From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Darryl Cherney's Speech at annual MAXXAM shareholder meeting in Houston
Wednesday, May 21, marked the annual MAXXAM shareholder meeting at the Marriot West Loop, near the Galleria. Of the 30 or so in attendance, most were on the board and staff of MAXXAM. One of the two environmental activists in attendance read a speech on behalf of Darryl Cherney, a shareholder of MAXXAM and an Earth First! organizer. His speech is as follows:
"Charles Hurwitz and Members of the Board of the MAXXAM Corporation:
I am very sorry that I can not be here today. As you know, I love visiting with you all and singing for Charles in particular. I cherish my five shares and the entrance it provides me to this grand affair. I do hope to pay you a cordial visit in the not too distant future. But for now, we'll have to settle for this statement that I am grateful to my proxy Courtney Clarke for reading.
Up here in the redwoods, things are looking a bit grim and I am concerned for the potential liability that my company may face. I trust that the Board is aware that people who are sitting in trees in peaceful protest are
being ripped down violently without regard to their personal safety by contractors who work for Pacific Lumber, a wholly owned MAXXAM subsidiary.
I can recall when Charles Hurwitz, back at the 1999 MAXXAM shareholder meeting, in front of 200 steelworkers and a cadre of environmentalists,
said to Cindy Alsbrooks, and I quote, "I am sorry for what happened to your son," referring to the death of David "Gypsy" Chain, an environmental activist from Houston.
It was the first time I had ever heard Charles Hurwitz say he was sorry. And Charles, you meant it. And I appreciate that. But there has been a lot of
water under that bridge, and although you can correctly assume that I do not see eye to eye with this Board and do in fact, have an alternate agenda, I can tell you honestly and factually that it is a miracle that another activist hasn't been killed by Pacific Lumber, a wholly owned MAXXAM subsidiary.
So, Charles Hurwitz, when you said your were sorry to Cindy Alsbrooks, did you think at that time that you might have to say your sorry again to another bereaved mother who's child died at your company's hands? Yes, these people are protesting. And yes, they are risking their lives. But they do not deserve to die. I simply want you to understand that I, as a
shareholder, want to recommend in the strongest possible terms that you order your wholly owned subsidiary Pacific Lumber to cease taking actions
that greatly endanger the lives of protesters.
I am not here, at least by proxy, to lecture you all about the irresponsible behavior of your wholly owned subsidiary. I am here, however, to suggest that you all look deeply into your souls and ask yourselves at what point will you kill another human being to make a
dollar. It's happened once. It appears that something severe is going to happen again.
The Forest Peace Alliance that this company arranged into reality with Ms. Alsbrooks as part of the settlement for the wrongful death suit she filed against you, began its venture by establishing some guidelines that the timber fallers should follow when encountering protestors. But laws and rules are only as strong as those who enforce them. Now you can make your excuses about how the people sitting in trees deserve what they get. And you can go on about trespassing laws. But, when you meet your maker, will
you tell him or perhaps her, that the company you directed was willing to kill people who sat in its trees. Imagine that moment, right now, if you will.
Ancient trees are like people to this company. They are something to be calculated on a ledger, given a value, and then exploited or eliminated as profit dictates. That is a given in your world of capital. But the world's capital is not its money, but its resources. And though the current economic systems that dominate the world allow us to grab all we can now, it doesn't mean that we must do so. That is a moral decision.
And that is what I want to leave you with today. To understand that no matter what side of the issue you're on, that this is a moral issue. Can
the corporate leaders of the 21st century decide that they want to be leaders of how we can make the world a better place? Can you conceive of making Pacific Lumber into a model timber company practicing truly
sustained yield? Can you employee people repairing the earth, including the land you've logged and left with landslides and dead streams? Can there be a way a company like MAXXAM can live in harmony with the Earth?
If not, then the company surely will go bankrupt. It will be economically bankrupt, as has most likely been the plan all along. The lots of real estate in the desert will have lost their value because the water tables
will have dried up. The Kaiser Aluminum Company went bankrupt, of course already. And the trees will really be gone, as they have for hundreds of
lumber companies before Pacific Lumber over the millennia. Boom and bust is nothing new.
And it will be morally bankrupt. No concern for the employees, including the staff here at MAXXAM in Houston. No concern for the future economy of
this nation as a whole. No concern for the earth that brings us all the very components of life itself.
So my fellow shareholders and members of the MAXXAM Board, in this heady time in the history of this country, MAXXAM has the opportunity to change
it's course. But of course I know that most likely all of you are set in your ways. But you know what I say. Live dangerously. Set a precedent. And not one to go down as a footnote in the biography of Michael Milken,
but rather one that shows the world that we can all change. If you can do that, it would truly be something to be remembered. If you don't and no one else does either, then there most likely will be no one left to
remember anything anyway.
