top
Iraq
Iraq
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Calls jam Capitol phones: Give peace a chance

by Tim Wheeler, PWW correspondent (pww [at] pww.org)
Lawmakers are reporting their phones ringing off the hooks with calls overwhelmingly against George W. Bush’s plans for a war on Iraq. Bush’s war resolution, sent to Capitol Hill last week, is a sweeping measure that would permit him to “use all means he determines to be appropriate, including force” against Iraq.


Lawmakers are reporting their phones ringing off the hooks with calls overwhelmingly against George W. Bush’s plans for a war on Iraq. Bush’s war resolution, sent to Capitol Hill last week, is a sweeping measure that would permit him to “use all means he determines to be appropriate, including force” against Iraq.

Aides to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) counted 5,614 phone calls over the past six weeks with only 136 supporting Bush’s war plan, The Washington Post reported Sept. 23 in a survey of House and Senate offices. Feinstein has sharply rejected Bush’s call for a unilateral war to remove Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) reports her phone messages and mail nearly unanimous against war. The Bush resolution, she charged, is a “blank check. I could never support that.”

Sen. Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), a Bush loyalist, acknowledges that his calls are running eight to one against war. Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Ill.) admitted in a radio interview that his constituents are bombarding him overwhelmingly opposed to war on Iraq.

Rep. Lynn R. Rivers (D-Mich.), co-sponsor with Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) of an anti-war resolution is receiving constituent messages “almost totally against war,” her aide, Gail Boskey, told the World. “Lynn said she has spoken with people in the more conservative parts of her district and they too are strongly against going to war.”

Voters are also using more direct methods. Peace activists sat in at Rep. David Oberstar’s (D-Minn.) office in Minneapolis. Oberstar then issued a statement that a unilateral U.S. attack “would undermine our moral authority to combat terrorism.”

A delegation of 12 women visited the Germantown, Pa., offices of Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Pa.) to thank him for his progressive positions. “He told us he will vote against any resolution to go to war against Iraq,” said Marlene Santoyo, a leader of the Philadelphia chapter of Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom.

Scott Lynch, spokesman for Washington-based Peace Action, told the World lawmakers are reporting their phone calls and mail as high as 200 to one against war on Iraq. “I’ve never seen anything like this,” he said. “People are perceiving the danger to our country brought upon us by the Bush administration. We need to continue to write and to get out into the streets. Most of our representatives in the House and Senate are not yet representing the views of their constituents.”

In a Sept. 20 speech on the Senate floor, Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) denounced Bush for using the war drive to divert voters’ attention from growing unemployment in an election year. “Are politicians talking about the domestic situation, weaknesses in the economy, jobs that are being lost, housing problems? No!”

Byrd said his belief in the Constitution compels him to vote against a war resolution. “But I am finding that the Constitution is irrelevant to the people of this administration. Nothing would please this president more than having a blank check handed to him.”

Lee, the only lawmaker to vote against Bush’s war on Afghanistan, and 26 other House members introduced H. Con. Res. 473 expressing the sense of the House that the U.S. “should work through the United Nations” to insure Iraqi compliance with UN resolutions. A “preemptive unilateral United States first strike could both set a dangerous international precedent and significantly weaken the United Nations as an institution,” the resolution warns.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), a co-sponsor of the resolution, told a Capitol Hill news conference Sept. 19, “Unilateral military action by the United States against Iraq is unjustified, unwarranted, and illegal. The administration has failed to make the case that Iraq poses an imminent or immediate threat to the United States.”

Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio) told the news conference, “Naked aggression is not the American way. Fighting for oil and those dictatorships that prop up the politics of oil is not worthy of the loss of one more American life.”

The antiwar groundswell is gaining worldwide. German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and his “Red-Green” coalition won reelection Sept. 22 on the basis of his vow that Germany would not participate in a war on Iraq, even if approved by the UN.

Al Gore, the 2000 Democratic presidential nominee, accused the Bush administration of flouting the will of the American people and U.S. allies around the world “to please the portion of its base that occupies the extreme right.” In the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack, Gore told the Commonwealth Club of California, the U.S. enjoyed enormous goodwill. “That has been squandered in a year’s time and replaced with great anxiety all around the world, not primarily about what the terrorist networks are going to do but about what we’re going to do.”

This reporter repeatedly dialed the Capitol Hill main switchboard at (202)-224-3121 in preparing this story. Often, all circuits were busy. The snail mail address of the House is: (Member’s name), U.S. House of Representatives, Washington DC 20515. The Senate is: (Member’s name), U.S. Senate, Washington DC 20510.

The author can be reached at greenerpastures21212 [at] yahoo.com

Originally published by the People’s Weekly World
http://www.pww.org





by bov
People need to focus on Daschle and Gephart - what are their constituents saying?

These two are leading the pack to the dark side and need to be stopped.

Focus the efforts!!
by d
The Democrats aren't interested in stopping the war. They just want to get the war off the front page cause they think they stand a better chance of holding the Senate if they can get the country talking about the economy. And, after victory is achieved in Iraq, they want to lay claim that they were a part of it. There's going to be a war in Iraq. That's already been decided by those of us in the country who really matter. No one's listening to you.
§d
by bov
Lots are listening to a lot of people who are working hard to stop the war - or we'd have been bombing a lot more than we already are, a long time ago.

Even the corporate news media has leaked stuff consistently. No one wants this war.

Focusing on key dems will have an effect. The progressive caucus and Barbara Lee have already come up with their own resolution and have support.

Yes the dems are idiots, but right now we're forced to work with them on stopping bushladen.
by brenda nichols (bnichols [at] sonic.net)
I am opposed to Bush starting this war. Bush is not listening to the public outcry, he is taking this upon himself to decide. Polls show overwhelming opposition agains this war. England is 79% opposed to Tony Blair's support of Bush, Ireland is overwhelmingly opposed to this war. Bush does not have the right to decided the faith of the world.
by d
theres going to be a resolution from the senate allowing the president to use force against iraq. there going to be a resolution from the UN saying its ok to use force against iraq. the dems are just tring to position themselves so no matter how this thing comes out they can say they were either on board or they tried to stop it. theyre gutless. i could care less what europe thinks. we told them to hit the road over 200 yrs ago. these are the same idiots who waited until hitler starting attacking his neighbors before lifting a finger. barbara lee? please. that commie pig bitch. progressives? you mean the ones whod rather talk until everyones dead before they decide to do anything? no thanx.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$190.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network