From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
SF Chronicle suspends tech jurno for going to no war rally
Much-loved computer columnist Henry Norr has been suspended by the Hearst Corporation - owners of The San Francisco Chronicle - for expressing political views on his day off.
Tech writer iced for expressing opinion
Posted: 29/03/2003 at 11:21 GMT
Much-loved computer columnist Henry Norr has been suspended by the Hearst Corporation - owners of The San Francisco Chronicle - for expressing political views on his day off.
Along with two thousand other citizens, including the former head of the Pacific Stock Exchange, Norr was arrested in San Francisco last week as he was protesting the US-British invasion of Iraq. He emailed the paper to say he would be late the next day. But the cowardly Chronicle insisted on calling creating a time card dispute, and Norr is currently suspended without pay.
"This is a bogus, after-the-fact cover for an act of political retaliation and an attempt to intimidate other employees," Norr wrote in an email to Jim Romensko.
That his employer should take on the role of policing what employees do in their own time is a remarkable act of corporate coercion.
Norr doesn't even do political reporting. "I write about things like (e-mail) spam," he told Reuters.
Don't be so modest, Henry. His Monday tech column Tech 21 is a rare beast: the former MacWeek editor completely eschews the kind of gushing, techno-utopioan advertorials that are now the norm for mainstream publications in favor of a gentle and wise, and hugely-well-informed skepticism. He also breaks stories. In other words, he one of the paper's best assets.
But the punishment lasts for a "minimum" of two weeks.
Norr's shabby treatment highlights one of the absurdities of the US media: it requires its staff to behave like eunuchs. This strange hangover from the days of the Puritan ducking stool baffles visitors, but keeps a mini-industry of "Journalism Schools" and ethics committees busy.
Which is why, after the long editorial filleting process of removing anything that might cause offense to anyone has been completed, you end up with newspapers that don't have any news in them.
"Total objectivity is an illusion," Norr eloquently explained yesterday. "Everybody has views on important issues, at least most people do."
"Objectivity" - a word you only hear in the USA - isn't just an illusion, it's a metaphysical impossibility. Although your tolerance for "objectivity" is bound to be highly selective. Clear Channel Communications - which dominates commercial radio in the USA - recently sponsored pro-Invasion rallies and yesterday a Fox News Channel anchor opened a news segment with the words "800 Iraqis ... and we pasted them!" But you know that these voices are human, they may be slanted, that owners exert influence, but hey - you're grown up adults. Take your pick.
"The best journalism comes from people who are engaged in the world around them," added Norr, who are not just blinkered scribes who sit there at the keyboard and write stories, but people who have passions and feelings and engagement."
The ducking stool treatment meted out to Norr by the Hearst Corporation, which owns the Comical, has already rung alarm bells in the Macintosh community, where where Norr is widely respected:-
"Punishing him at work for expressing a political view on what he thought was his own time is a dangerous way to proceed in a democracy," writes Applelinks' John Farr.
Yesterday, San Francisco citizens made their own protest at their city paper's anodyne coverage of the Invasion - no pictures of civilian casualties, but lots of light, "color" pieces from embedded correspondents - by dumping fake blood at the newspaper's offices.
Reporters without Borders, an international organization which tries to measure coercion against the free press, ranks the USA at17th in its estimation of press freedom - behind Costa Rica.
Along with two thousand other citizens, including the former head of the Pacific Stock Exchange, Norr was arrested in San Francisco last week as he was protesting the US-British invasion of Iraq. He emailed the paper to say he would be late the next day. But the cowardly Chronicle insisted on calling creating a time card dispute, and Norr is currently suspended without pay.
"This is a bogus, after-the-fact cover for an act of political retaliation and an attempt to intimidate other employees," Norr wrote in an email to Jim Romensko.
That his employer should take on the role of policing what employees do in their own time is a remarkable act of corporate coercion.
Norr doesn't even do political reporting. "I write about things like (e-mail) spam," he told Reuters.
Don't be so modest, Henry. His Monday tech column Tech 21 is a rare beast: the former MacWeek editor completely eschews the kind of gushing, techno-utopioan advertorials that are now the norm for mainstream publications in favor of a gentle and wise, and hugely-well-informed skepticism. He also breaks stories. In other words, he one of the paper's best assets.
But the punishment lasts for a "minimum" of two weeks.
Norr's shabby treatment highlights one of the absurdities of the US media: it requires its staff to behave like eunuchs. This strange hangover from the days of the Puritan ducking stool baffles visitors, but keeps a mini-industry of "Journalism Schools" and ethics committees busy.
Which is why, after the long editorial filleting process of removing anything that might cause offense to anyone has been completed, you end up with newspapers that don't have any news in them.
"Total objectivity is an illusion," Norr eloquently explained yesterday. "Everybody has views on important issues, at least most people do."
"Objectivity" - a word you only hear in the USA - isn't just an illusion, it's a metaphysical impossibility. Although your tolerance for "objectivity" is bound to be highly selective. Clear Channel Communications - which dominates commercial radio in the USA - recently sponsored pro-Invasion rallies and yesterday a Fox News Channel anchor opened a news segment with the words "800 Iraqis ... and we pasted them!" But you know that these voices are human, they may be slanted, that owners exert influence, but hey - you're grown up adults. Take your pick.
"The best journalism comes from people who are engaged in the world around them," added Norr, who are not just blinkered scribes who sit there at the keyboard and write stories, but people who have passions and feelings and engagement."
The ducking stool treatment meted out to Norr by the Hearst Corporation, which owns the Comical, has already rung alarm bells in the Macintosh community, where where Norr is widely respected:-
"Punishing him at work for expressing a political view on what he thought was his own time is a dangerous way to proceed in a democracy," writes Applelinks' John Farr.
