top
Santa Cruz IMC
Santa Cruz IMC
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Workers at Peet's Coffee and Tea in Santa Cruz Vote Against Union Representation.

by Brendon Constans
Workers at Peet's Coffee and Tea store #221 voted today and yesterday by secret ballot 11-6 against union representation. Supporters and organizers of the union drive were very surprised at the results, which they had anticipated to be more evenly split. They believe company propaganda had a lot to do with their loss.
After many months of organizing efforts, an election finally took place over two days at Peet's Coffee and Tea in Santa Cruz. The results came as a surprise to organizers and to employees in favor of unionization.

Brendon Constans, an employee at Peet's, had expected a much closer vote. "From talking with employees and from the vibe I got at recent company and employee meetings, I really thought that we had a chance. I figured it would be close, but that we still could win. When they started counting the votes, and so many came back as 'no', I was really quite surprised and very disappointed."

Constans has been spearheading the campaign, along with fellow employees and with support from the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) Local 839, who would've represented them if they'd won. The union drive started about three months ago when workers saw the company growing and profits increasing, yet at the same time cutting back on certain benefits such as sick pay and limiting the amount of hours they could work. After some research, Constans contacted the UFCW, who, after hearing their concerns, sent an organizer out to help with their efforts.

As soon as the union efforts were brought to the company's attention, they started holding mandatory staff meetings and talking with employees individually. Peet's main argument against unionization was that it was a great company and that the employees couldn't do any better with a union than they're doing now. They also kept insisting that the atmosphere in the store would change if a union were in place, and that the open communication that staff and management now have would no longer exist.

Support for the union was much stronger when the effort began, which leads union supporters to believe that these meetings, (which the company paid employees to attend), persuaded many undecided and uninformed members of the staff to vote against union representation.
"We believe that if more employees had attended the numerous union meetings we had, rather than just the company sponsored ones, they would have had much more accurate information, and many more would have voted 'yes'," says Constans.

After receiving the election results, Pat O'Dea, CEO of Peet's Coffee and Tea, sent a letter to the store, thanking everyone for voting and announcing a meeting to be held next week to address employees' concerns.

Employees must wait a year before pursuing union representation again. Says Constans, "If I'm still working for them, and they haven’t addressed our concerns, you better believe we'll try again. And next time, we'll win."
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Unionized Against My Will
Good for them! I'm forced to be in a labor union because of my job and a union is basically just another hand reaching into my wallet to take my hard-earned money. Hopefully, California will become a right-to-work state someday.
§C
by C
Amen. Unions did serve a purpose long ago but now they are nothing more than a way to protect the lazy.
by Peet's Worker
Refering to unions as protectors of the lazy is ignorant and cold. In Santa Cruz, let me tell you of a few people that have union representation: The city and county workers, the nurses and other hospital workers, the firemen, the bus drivers, Safeway employees, teachers, hotel workers, janitors, and many others. Unions have insured a voice to all these HARD working people in the community and provided them with wages, benefit packages, and most importantly, respect, that has made it possible for them to live happy, healthy, stable lives. No, unions aren't free, but what unions provide for employees, most importantly a democratic voice in the workplace, far out-weighs the small amount in union dues and initiation fees that employees pay.
Many retail stores aren't unionized, but that doesn't mean it's the way it should be. Change needs to start now.
by Frank
The reason I began to detest unions is when my union took money out of my pocket to support Gore. Nobody asked me. I supported Nader. But the union bosses gave my money to Gore. Where's the "democratic voice" in this?
by Unionized Against My Will
>>> but now they are nothing more than a way to protect the lazy <<<

This is so true. Where I work, everyone makes the same money and the Union spends our money defending people who deserve to be fired. We have one guy who does *nothing* all day. He sits at his desk and watches DVD's on his computer. Everytime the manager has tried to discipline him the Union has stepped in and gotten him his job back. This type of behavior is very demoralizing to those of us trying to work and do a good job.
by fellow worker
We have a guy like that, too. He's the boss. The guy don't do jack squat but exploit us. We do the work. He gets the money. That's what being a boss is all about.
by Frank
I must admit that every boss I've ever had works much harder than I do. And of course they have all that extra stressful responsibility.

by what a slacker
We know how hard you work. We can tell from how much free time you have during business hours to hang around our virtual water cooler. Good for you. Slack away, bro. You've got plenty of company.
by Tax Payer
I like the part of "We believe that if more employees had attended the numerous union meetings we had, rather than just the company sponsored ones, they would have had much more accurate information, and many more would have voted 'yes'," says Constans.

And this guy is a Union Rep? I’ve been in several Union shops that had Union meetings and they have all been “company sponsored”, I guess his opinion is different when the cost of those meetings are coming out of his own pocket.
by Brendon
No, I'm not a union rep, I'm an employee of Peet's Coffee and Tea. And the union meetings were not company sponsored, that would be illegal. The union is a seperate entity from the company of Peet's. By union meetings, I mostly mean meetings that the employees had amongst themselves outside of work. And there were also a few meetings with union reps there to give us some info. And there wasn't any money coming out of my pocket.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$210.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network