From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Fluoridation: 50 Years is Enough!
To learn more about fluoridation visit the Fluoride Action Network's website at http://www.fluoridealert.org.
The references for the following fact sheet are available at http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-facts.htm
The references for the following fact sheet are available at http://www.fluoridealert.org/fluoride-facts.htm
<p><font face="times"><b>Facts about Fluoridation<br>
</b></font><i><font face="times">Fluoride Action Network <br>
January 2001</font></i></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><strong>* 98% of WESTERN EUROPE </strong>has <strong>REJECTED</strong>
<strong>WATER FLUORIDATION. </strong>This includes <b><a href="govt-statements.htm">Austria,
Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands,
Norway, and Sweden</b>. The predominant reason for Europe's rejection is
the belief that public drinking water is NOT the appropriate vehicle with which
to deliver medication to a population. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b>Fluoride is the only chemical added to
drinking water for the purposes of medication (e.g. to prevent tooth decay,
a <strong>NON WATER-BORNE DISEASE</strong>). All other treatment chemicals are
added to treat the water (i.e. make the water safer and better to drink). </font>
</p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"> <b>* </b>Fluoride is <strong>NOT</strong> <strong>AN
ESSENTIAL NUTRIENT</strong>, which means that no human disease (including dental
decay) has ever been linked to a fluoride deficiency. (1)</font><font size="3" face="times"><br>
<br>
<b>* </b>The fluoride used to fluoridate water is an <strong>INDUSTRIAL WASTE
PRODUCT </strong>from the <a href="phosphate/overview.htm"><b>phosphate fertilizer
industry</b>. It is an unprocessed hazardous waste, contaminated with a
number of toxins, particularly arsenic. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>*</b> Fluoridation adds between 0.1 and 1.6
parts per billion (ppb) <strong><a href="f-arsenic.htm">ARSENIC</strong>
to drinking water, and therefore violates the EPA's Maximum Contaminant Level
Goal for arsenic - which is <b>0</b> ppb. (2)</font></p>
<p><font face="times"><b>* </b>Hydrofluosilicic acid & sodium silicofluoride,
which are the chemicals used to fluoridate 91% of fluoridated water in the US,
have <b>NEVER BEEN TESTED</b> for safety and effectiveness. According to a November
16, 2000 <a href="EPA-Masters.jpg"><b>letter</b> from the EPA, "to
answer your question on whether we have in our possession empirical scientific
data on the effects of fluosilicic acid or sodium silicofluoride on health and
behavior, <u>the answer is no</u>."</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> When water fluoridation began 50 years
ago, it was believed that fluoride needed to be ingested in order to be effective.
This is NO longer the view of the dental establishment, which now generally
concedes that fluoride's benefits are derived primarily from <strong>TOPICAL</strong>
application. (3) According to the US Centers for Disease Control, "[L]aboratory
and epidemiologic research suggests that fluoride prevents dental caries predominately
<u>after eruption</u> of the tooth into the mouth, and its actions<u> primarily
are topical </u>for both adults and children."</font><font size="3" face="times"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b>All fluoride products designed to be ingested
(e.g. fluoride supplements) are available by <strong>PRESCRIPTION</strong> only.
NO fluoride products designed for ingestion have EVER been approved as safe
or effective by the <strong><a href="fda.htm">US FOOD & DRUG AMINISTRATION</strong>.
(4) By logical extension fluoridated water can appropriately be classified as
an unapproved prescription drug.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> The dental community concedes that fluoride
is ineffective at preventing the most common type of dental decay - <strong><a href="pit-fissure.htm">PIT
& FISSURES</strong>. Pit & fissure decay - which is the decay found
in the crevices of the chewing surfaces - accounts for upwards of 85% of dental
decay now experienced in the US. (5)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Evidence now strongly suggests that fluoridation <strong>DOESN'T WORK</strong>.
