top
Anti-War
Anti-War
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Arabs and Palestinians are Sadists.

by Shannen (Shannen70 [at] hotmail.com)
Arabs and Palestinians are Sadists.
A thirst for violence is being drilled into Palestinian children. How should Jewish parents respond?
Lawrence Kelemen, New Republic, June 2, 02,

On a recent Shabbos morning, Palestinian terrorists burst into the bedroom of Shiri Shefi, took aim, and sprayed her and her three children with bullets using M-16 assault rifles. Mrs. Shefi, her 4-year-old son Uriel, and her 2-year-old son Eliad were wounded. Five-year-old Danielle, who was shot in the head, was killed.

Last year, a Palestinian sniper trained his high-powered rifle on 10-month-old Shalhevet Pass and killed the little girl in her father's arms. Six months earlier, Vadim Novesche and Yosef Avrahami, two Israeli reserve officers abducted by Palestinian police, were beaten until their heads were unrecognizable pulp and were then disemboweled by a waiting crowd outside the Palestinian Authority's Ramallah headquarters -- who then danced, entrails in hand, through the city's streets. We all know about all the other massacres the Palestinians have commited against Israeli civilians. The disco massacre, the Sbarros massacre, the Palestinian massacres of Jewish civilians on buses, cafe's and restaurants.

Beneath the strata of Islamic unity is a delight in cruelty that boggles the Western mind.

Cases like these stand out amidst the hundreds of murders of Israelis and foreign visitors here in recent months, not because of their evil -- for the value of every human life is infinite -- but because of their inhumanity. They reveal a terrifying layer in the story of this intifada. Beneath the strata of Islamic unity, Pan-Arabism, and Palestinian national aspiration -- at the root of this great campaign engineered by Arab leaders -- is pure, unbridled sadism, a delight in cruelty that boggles the Western mind.

And even if this lust for savagery is slightly less evident in the "ordinary" shootings and suicide bombings (ordinary?!) that people suffer in Israel on a daily basis, there is a growing suspicion that much of this violence flows from a visceral, Palestinian truculence -- a craving for Jewish pain. For blood.

Those of conscience ask not only what practical steps we can take to escape this nightmare, but also how it could ever have been conceived. What great power have Palestinian leaders tapped into? How do they draw forth so much human energy and direct it for evil?

Perhaps we can learn from them how to harness the same energy and use it for good.

TEXTBOOK INCITEMENT

"The sword and the book descended intertwined." (Midrash Rabbah)

Palestinian leadership takes education very seriously. When visiting the Palestinian National Authority website (http://www.pna.org), you notice that the first three listings are "Ministry of Higher Education," "Ministry of Information," and "Ministry of Education" -- before the Ministries of Labor, Health, or Water.

Since September 2000, despite their economic crisis and the instabilities of war, the PA managed to compose and introduce into their elementary and high schools 58 new textbooks, replacing the anti-Zionist but relatively benign Egyptian and Jordanian texts used previously. We are not surprised that the new, homegrown books obliterate the State of Israel from history and maps, showing instead a greater Palestine that stretches from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea -- with Jerusalem as the capital of the Palestinian State.

Textbooks describe the waves of aliyah as "infiltration," characterize Jews as being full of trickery and barbarity.

We should not be surprised that these texts present the liberation of Palestine as a struggle against Jewish occupation, describe the waves of aliyah as "infiltration," characterize Jews as being full of trickery, greed, and barbarity, and glorify Jihad and martyrdom. (See examples at http://www.edume.org.)

Beyond its local educational products, the Palestinian Authority also imports a wealth of educational materials from her neighbors: A 30-part series -- produced by Arab Radio and Television, featuring a cast of 400, and aired during the second half of Ramadan this year -- "dramatized" the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Arab viewers were also recently treated to a popular political satire showing Ariel Sharon drinking the blood of Palestinian children. The myth that Jews sprinkle the blood of Arab children into their matzah is graphically described in "The Matzah of Zion," published in 1983 by the current Syrian Defense Minister, Mustafa Tlas.

The Egyptian mass circulation daily al-Ahram also recently reported "many cases of the bodies of [Palestinian] children who had disappeared being found, torn to pieces, without a single drop of blood. The most reasonable explanation is that the blood was taken to be kneaded into the dough of extremist Jews." And of course this Purim we were treated to an article in the Saudi government daily, Al-Riyadh, describing in great detail the Jewish method of draining the blood of Muslim children to be used in baking Hamantashen.

