top
Afghanistan
Afghanistan
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Santa Cruz Secession

by Claude Glasses (dissentmatters [at] yahoo.co,)
People in Santa Cruz against the war in Afghanistan will stage a secession from the United States of America, November 11th, 2001, at 2 PM.
Santa Cruz, California:
People against the war in Afghanistan will stage a secession from the United States of America, November 11th, 2001, at 2 PM. The event will take place at the Doug Rand Peace Park (at the corner of Pacific and Water Streets). The action will demonstrate the disagreement of these people with the United States government’s decision to bomb Afghanistan specifically and with injustice generally. The action will also honor the Collateral Damage sculpture located within the Peace Park.
Contact information: dissentmatters [at] yahoo.com .

Statements prepared by event organizers follow.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Unanimous Declaration of those wishing to Secede from the United States of America, from Nationhood, and from Nation building

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, to sunder the bonds from this nation and nationhood all together, a respect to the opinions of the world requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the revolution.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all people are created equal, that they are endowed with certain fragile rights that exist only when they take responsibility to defend them, that among these are life, liberty, dignity and health, an it harm none. That to secure these rights, Governments have been instituted, often claiming to derive their just powers from the consent of the Governed. That when any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to Abolish it, and to create an alternative, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing itself in a new space of possibilities.

As happened before, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, not random but aimed at the same purpose which is part of a plan to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right and it is their duty to throw off such Government, and to provide: a new space of hope; and a connection to a rich history of non-violent creation and vigorous critical thought.

Such has been the patient sufferance of these people; and such is now the necessity which constraints them to abolish their former system of Government. The history of the United States government is a history of oppression, war, imperialism, genocide, slavery, thievery, hypocrisy, and bigotry, all advancing an absolute Tyranny over its States and over other peoples. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world:

Its President has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

It has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their substance.

It has kept among us, in times of peace, standing Armies without the Consent of our people.

It has affected to render the military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

It has plundered the seas, ravaged the Coasts, burnt towns, and destroyed the lives of people.

It is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy of the Head of a civilized people.

It has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with its measures.

Its Judges have usurped the power of the Electorate.

It has betrayed its own Bill of Rights, and threatened its own citizens who take issues with such treachery.

It has collaborated with corporations in efforts to alienate workers both economically and psychologically.

Its history of lies has eroded the confidence of its people.

In times of crisis, it uses incidents to its own ends, attempting to divert attention and push its own agenda.

Its penal system has abandoned rehabilitation and has become a series of internment camps which serve economic and racist motives.
It remains deaf to the voice of injustice and of consanguinity.

We, the people, therefore, appealing to the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do solemnly publish and declare that this Peace Park is, and of right ought to be Free and Independent; that we are absolved from all Allegiance to the United States and to Nationhood, on this date, November 11th, 2001.
We claimed the Doug Rand Peace Park in the city of Santa Cruz, California as a space no longer subject to the laws and policies of the US government. We are driven by a belief that the best way to protect our civil liberties is to exercise them. We are not represented by our government, yet its policies are putatively practiced in our name. We offer our bodies as monument to that contradiction.

This secession is not engineered to generate a new Nation, but is rather intended to clear the spaces, both conceptual and political, that Nationalism occupies. We are explicitly non-violent as we aim neither to harm human beings, nor to dismiss their foundational beliefs out of hand. Rather, we aim to challenge those beliefs with the creation of a truly public space. In this space, the symbolism and iconography that supports the equation “patriotism = support for political violence” is negated. Many (although probably not all) of us believe that such symbolism is itself a potent form of violation.

An important objective in our secession is to defend the memory of all those who have died under the chilling designation collateral damage. It is therefore significant to us that the plot of land we occupy has within its boundaries a sculpture dedicated to the victims of the US bomb attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki and to the civilian casualties of all wars. The continued destructive character of the United States is not worthy of such a work of art. In defense of the memory of the dead and the ethical conscience of the living, we liberate the Collateral Damage sculpture from the confines of U.S. soil.
We offer this secession as sanctuary for what we have been told is impossible.
by hippy boy
It appears the US was attacked again today. Maybe you should postpone
this sillyness.
by mkl
this is exactly the type of silliness that causes most of the US public to not take the movement seriously.

What will this accomplish? Don't these people have something more serious to do with their time than this?

All they are doing is giving O'Reilly, Fox, NYPost and the like a chance to publish the 'silliest event of the day'.

by mkl
this is exactly the type of silliness that causes most of the US public to not take the movement seriously.

What will this accomplish? Don't these people have something more serious to do with their time than this?

All they are doing is giving O'Reilly, Fox, NYPost and the like a chance to publish the 'silliest event of the day'.

by Anti-Fascist
It's about time!!!! I've been advocating for California's independence from the U.S. ever since Sept.11 and the rest of this fascist insanity was foisted on us. They're taking our rights away!! They're turning us into nothing more than commodities for corporate profit(WTO, IMF, World Bank, ad nauseum)!!!

FUCK THIS SHIT!!! YANKEE SCUM GO HOME!!!


FUCK FASCIST AMERICA!!!!!
by a3m
go down get a job on the plantation, massa.