Cavities have declined at similarly impressive rates throughout the entire western,
industrialized world over the past half century. This decline has occured irrespective
of a country's fluoridation status. Western Europe, which is 98% unfluoridated,
has experienced the <a href="WHO-dmft.htm"><b>SAME</b> decline in cavities
as the heavily fluoridated US, and today enjoys the SAME low level of tooth
decay. (6)<br>
<br>
<b>*</b> The largest dental survey ever conducted in the US found virtually
no difference in dental decay between children living in fluoridated vs. unfluoridated
areas. The study, which was conducted by the <strong><a href="ifin-290.htm">NATIONAL
INSTITUTE OF DENTAL RESEARCH (NIDR)</strong>, found that the average difference
in tooth decay (0.6 tooth surfaces) between children living in fluoridated vs
unfluoridated areas amounted to LESS than <b>0.5%</b> of the 128 total tooth
surfaces in a child's mouth. (7)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b><a href="feb-2001.htm"><b>5 peer reviewed studies</b> published
in the last 2 years have found that dental decay DOES NOT increase when communities
stop fluoridation. (8)<br>
<br>
</font><font size="3" face="times"><b>*</b> The rhetoric supporting fluoridation
is increasingly centered around the notion that fluoridation benefits the neediest
in society the most. This claim flies in the face of the experience of most
<b>US</b> <strong>INNER CITIES </strong>over the past 50 years. Despite the
fact that nearly all large US cities have been fluoridated for decades, dental
decay is currently rampant in virtually all poor urban areas. (<a href="f-boston.htm">Read
about Boston's experience.) </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"> <b>* </b>One of the major dental health problems
experienced in poor communities is a debilitating condition known as<a href="bbtd.htm">
<strong>"BABY BOTTLE TOOTH DECAY"</strong><strong> </strong>which
is also referred to as <strong>"EARLY CHILDHOOD CARIES."</strong>
This condition, which results from excessive consumption of sweetened liquids
at a young age, is NOT prevented by water fluoridation. (9) According to a study
in <u>Pediatric Nursing</u> "Data from Head Start surveys show the prevalence
of baby bottle tooth decay is about three times the national average among poor
urban children,<b> even in communities with a fluoridated water supply.</b>"<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>The real "oral health crisis" in the US is not lack of fluoridation,
but rather <strong>LACK OF PRIVATE DENTAL INSURANCE</strong> among the poor,
and <strong>UNDERINVESTMENT in MEDICAID</strong> by the Government. According
to a recent report from the Surgeon General, roughly 85% of US dentists do not
treat Medicaid patients due to Medicaid's low rates of reimbursement. (10)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Fluoride is a very toxic substance, which is why it is the active ingredient
in a number of <strong><a href="f-poisonings.htm">PESTICIDES</strong>. Just
2 grams of fluoride is enough to kill an adult, and just 500 mg is enough to
kill a child. (11) In the US, people have <a href="accidents.htm"><b>died</b>,
and many have become sick, when faltering fluoridation equipment has pumped
excess fluoride into the water. <br>
<br>
<b>* </b> <strong>POOR NUTRITION </strong>exacerbates the toxic effects of fluoride
exposure, which is a further reason why it's wrong to target poor communities
with fluoridation (as poor nutrition is more prevalent in low income communiites).
According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, "Existing
data indicate that <u>subsets of the population may be unusually susceptible</u>
to the toxic effects of fluoride and its compounds. These populations include
the elderly, people with deficiencies of calcium, magnesium and/or vitamin C,
and people with cardiovascular and kidney problems." (12) </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> <b>TOTAL FLUORIDE EXPOSURE </b> has increased
substantially since the early days of fluoridation. (13) When fluoridation first
began, exposure to fluoride from sources other than fluoridated water, was minimal.
