I've seen members of the UFCW picket non-union stores requesting the customer to shop at union stores. Then they go on strike and do the complete opposite and ask us to not support their employer, but support the non-union store. Prior to the strike, you didn't want us patronizing non union store, during the strike you wanted us to patronize non union stores. Now that the strike is over you want us to patronize union stores. Did you see the contradiction and how ridiculous this is?
Your gripe is with your employer NOT with the customer. Don't take it out on the customer and replacement workers. We all have gripes with our employers, whether it is what we contribute to our healthcare, how much sick time or vacation time we're entitled to and the sucky raise we received or didn't receive. Being non-union, we understand it is not the fault of those who patronize our employer. How selfish your thinking is. You're like spoiled little children who only have the ability of seeing their "horrible" situation. You want compassion and support from people who work just as hard or harder, from people who possibly do the same thing you do without the terrific pay and benefits, and from those who have also seen their pay, benefits and pension slashed. How self-centered can you be?
Ordinarily, no.
But if you cross a picket-line and choose to interfere in workers' attempts to bargain with their employer, thereby ignoring the workers' pleas and taking the employer's side in the dispute, then, yes, you are making yourself an enemy of working people.
Yes, other people indeed have money issues and struggles with their employers -- people everywhere are standing up for themselves and should support eachothers' efforts for worker dignity not undermine them. Your attempts to pit working people against working people will ultimately fail. Most working people struggling for their own rights know better than to interfere in other workers' disputes with employers. In contrast, those, like you, who favor low prices over fair wages will stroll right past a picket line and then cry about how the picketers were loud or mean to you when by your act of ignoring their cause you already yourself declared them and their rights to decent wages the enemy.
This suggests that the choice is between a good deal for consumers and decent wages for workers. The fact is that companies, such as Safeway, could maintain and expand upon *comparatively* decent wages and still make a profit without hiking prices. When pro-labor people imply that winning better working conditions will necessarily require that prices climb they're unwittingly doing managements' bidding.
the costs do come from somewhere, and frankly I do not care from where they come, from corporate profits or higher prices -- working people deserve a living wage and affordable health benefits, etc.
I also think it does activists a disservice to pretend that companies will not pass on added labor costs rather than take a bite in profits. to try to pretend that we can have it all, low costs and decent wages, is a bit disingenuous as someone somewhere is bound to be disappointed. it's better to be honest and upfront about costs rather than to try to bury them, and to build the stronger case that the costs are worth it instead of arguing that improvements for workers are cost-free.
if anything unwittingly does management's bidding, it's buying into this whole Value-America, everything-at-a-discount mentality. it hurts workers. it hurts our environment. it hurts a whole host of things, except for prices at the check-out counter. activists should make the plain case that any extra costs for improvements in said areas are worth it, well worth it, in the real improvements in workers' and their families' lives.
of course, I would prefer that increased labor benefits come from corporate profits, but that, to me, is a side issue. the real issue is taking care of workers, not how much a company makes or charges for their products.
Safeway actually does reward its hachett men quite well. If it's so fucking broke that they have to make the hard decision whether to cut back workers' wages and conditions to levels not seem since the Great Depression of the 1930s or increase prices--why then, did they give such a lucrative bonus to their CEO, Steve Burd? If they're having such a hard time, does this mean they'll have to increase prices because they gave him so much? The answer, of course, is "NO!"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read this from a news wireservice on April 13, 2005:
$19.5 million in 2004 for Safeway exec
Safeway Inc. Chairman Steven Burd's pay package totaled $19.5 million in 2004--a tumultuous year marked by a Southern California labor dispute that embittered the grocer's workers and alienated shoppers.
Burd generated $17.1 million of the windfall by cashing in 1.15 million of the stock options that he has accumulated since becoming Safeway's chief executive in 1993. He also received a $1.14 million salary and $1.15 million bonus, according to documents filed Tuesday.
The 2004 compensation package represented a 39 percent increase from 2003, when Burd pocketed $14 million, including $13 million from the redemption of stock options.
Safeway raised Burd's annual salary by 30% in July to $1.3 million, according to Tuesday's filing. His salary had been frozen at $1 million since 2000.
Safeway didn't give Burd any new stock options last year. He ended 2004 with 4.9 million vested stock options worth $37.4 million.
(from AP)
The point is, as customers we have done our weekly shopping in the same store for years. The customers have their own horror stories, raise freezes, no pension and steadily seen the amount the contribute to their monthly healthcare increase for years. I bet you never knew their situation when they patronized your employer. You had no idea they hadn't received a raise in over 18 months and were paying hundreds of dollars per month for their healthcare.
When the grocery workers went on strike it was a bitter pill for them to swallow. They understood completely the situation you found yourselves in. The understood because they had been living it for years and you had no idea.
Where were you when my employer froze my wages a year ago. Where were you for the past 10 years when my monthly contribution to provide healthcare for my family steadily increased? Where were you then and are you now?
if you weren't picketing then don't blame others trying to better their situation (or at least keeping it from getting worse)
This is wrong. I walked in solidarity on the picket lines 3 times during the strike. It was inspiring to see how many of the formerly loyal local customers stayed away. That really hit the markets where it hurt. And it was helped when the Teamsters honored the picket lines at distribution centers and NO products made it onto supermarket shelves.
