top
Palestine
Palestine
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Why The Left Hates Israel

by B.S. Thornton
THE DISTASTE FOR ISRAEL EVIDENT in coverage of the current crisis is a mystery to me. I'm not talking about the Arabs, who have their own obvious reasons for hating Israel, not the least being that Israel is a living reproach to Islamic civilization's inability to adapt to the modern world. The weakness of Islam vis-à-vis a West it once terrified and dominated is exposed daily by the strength and confidence and prosperity of a tiny nation dwarfed by the population and resources and armies of its adversaries.
I'm speaking rather about Israel's critics in Europe and the United States, where the media's double standard in judging Israel, and their failure to acknowledge the historical circumstances that have created the current crisis and explain it, are so commonplace that it usually goes unnoticed. It is testimony to the bizarre mental universe of many in the Islamic world that an American media that has made the Palestinians their pet victims "of color" instead continue to be seen as the puppets of some Zionist conspiracy.

The answer to this disgust can't be that Israel is as uniquely oppressive as it is claimed to be, setting aside for the moment the reasons why Israel has to do what it does. Given the bloodshed, violence, ethnic cleansing, seizure of territory, and genocidal rampages occurring daily across the planet, Israel's offences, even if they were as horrible as their enemies claim, are pretty small beer, and certainly not as destructive as those of many Arab regimes in the Middle East.

For example, if seizing territory and interfering with national autonomy and self-determination are such a crime, why isn't the international community bombarding Syria, which controls Lebanon, with demands to end the "illegal occupation" and withdraw its thousands of troops? Or if killing Arabs justifies such criticism, why don't we have marches in solidarity with Saddam Hussein's Islamic victims, which must number in the hundreds of thousands? Or if abusing Palestinians is the specific charge, why aren't there movements to isolate Jordan, which has probably killed more Palestinians than the Israelis have?

And of course, what's ignored is that Israel's actions have all been reactions to unceasing attempts to destroy it. Israel does what it does to survive, rather than to create an empire or acquire more wealth for a ruling elite or gain access to precious resources. Some in Israel may dream of a return to the Biblical borders of David and Solomon's kingdom, but most Israelis think about the West Bank solely in terms of security. Just compare the number of Israelis killed when Israel controlled the West Bank to the number killed since the Palestinians have controlled it, and you'll see their point.

Yet this necessary context for evaluating Israel's actions is usually ignored or dismissed. Instead Israel is judged by some absolute standard of behavior never applied to any Third-World country that's not to the right of Attila the Hun. An obvious reason for this phenomenon is that Israel is a Western society, and so it is held to the same utopian expectations for behavior that all Western nations are subject to. That critics strain out the Western gnat and swallow whole the Third-World camels of oppression and violence is a continuing scandal. I suspect that such critics are in reality ethnocentric chauvinists, and believe the West is superior, more civilized and advanced, and so should be held to a higher standard. Westerners, in other words, should know better because they are better.

There's another dimension, though, to this unfair standard. Just imagine for a moment that Israel was a communist country like Cuba. Do you think they'd be the evil villains they've been made out to be? You can answer that question by contemplating the relatively good press that Castro's regime enjoys. Compared to the obsessive attention paid to every move Israel makes in defending itself, we hear little outside of Miami about human rights violations in Cuba, which serve to maintain an autocrat's power rather than to prevent maniacs from blowing up children. Yet the same "progressive" Americans who sneak into Castro's island to gape at the socialist paradise join marches condemning Israeli "genocide."

So Israel is fair game because it's "capitalist," a client of the world's Great Satan, the United States, the premier colonial and imperial exploiter of the abused "other." We see here at work the same weird logic that allows right-thinking leftists to shrug off Communism's 100 million corpses at the same time they scream about the accidental killing of a civilian. Not all people's lives, it seems, are equally precious--just those playing the proper role in the Marxist historical operetta.

Israel is attacked, then, because it is a Western liberal democracy tarred with the brush of all the West's crimes against humanity. But let's not forget another obvious point--Israelis are Jews. A residual anti-Semitism has lately joined up with guilt-fatigue, particularly in Europe. As the generation responsible for the Holocaust dies off, I think we'll see more and more Europeans simply getting sick of the whole thing, sick of the guilt, the reminders of barbarity, the museums testifying to the insane depths to which presumably civilized people can descend.