Today that is not the case. People now receive fluoride from a whole host of
sources, including <a href="NOS-fluoride.htm">pesticide residues, fluoridated
dental products, mechanically
deboned meat, fluoride air <a href="pollution.htm">pollution, and <a href="f-juice.htm">processed
foods & beverages prepared with fluoridated water (e.g. soda, juice,
beer, cereal, etc). It has now reached the point where most people recieve the
"optimal" 1 mg/day of fluoride (which fluoridated water was designed
to deliver) WITHOUT ever drinking a glass of fluoridated water.<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Despite the increase in total fluoride exposure, the concentration
of fluoride added to drinking water (0.7-1.2 mg/L) as prescribed by the US Government,
is still the same as it was back in the 1940s.</font></p>
<p><font face="times"><font size="3"><b>* </b>Due to the increase in total fluoride
exposure, there has been a major increase in the rate of <strong>DENTAL FLUOROSIS</strong>
found among American children. According to data from the US Government, approximately
1 in 3 children living in fluoridated areas have dental fluorosis on at least
2 teeth. (14) Dental fluorosis is the first visible sign that fluoride has poisoned
enzymes in the body.<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Approximately half of the fluoride we ingest each day <strong>ACCUMULATES
</strong>in our bodies, primarily in the bones, but also in soft tissues. (15)
</font></font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> High levels of naturally occuring fluoride
causes a <b>CRIPPLING</b> bone disease known as <strong><a href="fluorosis-india.htm">SKELETAL
FLUOROSIS</strong>. According to <strong><a href="UNICEF.htm">UNICEF</strong>,
skeletal fluorosis is endemic "in at least 25 countries across the globe"
(16). The problem is particularly acute in India, China and other developing
countries. <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> Skeletal fluorosis comes in varying degrees
of severity depending on the level of exposure. The earliest symptoms are characterized
by joint pain that is difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish from <strong><a href="aging-factor.htm">ARTHRITIS</strong>.
According to a review on fluoridation by <a href="hileman.htm"><b>CHEMICAL &
ENGINEERING NEWS</b>: "Because some of the clinical symptoms mimic
arthritis, the first two clinical phases of skeletal fluorosis could be easily
misdiagnosed [as arthritis]." The World Health Organization states that
"early cases [of skeletal fluorosis] may be misdiagnosed as rheumatoid
or osteo arthritis." (17)<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times">It is estimated that approximately 40 million Americans
suffer from arthritis, the most common type being osteoarthritis. <br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Fluoride stimulates <b>ABNORMAL BONE DEVELOPMENT</b>. Clinical trials
published in the <u>New England Journal of Medicine</u> and <u>Journal of Bone
and Mineral Research</u> (18) report that high dose fluoride treatment increases
bone mass but that the newly formed bone is "<b>structurally unsound</b>"
(19). Thus, instead of reducing <strong>HIP FRACTURES,</strong> the studies
found that high doses of fluoride <strong>INCREASED </strong> hip fractures.
<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>There is concern that "low" doses of fluoride, taken over
long periods of time (e.g. fluoridated water), may also increase the rate of
hip fracture. Approximately 20 recent studies have investigated the relationship
between fluoridated water and hip fracture, with approximately half of the studies
finding an association. (20) <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> A 1995 study in the journal <u>Neurtoxicology
and Teratology</u>, found that fluoride accumulated in the brain of rats and
produced age-specific behavioral deficits typical of most <strong>NEUROTOXIC
</strong>agents. (21) In the study, fluoride induced damage to the hippocampal
region of the brain. Damage to the hippocampal region has been linked to hyperactivity
and cognitive deficits.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> 5 recent peer reviewed studies from China
have found an association between elevated fluoride exposure and <b>DECREASED</b>
<strong>IQs</strong> in children. (22)</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> In the late 1990s, a British scientist
discovered that fluoride accumulates to very high levels (avg = 9000 ppm) in
the crystallized tissue of the human <strong><a href="ifin-269.htm">PINEAL GLAND</strong>.
A subsequent animal study found that fluoride interferes with the pineal gland's
production of melatonin, a hormone which helps regulate the onset of <strong>PUBERTY</strong>.
