top
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

CONTACT YOUR SENATOR ABOUT THE HOMELAND SECURITY AGENCY BILL

by Matt Ehling (mattehling [at] yahoo.com)
The Senate is poised to vote on the establishment of the Homeland Security Agency. Many versions of the bill have circulated through congress, all containing different provisions. Because of the rapidly approaching Senate vote, it is important to contact your Senator this week, and urge them to vote for specific provisions of a House version of the bill - HR 5005.EH - that include crucial civil liberties protections. Also, urge them to vote against any provision that would authorize the creation of the “Total Information Awareness System” now funded by the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency.
Background:

The Senate will soon vote on the creation of the Homeland Security Agency, which will consolidate domestic security departments from the INS to the Coast Guard into one centralized federal agency. Many versions of the bill have circulated over the past few months, all with differing provisions. While most of these provisions deal with bureaucratic restructuring of various security agencies, one version of the bill passed by the House (HR 5005.EH) includes specific provisions that deal with important civil liberties issues. These provisions prohibit the implementation of the T.I.P.S. citizen informant network proposed by the Bush administration, create an office of civil rights and civil liberties within the new agency, and uphold the Posse Commitatus Act, which keeps the military out of civilian law enforcement.

Stalled for months before the elections, the agency is on the brink of becoming a reality after the Senate votes next week. Because of this, it is important to contact the Senate to urge them to retain the most important provisions of HR 5005.EH.

It is equally important to urge the Senate to disallow any provisions in the bill that would authorize the creation or utilization of the “Total Information Awareness System” currently funded by the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency. This is a massive electronic surveillance program that would search for patterns of “terrorist activity” in reams of public and private computer data and records. All information about U.S. citizens available through public and private sector records would be analyzed by this system.

Senate contact information can be found at thomas.loc.gov.

Dear (senator),

In am writing in reference to the Homeland Security Agency legislation currently being debated by congress. The creation of the Homeland Security Agency would constitute the single largest restructuring of the federal government since World War Two. The powers vested in, and the resources commanded by this agency would be enormous. Because of this, I am writing to urge your careful consideration of the bills that seek to create this agency.

Many pieces of legislation have passed before congress regarding this matter, each with its own specific provisions. I am writing to urge you to take special note of the most important of these provisions, and to make certain that these provisions are included in the final bill. These provisions are crucial to ensuring that civil liberties protections, and notions of restraint, are adhered to by the newly created agency. The provisions I refer to currently exist in HR 5005.EH, passed by the House of Representatives, and I have identified them below by the subsection numbers of that bill:

Section 604. Establishment of an office of civil liberties and civil rights. The creation of this office is a crucial step toward ensuring that civil liberties will be recognized by department employees. Furthermore, in the event that citizen rights are violated by department employees, this office will provide an avenue through which citizens can seek recourse.

Section 766. Military activities. This subsection prohibits the Homeland Security agency from engaging in war fighting activities, or from participating in the “military defense of the United States.” This subsection rightly recognizes the historical separation of civilian and military functions within the United States, and it keeps the newly created department from participating in military activities. This distinction between military and civilian affairs is crucial to a free society, and must be strictly adhered to.

Section 780. Reaffirming the continued importance of the Posse Commitatus Act. This section reaffirms the Posse Commitatus Act as it currently stands. This is a crucially important component of the bill to preserve, as the Bush administration has recently intimated that it may seek to review or amend the act in the near future.

The Posse Commitatus Act prohibits the U.S. armed forces, specifically the Army, Navy and Air Force, from engaging in civilian police work. While previous administrations have riddled the Act with exemptions, it is important that Congress takes no further steps toward normalizing a law enforcement role for the military - a role it is ill suited for.

Section 771. This subsection prohibits the implementation of the T.I.P.S. program. The T.I.P.S. program was introduced by the Bush administration earlier this year, and called for the creation of a nationwide informant network that would utilize postal carriers, utility workers, and other public and private sector employees with access to private homes. These individuals would be encouraged to engage in informal espionage, and to report suspicious activities to law enforcement authorities. After widespread public outcry over the potential for privacy violations, the plan was shelved by the administration. This provision would ensure that T.I.P.S would not be revived and implemented.

In addition to the items above, the final bill should insist on civil service protections for agency workers, so that they are not subject to capricious firing or other retaliatory actions.

