top
Anti-War
Anti-War
Indybay
Indybay
Santa Cruz
Santa Cruz
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Calendar
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: Anti-War
HUMBOLDT REMEMBERS HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net)
Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
Dozens of residents of Humboldt County, California turned out Saturday, Aug. 9, in solidarity with worldwide commemorations of the 58th anniversary of the US atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
peace_on_plaza.jpg

Story and Photos by
BRIAN OHKUBO COVERT
& KAZUMI OHKUBO COVERT

Arcata, Humboldt County, CA -- Handmade paper lanterns, paper cranes and a peace ceremony were how residents here Saturday commemorated the US government’s dropping of the atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki 58 years ago this week.

Peace events began in the monrning on the Plaza, Arcata’s main gathering place, amid the usual Saturday crowd of hundreds who turn out for the weekly “Farmer’s Market” ritual of selling and buying local produce and goods.

Members of the city of Arcata’s “Nuclear Weapons Free Zone Commission” set up tables for making Japanese-style paper lanterns that would be floated in a local lake later that evening. There was table space as well as for making paper cranes and displaying printed materials related to anti-war issues and the two atomic bombings of 1945. Some of the free printed materials on display at the Arcata Plaza included pamphlets, brochures and a book that were recently donated, especially for this occasion, to the citizens of Humboldt County by the city of Hiroshima.

The U.S. government tested its new atomic weapon in the desert of New Mexico on July 16, 1945, and nine days later on July 25, officially decided the Japanese cities on which such a weapon would be dropped.

Three weeks later, at 8:15 a.m. on Aug. 6, 1945, US military planes dropped the world’s first atomic bomb on the industrial port city of Hiroshima in western Japan. The bomb, nicknamed “Little Boy,” weighed about four tons, had a destructive power equal to about 15,000 tons of TNT -- and contained the radioactive element Uranium 235.

Three days later, at 11:02 a.m., on Aug. 9, 1945, US military planes dropped the world’s second atomic bomb on the industrial port city of Nagasaki in southwestern Japan. The bomb, nicknamed “Fat Man,” weighed about 4.5 tons, had a destructive power of about 21,000 tons of TNT -- and contained the radioactive element Plutonium 239.

Both cities were instantly incinerated and covered by deadly mushroom clouds of radioactivity that brought on intense heat rays, strong winds and a radioactive fallout of “black rain.” Many survivors of Nagasaki and Hiroshima have often referred to the bombs’ effects, as they experienced them, as “hell on Earth.”

About 150,000 people were killed in Hiroshima on Aug. 6; tens of thousands more were wounded. About 75,000 people were killed in Nagasaki on Aug. 9, with about as many also wounded. Millions of citizens around the world have protested the two atomic bombings ever since then, commemorating the Japanese victims of the bombs that arguably ended World War II yet ushered in the seemingly uncontrollable global arms race that continues today.

The severe health problems, too, of survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki continue on to this day.

On Aug. 6 this year, Hiroshima Mayor Tadatoshi Akiba, in a Peace Declaration, slammed the US for its current nuclear policy that “appears to worship nuclear weapons as God.”

“We must somehow convey to them [world leaders] that nuclear weapons are utterly evil, inhumane and illegal under international law,” Akiba said.

On Aug. 9 this year, Nagasaki Mayor Itcho Itoh reminded the world: “We have ceaselessly called for the eradication of nuclear weapons and the establishment of world peace, so that such a tragedy is never repeated.”

And on Aug. 9 this year in Humboldt County, California, Arcata City Councilmember David Meserve too expressed such sentiments during an evening “peace ceremony” held at the Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary. As the sun set and the moon rose over the clear summer skies of northern Humboldt, the paper lanterns made at the Plaza earlier Saturday, with their messages for peace, were lit and set adrift on a small lake adjacent to Arcata Bay.

Just like people do in Hiroshima and Nagasaki -- where lighted paper lanterns with messages are placed on rivers and floated out to the Pacific Ocean about this time every year, remembering the dead and praying for a peaceful future for the living.