In the study, animals dosed with fluoride had reduced levels of melatonin metabolites
in their urine and had earlier onsets of puberty than the controls. (23)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Up until the 1950s, European doctors used fluoride to reduce the activity
of the <strong><a href="galletti.htm">THYROID GLAND</strong> for people
suffering from overactive thyroid (hyperthyroidism). (24) The daily dose of
fluoride which people are now receiving in fluoridated communities (1.6 to 6.6
mg/day) (25) actually exceeds the dose of fluoride which was found to depress
the thyroid gland (2.3 to 4.5 mg/day). (26) <br>
<br>
<strong>HYPOTHYROIDISM</strong> (under-active
thyroid) is currently one of the most common medical problems in the United
States. <b>SYNTHROID</b>, the
drug doctors prescribe to treat hypothyroidism, was the fourth most prescribed
drug in the US in the year 2000. Symptoms of hypothyroidism include depression,
fatigue, weight gain, muscle and joint pains, increased cholesterol levels,
and heart disease.<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>A recent study published in the journal <u>Brain Research</u> found
that 1 ppm fluoride in water faciliated the uptake of aluminum into the brain
of rats, producing the type of brain tangles (amyloid deposits) that are associated
with <strong>ALZHEIMERS</strong> disease and other types of dementia. (27)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>An epidemiological study
published in the December 2000 issue of the journal <u>Neurotoxicology</u>,
found that fluoridated water was associated with elevated levels of <strong>LEAD</strong>
in children's blood. (28) The study's findings parallel the findings of an earlier
study published in the September 1999 issue of the <u>International Journal
of Environmental Studies</u>. (29) Lead in the blood is associated with a variety
of neurological problems, including reduced intelligence, aggression and hyperactivity.</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>*</b> Dozens of laboratory studies have found
that fluoride is a<b> MUTAGEN</b> - a classification which frequently indicates
that a substance is carcinogenic (i.e. that it causes <b>CANCER</b>). (30) A
cancer bioassay conducted by the National Toxicology Program found that rats
dosed with fluoride had a statisitically significant increase in <b>BONE TUMORS</b>
(osteosarcomas), which were not found among the controls. The initial review
of the study also reported that the fluoride-dosed rats had tumors of the thyroid,
oral cavity and rare tumors of the liver; however these tumors were later downgraded
under conspicuous and controversial circumstances. According to <a href="ifin-19.htm">Dr.
William Marcus, the Chief Toxicologist at the EPA's Office of Drinking Water,
the downgrading of the tumors was politically motivated and not scientifically
defensible. (31)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>A recent epidemiological study conducted by a scientist from the US
Public Health Service found that female <strong>INFERTILITY</strong> was associated
with elevated levels of fluoride ( >3ppm) in drinking water. The study concluded
that more emphasis needs to be given to the effects on health from <u>total
fluoride exposure</u> - not just exposure to fluoridated drinking water. (32)
<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>In light of the recent research indicating health risks from low level
fluoride exposure, the <b><a href="testimony.htm">UNION</b> <a href="testimony.htm"><b>of
SCIENTISTS and PROFESSIONALS at EPA HEADQUARTERS</b> has voted to oppose
fluoridation (33) and has called upon Congress to issue a "national moratorium"
on the fifty year old policy. According to the Vice President of the Union,
Dr. J. William Hirzy, <br>
<br>
</font></p>
<table width="92%" border="0" cellpadding="1" align="right">
<tr>
<td><font size="3" face="times">"In summary, we hold that fluoridation
is an unreasonable risk. That is, the toxicity of fluoride is so great and
the purported benefits associated with it are so small - if there are any
at all - that requiring every man, woman and child in America to ingest
it borders on criminal behavior on the part of governments."</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>*</b> After years of overlooking the problems
with fluoride & fluoridation, the environmental community is finally beginning
to address the issue. In September of 2001, the <a href="news/sierra-club.htm"><b>SIERRA
