top
Iraq
Iraq
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

May 3rd - Global Art Action For Peace

by Athomas Goldberg (athomas [at] worksonshirts.org)
The Works on Shirts Project invites you to take part in "WEARNICA", an international exhibition of artistic reactions to the war in Iraq and continuing conflicts throught the world.

WearnicaBig.gif"

On May 3rd, 2003, The Works on Shirts Project invites you to take part in "WEARNICA", an international exhibition of artistic reactions to war. On the day of the event, participants in over 30 cities in 8 countries around the world (with more locations added daily!) will form walking art galleries, wearing original works they've created on the backs of white dress shirts into museums and monuments, parks and shopping malls to help raise public awareness of the realities of war in our time.

On February 5th, Colin Powell stood before the U. N. to make his case for a new resolution authorizing the U.S. to take military action against Iraq. Notably absent was Picasso's "Guernica", perhaps one of the the twentieth century's greatest, most unsettling artistic images depicting the brutal, self-destructive nature of war. Under pressure from the U.S. Government, The tapestry was covered prior to the Secretary of State's speech out of concern that the painting's message might speak to historical parallels that the Bush administration and UN officials were clearly determined that the media or the public should not make.

In response, the Works on Shirts Project (http://www.worksonshirts.org) has initiated this historic event to give people in the U.S. and around the world an opportunity to follow Picasso's example by publicly expressing their own personal reactions to the war in Iraq and continuing conflicts throughout the world.

Here's what YOU can do:

By staging an event in your area, making a financial contribution or just spreading the word, you can help send a message to the Bush administration, the U.N. and the world that the power of art to reveal the horrors of war and the promise of peace cannot be covered up.

The Idea is Simple:

By creating original war-inspired artwork that can be worn as clothing, it's possible to stage an art exhibition in any location open to the public. As long as the participants conform to the standard behavior for the general public in the space, the white dress shirts will visually tie the pieces together, and the images will speak for themselves.

Toronto Star art critic Peter Goddard wrote of the Guernica coverup: "If there is a war with Iraq, there's already been the first casualty — art." We can change that. Where one image has been silenced, a thousand may drown out the drums of war forever.

Those interested in learning more about this event and how they can participate should visit: http://www.worksonshirts.org or contact info@worksonshirts.org

Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Aaron
I humbly submit to your organization, the attempt to counter "the Guernica cover-up" is based on misinformation. Perhaps by checking your facts a little more carefully you and other organizations that have perpetuated the misinformation about the "cover-up" would have found that Guernica was covered due to space, considerations for a Powell news conference as well as a request from the cameraman that the background was to busy for TV...Yikes--by all means continue to speak out against war but at least double check the facts to make sure your assertions are accurate!
by just wondering
And we should believe this, why?
by Brian Wallace
Even if the request that the mural be covered arose from 'innocent' requests from cameramen concerned about visually neutral backdrops, what does this say about the level of education of these individuals that they were ignorant as to the identity of the artwork? And what does it say about the expectations of (and consumer demands upon) the organizations that employ these individuals?
by Arthur Frayn (arthurfrayn [at] yahoo.com)
From the Daily Standard:

The "Guernica" Myth
You may have heard the story about how Colin Powell forced the U.N. to cover Picasso's "Guernica" while he made the case for war in Iraq. It isn't true.
by Claudia Winkler

Read the article for the truth.
by Perry White
>I asked a British diplomat assigned to the Security Council what had actually happened. A spokeswoman for the U.N. Secretariat independently confirmed the diplomat's version of events in all its particulars.



Secondhand hearsay from unnamed sources. Sloppy, very sloppy.
by John Henderson (john.henderson [at] nyu.edu)
"Under pressure from the U.S. Government, The tapestry was covered prior to the Secretary of State's speech out of concern that the painting's message might speak to historical parallels that the Bush administration and UN officials were clearly determined that the media or the public should not make."

You might have a better chance at being taken seriously if you didn't spout nonsense like the statement above that are easily shown to be false.
by Perry White
OK, then, show it to be false. Secondhand hearsay from unnamed sources don't count.
by by Claudia Winkler
It is difficult for those pursuing a goal of destruction to accept and recognize the truth.
by David Pittelli (DWPittellI [at] aol.com)
I haven't seen any credited, first-hand versions claiming that Guernica was censored for content.
by Ben
It seems to me that the cover-up accusastion should have to be proven true. You can't just fling mud at someone without backing it with any sources or facts whatsoever. I am anti-Bush and anti-war, but even this goes too far.
by Jack
And just who are the "named" sources that prove that the Bush administration ordered the painting blocked? And since when does the UN condescend to acquiesce to the US's requests?--particularly from a Republican administration.
by Tom Sylvester
Since you say that "second hand hearsay from unknown sources don't [sic] count", please identify your source of first-hand knowledge supporting your claim that "Guernica" was covered at the request of the Bush administration or Colin Powell, or that the painting was ever covered up at all. If you want to be taken seriously, you should provide proof supporting your assertion that a particular event occured, since you obviously weren't there to witness it. (Or were you one of the 800+ reporters covering Powell's speech at the UN?) No one needs to say anything to negate a claim that was never proven to be true in the first place.
by cynical but sadly correct
Sadly, does anyone think that the Bush administration is so misinformed as to think that Americans would:
1) recognize the Guernica painting (even if they saw the whole thing unobstructed);
2) Know what historical event the painting is about;
3) or have the vaguest understanding about the symbolism inherent in the work.

I WISH that this weren't the case, but unfortunately in our McDonald's, Soap Opera, Must See TV culture, most people probably think Guernica is a either a country or a new flavor from Baskin Robbins.
by Dave Walter
If the essence of art is an attempt to represent some truth about life and the essence of propaganda is to distort truth for a polical objective, then why would anyone with an interest in art or truth participate in this abuse of the Guernica painting to promote propaganda? The ony reason I can think of is if you believe that two wrongs (the original lie about hiding the painting + the use of the painting to protest the 'hiding') somehow make it right.
by Athomas Goldberg (athomas [at] worksonshirts.org)
As the author of the posting in question, I think it makes sense for me to respond to this thread.

First off, I'd like to say that after reading several articles regarding the incident at the UN, it is my belief that what I wrote in the posting is true. That said, I must confess that this is my own interpretation of the events, and that, were I a journalist, I would probably have better qualified the statement to indicate as much, and have made revisions to the website (http://www.worksonshirts.org) that reflect this. Links to some of the articles that led me to this conclusion are available on the site http://www.worksonshirts.org/links.htm and I leave it to the reader to judge for themselves the veracity of these sources.

Regrettably, the controversy over this incident has overshadowed (at least in the eyes of those participating in this thread) the event the posting was intended to promote. While the controversial events of February 5th served to bring Picasso's painting into the public eye, it was the painting and not the incident that was the inspiration for this event, and it is the painting that I hope those who participate in this event will draw on for inspiration in their work.

If there are those out there who support or oppose the idea of event itself, namely an international display of artistic reactions to war, I would be interested in hearing your views.

I have no doubt that by posting this, I am only opening myself up to further criticism, which I suppose is to be expected, but as I am interested in your feedback, good or bad, I am compelled to post it.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$190.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network