From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Iraqi VP Presents A Solution to The Iraqi Crisis: Bush, Saddam Should Fight A Duel
Iraqi Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan on Thursday disregarded U.S. Congress support for a resolution that would give the American president the power to initiate hostilities against Iraq. Ramadan suggested that instead of going to war with Iraq, Bush should fight a personal duel with Saddam Hussein.
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
Bush challenged to 'duel' with Saddam
An Iraqi vice-president has proposed that Saddam Hussein and George W Bush should fight a duel to settle their differences.
Taha Yassin Ramadan suggested that United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan should referee the duel on neutral territory.
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer
Mr Ramadan, who is not noted for a sense of humour but occasionally resorts to sarcasm, made the proposal in an interview with the Associated Press.
Mr Bush's spokesman Ari Fleischer rejected the idea saying, "there can be no serious response to an irresponsible statement like that".
His remarks came as the UN Security Council discussed the Iraqi offer for arms inspectors to return to Baghdad - the more straightforward route to avert war.
Leader versus leader
"Bush wants to attack the whole [of] Iraq, the army and the infrastructure," the Iraqi vice-president said.
"The American president should specify a group, and we will specify a group and choose neutral ground with Kofi Annan as referee and use one weapon with a president against a president, a vice-president against a vice-president, and a minister against a minister in a duel."
Mr Fleischer poured scorn on the proposal saying:
"In the past when Iraq had disputes, it invaded its neighbours. There were no duels; there were invasions. There was use of weapons of mass destruction and military. That's how Iraq settles its disputes."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2297371.stm
An Iraqi vice-president has proposed that Saddam Hussein and George W Bush should fight a duel to settle their differences.
Taha Yassin Ramadan suggested that United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan should referee the duel on neutral territory.
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer
Mr Ramadan, who is not noted for a sense of humour but occasionally resorts to sarcasm, made the proposal in an interview with the Associated Press.
Mr Bush's spokesman Ari Fleischer rejected the idea saying, "there can be no serious response to an irresponsible statement like that".
His remarks came as the UN Security Council discussed the Iraqi offer for arms inspectors to return to Baghdad - the more straightforward route to avert war.
Leader versus leader
"Bush wants to attack the whole [of] Iraq, the army and the infrastructure," the Iraqi vice-president said.
"The American president should specify a group, and we will specify a group and choose neutral ground with Kofi Annan as referee and use one weapon with a president against a president, a vice-president against a vice-president, and a minister against a minister in a duel."
Mr Fleischer poured scorn on the proposal saying:
"In the past when Iraq had disputes, it invaded its neighbours. There were no duels; there were invasions. There was use of weapons of mass destruction and military. That's how Iraq settles its disputes."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2297371.stm
It disturbs me that we are seeing so much talk of personal dueling at the beginning of this century. Recently, a legislator in Columbia challenged the VP of that country to a pistol duel. I think everybody is watching too much television.
I don't believe that in a democracy public policy should be subordinated to the dueling skills of its leaders. This recent suggestion is not funny but seems to me a sign of growing devolution and barbarism in the early 21st century. I sincerely hope the trend reverses itself.
I don't believe that in a democracy public policy should be subordinated to the dueling skills of its leaders. This recent suggestion is not funny but seems to me a sign of growing devolution and barbarism in the early 21st century. I sincerely hope the trend reverses itself.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network