CLUB</b> announced that:</font></p>
<table width="92%" border="0" cellpadding="1" align="right">
<tr>
<td><font size="3" face="times">"There are now valid concerns regarding the
potential adverse impact of fluoridation on the environment, wildlife, and
human health. The Sierra Club therefore supports giving communities the
option of rejecting mandatory fluoridation of their water supplies. To protect
sensitive populations, and because safer strategies and methods for preventing
tooth decay are now available, we recommend that these safer alternatives
be made available and promoted."</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
</b></font><i><font face="times">Fluoride Action Network <br>
January 2001</font></i></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><strong>* 98% of WESTERN EUROPE </strong>has <strong>REJECTED</strong>
<strong>WATER FLUORIDATION. </strong>This includes <b><a href="govt-statements.htm">Austria,
Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands,
Norway, and Sweden</b>. The predominant reason for Europe's rejection is
the belief that public drinking water is NOT the appropriate vehicle with which
to deliver medication to a population. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b>Fluoride is the only chemical added to
drinking water for the purposes of medication (e.g. to prevent tooth decay,
a <strong>NON WATER-BORNE DISEASE</strong>). All other treatment chemicals are
added to treat the water (i.e. make the water safer and better to drink). </font>
</p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"> <b>* </b>Fluoride is <strong>NOT</strong> <strong>AN
ESSENTIAL NUTRIENT</strong>, which means that no human disease (including dental
decay) has ever been linked to a fluoride deficiency. (1)</font><font size="3" face="times"><br>
<br>
<b>* </b>The fluoride used to fluoridate water is an <strong>INDUSTRIAL WASTE
PRODUCT </strong>from the <a href="phosphate/overview.htm"><b>phosphate fertilizer
industry</b>. It is an unprocessed hazardous waste, contaminated with a
number of toxins, particularly arsenic. </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>*</b> Fluoridation adds between 0.1 and 1.6
parts per billion (ppb) <strong><a href="f-arsenic.htm">ARSENIC</strong>
to drinking water, and therefore violates the EPA's Maximum Contaminant Level
Goal for arsenic - which is <b>0</b> ppb. (2)</font></p>
<p><font face="times"><b>* </b>Hydrofluosilicic acid & sodium silicofluoride,
which are the chemicals used to fluoridate 91% of fluoridated water in the US,
have <b>NEVER BEEN TESTED</b> for safety and effectiveness. According to a November
16, 2000 <a href="EPA-Masters.jpg"><b>letter</b> from the EPA, "to
answer your question on whether we have in our possession empirical scientific
data on the effects of fluosilicic acid or sodium silicofluoride on health and
behavior, <u>the answer is no</u>."</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> When water fluoridation began 50 years
ago, it was believed that fluoride needed to be ingested in order to be effective.
This is NO longer the view of the dental establishment, which now generally
concedes that fluoride's benefits are derived primarily from <strong>TOPICAL</strong>
application. (3) According to the US Centers for Disease Control, "[L]aboratory
and epidemiologic research suggests that fluoride prevents dental caries predominately
<u>after eruption</u> of the tooth into the mouth, and its actions<u> primarily
are topical </u>for both adults and children."</font><font size="3" face="times"><br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b>All fluoride products designed to be ingested
(e.g. fluoride supplements) are available by <strong>PRESCRIPTION</strong> only.
NO fluoride products designed for ingestion have EVER been approved as safe
or effective by the <strong><a href="fda.htm">US FOOD & DRUG AMINISTRATION</strong>.
(4) By logical extension fluoridated water can appropriately be classified as
an unapproved prescription drug.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> The dental community concedes that fluoride
is ineffective at preventing the most common type of dental decay - <strong><a href="pit-fissure.htm">PIT
& FISSURES</strong>. Pit & fissure decay - which is the decay found
in the crevices of the chewing surfaces - accounts for upwards of 85% of dental
decay now experienced in the US. (5)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Evidence now strongly suggests that fluoridation <strong>DOESN'T WORK</strong>.
