top
Health/Housing
Health/Housing
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Prop R Defeated; Prop N Passes

by Tenant Voter
San Francisco is often thought of as a progressive city, but the passage of Prop. N, cutting aid to homeless people to $59 with no guarantee of services, should make it clear that San Francisco is still very much a part of the United States.
San Francisco is often thought of as a progressive city, but the passage of Prop. N, cutting aid to homeless people to $59 with no guarantee of services, should make it clear that San Francisco is still very much a part of the United States.

Prop. N was just a publicity stunt by a young, 33-year-old wealthy hoodlum, Supervisor Gavin Newsom, for his presumed race for mayor in 2003, in which he will most certainly face the very-experienced politician, former President of the Board of Supervisors, attorney Angela Alioto. To fall for this act is to demonstrate that San Franciscans are just as easily swayed by con artists as the rest of the country.

As Prop N is implemented, it will be a political liability to Supevisor Newsom as it will not solve the homeless crisis at all, but make it much worse. Meanwhile, very poor people will suffer.

We can be proud that Prop R, the repeal of rent control proposition, was easily defeated with 60% of the vote. That was due to a very strong campaign of precinct-walking and phone-banking and it directly affected the lives of 2/3 of the residents of San Francisco.

We can be proud but not overwhelmed by the passage of Prop S with 62% of the vote, allowing San Francisco to grow its own marijuana. However, in San Francisco, Prop 215, the state medical marijuana initiative, won 80% of the vote, so 62% is a regression for San Francisco.

Pete Camejo, Green Party candidate for governor, got a respectable 15% of San Francisco's votes, not surprising in San Francisco.

The final number of voters will be about 200,000, out of 600,000 adults in San Francisco. A high voter turnout for San Francisco is 300,000. Clearly, not enough of the workingclass is voting. Not only does the passage of Prop N reflect a weak workingclass vote, but so does the defeat of Prop L, the real estate transfer tax increase on million dollar properties paying for needed city services, and the defeat of Prop D, the public power initiative.

If anyone still thinks that voting does not matter, just think how much better it would have been if Prop N were defeated and Prop. L and D passed. One can skip the Democrat-Republican politicians, but the propositions are always worth voting on, and they do make a difference.
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by carol
I don't think Newsom's con artist routine fooled anyone. I think he has his "friends" out there voting for him --- people who stand to gain from his program. And, working class folks aren't voting.
by tricky
I hate to break it to you Carol and all the other homeless activists-- the working class was for N, whether they voted or not. The homeless activists are miles out of touch with ordinary people-- which Gavin Newsome took great advantage of. Homelessness is not just a problem for the homeless but for regular people who don't want defection in front of their doors, needles in their neighborhood park, or just safe streets for the kids. When the activists stop dismissing everyone who has a complaint as a vicious yuppie, a right-winger, a fascist, a greedy business owner they might start to understand: WHY N WON IN A LANDSLIDE

Self-criticism might be a good place to start



by .........
"Homelessness is not just a problem for the homeless but for regular people"

That's for sure. But it's not dealing with the homeless that is the problem for the working class. It's *becoming* the homeless. Someone is out of touch.
by Finally
It felt great this morning when my neighborhood panhandler started his usual harassment of me for change. I just looked at him and said "Care Not Cash!". He got SO pissed off. It was very liberating to know that he felt the same way I've felt for five years of being hassled by him for change.
by fasdfasdf
"It was very liberating to know that he felt the same way I've felt for five years "

Have you every slept outside in San Francisco, had people in suits spit in your face and not know where you would get your next meal?

Its pretty scary that people who are asked for change feel like victims.

Whats next?

"I'm glad the US is bombing Ethiopia because now 'those people' know how we felt when they were begging for food in the 80s"

San Francisco really had sunk to a new low... hopefully next time you say something like that you get mugged; it would give you a tiny dose of real life...

As the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, burglers and pick pockets will become the shock troops of class war
by just a suggestion
What this town really needs is a serial killer who specializes in real estate speculators and slumlords.
by Simple Simon
Or perhaps a steamroller for the bums?
by shining
"What this town really needs is a serial killer who specializes in real estate speculators and slumlords."

Solutions seem to always involve murder with this guy.
by this guy
is a victim of murder by landlords.
by watcher
Not - In - My - Back - Room

You could let a homeless person stay with you during the winter

By choosing not to, death stains your hands as well
by Coalition on Homelessness (coh [at] sf-homeless-coalition.org)
SUBSTANCE ABUSE MENTAL HEALTH WORK GROUP

* There is currently nowhere for people to go who have a psychiatric crisis after hours - their only option is to call the police.