Nobody thought it funny when there was talk of forming a new county in East King Count area of Wa State. It may actually come about. Nobody laughed when it was proposed that the Liberty Creek gold area across the Cascades talked of succession. The Gov't boys showed a little more sense when on their nefarious interloping business of locking citizens from the commons. All it took in Nevada was the reopening of a road on public land in defiance of the federales. That was on the cover of Time and Newsweek for a long long while and started a movement that people like the apologist i address may be blithely ignorant of.

Point is that taken out of context, this Californio action isn't much. To those with open eyes, and a spark of Jeffersonianism in their still alive souls, .....well lets just say there is inspiration aplenty.

Course you can always stay here and work on maggies uncle sams farm till the chickens have all come home and roosted. Or dance-in the revolution.
by mlk
a3m and Anti Facist.
Read the article before you respond.
There seems to be intention to actually leave the union and create a new nation. Its symbolic only for some new age sounding reasons.

A lot different from people with land and guns in an isolateable area forming their own nation.

Shooting from the hip doesn't help anything.

by Krishna (shivambu [at] aol.com)
E.Callenbach (not sure of the spelling) wrote a book called Ecotopia in the 70s about the secession of part of the west coast.
Is it silly? Emma Goldman said 'If I cant dance to it.its not my type of revolution'.We need silliness,those who laugh and deride will anyway. Is the seriousness of Bush & Blair somthing to aspire to?
by Epperheimer (epperheimer [at] yahoo.com)
Hippyboy, first of all, you probably think their idea was silly because it was a protest that rejected hippies. Some of us are sick of the old, boring hippy events. Time for some new life and new blood and new ways to protest. Get with the times. Hippies are relics.
You should learn to read. That protest sounded interesting. I think it was an interesting idea.
As for mkl's concern over how O'Reilly might react...get a clue. You think any anti-war protest is going to make O'Reilly say on TV "these kids are doing some good work"???? You are only going to remain paralysed until you stop being so scared and concerned about what the corporate media might think.
And you ask why people don't have more serious things to do with their time? Maybe they should just stay home and watch Fox. Taking a War Protest into the streets is surely a waste of time. Getting people together to protest the war is not very serious. You're right. Thank god you're home all day transcribing your O'Reilly videotapes. That's some serious work.
Read their complaints and read their tweaking of the Declaration of Independence. Get a clue. There are minds at work there.
Start thinking differently or you will just live in fear of what the media thinks of you. Get over your hippydom. There are new people taking the reins now.
by certifiable
On November 12 2001 hippyboy said "It appears the US was attacked again today." Talk about jumping the gun. I bet hippyboy went around telling everyone that Muslims were behind the Oklahoma City bombing or the crash of that 747 over Long Island right after they happened. Hippyboy is a perfect example of the kind of thinking this world needs LESS OF....KNEE-JERK reactions. It is kind of fitting that the word JERK is in there.

Hippyboy, you really should examine facts before you start running around like chicken-little.
by my name (e-mail@e-mail)
Gosh, it is getting to be that planes can't even fall out of the sky anymore without some scared puppy barking "TERRORISTS!, TERRORISTS!". What has this wierd world come too?
by Dead Canary Liberation Front (politiksjunkie [at] whoever.com)
mlk, there were no guns... just brains. and lots and lots of kazoos.


la revolution est sur!

-DCLF
by funn
can we batten the hatches?
by vaclav kalishnikov
the canary is dead!
and yet
the canary is the hope for the revolution
we are the dead canary actoin front!
we feed on the packaged dreams of dorritos and
we drink off the spilled rings of drinks at the bar
other may have revolved more
but we have drank more!
we are here, and we are leaving
we are gone!
we're ALL about the little r. little a.
don't fuck with texas!

vaclav kalishnikov
commander in briefs
--dead canary action front--

thats fucking lavish!
by Mary Ann (MABBach [at] aol.com)
My daughter was one of the planners for this action. I am proud of her & her friends. If one really takes the time to READ the prepared statement, it is powerful and well thought out. The mainstream media claims the American people are 100% behind the president and the war machine. I am not and even if I am only 8-10% I believe my opinion and others count. Viet Nam war protestors were once only a small minority too. War is never the answer.
by kn
Mary Ann, Mary Ann, it is a big world out there. Don'tcha know that this ridiculousness won't do anything except make your movement highly ignorable?

My advice for you is to make sure your daughter gets into Harvard Law, occupies the corridors of power. Then maybe y'all would have more than a snowball's chance in hell of getting something done. Alternatively, there's always armed revolution, but good luck with that one.
by Dusent Matta
As a Californian outraged at the bullshit, corporatist(*), hypocritical Federal goverment, I would be more than happy to see this state seceed from the Union. However, the fact that California is such a major economic power, providing a large percentage of the technological resources, as well as being one of the largest produce-producing areas in the U.S., ensures that the Fed. Govt would never let a secession happen... too much vested interest. The rest of the United States would go into a deeper economic recession... which frankly, it deserves.

*: I make a difference between 'Corporatist' and 'Capitalist', in so much as the latter is about using free-market principles such as competition to drive down cost, and spurring innovation; the former being about large companies using federal corporate subsidies and/or corruption and/or government favoritism to stifle free-market innovation and step on the backs of the workers to increase profits. I think this is a distinction that more people should make.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$260.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network