Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
'Human Shield' Death Sparks Debate
Why is *anyone* using human shields? Why doesn't Israel just end its idiotic occupation?
"A number of government ministers told Israeli media that the country was in a war situation, and sometimes the lives of Palestinian civilians had to be endangered, to prevent attacks in Israel, or to protect Israeli soldiers."
"A number of government ministers told Israeli media that the country was in a war situation, and sometimes the lives of Palestinian civilians had to be endangered, to prevent attacks in Israel, or to protect Israeli soldiers."
Published on Thursday, August 15, 2002 by the BBC
'Human Shield' Death Sparks Debate
by Barbara Plett
The death of a Palestinian teenager in an Israeli army operation has revived the debate over human shields.
The young man was shot on Wednesday in the West Bank town of Tubas.
He was forced to go to the door of a house where a Hamas militant was believed to be hiding.
The use of Palestinian human shields became an issue during Israel's sweeping military operations in April, when human rights organisations petitioned the supreme court to order a stop to the practice.
Hail of bullets
Palestinian witnesses said 19-year-old Nidal Abumuhsein was forced at gunpoint to try and get the senior Hamas militant to surrender.
They said the Israeli army gave him a protective flack jacket and a sniffer dog.
When he knocked on the door he was killed by a burst of bullets, although Tubas residents claim they came from the soldiers, not the house.
The army said it was trying to prevent deaths by having the teenager warn any civilians who may have been inside.
Heated debates
But the Israeli human rights group, B'tselem, strongly condemned the incident as another example of Palestinians being used to shield Israeli forces from potential danger.
Several months ago, it petitioned the supreme court, along with other human rights activists to rule against the practice.
The group said the army was using civilians to check booby trapped buildings, remove suspicious objects from roads, and walk in front of soldiers to ward off gunfire.
The government responded by forbidding such practices.
But it drew a distinction between human shields and, what it calls "neighbourhood procedure", that is, using civilians to help soldiers enter Palestinian homes, or approach besieged militants to negotiate an end to a standoff.
B'tselem is demanding that this should also be prohibited.
But the issue is a matter of debate in Israel.
A number of government ministers told Israeli media that the country was in a war situation, and sometimes the lives of Palestinian civilians had to be endangered, to prevent attacks in Israel, or to protect Israeli soldiers.
© AFP 2002
'Human Shield' Death Sparks Debate
by Barbara Plett
The death of a Palestinian teenager in an Israeli army operation has revived the debate over human shields.
The young man was shot on Wednesday in the West Bank town of Tubas.
He was forced to go to the door of a house where a Hamas militant was believed to be hiding.
The use of Palestinian human shields became an issue during Israel's sweeping military operations in April, when human rights organisations petitioned the supreme court to order a stop to the practice.
Hail of bullets
Palestinian witnesses said 19-year-old Nidal Abumuhsein was forced at gunpoint to try and get the senior Hamas militant to surrender.
They said the Israeli army gave him a protective flack jacket and a sniffer dog.
When he knocked on the door he was killed by a burst of bullets, although Tubas residents claim they came from the soldiers, not the house.
The army said it was trying to prevent deaths by having the teenager warn any civilians who may have been inside.
Heated debates
But the Israeli human rights group, B'tselem, strongly condemned the incident as another example of Palestinians being used to shield Israeli forces from potential danger.
Several months ago, it petitioned the supreme court, along with other human rights activists to rule against the practice.
The group said the army was using civilians to check booby trapped buildings, remove suspicious objects from roads, and walk in front of soldiers to ward off gunfire.
The government responded by forbidding such practices.
But it drew a distinction between human shields and, what it calls "neighbourhood procedure", that is, using civilians to help soldiers enter Palestinian homes, or approach besieged militants to negotiate an end to a standoff.
B'tselem is demanding that this should also be prohibited.
But the issue is a matter of debate in Israel.
A number of government ministers told Israeli media that the country was in a war situation, and sometimes the lives of Palestinian civilians had to be endangered, to prevent attacks in Israel, or to protect Israeli soldiers.
© AFP 2002
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$110.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network