Safeway, Ralphs and Albertsons still haven't returned to previous levels of local customer patronage. People found other places to shop--like neighborhood mom-and-pop ethnic markets, Trader Joes and upscale grocers--and haven't returned to the chain markets.
The previous poster says working people don't know how bad it's gotten for workers in other sectors--I say wrong again. Everyone I knows, including me, compains constantly how fucked up working conditions have been getting for the last 30 years. I don't know anyone who's blind to this.
The only way to reverse this and start fighting the class war on the offensive is to back up other working class people with solidarity. The IWW got it right: AN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL!
Gifford
No matter how many times and how many different ways you try to explain, bottomline; it is not the fault of those who patronize your employer or mine. The only thing it does is create animosity from everyone involved; the union members, the employers and the customer.
Perhaps the union should devise a new strategy. You have to even admit the current strategy does not work.
You hit the nail on the head. Since the strike ended Safeway, Ralphs and Albertson's have lost a lot of their customer base. I happen to be one they have lost that has no intention of returning. We thank you, the strikers for showing us alternative stores to shop that have far superior customer service from employees who love their job, actually greet the customer with a smile and don't have a holier than now attitude. And they do it all and receive less money and worse benefits than you receive.
Your statement puzzles me. Are you telling me as a customer that your strategy worked because it's obvious the customer have not returned to the three major grocery chains that were on strike? Exactly how do you consider that a beneift? Ultimately, what you have done is furthered your chances for your hours, salary and benefits being further reduced.
The mere fact that this is still a topic of debate a full year after the strike is over and emotions on all sides are still high, only proves the point that picketing an employer is no longer a strategy that works to benefit the employee.
even though most of those raised prices will be incurred by workers?
all i can say to that is it's a really good message to telegraph to potential allies if your goal is not to have many.
what i think you're ignoring is that capitalists are always looking to raise prices. that's a constant. whether they do so is based on their perception of market conditions. safeway and alberton's workers could vote themselves large pay reductions and their bosses would try to jack prices, if they thought it would result in bigger profits.
The whole strike was a very unfortunate event. We can argue it either way, really.
The fact is that the workers really got screwed. After the strike, I heard that all of the contracts that came up in other "divisions" (I don't know if that is the correct word), were renewed by the management without any changes--no second tier, no health care changes, nothing! The workers in So. Cal. lost a battle for themselves, but won it for others. That's got to be frustrating. And the upper management has screwed themselves because now it's difficult to find and keep good employees. Turnover is very high because wages are low; benefits don't kick in for quite a long time; and union dues are expensive.
On the other hand, I don't think the workers should have gone on strike in the first place. I really couldn't see how they thought they could win. It never made sense to me. So when they lost I wasn't surprised, although I did feel sorry for them because in my opinion they were really between a rock and a hard place.
Jennifer: I know it may seem hard to believe that an employee that averages $ 15 an hour and works on average 24 hours a week would want raises and affordable health care! However, the insurance provided in the state I live and work in is substandard, it is better than nothing but not much! It is however what the union provides on what the Grocery Store I work for pays. I would have no problem paying for part of my health care if I got BETTER health insurance and I received said insurance after I retired. As it is now union retirees do not receive health insurance. While it is hard to win with Big Business where would we be as a race if we shirked from every challenge; quit because there is no way to win. Those employees had to stand up for themselves; win or loss, it was the principle!
No, that's not hard to believe. I don't get the sarcasm here. You might want to go back and read my post. I'm not really hammering the workers, I just didn't agree with them. Big difference.
"I would have no problem paying for part of my health care if I got BETTER health insurance and I received said insurance after I retired. As it is now union retirees do not receive health insurance."
I understand. If I could have it that way, I'd want it that way too.
"While it is hard to win with Big Business where would we be as a race if we shirked from every challenge"
You are generalizing to make your point, and it doesn't work here. Sometimes it's better to retreat. The trick is knowing when.
"[We] quit because there is no way to win."
Hmmm, my view is that if the strikers had held out *until the next round of contract negotiations at another district*, they may have had some real bargaining power. The stores were losing money, no question. And the thought of another district also going on strike might have forced corporate to look at things differently. But, I'm certainly not a corporate CEO; these are just things I've wondered about.
"Those employees had to stand up for themselves; win or loss, it was the principle!"
While I now understand that you wanted to go on strike because of the principle, I still do not think it was a wise decision. My experience was that the strikers outside the store where I worked were not like you, they were not doing it based on principle. I listened to their chants, and called their union strike-update hotline. It was clear that they thought they could win - the union reps were telling them this over and over, that it would only take the stores six to eight weeks to give in. So while you were doing it for the principle, I suspect you were in the minority.
I think the union was WAY wrong to advise the strike. It cost the workers way too much in the long run.
All I can say is...nothing, I'm saddened that such profitable corporations are in it for their pocket books and are phasing out the holidays
By the way, you smiling cashiers are here for your shopping needs till 9 pm on Thanksgiving.
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.