From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Why its OK to burn an Israeli and Amerikkkan flag.
Regarding the burning of the Israeli flag on saturday.
Alot of people seem to equate the burning of the Israeli and Amerikkkan flag as hatred against EVERYTHING Jewish and Amerikkkan. Well that is not true. It is not against the Jewish and American people we are against. Merely the Israeli and Amerikkkan GOVERNMENTS themselves. After all I was born an "American". So why would it make sense to hate my "Amerikkkan" heritage? These are the same people who say that their pro-israeli/US march last week was ACTUALLY comparable to saturdays march numberwise! Right. At most their so called "rally" got at 5,000 at most! Ours was 30,000 plus!
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
Chris Drater
The "love it or leave it" cop-out is both ignorant and hypocritical.
You say change work to change the system, and claim no one is doing anything to change the system. Then you complain that these same people are using the benefits of the system.
You also presume there's anyplace in the world safe from U.S. imperialism.
There is no place safe from U.S. imperialism, and while making statements on Indymedia may not constitute a tangible change, it is a valid and important form of expression.
Your presumptions that
a) People who are opposed to this system participate in it fully and ignorantly and
b) People who are opposed to this system do nothing effective to change it
Are wishful thinking, which serves as the sand you cover your head in.
At the local 7-ll, they sell a How to Protect Your Family From Terrorism
pamphlet. The pamphlet has a picture on the cover that depicts a large
gathering, of what looks like Middle-Easterners who have scarves covering
their faces, and they are burning a flag and doing what looks like
the standard "Death to the Great Satan" chant.
Zionism, is the jewish nationalist movement who supports the establishment of a jewish nation in the ancient land of israel. As a Jew i have exactly the same right for a country of my own, like your avarage ranch, german or egyptian citizen. And the right to protect it from aggressors in exactly the same manner the armies of these nations will protect their own.
Zionism is not a dirty word, not more than, say American pride, or the anthem of france.
Once my homeland was attacked i have the right to defand it. Three arab armies has attacked Israel in 1967 (six day war), assisted by the palestinians, in the intention to annihilate Israel. Israel has won and captured Jerusalem and the West Bank from the hands of the Jordanian. In the recent years a peace treaty was signed between Israel and Jordan, and these territories were left in the custody of Israel.
..I am not ashamed to be a Zionist, i am proud.
assisted by the palestinians, in the intention to annihilate Israel."
"On June 5th, Israel decided to launch a pre-emptive attack on Egypt."
Anyone who burns a flag of ANY nation is just a coward attempting to incite violence.
Go ahead, burn my flag. I'm still American. I still love my country more than yours. And you are still a pesky idiot. Nothing has changed.
...
"Robert Dassa was one of the first of the spies to be caught. Philip Nathanson was caught soon after when, on the way to blow up a cinema in Alexandria, the bomb he was carrying in his pocket ignited and then exploded. What was a particularly alarming factor was that outside of the theater a fire engine was waiting, as if expecting them. Philip had the distinct feeling he was being watched. It turned out that he had been.
As Philip lay on the ground, he saw startled and frightened faces looking down at him. While somebody shouted "Take care! He may have another bomb!" Philip heard a police sergeant say "Don't worry, don't worry. We were waiting for them. These are the people who set fire to the American library." He was taken by ambulance to a hospital. After being lightly treated, he was interrogated by members of Egypt's military intelligence, the Muhabarrat. The others were caught soon after - Shmuel Azar, Philip Nathanson, Robert Dassa, and Marcelle Ninio. None of them had been prepared by their Israeli handlers for this eventuality.
They refused to implicate one another. At first, they didn't even admit to the bombings. When the police brought Philip Nathanson to his house with incriminating material, which were sure to implicate him, Philip continued to maintain that he was innocent of all charges. As he recalls being brought to his house; "'The house was overflowing with policemen and detectives in and out of uniform. They took me straight to the garden, and to the workshop in the garden hut. This too was so crowded there was no room for me, and I remained standing on the threshold…The policemen had piled the table with Vim cans, chemicals, and the fine scales I used for weighing them. With each item they found, they asked me: 'What's this? What's it for?'"