Cavities have declined at similarly impressive rates throughout the entire western,
industrialized world over the past half century. This decline has occured irrespective
of a country's fluoridation status. Western Europe, which is 98% unfluoridated,
has experienced the <a href="WHO-dmft.htm"><b>SAME</b> decline in cavities
as the heavily fluoridated US, and today enjoys the SAME low level of tooth
decay. (6)<br>
<br>
<b>*</b> The largest dental survey ever conducted in the US found virtually
no difference in dental decay between children living in fluoridated vs. unfluoridated
areas. The study, which was conducted by the <strong><a href="ifin-290.htm">NATIONAL
INSTITUTE OF DENTAL RESEARCH (NIDR)</strong>, found that the average difference
in tooth decay (0.6 tooth surfaces) between children living in fluoridated vs
unfluoridated areas amounted to LESS than <b>0.5%</b> of the 128 total tooth
surfaces in a child's mouth. (7)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b><a href="feb-2001.htm"><b>5 peer reviewed studies</b> published
in the last 2 years have found that dental decay DOES NOT increase when communities
stop fluoridation. (8)<br>
<br>
</font><font size="3" face="times"><b>*</b> The rhetoric supporting fluoridation
is increasingly centered around the notion that fluoridation benefits the neediest
in society the most. This claim flies in the face of the experience of most
<b>US</b> <strong>INNER CITIES </strong>over the past 50 years. Despite the
fact that nearly all large US cities have been fluoridated for decades, dental
decay is currently rampant in virtually all poor urban areas. (<a href="f-boston.htm">Read
about Boston's experience.) </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"> <b>* </b>One of the major dental health problems
experienced in poor communities is a debilitating condition known as<a href="bbtd.htm">
<strong>"BABY BOTTLE TOOTH DECAY"</strong><strong> </strong>which
is also referred to as <strong>"EARLY CHILDHOOD CARIES."</strong>
This condition, which results from excessive consumption of sweetened liquids
at a young age, is NOT prevented by water fluoridation. (9) According to a study
in <u>Pediatric Nursing</u> "Data from Head Start surveys show the prevalence
of baby bottle tooth decay is about three times the national average among poor
urban children,<b> even in communities with a fluoridated water supply.</b>"<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>The real "oral health crisis" in the US is not lack of fluoridation,
but rather <strong>LACK OF PRIVATE DENTAL INSURANCE</strong> among the poor,
and <strong>UNDERINVESTMENT in MEDICAID</strong> by the Government. According
to a recent report from the Surgeon General, roughly 85% of US dentists do not
treat Medicaid patients due to Medicaid's low rates of reimbursement. (10)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Fluoride is a very toxic substance, which is why it is the active ingredient
in a number of <strong><a href="f-poisonings.htm">PESTICIDES</strong>. Just
2 grams of fluoride is enough to kill an adult, and just 500 mg is enough to
kill a child. (11) In the US, people have <a href="accidents.htm"><b>died</b>,
and many have become sick, when faltering fluoridation equipment has pumped
excess fluoride into the water. <br>
<br>
<b>* </b> <strong>POOR NUTRITION </strong>exacerbates the toxic effects of fluoride
exposure, which is a further reason why it's wrong to target poor communities
with fluoridation (as poor nutrition is more prevalent in low income communiites).
According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, "Existing
data indicate that <u>subsets of the population may be unusually susceptible</u>
to the toxic effects of fluoride and its compounds. These populations include
the elderly, people with deficiencies of calcium, magnesium and/or vitamin C,
and people with cardiovascular and kidney problems." (12) </font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> <b>TOTAL FLUORIDE EXPOSURE </b> has increased
substantially since the early days of fluoridation. (13) When fluoridation first
began, exposure to fluoride from sources other than fluoridated water, was minimal.