We might (or might not) be able to imagine the effect academic and media presentations like these have on the Palestinian soul.

HARDWIRING FOR SADISM

However frightening this propaganda and its effects might be, we must confront the possibility that an even more hideous engine drives the terrorists' cruelty. Relative to the West, life in Arab countries has always been harsh. Corporal punishment of children is thoroughly imbedded in the culture. No mainstream Islamic authority has yet spoken out against slapping children's faces, dragging them by their hair, or any of the other disciplinary approaches that shock Western onlookers.

The American Academy of Pediatrics estimates that approximately 100 million girls from Africa and the Middle East between the ages of 4 and 10 have had their clitoris (and usually surrounding tissue) removed, typically without any anesthesia and while held down forcibly on a table or bench. AAP said the procedure, typically performed with "instruments such as knives, razor blades, broken glass, or scissors," is performed 4-5 million times annually.


An estimated 100 million Arab girls have had female circumcision, typically using crude instruments and without any anesthesia.

Survival in such a culture necessitates some numbing. But this psychological component might be insignificant relative to the neurobiological effects of being beaten and tortured in childhood. It was Harvard researchers who first revealed that stress hormones released when children experience physical and sexual abuse actually impede development of that part of the brain responsible for empathy and conscience.

Brain scans of those who suffered through events common in the childhood of Palestinian children reveal an underdeveloped hippocampus and vermis. Among the behaviors associated with this sort of brain damage: impulsivity, sadism, and suicide.

It is almost too frightening to consider that Israel today faces a population, many of whom are hardwired for the sort of violence we have been witnessing.

More terrifying is the long-term prognosis for Palestinian society. Martin Teicher, a lead researcher in the Harvard study, reports in Scientific American (March 2002) that sadistic parents neurobiologically infect their children with the same trait:

Society reaps what it sows in the way it nurtures its children... Whether it comes in the form of physical, emotional, or sexual trauma, or through exposure to warfare, famine, or pestilence, stress can set off a ripple of hormonal changes that permanently wire a child's brain to cope with a malevolent world. Through this chain of events, violence and abuse pass from generation to generation as well as from one society to the next.

EXTRACTING LIGHT FROM THE DARKNESS

In the near term, it is unlikely that Israel will do much to stem the flow of anti-Semitic propaganda, or reduce the violence that Palestinians do to their own children. We must accept that Israel is locked in a battle with a population many of whom are programmed for inconceivable callousness and hatred.

Ironically, we can learn from our neighbor's example:

Just as Palestinians take education very seriously and produce sadism, so can we dedicate the lion's share of our resources to Jewish education in order to produce sensitivity, altruism, and righteousness. The percentage of Jewish charitable funds directed to teaching Torah to Jewish youth is miniscule, obscenely small. Just as Palestinian political and lay leaders obsess over immersing their children in the details of Palestinian history and culture, so can our political and lay leaders.


The percentage of Jewish charities directed to teaching Torah to Jewish youth is obscenely small.

Israeli leaders and heads of major Jewish organizations in the Diaspora all too often play down (or outright deny) the value of an immersion in Judaism. Just as Palestinian parents speak to their children about the need to "sacrifice for our national dream," so too we can speak to our children about giving of themselves to achieve real Tikkun Olam.

Perhaps our children hear too much about how to get what they want, and not enough about how to let go of what they want for the sake of something or Someone bigger than them.

And just as the harshness of Palestinian childhood might be wiring children for hatred and violence, so too perhaps attentive, loving parenting might wire our children for goodness. (I have summarized the considerable evidence for this possibility in my book, "To Kindle a Soul.")

Perhaps the moment has arrived to rethink the amount of time we spend (or don't spend) with our children; the way we discipline them; the media we expose them to. Perhaps we can be inspired by the intifada to commit ourselves, 24/7, to raising a different sort of child. Perhaps those of us who survive the current crisis can emerge different, better, for the horrors we have seen.
by karen
Shannen comes up with a title that leads us to believe that what follows might be a balanced presentation of facts.

What bullshit. We are given a list of alleged atrocities, all committed by Palestinians and Arabs and not a single atrocity or act of terorrism that is routinely done by the murderous IDF.

The fact that in the past 20 months over 1,000 more Palestinians Arabs have been killed by the Israeli Jews, as compared to Israelis being killed by Palestinians is completely ignored. The majority of the killings on both sides has involved innocent civilians.

