From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Spolied Brat Terrorists
Like manly anti-globalists, the 9/11 terrorists were spoiled college brats. Could you be the next mass murderer>
So you're a white American college student anarchist, devoutly believing in anti-globalism. You are willing to go out onto the streets and push the limits of the law to express your views. Your rich daddy is upset! You go online and complain about globalism with your other privileged Internet-using buddies.
You may have more in common with the 9/11 terrorists than you think. Could you be the next mass murderer?
Most of the hijackers in the terrorist attacks on America were recruited from wealthy Saudi families. Rather than being hired "muscle" or terrorists posing as Saudis with false identities, as previously thought, investigations have revealed a privileged and elite group.
Not only that, Saudi Arabia itself is a privileged and elite Muslim country. It is awash in petroleum, linked by fiber optics, and dotted with shopping malls, McDonald's, Pizza Hut, and Starbucks. The country has a GDP per capita of over $10,000, compared with Algeria ($5,500), Bangladesh ($1570), Djibouti ($1300), Sudan ($1000), or Afghanistan ($800).
Fifteen of the 19 hijackers are now known to be Saudis, including the brother of a police commander, the son of a tribal chief, two teachers and three law graduates.
Well-educated, intelligent and in their mid-twenties, many of them had a history of making trips both to other countries, including Germany, America and Afghanistan.
Mohammed Atta, 33, who the FBI said was on the first plane to hit the World Trade Center, was an architect and has been described as a 'model student' at Hamburg's Technical University.
Ziad Jarrah, 26, who was aboard the United Airlines plane that crashed in Pennsylvania, was a student at the University of Applied Sciences in Hamburg where he studied aeronautical engineering.
Marwan Al-Shehhi, 23, identified by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation as a hijacker on the United Airlines plane that hit the south tower of the World Trade Centre, studied in a German-language program at the University of Bonn under the name Marwan Lekrab.
One hijacker now identified as a ringleader on September 11 is Nawaf al-Hamzi, who sat in seat 5F of American Airlines flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon. Al-Hamzi, according to local sources, is the brother of a police chief from the coastal town of Jizan, in southwest Saudi Arabia. Talk about being "the man!"
Hani Hanjour, a trained commercial airline pilot and the son of a wealthy businessman from Ti'af, 50 miles east of Mecca, was also on the flight, as was Majed Moqed, a law student at the King Saud University in Riyadh.
A former college room-mate of Moqed was Satam al-Suqami, a hijacker on American Airlines flight 11, which crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center. Also a law student at the King Saud University, he was from a northern Saudi province.
Brothers Waleed and Wail al-Shehri, also on the same flight, came from Khamis Mushayt, east of Abha. Described by friends as "peaceful and devout", Wail had graduated from an institute of teachers. Where did their non-violence go?
Ahmed al-Nami, a hijacker on board United Airlines flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, was identified last week as another law student, trained at the King Khaled University Law school in Abha.
These terrorists were not your average Muslim. They were not "the other." They were not the "starving masses." They didn't even come from a country with "starving masses."
They were just like you, spoiled college brats, caught up in a deadly combination of "rich man's guilt" and religious fervor.
If you believe too strongly in your cause, you may end up just like them.
You may have more in common with the 9/11 terrorists than you think. Could you be the next mass murderer?
Most of the hijackers in the terrorist attacks on America were recruited from wealthy Saudi families. Rather than being hired "muscle" or terrorists posing as Saudis with false identities, as previously thought, investigations have revealed a privileged and elite group.
Not only that, Saudi Arabia itself is a privileged and elite Muslim country. It is awash in petroleum, linked by fiber optics, and dotted with shopping malls, McDonald's, Pizza Hut, and Starbucks. The country has a GDP per capita of over $10,000, compared with Algeria ($5,500), Bangladesh ($1570), Djibouti ($1300), Sudan ($1000), or Afghanistan ($800).
Fifteen of the 19 hijackers are now known to be Saudis, including the brother of a police commander, the son of a tribal chief, two teachers and three law graduates.
Well-educated, intelligent and in their mid-twenties, many of them had a history of making trips both to other countries, including Germany, America and Afghanistan.
Mohammed Atta, 33, who the FBI said was on the first plane to hit the World Trade Center, was an architect and has been described as a 'model student' at Hamburg's Technical University.
Ziad Jarrah, 26, who was aboard the United Airlines plane that crashed in Pennsylvania, was a student at the University of Applied Sciences in Hamburg where he studied aeronautical engineering.
Marwan Al-Shehhi, 23, identified by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation as a hijacker on the United Airlines plane that hit the south tower of the World Trade Centre, studied in a German-language program at the University of Bonn under the name Marwan Lekrab.
One hijacker now identified as a ringleader on September 11 is Nawaf al-Hamzi, who sat in seat 5F of American Airlines flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon. Al-Hamzi, according to local sources, is the brother of a police chief from the coastal town of Jizan, in southwest Saudi Arabia. Talk about being "the man!"
