From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Dead Kennedys Play the Bay
The DK will play the Bay this month, but they may not be worth our watts.
I don't mean to spoil a good time or tell people who want to go hear the DK not to go, but I'd like to share some words from Jello about the band.
The following are excerpts from a statement Jello made about "the new" DK:
The three ex-Dead Kennedys have sold off the albums without my permission or endorsement to a label called Manifesto and are now planning a "reunion" gig in Los Angeles in late September.
People have been calling Alternative Tentacles complaining that Ticketmaster failed to warn them that I was not a part of the "band" and wanting their money back. Please understand that I am not part of this scam at all. Nor am I part of this ex-DKs "personal appearance" in Los Angeles sponsored by, get this, Best Buy (!) to promote the movie "Rage".
The ex-DKs legal action came right after I opposed using our best song "Holiday in Cambodia" in a Levi¹s Dockers TV commercial.
I have asked the ex-DKs and their rogue enterprise Decay Music to please remove my name and likeness from all their releases and promotional material. Don't get me wrong, I'm as proud as ever of Dead Kennedys and grateful for how much we mean to people. But to me what they are trying to do is like spray-painting a McDonalds logo on the Mona Lisa.
Just wait until you see how they "improved" the artwork on the CDs. People who have heard them also seem divided on whether the re-mastering improved the sound or did the opposite. I can¹t tell because Ray & Co. have not allowed me to hear the remastered versions or have any input at all.
So our fight to keep something that means a lot to many of us (especially me) from winding up in the corporate cartoon graveyard goes on. All help and support for the Alternative Tentacles Legal Defense Fund continues to be very deeply appreciated.
Yours in Frankenchrist,
Jello Biafra
For the full statement and other related info, go to http://www.alternativetentacles.com
Check out a book called "Real Interviews" by Vic Vale...with Henry Rollins, Jello, Lawrence Ferlingehti, and Billy Childish. Support your local independent bookstores.
P.S. Indymedia needs more article categories like "going corporate," or "protecting the arts."
The following are excerpts from a statement Jello made about "the new" DK:
The three ex-Dead Kennedys have sold off the albums without my permission or endorsement to a label called Manifesto and are now planning a "reunion" gig in Los Angeles in late September.
People have been calling Alternative Tentacles complaining that Ticketmaster failed to warn them that I was not a part of the "band" and wanting their money back. Please understand that I am not part of this scam at all. Nor am I part of this ex-DKs "personal appearance" in Los Angeles sponsored by, get this, Best Buy (!) to promote the movie "Rage".
The ex-DKs legal action came right after I opposed using our best song "Holiday in Cambodia" in a Levi¹s Dockers TV commercial.
I have asked the ex-DKs and their rogue enterprise Decay Music to please remove my name and likeness from all their releases and promotional material. Don't get me wrong, I'm as proud as ever of Dead Kennedys and grateful for how much we mean to people. But to me what they are trying to do is like spray-painting a McDonalds logo on the Mona Lisa.
Just wait until you see how they "improved" the artwork on the CDs. People who have heard them also seem divided on whether the re-mastering improved the sound or did the opposite. I can¹t tell because Ray & Co. have not allowed me to hear the remastered versions or have any input at all.
So our fight to keep something that means a lot to many of us (especially me) from winding up in the corporate cartoon graveyard goes on. All help and support for the Alternative Tentacles Legal Defense Fund continues to be very deeply appreciated.
Yours in Frankenchrist,
Jello Biafra
For the full statement and other related info, go to http://www.alternativetentacles.com
Check out a book called "Real Interviews" by Vic Vale...with Henry Rollins, Jello, Lawrence Ferlingehti, and Billy Childish. Support your local independent bookstores.
P.S. Indymedia needs more article categories like "going corporate," or "protecting the arts."
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
It galls him to think that people would still go see the gigs and most of all, LIKE them. Brandon Cruz has done a great job of taking on the vocal task, a role he didn't seek, but has taken name calling from Biafra and blatant lies.
I think an article with words from the remaining members and Cruz is due.
Remember, there are always two sides to everything.
The tour continues, the raves keep coming in, and Jellous has revved up his whining.
If this whole thing started when Jello refused to allow Holdiay In Cambodia to be used by Levis then why, now that they have the rights to their songs, haven't we seen the commercial yet? All I've seen is an edited version of Police Truck on a Playstation game (which Jello OK'ed).
I too was concerned about everything the DK's have been doing. You know what I did? I wrote to Brandon Cruz and Jello Biafra, telling them how I felt. Brandon wrote back to me, we debated for awhile and, as a means to allow me to make up my own mind, he invited me to the Portland show as his guest, allowed me backstage to chat with the band and has become a friend.
Jello never replied. Come to think of it, I've tried contacting Jello several times over the years and the only time I ever heard back from him was when I sent him money.
This one is a no-brainer for me.
It's rather obvious that Ray and Jello have had issues with each other long before this ever came up (the part about Jello "taking over" AT in '86 wasinteresting--was that before or after he got busted, Ray?). One second-hand quote I found suggested that Biafra did not want to tell Ray in particular for fear of what he would do (is this true? I have no idea--but it suggests that friction is not a new thing here)..The point that I was making (which you both conveniently ignored) is that, regardless of what you personally think of Biafra, his crucial role in the creative aesthetic and political ethos of the band cannot be so lightly cast aside, and several aspects of the verdict itself are at least a tad questionable. If Biafra let his lawyer play games with an accounting error, he indeed screwed up big time and deserves a rap on the head in addition to a stiff fine (though my understanding is that the royalties were repaid long before the matter went to trial). But it still does not logically follow that Biafra must an evil, corrupt power-mad meglomaniac who must be crushed at any cost . Of course he has a big ego (well, duh--as Lee Ving once said, show up for your prize there in the lavoratory). Yes, he has been, as one zine put it, "ruthless" in his criticisms (when has Biafra ever minced words?). But, if nothing else about the verdict appalls you, the sleazy attempt to wrest songwriting credits away from him (well over a decade after the fact) should indicate that there's more here than meets the eye. This is indeed about power, but the "royalties fraud" issue is no more than a PR prop now, a way of showing us who the real "bad guy" is..
.
. . . Which bring us to issue of the usage of HIC in an ad campaign. . . .well, apparently the ad agency changed its mind before anyone had a chance to say yes, so I think that's also a dead issue. Ray has been quoted as saying that they might agree to something like that if, say, "Darren's mother needed a liver transplant." I'm with him on that one, but it would have to be something that desperate to justify it.
The issue of songwriting credits alone merits an appeal. "Failure to promote," at the very least, turns the indie ethos on it head.
Cruz seems to me to be caught in the middle, but he must have had some idea what he was getting into. At any rate, the back-and-forth legal bullshit is not his doing; he's just along for the ride. But I still stand by what I sad: I don't care if he's the reincarnation of Jim Morrison--that dish just don't taste the same (I thought Sabbath with Dio sucked, too--only this is worse: sorry, Brandon, but tell them to call it something else or a call it a day).
When the suits get done arguing, I guess we'll see what comes out in the wash. If any of you (yes I mean YOU--the principal four--want to chat, my email address is above. Run it by the suits and drop me a line).