Florida Men Strip for Peace
Deeply troubled by the looming war against Iraq, these serious peace advocates determined to express their heartfelt desire for peace, by crafting the word "PEACE" and the Peace Sign with their nude bodies. These images were captured on film by renowned photojournalist and nature photographer, John Moran.
The statement of this photo moment was enriched by the fact that many of the men who came together to create these images were previously unknown to each other. They were bound together by only one thing; their united desire to stop the American war machine. " What we did was outrageous, because war is outrageous," exclaimed Bob Ellenberg. "All the peace loving people in the world need to see what we have done." This depth of passion was echoed by Frank Gubasta, who said, "I'd die for a better/peaceful world for my sons to grow up in." These men intended for their act to be a dramatic statement and they want the chance to express themselves about war and peace. A candidate for Tampa City Council, Kelly Benjamin, says, "I'd love to talk with anyone about peaceful alternatives to this stupid war."
As the photo session took place, the act took on a somber aspect. One of the participants, Jim Cameron, describes the scene as the men moved to take up their assigned positions. "As we walked in a broken group through the tall grass, I was deeply touched at the sight of everyone against the hills, trees, sunlight and blue sky. The group was composed of young college students, old hippies, alternative culture folks and Viet Nam vets. But the sight of everyone wading through the tall grass was so archetypical and I guess reminiscent of the tragedy of war." Once the men were posed for the photograph, Mark Kamleiter, an attorney and peace activist, was struck by the same symbolism. "These bodies, pale and white, laid out, exposed on the ground resembled, symbolically, the dead that the pending war with Iraq will most certainly produce."
This peace action was organized by Diane Cardin-Kamleiter and Linda Pollini, two Green Party peace activists. It sprang from a growing sense of urgency as this country rushes to war. Despite at large peace demonstrations around the country, the media has largely ignored the steadily growing peace movement. Even the most conservative polls show that almost half of the citizens in this county do not want a war with Iraq, yet the mainstream media has neglected serious treatment of the anti-war sentiment in this country.
Peace activists have been left wondering what will it take to make the press stop, look and listen to their earnest peace message. Maybe the media can ignore 200,000 demonstrating in Washington, D.C., but would they be able to ignore a group of naked men, willing to set aside their modesty in order to get their message out? Once the idea was seized upon there was no stopping it.
What is sought from this daring act? That all those who see these photographs stop and reflect on their meaning and hear the message of Peace.
Any and every action for peace works toward peace. All action against peace works against peace.
Spread peace. It's up to you.
Whew! I thought I was going to have to put a picture of my butt on this site to disprove how big my "friend" thought it was.
Theresa Smith
Of course, there are some who believe that there is something immoral about being naked, but they are just hillbillies or rag heads, and their opinion doesn't really matter anyway.
What a great idea! Using our bodies to protest and to deliver a unified message is a great way to get attention in a time when we are transitioning from the old world of body-negative values to one of greater body-awareness and greater freedom of expression.
It is interesting to hear other peoples' comments on this simple action. What could be more innocent than the human body in its most natural state? Its kinda scary to see how open people are about their negative views of the body. It is clear that there is such a great need for body-postive outreach.
For more info on how people are using their bodies in positive ways in your community visit b o d y f r e e d o m . o r g and get involved!
Vote Republican and re-elect a president who wouldn't know narcissism if he smoked it and who, if he could spell, would spell both naiveté, and nonsense with capital letters.
These guys me be a bunch of nuts but they're nuts in a green field in Florida not in the White House.
although it seems to be by a small minority of people, it appears that there is a direct opposite reaction to the republican war machine. the peaceful individuals within america are pushing for freedom from repression. most of the individuals pursuing freedom and peace are doing so in ways that ONLY freak out the establishment or those that created the establishment. i think regular folks in the middle do not care either way about a couple naked men in gainesville. it is good that people protest in ways that they are comfortable with and that do not harm others that might not share their views. this is the new peace movement.
if nudity offends you, than you are an individual who is not at peace with the laws of nature. search and read information available to you throught the internet and you too will discover that it is prudish, closed-minded beliefs that hold you back from enjoying the laws of nature. or maybe you were born with a suit and tie?
i guess people need to feel repressed by their "elected" officials before they start to demonstrate. thanks to all the thoughts shared on this site (pro and con) - i only wish i new about the g-ville peace rally, i would have loved to join in.
All I can think about when I see this photo is how tight my sphincter gets. These guys are homos of the highest order. Very scary.
by TA • Monday December 30, 2002 at 02:22 PM
that's a different TA, not me.
So is a bunch of guys stripping down and posing for a a photo shoot our in the gardens.
Obsessing about what other people do with their pee-pees is unnatural behavior.
