From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Who Is Dr Pablo Stewart and Why Is He Willing To Sacrifice Lives For Newsom Money?
I just heard a debate on KQED between Dr Pablo Stewart and Chris Daly about Cash Not Care. While little new came up it was apparent that Dr Stewart had an agenda beyond reducing homeless deaths. I was struck by his references to SF as a magnate for the homeless and his unwillingness to condemn smear campaigns that by demonizing the homeless add to mental health issues. Is Stuart merely a hypocrite who wants to move homeless people out of SF rather than help them or is something else going on?
Here is a link to audio from the KQED debate online:
http://www.kqed.org/programs/program-landing-local.jsp?progID=RD19
The double talk from the city official interviewed is understandable but a such talk from the "director of psychiatry at the Haight Ashbury Free Clinic" seems very strange. I had heard Stewarts statements about deaths following GA payments before, but this time he makes his broader views clear when he starts making statements about the homeless problem as more of a problem for the city rather than a problem for the homeless themselves.
Perhaps Stewart does have the beliefs he claims to have about ODs and GA checks but why is he always being interviewed as a “health worker” when ALL the call-ins on the program from nurses and doctors (who deal with the homeless) contradicted him? His tone of voice and unwillingness to condemn the anti-homeless billboard campaign has the tone of a party hack rather than a health worker. Which leads one to an obvious question that deserves study? Does Stewart receive any money from Newsom? Does Stewart stand to gain from a Newsom win for mayor (by being promoted to a city position that pays more than his current job)?
Investigative work needs to be done since the use of a supposedly "unbiased homeless advocate" to promote Newsom's far right agenda sets a dangerous precedent. Gavin Newsom’s core base of support is farther to the right than any former mayoral candidate, yet he has enough money to disguise his real agenda with a multi-million dollar PR campaign (including fake call-ins to radio shows, fake letters to the editors, the placement of agent-provocateurs in anti-Newsom protests…). The Haight Ashbury Free Clinic does good work and its name should not be dragged through the mud to promote a far right agenda.
http://www.kqed.org/programs/program-landing-local.jsp?progID=RD19
The double talk from the city official interviewed is understandable but a such talk from the "director of psychiatry at the Haight Ashbury Free Clinic" seems very strange. I had heard Stewarts statements about deaths following GA payments before, but this time he makes his broader views clear when he starts making statements about the homeless problem as more of a problem for the city rather than a problem for the homeless themselves.
Perhaps Stewart does have the beliefs he claims to have about ODs and GA checks but why is he always being interviewed as a “health worker” when ALL the call-ins on the program from nurses and doctors (who deal with the homeless) contradicted him? His tone of voice and unwillingness to condemn the anti-homeless billboard campaign has the tone of a party hack rather than a health worker. Which leads one to an obvious question that deserves study? Does Stewart receive any money from Newsom? Does Stewart stand to gain from a Newsom win for mayor (by being promoted to a city position that pays more than his current job)?
Investigative work needs to be done since the use of a supposedly "unbiased homeless advocate" to promote Newsom's far right agenda sets a dangerous precedent. Gavin Newsom’s core base of support is farther to the right than any former mayoral candidate, yet he has enough money to disguise his real agenda with a multi-million dollar PR campaign (including fake call-ins to radio shows, fake letters to the editors, the placement of agent-provocateurs in anti-Newsom protests…). The Haight Ashbury Free Clinic does good work and its name should not be dragged through the mud to promote a far right agenda.
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Newsome is mobilizing for Tuesday's board meeting
Tue, May 13, 2003 12:10AM
Pablo in action . . .
Mon, May 12, 2003 12:34PM
Darryl Inaba on Pablo Stewart
Mon, May 12, 2003 10:58AM
here's why
Mon, May 12, 2003 10:57AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network