Americans politicians should quit supporting this killing with the payments of billions in taxes to the Sharon war machine. That is obscene and immoral.

by Dr. lovely
child1.jpgokh316.jpg
We are peaceful people.
by Dr. lovely
babykalashnikov_1_.jpgzuf316.jpg
Look at the new toy papa gave me
by Dr. lovely
little_killers_1_.jpgdhf264.jpg
Jihad, Jihad, Jihad
by inquisitor
JoJo Gunn, can you explain why the United States was one of the few countries to vote against an international agreement against children as war combatants? If these pictures are so disturbing, why would your beloved government prevent it from being illegal, when the entire world was ready to do so?
by JoJo Gunn LICKS HIS DOGS BALLS !!
JoJo Gunn LICKS HIS DOGS BALLS !! JoJo Gunn LICKS HIS DOGS BALLS !! JoJo Gunn LICKS HIS DOGS BALLS !! JoJo Gunn LICKS HIS DOGS BALLS !! JoJo Gunn LICKS HIS DOGS BALLS !! JoJo Gunn LICKS HIS DOGS BALLS !! JoJo Gunn LICKS HIS DOGS BALLS !! JoJo Gunn LICKS HIS DOGS BALLS !! JoJo Gunn LICKS HIS DOGS BALLS !!
by inquisitor
Warning: you might have to learn something you ignorant piece of shit
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22optional+protocol%22+child+soldiers+united+states+vote
by inquisitor
JoJo, I know you were hoping this thread would silently go away. I want know why your beloved government stagnates the fight to end child combatants. What do they have to gain by keeping child soldiers? Do you even have the remotest fucking clue you ignorant son of a bitch?
by mike
Got an explanation for this, you war mongers?

http://www.theithacajournal.com/news/stories/20020525/topstories/380284.html

"We were told there were no friendly forces," said Guckenheimer, an assistant gunner with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody there, they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there were women and children to kill them."

The private's mealy-mouthed "clarification:"

http://www.theithacajournal.com/news/stories/20020604/opinion/440857.html

See also:

http://www.themoscowtimes.com/stories/2002/06/07/120.html

by mike
ok, we have Racer X's apology for U.S. terrorism. Any other conservatives? JoJo? Eric? Step right up with your sickening justifications. Remember: when they kill women and children, it's terrorism. When we do it, it's part of the cold, hard necessity of war.

First one forward gets a Hypocrites' Medal. On you marks, get set, go!

by Eric
You're right mike. Let's just go over to Kabul and protest until they stop crashing planes into our buildings. Let's scold them on the internet until they don't wanna blow a dirty bomb up in my neighborhood. Let's hold our breathes and stomp our feet until they see things our way.

Now if you think that's ridiculous, then good, you're not part of the looney left. And I've read enough of your posts to know you're reasonable in your justifications. So mike, if your a soldier in a war, and a kid is shooting at you, what would you do?
by Eric
While it is true that the hijackers were not Afghanis, it is also true that they were Al Quaeda terrorists, a group headed by bin Laden and based in Afghanistan. An ultimatum was given to the ruling faction of Afghanistan to turn him over. They refused choosing to harbor terrorists. But I think you know this already.

So now, "innocent" Afghani women and children have to suffer. Those "innocent" Afghanis that couldn't turn their terrorists out, but can grab a gun and fight imperialist invaders. Yeah, that makes sense.
by mike
The intentional killing of innocent women and children is a war crime, regardless of how it compares with other war crimes. If the Nazis killed 50,000 innocent civilians in a Polish village in 1944, for example, and the Soviets came along and killed another 400, the Soviet action would still be a war crime.

No Afghan flew planes into any buildings. No Afghan slit any passenger's throats. No Afghan enrolled in any flight training school.

Unintentional civilian casualties may be likely in any conflict, but whether even these are worth the risk depends, essentially, on whether greater civilian casualties can be avoided as a result of the use of force. The U.S. entered World War II realizing that civilian casualties were possible, but also knowing that military intervention could save the world from exponentially greater Nazi atrocities.

No such justification applies to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. Eliminating the Taliban (a military junta imposed on the Afghan people by Pakistan, with a "green light" from the U.S.) simply caused Osama and company to flee into Pakistan, where they continue to pose a threat. And there is never any justification for intentionally killing innocent women and children. The private explicitly said that all civilians, not just combatants, were targets. His later "clarification" was so lame, in my view, that it only made his original statements more credible.

Well, then, say conservatives, liberals and even, God help us, more than a few progressives, "What is the alternative? What would YOU do?"

