top
Global Justice
Global Justice
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Cal Supreme Court Says Nike Can Be Sued Over Ads That Defended Worker Wages, Treatment

by Karen Gaudette
The California Supreme Court ruled that Nike Inc. can be sued by a man who claims the company broke advertising laws with an ad campaign that defended the wages, treatment and safety conditions of workers at overseas factories.
wto_toilet.jpg
California Supreme Court Says Nike Can Be Sued Over Ads That Defended Worker Wages, Treatment
By Karen Gaudette Associated Press Writer
Published: May 2, 2002

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The California Supreme Court ruled that Nike Inc. can be sued by a man who claims the company broke advertising laws with an ad campaign that defended the wages, treatment and safety conditions of workers at overseas factories.
In a split decision Thursday, the court overturned a lower court ruling that said Nike's efforts to quell accusations of worker mistreatment did not constitute commercial speech.

"Our holding, based on decisions of the United States Supreme Court, in no way prohibits any business enterprise from speaking out on issues of public importance or from vigorously defending its own labor practices," the court wrote. "It means only that when a business enterprise, to promote and defend its sales and profits, makes factual representations about its own products or its own operations, it must speak truthfully."

Nike attorney David Brown said he still was reading the decision and couldn't comment.

The highly publicized lawsuit claims Nike's 1996-1997 campaign in defense of its wages, treatment of workers and health and safety conditions at Asian plants run by contractors was misleading.

The lawsuit says Nike falsely stated that it guarantees a "living wage" to all workers, that its workers in Southeast Asia make twice the local minimum wage and are protected from corporal punishment, and that it complies with government rules on wages, hours and health and safety conditions.

Those claims are refuted by studies by labor and human rights groups and a January 1997 audit by the firm of Ernst & Young, commissioned by Nike, according to the lawsuit filed by Marc Kasky. Among other things, the audit found employees in a Vietnam shoe factory were exposed to a cancer-causing substance and suffered a high incidence of respiratory problems, according to the lawsuit.

It wasn't immediately clear what Kasky's connection was to Nike or the foreign workers.

---

On the Net:

http://www.nike.com

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov

AP-ES-05-02-02 1402EDT

http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGARICJXQ0D.html
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$225.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network