§Peace Of The Plaza
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
peace_tables.jpg
The peace event Saturday on the Arcata Plaza started off with a table (left) for people to make paper lanterns, and another table (right) for displaying Hiroshima-related materials and for folding paper cranes.
§Lantern Makers
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
making_lanterns.jpg
Mark Dubrow of the Arcata “Nuclear Weapons Free Zone Commission” (center, wearing hat), an organizer of Saturday’s peace event at the Plaza, and others make paper lanterns to be floated at the Arcata Marsh later that evening.
§Artist At Work
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
lantern_drawing.jpg
A young boy draws his own design for a paper lantern.
§A Little Snip Here And....
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
paper_cutting.jpg
An elaborate lantern design takes shape as this participant puts scissors to paper.
§Folding Hands
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
paper_crane_folding.jpg
Meanwhile, over at the other peace table, four pairs of hands are fast at work making “origami” paper cranes. Under Japanese custom, the making of one thousand paper cranes is said to help a person to recover from sickness.
§What Peace Looks Like
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
making_peace.jpg
It’s all hugs, curiosity and serious paper crane-making at the Plaza, as the Farmer’s Market crowd strolls around in the background.
§Lanterns and Cranes
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
cranes_and_lanterns.jpg
And voila! A few finished paper cranes and completed paper lanterns, alongside copies of the Hiroshima mayor’s official Peace Declarations of 2002 and 2003.
§From Hiroshima
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
hiroshima_materials.jpg
Some of the other Hiroshima-related materials at the peace table Saturday included these English-language pamphlets and brochures, as well as a bilingual documentary book, sent recently to Humboldt County citizens from the Hiroshima city government.
§At The Marsh
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
at_the_marsh.jpg
Early evening at the Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary’s Klopp Lake, where a couple dozen or so people gather for the second part of Saturday’s “Hiroshima/Nagasaki Day” activities.
§The Ceremony Begins
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
preparing_ceremony.jpg
Young and old alike gather at the peace ceremony at the Marsh, where about 30 lanterns created earlier in the day on the Plaza are ready for floating. “We Want a World Full of Peace” and “Nukes Cause Cancer” were among the many messages inscribed on the paper lanterns.
§Meserve Speaks
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
meserve_speaks.jpg
Arcata City Councilmember David Meserve (right) addresses the crowd gathered at the Marsh. Meserve reminded the group about the destruction wrought by the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the importance of working for a world without such weapons.
§Moonrise Over Marsh
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
peace_performance.jpg
As the moon rises over the mountains from the east, Arcata resident Laurel G., age 13, gives a solo performance she calls “Looking the Tiger in the Eye.” Part of her performance included playing Sadako, a Japanese girl of around the same age who died of leukemia in Hiroshima following the dropping of the atomic bomb. (Sadako died before she could finish folding the thousand paper cranes she hoped would help heal her.) The large work of art to the left of Laurel is one she created herself; it also won first prize in a book-cover design contest organized by the Arcata “Nuclear Weapons Free Zone Commission.”
§Afloat
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
floating_lanterns.jpg
As night falls, candles within the paper lanterns are lit and the lanterns are set adrift one by one in Klopp Lake.
§Night Lights
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
lanterns_on_pond.jpg
A near-full moon casts its glow over the lanterns as they gracefully glide on the lake.
§Rest In Peace
by Brian Ohkubo Covert & Kazumi Ohkubo Covert (inochi [at] cox.net) Monday Aug 11th, 2003 1:05 AM
rest_in_peace.jpg
One of the lanterns that floated at the Arcata Marsh that evening, with a special message for the spirits of those who perished in Hiroshima and Nagasaki on those fateful days in August 1945.

Comments  (Hide Comments)

by Rolling Stone Mag. Hillary Johnson 10-02-03
(BC1nAZ [at] aol.com) Monday Sep 15th, 2003 5:46 AM
I was appalled to read that we used depleted uranium in Iraq and Afghanistan. We used 1,000,000 rounds of this stuff carrying up to 10 pounds of depleted uranium each. By the way, this stuff has a half life 4.5 BILLION years. The weapons also contain traces of Plutonium and Americium which are far more radioactive than depleted uranium. Anyway, read the October 2nd 2003 issue of Rolling Stone Magazine for a full story and lots of pictures. I didn't know what depleted uranium was until I read the article in Rolling Stone.
by plutonium
Monday Sep 15th, 2003 5:40 PM
Soooooooooooo, you think bombing Nagasaki and Hiroshima was a BAD idea? It saved a million American GI lives! The incredibly DUMB Japanese government brought it on to themselves when they bombed Pearl Harbor. In reality - the Japanese government bombed N. and H.
Do you think we were just going to watch as they colonized China and the Far East?
It's an age old debate long since settled.
As far as using depleted uranium - it is saving lives also. War is hell... tell the terrorists to go away and none of this is needed! Or continue to coddle them with acts/deeds/words of sedition.
by is deadly
Monday Sep 15th, 2003 6:40 PM
when it hits you at 3600 ft per second.

However - otherwise it's about as dangerous as granite, and almost less radioactive. In fact, granite's got thorium which breaks down into radon.

A half-life of 4.5 billion years means one atom of that has a 50/50 chance of splitting sometime during that 4.5 billion years. Contrast that with some of the medical isotopes that have a half-life of seconds to minutes, it's about as inert as it's possible to be.

The WHO doesn't think it's much of a danger.

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs257/en/

The National Radiologic Protection Board isn't too worried...

http://www.nrpb.org/faq/du/index.htm

And to put the half-life in perspective as far as a time scale goes - the earth was formed about one half-life of U-238 ago.

