top
Environment
Environment
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

tensions escalate at Freshwater tree-sits

by repost
Activists supporting the on-going tree-sits in the Freshwater watershed expressed concern today as a fight broke out between Pacific Lumber employees and a person unknown to the activists.

Bay Area Coalition for Headwaters

For immediate release
March 28, 2003
Contact: Karen Pickett

Activists Concerned As Tensions Escalate in the Forest

Unknown Person Provokes Violence in Freshwater

Activists supporting the on-going tree-sits in the Freshwater watershed expressed concern today as a fight broke out between Pacific Lumber employees and a person unknown to the activists. The activists associated with Earth First! and others carrying out the protests in opposition to liquidation logging by Maxxam/Pacific Lumber have been resolute in their commitment to non-violent tactics, even in the face of violence. Protesters have been assaulted, hog-tied, and placed in extremely dangerous circumstances as PL-hired climbers have been carrying out a campaign to remove tree-sitters from their perches in giant old growth trees. Climbers have in some cases climbed the redwood trees 150 to 200 feet up, hand-cuffed activists' wrists and ankles before lowering them to the ground. At least two criminal assault complaints have been filed by activists injured on the ground. In the face of all this, activists have not only remained non-violent, but insisted that everyone participating in the protests attend non-violence trainings.

However, on Friday morning a person not affiliated with any of the activists entered Pacific Lumber property near the tree-sits and ended up in a physical altercation with PL security and loggers. This individual was in this area on his own accordance and entered into the fall zone area. As activists yelled at him to stop, he allegedly brandished a knife, was apprehended by the logging contractor's security personnel and was arrested.

Tree-sitter Opal, who was present at the scene said, "We do not condone this behavior. We do not know who this guy is, or where he is from. He is certainly not with Earth First! He showed up a couple weeks ago out of the blue, encouraging behavior that is contrary to our non-violence code. We do not know if he is a provocateur or wingnut or both. He is not in any way, a representative of the forest defense movement. We urge all newcomers, to participate in non-violence training. We also ask that Pacific Lumber stop cutting trees within tree-sit areas in order to diffuse tensions."

At last Tuesday's Humboldt county Board of Supervisor's meeting, tree-sitter Remedy, who lived in an old growth redwood tree in Freshwater for 362 days, urged the supervisors to help prevent further casualties as tensions mount, asking them to recognize the casualties already incurred due to Maxxam's takeover of Humboldt county resources, including:
--Once- abundant runs of Salmon
--Countless hillsides
--Several families' homes in Stafford, buried in mud
--The intergrity of state agencies, specifically Calif. Dept. of Forestry and the Board of Forestry
--Truth
--Justice
--David Nathan Chain aka "Gypsy", killed in 1998 when an angry PL logger felled a tree on him.

As protests continue, PL is in court answering environmental groups and the Steelworkers union challenge to their Sustained Yeild Plan, and the county DA has filed a $250 million fraud lawsuit.

### --
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Mike (stepbystepfarm [at] shaysnet.com)
YOU don't get to define this.

You CAN'T say "He is certainly not with Earth First!" Not simply based upon his not being committed to non-violence. Commitment to "non-violence" is NOT a prerequisite (though perhaps the majority of EF!ers are).

You cannot say he is not in any way a representaitve part of the forest defense movement.. We simply have no idea how many forest defenders choose to defend the forests through other ways than civil disobedience.

Wingnut? Here I'll agree with you. I don't think violence in defense of the forests would be useful. But IF he were resolved on using violence, then he was woefully unprepared (underarmed).
by whywingnut
Wingnuts are people who are aware of the serious problems presented by environmental destruction, yet choose methods of protest that are very different from more organized protesters. It is an issue throughout many activist communities, and needs to be discussed and included in the larger activist community.

Here's a scenario; Some guy from Philly finds out he has lead poisoning from the drinking water pipes. He wants to find out more about the symptoms and causes. This leads him on a search from the aluminum industry to Maxxam corporation, and everything inbetween. Due to his traditional upbringing, he has difficulty relating to the activists liberated lifestyle, yet he still feels anger towards the industrialist polluters / forest destroyers. Increasing physical mental stress cause his thinking to become less logical, and he lashes out against the oppressive loggers as representatives of the system..

This is one possibility, everything else in the Universe. We are all under a great deal of stress and feel great anger against the system. Some people discover their anger almost instantaneously due to personal circumstances. This can emerge in a sudden reaction, too much pent up stress..

Nothing like a clove of fresh garlic when feeling stressed out..
by Wildcat
It is an interesting tactic, the exclusion of the intelligent, honest opinions of a different perspective, yet the inclusion of the raving, foaming at the mouth responses to being silenced. I can understand the designers of this site are doing what they can to favor the opinions they hold. Were I to run a site, the result may be much the same. Remember that the whole truth is not possessed in a biased perspective. I had hoped that this site could provide a useful platform of discourse for all spectrums of issues. That appears to not be the case.
Either way I hope all folks involved can realize that despite the slant, there are human beings on all sides of every conflict. The problems of our world lie not in the heart but in the head.

Meow
by one of the editors
Hitler was a human, too. So was Vlad the Impaler. So what? Just because you're a human being doesn't mean that we are going to put our time, money, energy and skills in your service. We refuse to allow our site to be hijacked by our freeloading, parasite enemies to promote their sick, evil agendas.

But FWIW, we never "censor" anything. We simply move it to where our friends and allies, for whose benefit we run this site, don't have to look at it unless they want to. This is how we do it here. Get used to it. We're not going to change, just because our enemies whine about it. Anybody who doesn't like how we do things here can go somewhere else.
by joe bob
i am interested to hear from curt and treemom regarding indymedia's censorship of the writer named "sinner." you 2 seem to be the only ones able to converse with this guy. how do you feel about the silencing of the "sinner"?
by sinner
How can you be offended at what you claim is my hijacking of your site? I have a vested interest in what happens in Humboldt county. I am born and raised here, and I love the trees, hills, rivers, ocean, mountains, prairies, weather and the people here. It means more to me than to the people who are temporarily passing through or taking a transient interest in this region and its issues. Unlike them, I am not leaving, so what happens here is of vital interest to me, and indeed it is you who strike me as being the hijacker of these things that I both enjoy and work with because you uniformly discount my views. So I discount yours in return.

In the THP review process, the general public is given a chance to comment on what is happening. This sometimes accomplishes nothing, but sometimes those commenst do raise valid points to consider. Many consider this to be a imposed highjacking of an involved process, for these comments are often disruptive rather than constructive. I demand the same right on this site!

I notice that you are not reluctant to publish inane rantings from both sides of the timber fight. I also notice the growing trend to censure rational argumentation and opinions. Do these logically expressed and supported communications threaten you? Or are you simply more comfortably with base, lowbrow rantings? If you were truly intrerested in a solution, in protecting things, you would get real and join in instead of censoring my commentary.
by curt
While I don’t share sinner’s viewpoints I would argue that his posts shouldn’t be censored . I’d add that his posts are typified by insults and taunts which add little to constructive public debate. If we aren’t able to be tolerant and humane from the safety of our home p.c.’s we have little hope for conducting ourselves civilly in society. The best way to respond towards insult and hyperbole is to ignore the post and carry on with our discussions.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$110.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network