top
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Californians, Protect the Accuracy and Veracity of Your Vote

by Peter T / Working Assets
I hope you will pass on information about the proposed changes in California electron voting machines, which may or may not have a voter verifiable audit trail. See http://www.actforchange.com for details. Public comment should be in by August 1. The email address is: elections [at] ss.ca.gov
Californians, Protect the Accuracy and Veracity of Your Vote

Contributed by Working Assets

Touch-screen voting machines that have no paper trails or system for voters to verify that their votes are being recorded correctly endanger the integrity of our elections and the very core of our democracy. The problem with electronic voting machines as they are currently used in the U.S. is that voters have no way of knowing whether the machine actually recorded their ballots as voters intended. In response to concerns about current and pending purchases of touch-screen electronic voting equipment in California, Secretary of State Kevin Shelley created an ad hoc task force and has recently released a report of their recommendations.

The good news is that several members of this task force made a crucial recommendation: that a voter verifiable audit trail be required on all voting equipment. With voter verification, the individual voter checks the accuracy of the ballot, ensuring that ballots are recorded and counted as intended.

However, there is disagreement on when and how voter verification should be achieved. The majority of the committee want the voter verifiable audit trail requirement to be imposed on voting machine vendors beginning in 2007, and equipment purchased before that time would not be required to be modified to include a voter verifiable audit trail (VVAT) until 2010. Other members argued vigorously that a voter verifiable audit trail requirement should be imposed immediately.

The problem with waiting is that thousands of touch-screen machines will be purchased between now and 2007. As many as 50% of all Californians will be using paperless touch-screen computer equipment to cast their votes by that time if currently planned purchases occur. If we wait, hundreds of millions of dollars will be spent on equipment that does not meet the proposed requirements, and the State could be faced with a potentially large bill for the upgrades in 2010. This could even further delay the implementation of voter verification.

Since the task force was purely advisory, Secretary Shelley must now decide what to do. He has opened up a 30 day comment period and is encouraging comments on the Task Force's recommendations. This is our chance to speak up and let Mr. Shelley know how the voting public truly feels about this issue. Otherwise, the only people he will hear from are the few strong advocates of electronic voting, including the companies selling the touch-screen machines.

With another presidential election on the horizon in 2004, we cannot take unnecessary risks with our vote. It's crucial that Californians, and all Americans, have full confidence in our election and voting systems, are convinced that our votes still do count and that our system is accurate, tamper-proof and error-proof.

Call to actionUrge Secretary of State Kevin Shelley to protect the integrity of your vote and impose a requirement for a voter verifiable audit trail for all voting equipment immediately rather than waiting until 2007.

Deadline: August 1, 2003



Peter's note: Below is link to a long, but interesting, article on how vote manipulation is/can be accomplished:

http://pushhamburger.com/black.htm
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Call and Protest Unsecure Touch Screen Voting
New Flawed Voting Method--Call and Protest Unsecure Touch Screen Voting

portion of Task Force report:
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Task Force has agreed that there are four major areas deserving recommendations to the Secretary: Security, Paper Records, Voter Verification, and Independent Verification.....
http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/taskforce_report_4.htm

letter from Kevin Shelley.............

July 2, 2003

Dear Californian:

.....in response to concerns over the security of Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting machines that record votes electronically and the related issue of the value of a paper trail.

I am making this report available for public comment for 30 days. I encourage interested parties to submit comments on the Task Force's recommendations. These comments will be considered in combination with the Report when I issue my directions to the Voting Systems Panel on how California will address these issues.

To submit comments, please

Write to:
Secretary of State Kevin Shelley
Attn: Touch Screen Report
1500 11th Street
Sacramento, CA 95814

Send email to:
TaskForceComments [at] ss.ca.gov

Fax comments to:
(916) 653-9675

This is a very significant issue for the future of California's elections. So I encourage the public to share their views with me.

Sincerely,

KEVIN SHELLEY

http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/taskforce.htm

Write Shelley and tell him we Need Secure Voting Machines, Protections Against Disenfranchisement and Instant Accountability--Keep Paper Trails!
by Albert Kada (davecom [at] io.com)
This very crude and effective open design can be manufactured by competetitive companies.

Reduce chances of dishonesty by using this design.

Contains no computer code. Extremely accurate.

Adapts easily to handicap voter service equipment.

Complete voter anonymity.

Safe, effective, and reliable recounting ability.

Every voter can verify their vote.

As an independent consultant I can assure you that paper ballot
counting by scanners can be corrupted using subtle methods that
won't inspire a recount.

please see the design at http://www.io.com/~davecom/voter/



We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network