From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Znet vs. Socialist Worker: Debating Marxism
The relevance of Marxism today.
In this Internet discussion, Michael Albert of ZNet and Alan Maass of Socialist Worker debate the relevance of Marxism in the 21st century. The exchange, which appears on both SW Online and ZNet, will consist of an initial essay by Albert and Maass, and then a series of ongoing replies--so be sure to check back every couple weeks for the latest installment in the discussion.
http://socialistworker.org/Featured/MarxDebate.shtml
In this Internet discussion, Michael Albert of ZNet and Alan Maass of Socialist Worker debate the relevance of Marxism in the 21st century. The exchange, which appears on both SW Online and ZNet, will consist of an initial essay by Albert and Maass, and then a series of ongoing replies--so be sure to check back every couple weeks for the latest installment in the discussion.
http://socialistworker.org/Featured/MarxDebate.shtml
http://www.zmag.org/debateiso.htm
http://socialistworker.org/Featured/MarxDebate.shtml
In this Internet discussion, Michael Albert of ZNet and Alan Maass of Socialist Worker debate the relevance of Marxism in the 21st century. The exchange, which appears on both SW Online and ZNet, will consist of an initial essay by Albert and Maass, and then a series of ongoing replies--so be sure to check back every couple weeks for the latest installment in the discussion.
http://socialistworker.org/Featured/MarxDebate.shtml
http://www.zmag.org/debateiso.htm
Add Your Comments
Comments
(Hide Comments)
It gets Smashy's seal of approval. It is a must read then.
what relevence? marxism has proven itself to be a colossal failure. aging hippies will one day fade away and all this nonsense will be over.
Shows how stupid the rightwing is.
Che-- I recommend you reading the debates.
While both authors oversimplify individuality into two or three arbitrarily defined classes (ignoring the overlapping [multi-dimensional] bell curves of attributes, relationships, and responsibilities that describe the uniqueness of each individual within a company), there are some interesting critiques of Marxism and the related socialist/anarchist ideology.
Neither writer's politics are right-wing.
While both authors oversimplify individuality into two or three arbitrarily defined classes (ignoring the overlapping [multi-dimensional] bell curves of attributes, relationships, and responsibilities that describe the uniqueness of each individual within a company), there are some interesting critiques of Marxism and the related socialist/anarchist ideology.
Neither writer's politics are right-wing.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network