As Gore Vidal has said (and I've noted in another post to this board), "You don't bomb Sicily to take out the Mob. You get an international police force and you go in and get them." Anyone looking for a conservative articulation of this principal can read Michael Howard's article last fall in Foreign Affairs.

If you look at the strikes against al-Quada that have been successful, you'll notice that most of them were police actions coordinated between governments and among financial institutions.

The unilateral American intervention in Afghanistan is not only wrong, it has failed to achieve its stated objectives
by Eric
>The intentional killing of innocent women and children is a war crime, regardless of how it compares with other war crimes.
by alskjfk
>The private explicitly said that all civilians, not just combatants, were targets. His later "clarification" was so lame, in my view, that it only made his original statements more credible.


I've already made clear in another discussion on this same subject that's taking place concurrently that I don't believe the story. The writer obviously has a political agenda to push that supercedes reporting the news.

I do find it interesting that those who are so willing to quickly dismiss the "corporate controlled media" will immediately jump on it's bandwagon if they think it helps their promote their cause.
by Eric
>I do find it interesting that those who are so willing to quickly dismiss the "corporate controlled media" will immediately jump on it's bandwagon if they think it helps their promote their cause.

Ahhhhhh! The old "Indymedia is a propaganda machine for the left" argument! I wonder if we know anyone else that has stated as much? Hmmm let me see...

IndyMedia: Keeping the wheels of left wing propaganda well lubed!
by Sargent at Arms
>kids and guns
by inquisitor • Monday June 10, 2002 at 01:07 AM

JoJo Gunn, can you explain why the United States was one of the few countries to vote against an international agreement against children as war combatants? If these pictures are so disturbing, why would your beloved government prevent it from being illegal, when the entire world was ready to do so?

Does this fool deserve an answer? Probably not, but for the rest of us who studied in school, let's review.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22optional+protocol%22+child+soldiers+united+states+vote

According the the articles written under the above link, the Bush Administration supports the legislation. But, it's stuck in the Senate. Why?

We can't know for sure without examining the draft as it is being presented to the Senate. But usually these things get caught up because some Senator or group of Senators try to attach some "pork barrel spending" rider to the original draft in order to benefit their State, and it bottles everything up. Until "inquisitor" can demonstrate beyond a shadow of a doubt that is NOT what is happening here, then we cannot assume that the Senate is opposed to the draft the Bush Administration supports.





by inquisitor
Hey Sargant ... keep looking. Finding the first article and proclaiming it to be the end of the story is pretty stupid. If you dont know what is being talked about, why would you feel so confident asserting the very first thing you find? Idiot.
by S at A
... because I'm right.
by aaron
what's a day gone by without hearing jo jo sweetly whisper 'sewage' in our ears? It's like a cool breeze on a hot summer afternoon. Thank you jo jo.

please, never leave us jo jo. you're such an intelligent and thoughtful cro-magnon.
by aaron
i think you have some freudian issues with the poddy jo jo. are you, how should i say, "trained"? or does mommy still have to change li'l jo jo's diapers before he jumps on the net every morning?
by now you know
Little known fact: JoJo actually works for us. He's out enployee. We pay him handsomely to make us look articulate by comparison.
by the REAL now you know
JoJo doesn't even exist. He's nothing but a figment of Wanda Jean Kominsky's imagination.

There, I said it. I said it and I'm glad.
by zooloo
Anyone employed however remotely by a intelligence agency, disregard the following...

For the rest of us..... the divide and conquer effect is fully at play here.......

Stop

For a Moment

Who wants to die?

You?

Me?

Them?

Us?

No.

Not a single one of us.

To live, we need nurturing.

To live we need caring.

Food. Shelter. Clothing.

I need that. I will give it as i can.

Who is with me? Say Eye.

z
by zooloo
.....for all those who miss the point when spelling is incorrect. z
by Eric
>JoJo doesn't even exist. He's nothing but a figment of Wanda Jean Kominsky's imagination.

Oh JoJo exists alright. Wana may be the figment of Nessie's imagination, but JoJo is real.

See, it's not about who is real on IMC or not Wanda. It's not about your imaginary pathetic life in Wichita or the Jewish Bankers. Or how many monikers you can post under without anyone knowing who's who or which end is up.

Every voice posted is a real voice. It may not be the voice of the person who posted it, but you can bet dollars to deutsche marks that for every idiotic post, there's an idiot that agrees with it.
by mike
<for every idiotic post, there's an idiot that agrees with it.>

speak for yourself, dude.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$190.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network