SFPD internal memos: unauthorized undercover operations

this:

http://www.indybay.org/news/2003/03/1582290.php

Time for the police to re-visit the policy re: surveilance. No reason for them not to use all available resources to identify those who damage property.

why are you so worried about property damage??

any damage done is to bring attention to this fucked up system that is causing many people to suffer and to bring an end to it as soon as possible. property is inconsequential. and locking people up because they have the courage to take a stand against injustice is just plain wrong.

Then let us know where your personal property is located so we can destroy it, "to bring attention to this fucked up situation". I would venture to say you dont own squat.

but i really don't own much of anything.

Why are you NOT worried about the damage to the human flesh of the scores of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians who will be slaughtered for profit in a few days?

"If I devote myself to other pursuits and contemplations, I must first see, at least, that I do not pursue them sitting upon another man's shoulders. I must get off him first, that he may pursue his contemplations too." -Thoreau
So then why attack a person for advocating property distruction, who has no property? He has only proven himself not to be a hypocrit.
If a man is on another man's shoulders, is it not also right to remove him once you have removed yourself? "Property is theft" in a myriad of ways. Distruction of property may be considered a punishment for the grandest of all theives: copreate powers.
The police should be the ones redistributing the wealth to those who need it and punishing the Robber Barrons of the new Amerika, we shouldn't have to do it for them.
....or I might be wrong, you decide.