* Police bring individuals either to the locked facility at S.F. General Hospital (Psychiatric Emergency Services), or to jail. Thousands of individuals in crisis are further traumatized by this experience, or in the most severe cases, are killed by the police (such as in the recent example of Idriss Stelley).

* San Francisco has the highest 5150 rate in the state. 5150's are incidents of people being involuntarily detained for 72 hours for psychiatric evaluation. (CMHS, 1999)

* The second leading cause of violent death for people with psychiatric illnesses is police killings. (CA Alliance of the Mentally Ill)

* One in four calls to the San Francisco Police Dept. are responses to individuals in psychiatric crisis. (Dr. Forester, SFPD, 2000)

* Approximately 3000 people go to SFGH Psychiatric Emergency Services for severe psychiatric crisis every year who have not had previous contact with the mental health system. (Phyllis Harding, DPH)

* Over 30% of those seeking mental health treatment last year never received it. (COH, June 1999)

* Due to the involuntary nature of 5150's, the process is intrusive and counter-therapeutic, and can cause someone who needs mental health services to lose faith in the system. At the same time, it is a response that occurs only after an emergency takes place. This initiative will ensure that for many individuals, their first experience with the mental health system will not be met with an armed officer and 5 point restraints.

* Approximately 30 - 40% of homeless San Franciscans are mentally ill; this could be as many as 5600 homeless people with mental illnesses. (S.F. McKinney application, fall 2000) The S.F. mental health system is currently serving only 2750 homeless individuals. This critical service will be designed to be homeless-friendly and will meet homeless people's needs.
by kay
I think it is a good question to ask if working class people really voted for this...I'd have to say that if they did indeed vote for N, that it reflects a general view that American culture has that homeless people just want to be homeless and unemployed, and are lazy and crazy and get what's coming to them. These same "working class" people probably don't really question the system, and so I still think that doesn't make them faultless for what happened, although I can sympathize with them wanting better situations for their families and themselves. The unfairness is this view that all homeless people are crazy and lazy...that property is king...and that it's the rich people who had the money to advertise this thing in a corrupt way that pushed it through....feeding on people's hopes for improvement and their resentment and stereotyping of the homeless. The unfairness is that that money and business really are in power, and that most citizens seem to think that autonomy of choice isn't worth respecting, that we have the right to judge how homeless and ill and down and out people spend the money...instead of seeing them as human beings like ourselves Look at Europe...do they have these issues? No.
by kay
I think it is a good question to ask if working class people really voted for this...I'd have to say that if they did indeed vote for N, that it reflects a general view that American culture has that homeless people just want to be homeless and unemployed, and are lazy and crazy and get what's coming to them. These same "working class" people probably don't really question the system, and so I still think that doesn't make them faultless for what happened, although I can sympathize with them wanting better situations for their families and themselves. The unfairness is this view that all homeless people are crazy and lazy...that property is king...and that it's the rich people who had the money to advertise this thing in a corrupt way that pushed it through....feeding on people's hopes for improvement and their resentment and stereotyping of the homeless. The unfairness is that that money and business really are in power, and that most citizens seem to think that autonomy of choice isn't worth respecting, that we have the right to judge how homeless and ill and down and out people spend the money...instead of seeing them as human beings like ourselves Look at Europe...do they have these issues? No.
by kimberly craig
I think it is a good question to ask if working class people really voted for this...I'd have to say that if they did indeed vote for N, that it reflects a general view that American culture has that homeless people just want to be homeless and unemployed, and are lazy and crazy and get what's coming to them. These same "working class" people probably don't really question the system, and so I still think that doesn't make them faultless for what happened, although I can sympathize with them wanting better situations for their families and themselves. The unfairness is this view that all homeless people are crazy and lazy...that property is king...and that it's the rich people who had the money to advertise this thing in a corrupt way that pushed it through....feeding on people's hopes for improvement and their resentment and stereotyping of the homeless. The unfairness is that that money and business really are in power, and that most citizens seem to think that autonomy of choice isn't worth respecting, that we have the right to judge how homeless and ill and down and out people spend the money...instead of seeing them as human beings like ourselves Look at Europe...do they have these issues? No.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$120.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network