For what it's worth, smoking's a LOT more dangerous than radiation from DU. If I were you, I'd do a bit more research on this and look into the physics behind it. It's easy to find, and I wouldn't trust Rolling Stone magazine to put out the straight dope on something that:

1. Won't affect any of it's readers.
2. Can be used to sensational effect.
by lie
Monday Sep 15th, 2003 6:56 PM
Not if you inhale or ingest the dust it isn't.
by Inhale coal dust, you get black lung.
Monday Sep 15th, 2003 7:36 PM
What is it, you can't be bothered to read a link?

From the WHO link...

"In the kidneys, the proximal tubules (the main filtering component of the kidney) are considered to be the main site of potential damage from chemical toxicity of uranium. There is limited information from human studies indicating that the severity of effects on kidney function and the time taken for renal function to return to normal both increase with the level of uranium exposure."

(Like any heavy metal, such as lead, uranium is toxic - however, it's pretty inert so you've got to have a LOT of it in your system to have problems.)

"In a number of studies on uranium miners, an increased risk of lung cancer was demonstrated, but this has been attributed to exposure from radon decay products. Lung tissue damage is possible leading to a risk of lung cancer that increases with increasing radiation dose."

(Pretty much what you figure, right? But keep reading...)

"However, because DU is only weakly radioactive, very large amounts of dust (on the order of ___grams___) would have to be inhaled for the additional risk of lung cancer to be detectable in an exposed group. Risks for other radiation-induced cancers, including leukaemia, are considered to be very much lower than for lung cancer."

(Starting to get a picture here? The stuff's darn near inert from a radiation standpoint.)

"Erythema (superficial inflammation of the skin) or other effects on the skin are unlikely to occur even if DU is held against the skin for long periods (weeks)."

(The '(weeks)' was in the original link. Check for yourself.)

"No consistent or confirmed adverse chemical effects of uranium have been reported for the skeleton or liver. "

(Hmmm.)

"No reproductive or developmental effects have been reported in humans."

(Remember, this is for DEPLETED uranium, where the radioactive isotope of uranium has been removed.)

"Although uranium released from embedded fragments may accumulate in the central nervous system (CNS) tissue, and some animal and human studies are suggestive of effects on CNS function, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions from the few studies reported."

Look - you want to believe DU glows in the dark? Go right ahead. You want to believe that you'll have three-headed kids if you're in the same county as a DU round? Have fun.

The facts remain that DU is damn near as inert as it's possible to be, and still be radiologically active. Toxicity isn't a factor. Radiation isn't a factor. You yourself are more likely to be more radioactive than a pound of DU, because you've got Carbon-14 in you, and that's MUCH more radiologically active than DU is.

Lies? Come on. Show some proof. I'll trust the World Health Organization over Rolling Stone, myself. Rolling Stone magazine has to entertain - and then it'll get tossed for the next issue. The World Health Organization - what they've got HAS to be right. Because when dealing with these kinds of issues, close isn't good enough.
by Auntie N.
Monday Sep 15th, 2003 11:56 PM
Start here:

http://www.tv.cbc.ca/national/pgminfo/du/

http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/uran/index_e.html

http://www.iacenter.org/depleted/du.htm

http://www.ngwrc.org/Dulink/du_link.htm

http://www.pandoraproject.org/

http://www.antenna.nl/wise/uranium/dhap99.html

http://www.iacenter.org/depleted/append7.htm

http://www.disasternews.net/news/news.php?articleid=1687
by globally challenged
Tuesday Sep 16th, 2003 1:02 AM
The World Health Organization - what they've got HAS to be right? or what? who do they answer to when they are wrong?

in 2002 The World Health Organization published its findings that second hand smoke posed no detectable health risks to anyone exposed to it
(they must be correct!)
by you’re ignorant. Wise up?
Tuesday Sep 16th, 2003 1:10 AM
Auntie N

so nice to see you are here to spread good cheer to your fellow man. it is nice to see that we can discuss our differing views with dignity and intelligence.
by Auntie N.
Tuesday Sep 16th, 2003 1:31 AM
I'm here to spread the truth. If it cheers you up, so be it. If it doesn't cheer you up, too bad for you.

If you want the truth to cheer up, create cheering truths.
by Carrot Top
Tuesday Sep 16th, 2003 2:49 AM

what you have been spreading on thick - also is required to be watered in ;-)

by incredulous
Thursday Sep 25th, 2003 4:02 PM
what did that last comment mean??? it boggles the mind.
also: isn't it kind of cute when someone thinks uranium is so safe they'd cook with it? i hope soon it will be discovered that it has a practical application in the american kitchen...anyone who believes it will be taken care of.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

donate now

$ 327.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network