From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
U.S. To Fuel Sick Economy With Reconstruction Contracts Paid By Iraqi Oil
After using expensive weaponry to destroy Iraqi infrastructure and killing thousands of human beings, The U.S. will rebuild Iraq using a restricted bidding process made up of American contractors only.A subsidiary of Halliburton, the firm formerly headed by the US vice-president, Dick Cheney, is a member of one of four consortia whose bids were invited in a secret process last month. Several of the firms are major Republican party donors. Weapons manufacturers and Construction firms both win. Iraqi oil will pay whatever their asking price is, to fuel our U.S. economic upturn...US administration officials would act as "shadow ministers", keeping a close eye on Iraq's new government.
US firms get $1.5bn deal to rebuild Iraq
Oliver Burkeman in Washington
Tuesday March 18, 2003
The Guardian
The United States plans to transform the infrastructure of Iraq within a year of a war ending, but has sidelined aid agencies by allocating almost all the funds available to private American firms.
Non-governmental organisations and the UN would get just $50m, a tiny fraction of the $1.5bn being offered to private companies, according to more than 100 pages of confidential contract documents leaked to the Wall Street Journal.
In the Azores at the weekend, President George Bush emphasised the need for a significant UN role in a postwar Iraq, a stance the administration considers essential to maintaining some degree of multilateral backing for military action and its aftermath.
But Washington's plan - backed by a request for cash that the White House is expected to submit to Congress soon - envisages a rapid reconstruction process led by US corporations, repairing Iraq's infrastructure and reforming its educational, healthcare and financial systems, with many results evident before a year has passed.
US administration officials would act as "shadow ministers", keeping a close eye on Iraq's new government.
The UN Development Programme, which has traditionally coordinated many postwar rebuilding schemes, estimates that reconstruction could cost $10bn a year, over at least three years - whereas the request to Congress is expected to demand a total of $1.8bn for reconstruction in the first year, and $800m for humanitarian assistance, the Journal reported.
Washington has restricted the initial bidding process - for contracts worth $900m - to American firms, invoking emergency regulations that allow companies to sidestep the usual open procedures.
A subsidiary of Halliburton, the firm formerly headed by the US vice-president, Dick Cheney, is a member of one of four consortia whose bids were invited in a secret process last month. Several of the firms are major Republican party donors.
The Bush administration intends to make sure the Iraqi people know that the US has taken the central role in rebuilding, in an effort to shore up public opinion there, the leaked documents suggest.
Officials at USAID, the government department coordinating the plan, believe that a more multilateral approach could see projects getting bogged down.
Ellen Yount, a USAID spokesperson, said non-American firms were not excluded from the process because they could serve in subcontract roles, and might be candidates for future bidding rounds.
The USAID plans have been roundly condemned by NGOs and representatives of the EU and UN.
Mark Malloch Brown, head of the UN Development Programme, said the one-year deadline "flies in the face of human history," while Chris Patten, the EU's external affairs commissioner, has called the US approach "exceptionally maladroit".
Oliver Burkeman in Washington
Tuesday March 18, 2003
The Guardian
The United States plans to transform the infrastructure of Iraq within a year of a war ending, but has sidelined aid agencies by allocating almost all the funds available to private American firms.
Non-governmental organisations and the UN would get just $50m, a tiny fraction of the $1.5bn being offered to private companies, according to more than 100 pages of confidential contract documents leaked to the Wall Street Journal.
In the Azores at the weekend, President George Bush emphasised the need for a significant UN role in a postwar Iraq, a stance the administration considers essential to maintaining some degree of multilateral backing for military action and its aftermath.
But Washington's plan - backed by a request for cash that the White House is expected to submit to Congress soon - envisages a rapid reconstruction process led by US corporations, repairing Iraq's infrastructure and reforming its educational, healthcare and financial systems, with many results evident before a year has passed.
US administration officials would act as "shadow ministers", keeping a close eye on Iraq's new government.
The UN Development Programme, which has traditionally coordinated many postwar rebuilding schemes, estimates that reconstruction could cost $10bn a year, over at least three years - whereas the request to Congress is expected to demand a total of $1.8bn for reconstruction in the first year, and $800m for humanitarian assistance, the Journal reported.
Washington has restricted the initial bidding process - for contracts worth $900m - to American firms, invoking emergency regulations that allow companies to sidestep the usual open procedures.
A subsidiary of Halliburton, the firm formerly headed by the US vice-president, Dick Cheney, is a member of one of four consortia whose bids were invited in a secret process last month. Several of the firms are major Republican party donors.
The Bush administration intends to make sure the Iraqi people know that the US has taken the central role in rebuilding, in an effort to shore up public opinion there, the leaked documents suggest.
Officials at USAID, the government department coordinating the plan, believe that a more multilateral approach could see projects getting bogged down.
Ellen Yount, a USAID spokesperson, said non-American firms were not excluded from the process because they could serve in subcontract roles, and might be candidates for future bidding rounds.
The USAID plans have been roundly condemned by NGOs and representatives of the EU and UN.
Mark Malloch Brown, head of the UN Development Programme, said the one-year deadline "flies in the face of human history," while Chris Patten, the EU's external affairs commissioner, has called the US approach "exceptionally maladroit".
For more information:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,1227...
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
... we see a story appearing in a foreign newspaper that should be appearing in an ameircan newspaper. no one would know what this story has to tell if it weren't for this open newswire, or a book shop where this and other foreign newspapers can be bought.
see kids, it pays to be connected, like these corporations are to the u.s. government. you really don't have to do any work to get multi-million dollar contracts from the government. all you have to do is have the right connections. the government creates the mess, and then they hire you to clean it up. and then they expect you to fund their election campaigns. what a nice, tidy little scheme...
i like the bit about iraqi oil being appropriated by the u.s. and used to pay for rebuilding iraq from the damage caused by a u.s. war. this after hearing so many lies about "the oil belongs to the iraqi people" and this war has "literally nothing to do with oil." sure. gimme a fucking break...
see kids, it pays to be connected, like these corporations are to the u.s. government. you really don't have to do any work to get multi-million dollar contracts from the government. all you have to do is have the right connections. the government creates the mess, and then they hire you to clean it up. and then they expect you to fund their election campaigns. what a nice, tidy little scheme...
i like the bit about iraqi oil being appropriated by the u.s. and used to pay for rebuilding iraq from the damage caused by a u.s. war. this after hearing so many lies about "the oil belongs to the iraqi people" and this war has "literally nothing to do with oil." sure. gimme a fucking break...
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network