Seriously, you should seek therapy.
When I saw the even larger one, now with both men and women, and how it's getting better and better, I started to wonder if this might really turn into something . .. . excellent. Will the moron media sideshow decide to frenzy at the sight of the response to this much flesh, and even bite?
You know what would be cool, is if somehow this image could have been constructed from fractals, so that anyone trying to zoom in, would only see the same thing over and over, only smaller and smaller . . .
At least that way, the next unsuspecting heterosexual male wouldn't have to be bombarded with this gay orgy.
And I'm pretty tired of the gays claiming animals to be homosexual. That is nothing more than tired, old queer propaganda, none of which can be reasonably proven. Hell, my dog likes to lick. I'm sure if I put my nut sack up to his mouth he'd lick my balls, does that mean he likes performing oral sex on humans?
You perverts need to repent before you all burn in hell.
I want you to enlighten me on the scientific methods and logic used to prove an animal is "gay". Even Pavlov trained dogs to salivate at the ringing of a bell.
Maybe with the proper stimulus we can train you to like pussy. Whadaya think?
His duplicitous nature knows no bounds!
My bad. I forgot. Next time I wanna insult you, I'll do it on the appropriate thread:
http://www.indybay.org/news/2002/11/1546540.php
Wouldn't want to be accused of being rude. But obsessed? Paaaleaze. Huge ego ya got there ness.
So far you've accused tightanus of being a sniveling coward that uses the internet for protection (which is exactly what YOU do) and ME of being obsessed with YOU (which we all know that it's the other way around).
So let's add to the list:
Presumptuous
Bitter
Egotistical
and now we've got Duplicitous.
Sound like anyone you know?
But as for this thread, tite-butt-hole is right. Those guys are obviously gay. No big deal, nothing to be ashamed of. Just tell it like it is. So what?
Thanks for letting me express my views. Continue to speak your minds. This is a free country-because of the sacrifice of soldiers from the War of Independence to the War against Terrorism.
It's because of War, that you better than thou peace lovers, have your freedom to express your views.
Personally I think the military ought to use human peace symbols for target practice, since that's what they look like!
I challenge anyone to go tell it to the families that lost loved ones, when Bin Laden sent planes into the Twin Towers, that terrorism should go unpunished.
If your against war, than take your yellow belly asses and get the hell out of America! Because cowards like you don't belong here.
There's some, though, that are beyond anything I can imagine. STL was one of those. BA used to be, but he's becoming more fleshed out on the portland site. They seem to be on the verge of banning him because he basically lives on there. Poor guy - probably paid to be there and has no other life. And the nazis with their own sites are also unfathomable.
But this thread is amazing, just to see people's real reactions to the nakedness, to the complete vulnerability of these activists - and yet, also out of reach.
UC Berkeley psychologist finds evidence that male hormones in the womb affect sexual orientation
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2000/03/03-29-2000a.html
Homosexuality in men and number of older brothers AUTHORBlanchard R, Bogaert AF REFERENCEAm J Psychiatry 1996; 153: 27-31 PLACE OF STUDY Canada ABSTRACT This study investigated whether homosexual men have a lighter mean birth order than heterosexual men primarily because they have more older brothers or because they have more older siblings of both sexes. 302 homosexual men were individually matched on years of birth with an equal number of heterosexual men. Each completed an anonymous questionnaire concerning family background and other biodemographic information. Homosexuality was positively correlated with the proband's number of older brothers but not with older sisters, younger brothers, younger sisters, or paternal age at the time of the proband's birth. Each additional older brother increased the odds of homosexuality by 33%. These results restrict the range of possible theories of the birth order phenomenon. The point is to explain not only why older brothers increase the probability of homosexuality in later born males but also why older sisters neither enhance this effect nor counteract it.
-”I challenge anyone to go tell it to the families that lost loved ones, when Bin Laden sent planes into the Twin Towers, that terrorism should go unpunished.”-
This is tiresome.
Also rather pathetic in it’s incipient stupidity. Prove the above statement. The U.S. government hasn’t. What they have proven is
their ability to smother any kind of investigation into this event.
That's why they have to squeak so loud to get any attention. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. I do know that stripping down with a bunch of other guys for a photo of a peace symbol is a gay action. I'd bet a thousand dollars that the majority of those guys are gay or bi-sexual. There might be one idiotic liberal in the bunch that is straight, having been unsuspectingly duped into posing for the camera by his queer friends so that could size up his pee-pee. But like I said, I couldn't care less.
"It's hard god-damned work to make you look so bad!"
So, c'mon now. All at once. Repeat after me,
"THANKS ERIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Thank sf imc. HAR! Funny.