Today that is not the case. People now receive fluoride from a whole host of
sources, including <a href="NOS-fluoride.htm">pesticide residues, fluoridated
dental products, mechanically
deboned meat, fluoride air <a href="pollution.htm">pollution, and <a href="f-juice.htm">processed
foods & beverages prepared with fluoridated water (e.g. soda, juice,
beer, cereal, etc). It has now reached the point where most people recieve the
"optimal" 1 mg/day of fluoride (which fluoridated water was designed
to deliver) WITHOUT ever drinking a glass of fluoridated water.<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Despite the increase in total fluoride exposure, the concentration
of fluoride added to drinking water (0.7-1.2 mg/L) as prescribed by the US Government,
is still the same as it was back in the 1940s.</font></p>
<p><font face="times"><font size="3"><b>* </b>Due to the increase in total fluoride
exposure, there has been a major increase in the rate of <strong>DENTAL FLUOROSIS</strong>
found among American children. According to data from the US Government, approximately
1 in 3 children living in fluoridated areas have dental fluorosis on at least
2 teeth. (14) Dental fluorosis is the first visible sign that fluoride has poisoned
enzymes in the body.<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Approximately half of the fluoride we ingest each day <strong>ACCUMULATES
</strong>in our bodies, primarily in the bones, but also in soft tissues. (15)
</font></font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> High levels of naturally occuring fluoride
causes a <b>CRIPPLING</b> bone disease known as <strong><a href="fluorosis-india.htm">SKELETAL
FLUOROSIS</strong>. According to <strong><a href="UNICEF.htm">UNICEF</strong>,
skeletal fluorosis is endemic "in at least 25 countries across the globe"
(16). The problem is particularly acute in India, China and other developing
countries. <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> Skeletal fluorosis comes in varying degrees
of severity depending on the level of exposure. The earliest symptoms are characterized
by joint pain that is difficult, if not impossible, to distinguish from <strong><a href="aging-factor.htm">ARTHRITIS</strong>.
According to a review on fluoridation by <a href="hileman.htm"><b>CHEMICAL &
ENGINEERING NEWS</b>: "Because some of the clinical symptoms mimic
arthritis, the first two clinical phases of skeletal fluorosis could be easily
misdiagnosed [as arthritis]." The World Health Organization states that
"early cases [of skeletal fluorosis] may be misdiagnosed as rheumatoid
or osteo arthritis." (17)<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times">It is estimated that approximately 40 million Americans
suffer from arthritis, the most common type being osteoarthritis. <br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Fluoride stimulates <b>ABNORMAL BONE DEVELOPMENT</b>. Clinical trials
published in the <u>New England Journal of Medicine</u> and <u>Journal of Bone
and Mineral Research</u> (18) report that high dose fluoride treatment increases
bone mass but that the newly formed bone is "<b>structurally unsound</b>"
(19). Thus, instead of reducing <strong>HIP FRACTURES,</strong> the studies
found that high doses of fluoride <strong>INCREASED </strong> hip fractures.
<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>There is concern that "low" doses of fluoride, taken over
long periods of time (e.g. fluoridated water), may also increase the rate of
hip fracture. Approximately 20 recent studies have investigated the relationship
between fluoridated water and hip fracture, with approximately half of the studies
finding an association. (20) <br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> A 1995 study in the journal <u>Neurtoxicology
and Teratology</u>, found that fluoride accumulated in the brain of rats and
produced age-specific behavioral deficits typical of most <strong>NEUROTOXIC
</strong>agents. (21) In the study, fluoride induced damage to the hippocampal
region of the brain. Damage to the hippocampal region has been linked to hyperactivity
and cognitive deficits.<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> 5 recent peer reviewed studies from China
have found an association between elevated fluoride exposure and <b>DECREASED</b>
<strong>IQs</strong> in children. (22)</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>* </b> In the late 1990s, a British scientist
discovered that fluoride accumulates to very high levels (avg = 9000 ppm) in
the crystallized tissue of the human <strong><a href="ifin-269.htm">PINEAL GLAND</strong>.
A subsequent animal study found that fluoride interferes with the pineal gland's
production of melatonin, a hormone which helps regulate the onset of <strong>PUBERTY</strong>.