So go out, have one last steak dinner, and then bust out in the morning and say, we're going to start saving some trees. We're going to start repairing the damage we've all done. And we're going to leave the world looking better than when we found it, just like a real environmentalist.
Thank you."
http://www.jailhurwitz.com/
Darryl Cherney's music homepage: http://www.darrylcherney.com/
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
I've never been to a shareholders meeting - does anyone get to speak? I think the majority of shareholders don't go to the meetings. Is there a way to get the speech out to all those people? Is there a way for shareholders to communicate as a group?
Cherney doesn't want them to get hurt, but yet he has no problem with these people placing themselves hundreds of feet off the ground where they are at high risk. But when people have to physically remove them from from performing this illegal activity, should someone get hurt, he's wants to blame MAXXAM rather than the law breaker.
Here's a parallel for you Darryl. If someone enters my home without permission and I have every reason to believe they are there for no good, i.e. a thief or a robber, I'm going to shoot them. You've got to figure, the mind of someone who says "I'm going to break into someone's home and rob them" has already calculated in his mind that by doing so, he could get shot and killed. But, he's willing to take that chance.
In the same manner, these tree climbers are taking a big risk that they could get injured or even die from tree sits. They understand that their might be those who come along and try to physically remove them, and by resisting such, they place their lives in danger. In other words, they know the risks. Given they know the risks, they shouldn't complain when something goes wrong.
Here's a parallel for you Darryl. If someone enters my home without permission and I have every reason to believe they are there for no good, i.e. a thief or a robber, I'm going to shoot them. You've got to figure, the mind of someone who says "I'm going to break into someone's home and rob them" has already calculated in his mind that by doing so, he could get shot and killed. But, he's willing to take that chance.
In the same manner, these tree climbers are taking a big risk that they could get injured or even die from tree sits. They understand that their might be those who come along and try to physically remove them, and by resisting such, they place their lives in danger. In other words, they know the risks. Given they know the risks, they shouldn't complain when something goes wrong.
'he's wants to blame MAXXAM rather than the law breaker'
He isn't blaming anyone. He's asking if these shareholders want to involved with a situation where lives are and can be lost. It's fairly simple. Looks like you're upset about it. Do you own some of these shares? Or shares in some other company whose profits rely on situations where people may die?
He isn't blaming anyone. He's asking if these shareholders want to involved with a situation where lives are and can be lost. It's fairly simple. Looks like you're upset about it. Do you own some of these shares? Or shares in some other company whose profits rely on situations where people may die?
Your parallel isn't valid. Loggers are breaking Nature's law of not taking more than your need, and keeping your harvest sustainable, i.e. leave a place better than when you arrived.
Tree sitters are attempting to prevent more "breaking and entering" and raping of our plant relatives. Even if you don't believe that last part - that we are all part of an organic whole - surely you see that there is nothing else to do but to defy the real lawbreakers by putting our bodies on the line. When all the forests are gone, the waterways polluted, and the atmosphere full of poison, where will man be then? We'll be lucky if we aren't all dead by our own hands because of the wanton, arrogant destruction of the earth we pursue now.
Wake up! You can be a part of the cure, not remain a part of the sickness. There's no other choice ...
Thanks,
Not a Tree Sitter (but with you in spirit!)
Tree sitters are attempting to prevent more "breaking and entering" and raping of our plant relatives. Even if you don't believe that last part - that we are all part of an organic whole - surely you see that there is nothing else to do but to defy the real lawbreakers by putting our bodies on the line. When all the forests are gone, the waterways polluted, and the atmosphere full of poison, where will man be then? We'll be lucky if we aren't all dead by our own hands because of the wanton, arrogant destruction of the earth we pursue now.
Wake up! You can be a part of the cure, not remain a part of the sickness. There's no other choice ...
Thanks,
Not a Tree Sitter (but with you in spirit!)
Natural Law eh?
This law exists only in your moral constructions. There is no mutual agreeable natural law. Thus, there is no "sickness" associated with those who behave differently than you would have them. Your judgement over others is sad and dehumanizing.
Perhaps such judgement reflects a "sickness" in itself.
Either way, no one opinion or beleif makes one person morally superior to another.
This law exists only in your moral constructions. There is no mutual agreeable natural law. Thus, there is no "sickness" associated with those who behave differently than you would have them. Your judgement over others is sad and dehumanizing.
Perhaps such judgement reflects a "sickness" in itself.
Either way, no one opinion or beleif makes one person morally superior to another.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network