Finally, I urge you to disallow the addition of any provisions authorizing the creation or implementation of the “Total Information Awareness System”. This program, currently being researched and funded by the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) is a massive electronic surveillance program that would search for patterns of “terrorist activity” in reams of public and private computer data and records. All information about U.S. citizens available through public and private sector records would be consolidated and analyzed by this system, effectively abolishing the privacy rights of American citizens.

Again, I urge you to take these matters into consideration when you vote on the final version of the Homeland Security Agency Bill.

Sincerely,

(name)
by bov
With the Iraq votes . . . frankly I'm burned out on trying to convince them to listen to constituents. Thousands and thousands of emails meant nothing to our senator. I sat in Frankenstein's lobby and talked with her aide and he was a brick wall, worse than a republican. He acknowledged that they got a huge amount of emails against the war - so what? Frankenstein does and Frankenstein does so that she can be a republicrat president. She could care less about CA constituents when what she's really worried about is the far right wing in swing states.

So I'd rather spend my time working on more reasonable things than groveling before idiot republicrats. My time is better spent with the Greens.
by light
just read an article of BBC italy that the police stormed indymedia calling them anticapitalists not supporting the G8. A reporter that escaped said that there was blood everywhere.
by bov
I wasn't aware the G8 was meeting in Italy again . . .
by death2theNWO
IAO: INFORMATION AWARENESS OFFICE
http://www.darpa.mil/iao/

PENTAGON PLANS A VAST ELECTRONIC DRAGNET
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/politics/09COMP.html

YOU ARE A SUSPECT
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/14/opinion/14SAFI.html
Even William Safire is concerned.

INFORMATION AWARENESS OFFICE GOES PRIMETIME
http://www.guerrillanews.com/civil_liberties/doc835.html

US GOVERNMENT'S 'ULTIMATE DATABASE' RUN BY A FELON
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/28107.html

MEET AMERICA'S NEW BIG BROTHER
http://www.hereinreality.com/bigbrother.html

ACLU on IAO
http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=11309&c=206
by Flag
Umm, back to the original post. CONTACT YOUR SENATORS NOW!!!!

and get others to do the same!

There's a narrow little window between now & fascism.

DON'T GET SIDETRACKED by other issues, this is the MOST IMPORTANT one now, by far, because once it passes, then there's no more dissent.
by maxglick
There is a new site that is a great source of information and action concerning the Total Information Awareness project.

http://geocities.com/totalinformationawareness
by JOSHUA
Do it! There was an editorial in today's New York Times, & an editorial in Saturday's Washington Post, and when I called my senators today, (both here and in washington ((why not!), they said that they were getting a lot of calls. So do it! Because FREEDOM is not just about laws, it's about an atmosphere that allows for dissent, an atmosphere that allows one to go to differerent web-sites (like this one) and not feel INTIMITADED!!!

SO DO IT!!!!! CALL!! WRITE!!! (both "left" wing & "right" wing are united on this one!!!
by bov
Who did you call - Frankenstein? She already said she doesn't care about calls from constituents.

And in DC they say the callers are spammers.

It might be better to just put energy in to getting the message out afterwards about how our scum politicians voted - do people even *know* that Pelosi voted yes on Homeland Insecurity?

And what about the justices that are going through. Not much of a peep from the dems. Pelosi even said she supports Bush on the war, once it starts.
by ziggy
It takes so little time to call that it should be done no mater if the action is ignored. That's just fact. And targeting the media is a great idea

see:

http://www.indybay.org/news/2002/11/1543901.php

Don't bother writing with a response about how such and such action will not make a difference. In the time you took to write the response, you could have written to the new york times ;-)

Now, is it true that these efforts are minimal efforts, and that we need to do much more? Of course.
by bov
I'm just burned out on idiot senators at the moment - but probably you'll convince me eventually.

It's true that going after the media is worthy - they at least have to respond when thousands of people contact them.
by Mark
All the above. Write the media ( I found a good site on google, that had all major newspapers' e'mail (contact, editorial ((i think), but you should call & e'mail your senators; I called today and they said that they were getting a lot of responses, and saturday there was an editorial in the Washington Post, and today in the New York Times, and last week Safire wrote against it. And NPR did a piece on it tonight. So, it's picking up speed. This is, by far, the most important "issue" NOW, because, if it passes, as is, THERE WILL BE NO MORE DISSENT! In fact, you won't even be able to go to this web-site. Freedom is more than laws, it's an atmosphere in which you don't feel INTIMIDATED to read and express what you want.
CALL & E'MAIL YOUR SENATORS NOW!

/http://www.congress.org/

&
write to the media!
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network