'I told them I was manufacturing dyes.'
'Sure,' said the governor sarcastically. 'There's a good market for them, praise be to Allah.'"
The police took everything they could from his house, even a fork and a spoon, to be used as evidence against them. Victor Levy, Robert Dassa and Philip Nathanson held up to the persistent questioning, threats, and occasional beatings. They maintained that they were Communists who wanted the British imperialists out of Egypt. This even earned them the admiration and respect from the Egyptians, who also wanted the British out. That is, until Shmuel Azar, who was constitutionally incapable of telling a lie, admitted that they were Jews and Zionists working on behalf of the State of Israel. Thereafter, the whole network was rounded up and arrested by August 5, 1954. "Paul Frank", or Avraham Seidenberg, meanwhile, did nothing, and left Egypt only on August 5, when Meir Meyuhas and Moshe Marzouk were arrested."
http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/History/lavon.html
"We the sheeple, in order to form a truly fucked up union, ensure a police state and domestic traquility at the point of a gun..."
Just as amazing as the fact that there are people who think the constitution is such "the end all, be all" that they never learn how to treat people and their beliefs with the respect they deserve.
It's like saying, "Well the constitution doesn't say I can't, so it must be my God given right to burn the flag." Stupid, huh? Yeah, it's your right. In fact, it's your duty. Why don't you go out in the streets right now and burn one.
We'll send you a get well card at the hospital while you're healing up from the ass-whipping you'll get.
I wonder if it's my God given right to whip your ass since the constitution doesn't say I can't? Hmmmm.
It is because of mindless people like yourself that I carry, to deter if possible, to defend when needed. I took an oath once, to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I still feel the need to follow that oath even though I'm no longer in the service. So feel free to assault me for exercising free speech, I will then exercise my right to self defense.
If you truly believe in freedom of speech then the speech that must be most protected is unpopular speech. Just as people have the right to burning the American, Israeli, Palestine, Iraqi, Nazi, the Rainbow Flag, Confederated, or United Nations flag, they also have the right to fly and display those flags proudly and go about their business unmolested.
Will people label you for your actions if you fly or burn this flag or that flag? Of course, to say otherwise is very naïve and borderline stupid. A flag is a very significant political symbol and your actions with a flag tells a lot about your political views. So burn and fly those flags proudly, but know the price for true freedom of speech.
>So you would use violence against me...for voicing my views, how American, how hypocritical, how typical...
is in itself hypocritical. How did you plan plan to defend the constitution against all these so called enemies while you were a part of the war machine? Hunger strike? Non-violent protest? Lay down your body in the path of the advancing enemy tank?
When I threatend to beat you up, I really didn't plan on doing it. No, really, you can stop being afraid now. It was simply to make the point that the constitution is not the guiding doctrine for being a good human being. Nobody is saying shred the constitution. No one wants to impede your freedom of speech. But as I'm sure you know, freedom of speech requires responsibility. Some Americans hold the flag sacred. Some Americans respect the icons of all nations. The constitution doesn't tell you how to be a respectful human being. Why don't you go read it again.
Yes you do have the right to speak your mind, but there is a price to pay. You want to use yelling fire in a movie theater as an example, sure yell fire in a movie theater, but if you get caught prepare to pay for the price of your freedom of speech.
And that’s what I mean by the price of freedom of speech, yes you have freedom of speech here, but there is a cost. And from the sound of Screaming Racist, if he is perfectly fine posting racial remarks that’s fine by me, but when people point at you and give you the John Rocker treatment, well that’s the price of freedom speech. I’m prepared to pay the price, but by the sounds of your sarcastic tirade, sounds like you are one of those hypocrites I was mentioning.
It's not the consequences that we're dealing with here. If free speech has consequences, then it's not free. Free speech means exactly that...no consequences for speaking freely. None.
What we're dealing with isthe responsibility that goes along with freedom. Having free speech doesn't mean I can infringe on your rights. So freedom of speech has limits.
But there's no law against calling someone an uncle tom tar baby coon just like there's no law against flag burning. It's just insulting and rude. Logic dictates you shouldn't do it. So when you say there's nothing wrong with doing it, you're just being illogical.