In short, they'll want to forget, and the existence of Israel itself, its determination never again to be a despised and pitied victim, is a constant irritating reminder that won't let them forget.
by this thing here
... b.s. (bull shit) thornton. we'll just sit here supporting israel blindly, and wonder why suicide bombers start roaming the streets in america. what gets me the most is the the wondering why, the wondering why we're hated...

hatred's spreading from the west bank to america. and nobody wants to do shit about it in america, except watch. it's untrue to believe that this matter is simply between israel and palestine. completely false. THEY NEED HELP. this big co-dependant lovers triangle that is palestine, israel and the united states. so don't be surprised. be angry. be upset. but don't be surprised when shit starts to fly.
by Hisham Abdullah
"

Palestinians opposed to suicide bombings speak out

By Hisham Abdullah
Agence France-Presse

RAMALLAH — Suicide bomb attacks are not only wreaking havoc on the lives of Israelis, they are also stirring divisions among Palestinians themselves on the best ways to fight against the Israeli occupation.
These differences have emerged as the number of Palestinians who have signed a petition calling for a halt to suicide attacks against Israeli civilians rose to nearly 1,000 on Saturday, organisers said.

The row is reflective of the symptoms of weakness that has plagued the Palestinian leadership since the start of the uprising, or Intifada, in September 2000, analyst and opponents of the petition have said.

This week's reoccupation of Palestinian self-rule towns on the West Bank, after a major offensive lasting more than five weeks earlier this year, have fuelled the row, they added.

“Dealing with the issue of suicide bombings must be done in a comprehensive fashion,” a senior member of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's Fateh movement, Hatem Abdul Qader, told AFP.

“It cannot be done from one-sided perspective that fails to indicate that these attacks are taking place as a reaction to the war that (Israeli Prime Minister Ariel) Sharon is waging against us,” he said.

He was referring to the message contained in the petition that was launched Wednesday by leading Palestinian figures, including PLO political commissioner in Jerusalem Sari Nusseibeh and deputy Hanan Ashrawi.

Initially the petition called on “those who stand behind the (suicide) military operations that target civilians in Israel to revise their calculations and stop inciting our young people to commit them.”

“These operations do not help our national plan for freedom and independence. On the contrary, they strengthen the enemies of peace and give pretexts to the aggressive government of Ariel Sharon to pursue his furious war against our people,” the message said.

But the message has since been amended to include a condemnation of Israel's “repressive measures against our people, including the policy of occupation, assassinations and blockades”.

“The occupation is the basis for the hardships faced by our people and resistance is a right and a duty,” said the new message accompanying the petition as published Friday and Saturday by the Palestinian daily Al Quds.

Abdul Qader, meanwhile, said that Fateh is holding talks with Palestinian secular and Islamic groups to chart “a political programme for the Intifada and pinpoint methods for the struggle.”

For political commentator Hani Al Masri, the Palestinian leadership is “caught between a crossfire: It wants (peace) negotiations and resistance at the same time.”

“Local initiatives such as the petition have emerged to fill the vacuum that has been created by this situation,” Masri said.

A total of 26 Israeli civilians were killed in two suicide attacks in occupied Jerusalem on Tuesday and Wednesday, giving Israel the pretext to launch a new aggression and express its desire to reoccupy West Bank towns.

After Tuesday's attack Nusseibeh and Ashrawi were among the first 55 Palestinian figures to sign the petition.

On Friday Al Quds published the names of 225 Palestinian supporters of the petition and another 118 on Saturday as signatures poured in, organisers of the petition said.

“So far there are 1,000 signatures,” one of them told AFP.

Arafat also joined the fray by lending his support to a halt to suicide bombings, calling on the groups who usually claim such attacks to stop them. Later he told the Israeli daily Haaretz: “No more war. Enough is enough.”

But Hamas and the Islamic Jihad turned down Arafat's appeal.

Hamas member Ismail Abu Shanab even suggested that a referendum could be held on the issue.

A poll published June 12 by the Jerusalem Media and Communications Centre showed that nearly 66 per cent of Palestinians back suicide bombings, while 15 per cent said their backing had diminished and 15 per cent said Israeli incursions had left their position unchanged.

Sunday, June 23, 2002

by Angry Iranian
I'd like to know were islamic"unity" was when Saddam butcherd
500,000 Iranians and shiites during the Iran/Iraq war.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$140.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network