The checks in the mail.
Has it occurred to you that there is a position between these; that one can be for punishing terrorists but against war?
You mean like the moron regime in DC? Yeah, I hear ya. And I'm against war, too.
I say impeachment is as good a punishment as any. But it would have to be the whole lot of them, not just Bushmoron. Otherwise we get Cheneymoron, and that's even worse.
Impeachment or resignation, dems or repubs, out with the lot of them.
I don't offer alternatives, I work to make them happen.
Only one party is growing significatnly in membership in this country, and it ain't the republicrats.
http://www.lpnevada.org/newsreleases/NR990805.htm
http://www.baltimorecountygreens.org/press_releases.htm
http://www.scnatural-law.org/history.html
ad naseum
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=fastest+growing+political+party
Just another snake oil salesman with the bunk we all need to make our lives better.
In NJ they were starting to team up to get stuff done, and it worked, for getting into the debates, etc. One of the things they talked about was boycotting all the sponsors of stations that wouldn't cover them in televised debates. Those types of ideas will grow and grow, as more and more flee the parties that are looting and attacking the world as fast as they can.
"One hundred thousand women and men will strip on Jan. 18 in Washington D.C. and San Francisco for the huge national peace march in protest of the stripping of constitutional rights by a government intent on war," said Donna Sheehan, founder of Unreasonable Women Baring Witness in Point Reyes Station.
"Our message to women all over the world is be bold, be courageous, be vulnerable for peace."
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/gate/a/2003/01/03/marin.DTL
It would be easy to scoff at Donna Sheehan and her fellow bare-naked ladies, but it would be wrong. Not only do I applaud her courageous vulnerability, but from now on I won't take anyone seriously who expresses "antiwar" sentiments without getting naked.
So you'll be joining the march then?
I'll call it "Liberals Gone Wild!" Oh Yeah! I'm gonna be rich baby!
The conservative way teaches that the human form should be hidden from view, kept in dark rooms. Yet those who are in tune with nature understand that nudity is a part of the natural world.
The "men of peace" have made a statement, one which is essentially telling us that the physical baring of their bodies represents a baring of their soul to stand for that which they believe. To stand naked before the world is to expose all of self, to strip away the conventions of society. It touches the essential person, unhidden. These men have essentially told us there is nothing more important to them than peace.
To bring homosexual and homophobic commentary into this discussion is to reduce it to the mores of society as they are put forth by those who are in seats of power. It is a travesty to attempt to censor this statement with those mores.
When it comes down to it, we are all naked beneath those clothes we wear each day. Some have the courage to step forward and reveal all to make a statement. The rest continue to hide behind their garments and their words.
Everybody gets in such an uproar when I say that these guys are just being "in your face" queers, but no one disputes the obvious truth of it.
Only homos would get together and strip down for something like this. Period. End of story. I don't want to hear another word about it. So shut up already. Unless you casn prove otherwise then you're just smaking off at the lips and saying nothing.
So just quit making yourselves look stupid.
Exactly. Go ahead and say and do whatever you will. It will make you feel better, but it won't change a thing, because who cares what you think. etc., etc.,etc.
There are a million good reasons to take clothes off, but this kind of peace isn't one of them. Go ahead and do it if you want to, It makes you look like some kind of surrealist idiot when you attack a problem with a means nowhere nearly connected to the problem. Do something constructive or destructive, but, for crying out loud, make it relate. Sheesh!
Hey, maybe your onto something here. When do we start?
I am an old gay guy -- I have seen many things -- but it is obvious that WE ARE WINNING !!
Kiltie
1. Saddam's CIA supported rise to power and gassing of Kurds.
2. Ten years of sanctions (1 million+ dead)
3. Our two "wars" against Iraq. There is no such thing as a surgical strike expecially when you're bombing an urban area.
Saddam Hussein: The US has continued to supply him with weapons of mass destruction (chemical and biological) up until the day before the first Gulf War. WE pulled the weapons inspectors out of his country right before the first Gulf War. Bush Sr.'s Secretary of State essentially gave him permission to invade Kuwait eight or nine days before the first Gulf War thruogh a press conference during which she said the US has no stake in the fate of Kuwait. And on top of all that there was The Highway of Death. Look into it.
Today(Jan6 2006) Bush surrounded himself, in the White House,for a 'photo-op' with about 30 superannuated Secretaries of State and executives to discuss Iraq policy.
Rule#1 in Management is concentrate responsibility when rewards and medals are on the table BUT DELEGATE FAR AND WIDE WHEN THE SHIT IS ABOUT TO HIT THE FAN.
It is obvious that the WhiteHouse now considers the IRAQ debacle to be 'unwinable'!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.