top
Anti-War
Anti-War
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Outrage At Britain and Italy During Protests At EU Meeting In Athens

by Stop The US/UK/Italian War
Reports said a bank had also been set on fire, shop windows smashed, and petrol bombs and other missiles thrown at the UK and Italian embassies.
a1.jpg
Greek riot police have fired tear gas at protesters in violent clashes close to a key European Union summit in Athens.

Reporters said some of the demonstrators threw petrol bombs and red paint at police, after breaking away from a large anti-war protest.

At the summit, all 15 EU states and the 10 new members formally signed a treaty setting in stone the EU's historic eastward expansion.

The 10 newcomers will formally join in May 2004.

But the summit has been overshadowed by the EU's bitter splits over Iraq, which have divided leaders as well as sparking public anger.

The clashes happened in Athens' Syntagma Square, only 300 metres (yards) from the hall where leaders have been meeting.

Reports said a bank had also been set on fire, shop windows smashed, and petrol bombs and other missiles thrown at the UK and Italian embassies.

"There is smoke from Molotov cocktails and tear gas billowing in the air," said Reuters reporter Karolos Grohmann, who witnessed the clashes.

Dozens of protesters were said to have occupied the Athens offices of British Airways, where they erected a large banner reading "Killers, imperialists".

A banner was unfurled at the British Airways building
Ten thousand police officers are believed to be involved in the security operation at the summit.

On his way to Athens, UK Prime Minister Tony Blair visited the German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder - one of Europe's most committed war opponents - in what was seen as a bridge-building mission.

Most EU leaders are thought to be keen to move on from their bitter pre-war splits, and at least agree on how to run and rebuild Iraq after the conflict.

Crucially, they will have to agree on what role the UN should have.

United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan, also attending the two-day summit, will consult key members of the UN Security Council on their views on a future role for the UN in Iraq.

The last few months have shown just how difficult it will be to turn rhetoric about a unified Europe and a common foreign policy into reality, says BBC Europe correspondent Chris Morris.

UK Prime Minister Tony Blair has called on his European allies to put their differences over the war in Iraq behind them and concentrate instead on finding agreement over the best way to reconstruct the country.

Greek Prime Minister Costas Simitis, whose country holds the rotating EU presidency, also urged European leaders to find some ground for unity.

"We must do everything... to reinforce the transatlantic dialogue and avoid any worsening of relations between Europe and the United States," he said on Tuesday.


Police have kept protesters back from summit venue
"In the long term, nobody can govern the world alone."

But there are still strong disagreements over how Iraq should be reconstructed, both economically and politically.

French President Jacques Chirac and Mr Schroeder have both made clear they expect the UN to play a high-profile, central role, covering humanitarian assistance as well as offering some form of political input.

But the United States, which led the military intervention in Iraq, believes it should decide largely how any post-conflict administration is shaped.

While Mr Blair is closely allied to the United States on Iraq policy, he is known to be more enthusiastic than many in Washington about a wider role for the UN.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2952959.stm
§Athens
by Stop The US/UK/Italian War
a2.jpg
§Athens
by Stop The US/UK/Italian War
a3.jpg
§Athens
by Stop The US/UK/Italian War
a4.jpg
§Athens
by Stop The US/UK/Italian War
a5.jpg
§Athens
by Stop The US/UK/Italian War
a6.jpg
§Athens
by Stop The US/UK/Italian War
a7.jpg
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by fasdf
The number arrested for throwing fire bombs and burning banks in Athns is 10-20x less than those arrested for protesting on the sidewalk in SF!! And people claim there is a right to dissent in the US.
by 'lo
1 | 2 | corporate | 4 | 5
by Isolationist
We allow dissenting but we are not tolerant of lettering chaos control of our streets. Dissenting and Chaos are two very different things.
by ko
Dissent and chaos are two different things that are usually confused by the police authorities.
by Scottie
Free speach would not be particularly restricted if protests which require government support (I mean where large amounts of police are required to keep them under control), like the ones we have seen lately, were not allowed.

I liken it to the mafia - sure the mafia in itself is not a bad thing its a group where italian men can get together for some male bonding (it is a refection of the right to free association) - but we all know that they are going to bond some of the men to stones and throw them in the river. Then you have to send thousands of cops out to keep an eye on them.

People could have their free speach as individuals or as organizations they would just have a little more difficulty drawing attention to themselves without the ability to disrupt business and cause vandalism.
by machno
What exactly means free speech.
The use of free speech is relevant if you may act and decide of what to do. Talking about the government and not be able to do anything because you'll be arrested, well this is police state.
Capitalism let you speak but not acting. And when free speech will be dangerous to the government because you are able to gather support, well they are going to take away this free speech and they are going to jufisty as security reason.
by Scottie
Requiring police to monitor protests is just as good an excuse to increace police numbers and powers and move towards a police state as anything else.

Capitalism let you speak but not acting

- All systems do this.. except those that dont let you speak. there are always constraints.

Anyway - Police states tend to hit you like a brick in the face as opposed to like a slow moving of the tide.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$120.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network