Yesterday, San Francisco citizens made their own protest at their city paper's anodyne coverage of the Invasion - no pictures of civilian casualties, but lots of light, "color" pieces from embedded correspondents - by dumping fake blood at the newspaper's offices.
Reporters without Borders, an international organization which tries to measure coercion against the free press, ranks the USA at17th in its estimation of press freedom - behind Costa Rica.
For more information:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/28/30...
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
He didn't get suspended for going to the rally.
He got suspended for claiming a sick day when he went to the rally. Same thing happens when you call in sick, take the money, and then your bosses see you on TV attending a baseball game.
He lied.
He took money under false pretenses. He says he was sick --- yet he was healthy enough to go to the rally. Calling in sick means you are too sick to get to the office, that you need to saty home and recuperate. If he took a day without pay -- IF HE HAD SOME BALLS TO PAY FOR HIS PROTEST WITH LOSS PAY -- LIKE A LOT OF US WHO GOT FUCKED OVER BY YOU ASSHOLE PROTESTORS -- IF HE WAS JUST HONEST --- he wouldn't be in trouble.
Good for the Chron.
Burn the fucker.
He got suspended for claiming a sick day when he went to the rally. Same thing happens when you call in sick, take the money, and then your bosses see you on TV attending a baseball game.
He lied.
He took money under false pretenses. He says he was sick --- yet he was healthy enough to go to the rally. Calling in sick means you are too sick to get to the office, that you need to saty home and recuperate. If he took a day without pay -- IF HE HAD SOME BALLS TO PAY FOR HIS PROTEST WITH LOSS PAY -- LIKE A LOT OF US WHO GOT FUCKED OVER BY YOU ASSHOLE PROTESTORS -- IF HE WAS JUST HONEST --- he wouldn't be in trouble.
Good for the Chron.
Burn the fucker.
"He got suspended for claiming a sick day when he went to the rally. "
I've worked at quite a few jobs downtown doing tech work and at just about every one a personal day and a sick day are treated the same (we got them seperate but were encouraged to use sick days first since they didnt roll over into new years)
I really doubt anyone would get suspended for this reason unless there was something else going on. The reporter probably wasnt seen as "fitting in with the team" and this was the excuse used to suspend him. Personally if I was in that situation I would quit right away since its a clear sign of a bad employer (even Fortune 500 firms Ive worked for would understand that the strength of my beliefs would justify the lack of notice given on a sick day when the war started)
The Chronicle has become pretty right-wing (in the SF/Willie Brown Democratic Party machine way) and I'm sure they were surpised that one of their own supported the protests.
I already get most of my news online and I have started turning to other papers (like the Oakland Tribune and San Jose Mercury News) when I want to buy a paper. SF really isnt a one paper town and the Chronicle needs to be shown that when it disrespects a good portion of its readers, it can have an impact on their bottom line...
I've worked at quite a few jobs downtown doing tech work and at just about every one a personal day and a sick day are treated the same (we got them seperate but were encouraged to use sick days first since they didnt roll over into new years)
I really doubt anyone would get suspended for this reason unless there was something else going on. The reporter probably wasnt seen as "fitting in with the team" and this was the excuse used to suspend him. Personally if I was in that situation I would quit right away since its a clear sign of a bad employer (even Fortune 500 firms Ive worked for would understand that the strength of my beliefs would justify the lack of notice given on a sick day when the war started)
The Chronicle has become pretty right-wing (in the SF/Willie Brown Democratic Party machine way) and I'm sure they were surpised that one of their own supported the protests.
I already get most of my news online and I have started turning to other papers (like the Oakland Tribune and San Jose Mercury News) when I want to buy a paper. SF really isnt a one paper town and the Chronicle needs to be shown that when it disrespects a good portion of its readers, it can have an impact on their bottom line...
Hearst corp owns ALL of the dailies in the entire bay area, the Trib, The Merc, alla 'em. At least if you are reading the chomical you get an entire page of misinformed drivel and AP reports of local happenings intead of 1 paragraph blurbs of misinformation and filtered AP reports of local happenings.
And after seeing papers from other large cities, on par with SF and the surrounding cities, I'd say the big papers all do the same thing. Denver post, Chicago area papers, LA times, New york newsday, Miami herald, etc. You want more news and a broader perspective, it's propbably a better idea to look at anything BUT a daily paper, (except during your lunch hour) and keep reading (and participating in) Indymedia, democracy now, and for that matter, chron watch etc.
Tom
And after seeing papers from other large cities, on par with SF and the surrounding cities, I'd say the big papers all do the same thing. Denver post, Chicago area papers, LA times, New york newsday, Miami herald, etc. You want more news and a broader perspective, it's propbably a better idea to look at anything BUT a daily paper, (except during your lunch hour) and keep reading (and participating in) Indymedia, democracy now, and for that matter, chron watch etc.
Tom
Get your facts straight, Tom. the Oakland Tribune is owned by the Alameda Newspaper Group (ANG). The SJ Mercury is owned by Knight-Ridder.
It doesn't help to spread misinformation.
It doesn't help to spread misinformation.
You used "Not!"
My god. Are you in junior high in 1991?
I'm so concerned that you don't consider me legit.
And the reporter still lied. It doesn't matter if other orgs would let him lie, he lied. He pays the price.
BURN HIM!!!!
My god. Are you in junior high in 1991?
I'm so concerned that you don't consider me legit.
And the reporter still lied. It doesn't matter if other orgs would let him lie, he lied. He pays the price.
BURN HIM!!!!
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network