In the study, animals dosed with fluoride had reduced levels of melatonin metabolites
in their urine and had earlier onsets of puberty than the controls. (23)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>Up until the 1950s, European doctors used fluoride to reduce the activity
of the <strong><a href="galletti.htm">THYROID GLAND</strong> for people
suffering from overactive thyroid (hyperthyroidism). (24) The daily dose of
fluoride which people are now receiving in fluoridated communities (1.6 to 6.6
mg/day) (25) actually exceeds the dose of fluoride which was found to depress
the thyroid gland (2.3 to 4.5 mg/day). (26) <br>
<br>
<strong>HYPOTHYROIDISM</strong> (under-active
thyroid) is currently one of the most common medical problems in the United
States. <b>SYNTHROID</b>, the
drug doctors prescribe to treat hypothyroidism, was the fourth most prescribed
drug in the US in the year 2000. Symptoms of hypothyroidism include depression,
fatigue, weight gain, muscle and joint pains, increased cholesterol levels,
and heart disease.<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>A recent study published in the journal <u>Brain Research</u> found
that 1 ppm fluoride in water faciliated the uptake of aluminum into the brain
of rats, producing the type of brain tangles (amyloid deposits) that are associated
with <strong>ALZHEIMERS</strong> disease and other types of dementia. (27)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>An epidemiological study
published in the December 2000 issue of the journal <u>Neurotoxicology</u>,
found that fluoridated water was associated with elevated levels of <strong>LEAD</strong>
in children's blood. (28) The study's findings parallel the findings of an earlier
study published in the September 1999 issue of the <u>International Journal
of Environmental Studies</u>. (29) Lead in the blood is associated with a variety
of neurological problems, including reduced intelligence, aggression and hyperactivity.</font></p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>*</b> Dozens of laboratory studies have found
that fluoride is a<b> MUTAGEN</b> - a classification which frequently indicates
that a substance is carcinogenic (i.e. that it causes <b>CANCER</b>). (30) A
cancer bioassay conducted by the National Toxicology Program found that rats
dosed with fluoride had a statisitically significant increase in <b>BONE TUMORS</b>
(osteosarcomas), which were not found among the controls. The initial review
of the study also reported that the fluoride-dosed rats had tumors of the thyroid,
oral cavity and rare tumors of the liver; however these tumors were later downgraded
under conspicuous and controversial circumstances. According to <a href="ifin-19.htm">Dr.
William Marcus, the Chief Toxicologist at the EPA's Office of Drinking Water,
the downgrading of the tumors was politically motivated and not scientifically
defensible. (31)<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>A recent epidemiological study conducted by a scientist from the US
Public Health Service found that female <strong>INFERTILITY</strong> was associated
with elevated levels of fluoride ( >3ppm) in drinking water. The study concluded
that more emphasis needs to be given to the effects on health from <u>total
fluoride exposure</u> - not just exposure to fluoridated drinking water. (32)
<br>
<br>
<b>* </b>In light of the recent research indicating health risks from low level
fluoride exposure, the <b><a href="testimony.htm">UNION</b> <a href="testimony.htm"><b>of
SCIENTISTS and PROFESSIONALS at EPA HEADQUARTERS</b> has voted to oppose
fluoridation (33) and has called upon Congress to issue a "national moratorium"
on the fifty year old policy. According to the Vice President of the Union,
Dr. J. William Hirzy, <br>
<br>
</font></p>
<table width="92%" border="0" cellpadding="1" align="right">
<tr>
<td><font size="3" face="times">"In summary, we hold that fluoridation
is an unreasonable risk. That is, the toxicity of fluoride is so great and
the purported benefits associated with it are so small - if there are any
at all - that requiring every man, woman and child in America to ingest
it borders on criminal behavior on the part of governments."</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><font size="3" face="times"><b>*</b> After years of overlooking the problems
with fluoride & fluoridation, the environmental community is finally beginning
to address the issue. In September of 2001, the <a href="news/sierra-club.htm"><b>SIERRA
CLUB</b> announced that:</font></p>
<table width="92%" border="0" cellpadding="1" align="right">
<tr>
<td><font size="3" face="times">"There are now valid concerns regarding the
potential adverse impact of fluoridation on the environment, wildlife, and
human health. The Sierra Club therefore supports giving communities the
option of rejecting mandatory fluoridation of their water supplies. To protect
sensitive populations, and because safer strategies and methods for preventing
tooth decay are now available, we recommend that these safer alternatives
be made available and promoted."</font></td>
</tr>
</table>
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network