top
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Sonicblue ordered to monitor customers

by Gabriel
A federal order was made to Sonicblue to record and submit the viewing habits of its customers to AOL, MGM, Disney, NBC, ABC and CBS.
Earlier this month, a federal magistrate ordered Santa Clara, Calif.-based Sonicblue to develop software that would allow it to monitor the viewing habits of its ReplayTV set-top box owners. The order also required Sonicblue to hand that information over to the plaintiffs in the copyright-infringement case--a group of entertainment powerhouses including AOL Time Warner, MGM, Disney, and the big three TV networks.

"We're being ordered to spy on our customers; that's the most direct way of looking at it," Ken Potashner, Sonicblue's CEO, said at the time.

On Monday, Sonicblue requested a stay and a reversal of the order. Judge Florence-Marie Cooper granted the stay on Wednesday, deferring the decision on the need for the monitoring software until at least June 3, when Cooper will hear Sonicblue's request for a reversal.

The order, handed down by Central District Court Magistrate Charles F. Eick, has raised the ire of numerous privacy groups, as well as the company, and has once again pushed "digital rights management" into the realm of public debate.

Sonicblue's ReplayTV recorders and digital video recording service allow consumers to record live TV shows, store them on a hard drive, skip commercials, and send TV shows to other ReplayTV owners over the Internet. In their suit, the entertainment companies claim that distributing shows infringes on copyright laws.

Sonicblue called the order "breathtaking and unprecedented" in its request for a reversal. The company objects to the order in part because it requires gathering information on individual users. But the plaintiffs argue that by requiring Sonicblue to track viewers "only by unique identification numbers," the order preserves users' anonymity.

Sonicblue asked that in the event the order was not reversed it be modified so that consumers would be allowed to opt in or out of the data collection. The company also asked that the plaintiffs be allowed access to the data for only a limited time.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network