Hani Hanjour, a trained commercial airline pilot and the son of a wealthy businessman from Ti'af, 50 miles east of Mecca, was also on the flight, as was Majed Moqed, a law student at the King Saud University in Riyadh.
A former college room-mate of Moqed was Satam al-Suqami, a hijacker on American Airlines flight 11, which crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center. Also a law student at the King Saud University, he was from a northern Saudi province.
Brothers Waleed and Wail al-Shehri, also on the same flight, came from Khamis Mushayt, east of Abha. Described by friends as "peaceful and devout", Wail had graduated from an institute of teachers. Where did their non-violence go?
Ahmed al-Nami, a hijacker on board United Airlines flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, was identified last week as another law student, trained at the King Khaled University Law school in Abha.
These terrorists were not your average Muslim. They were not "the other." They were not the "starving masses." They didn't even come from a country with "starving masses."
They were just like you, spoiled college brats, caught up in a deadly combination of "rich man's guilt" and religious fervor.
If you believe too strongly in your cause, you may end up just like them.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
There have been quite a few murderers throughout history, and many more people who killed within the context of being a soldier in an army that was fighting on a bad side. All of these people had various characteristics, and there are very few characteristics that all of them have in common. There are murderers who had strong beliefs, and there are murderers who were stupid and had no beliefs, and there are murderers who were fairly moderate and motivated by greed or money. There are lots of soldiers who were too scared to resist the draft - in 1930s germany, the US Vietnam war etc.
In any case, you could find a murderer who had a characteristic which would match a characteristic of anyone alive.
Does left and right wing really matter when you are killing people for a religion (be it supernatural, economic, or political)?
For that matter, can you say Al-Qaeda is truly right wing? Those Al Qaeda guys don't believe in big money capitalism (their daddies might though). They rejected it for the life of ascetic activism. OBL lived in a cave...they though American consumer capitalism made us weak.
Al Qaeda members are true believers in Islam's strong charitable redistribtuion system (2.5% of income and assets must go to charity). Infact, much of Al Qaeda money was funneled through Islamic charities. Islam also denies interest on loans, which is a killer to capitalism. Islam does protect private property, but evidently these guys didn't mind destroying billions of dollars of it, did they.
Read Osama Bin Laden's Fatwas, they sound like they could be on IndyMedia...
"The Americans' aims behind these wars are religious and economic, the aim is also to serve the Jews' petty state and divert attention from its occupation of Jerusalem and murder of Muslims there."
"for over seven years the United States has been occupying the lands of Islam in the holiest of places, the Arabian Peninsula, plundering its riches, dictating to its rulers, humiliating its people, terrorizing its neighbors, and turning its bases in the Peninsula into a spearhead through which to fight the neighboring Muslim peoples"
Anti-Israel, anti-globalism, anti-military....
And... no Osama bin Laden's fatwas don't resemble posts on indymedia, and .. it is no true that Osama bin Laden is anti-military.
What you're doing is choosing the mildest connections between groups and concluding that that makes them equivalent. Seriously, you could take any two people under the sun, who disagree on almost everything, and you could still find a couple things that they have in common. Take your statement that al Qaeda and the assorted people who in the pro-democracy movement( often titled the 'antiglobalization' movement by the media who ignore the fuzzy and contradictory nature of this term given its int'l nature) are basically equivalent or highly similar groups of people because al Qaeda are very religious, and the democracy folks embrace something that is equivalent of religion in terms of their political beliefs (which is also a contention that I would disagree with. You have not caught on to the fact that most quote "antiglobalization" people strongly reject authoritarian dogmas like communism, and reject having gurus like marx or whoever). This idea is highly equivocal because about 85% of society is religious, and you claim that the rest probably have replacement religions involving politics or economics or new age. Indeed, almost everyone is religious and the claims about religious people being capable of going all al-Qaeda-esque on us would apply to everyone.
Who wants peace
and who wants to own all the resources, all the people..who seeks power and who seeks peace
Remember the words of Black Elk!
-Someone, but I forgot who
But, let's suppose the argument has merit. Let's take them to its logical conclusion.
The wealthy already have control over the lives of the poor. Maybe the wealthy should only be able to behave in ways that only affect other rich people, not poor people. They should only be allowed to employ rich people in their factories and offices.
Maybe only the poor should be able to agitate for their own liberation from poverty. From now on, we should privilege more of their actions as legitimate acts of liberation. From now on, stealing new cars from auto dealerships is legal, as long as you make less than $10,000 a year (in the USA) and cannot afford a car.
I admit it. I'm being extreme. Here's a counter example that really makes my point.
Let's say that only an oppressed minority has the right to demand equal rights. So, go back in time to 1955. Black are calling for civil rights. Only Blacks participate in the movement, and everyone else is rejected as illegitimate.
Being a minority, and having very little power, the Civil Rights movement fails. There's no new Civil Rights laws, because all the lawmakers are white. No middle class activists participate. Segregation persists. Nothing improves. Status quo.
Solidarity is important to all struggles for human liberation. We are all enlisted in this effort.