top
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

anti-drug webcam in SF

by SCP-NYC (notbored [at] panix.com)
translation of article in "Liberation" (Paris) about Jeff Webb, an anti-drug wingnut who uses a webcam to deter drug dealing in his area of San Francisco
By Emmanuelle Richard, 25-26 August 2001 issue of \"Liberation.\"

http://www.liberation.com/quotidien/semaine/20010825samd.html

[translated from the French by Bill Brown]

Big Brother has arrived

Los Angeles: Jeff Weber has found a good way of getting rid of the crack dealers from the street he lives on, which is near Market Street in San
Francisco. Instead of calling the police, he displays the dealers of Stevenson Alley for the whole world to see. On 16 July [2001], the 37-year-old messenger installed a cheap webcam in the window of his room in the Seneca Hotel, which has been his modest home for the last six years.
Gunshots, knife fights, dealers with furtive gestures and drug-using bums lighting their pipes: street scenes such as these appear in \"real time\" on his free web site.

\"I want to shame the Mayor and the San Francisco Police, and get them to clean up the neighborhood,\" explains well-named Jeff Webb, during a
conversation that was interrupted several times by the sound of police sirens. When the residents of the neighborhood called the police to complain about the dealers, he affirms, the police said that they were overwhelmed and that, by the time they arrived on the scene, the criminals
would have already left. \"With the webcam, the police can\'t say they didn\'t see anything,\" Webb says.

This bizarre initiative comes at a time when the video surveillance of public places by the authorities is beginning to alarm the American public.
When private cameras are utilized on a public street, \"they are always widely known about,\" reports Jeff Fryrear, director of the National Crime
Prevention Institute in Louisville, Kentucky. The personal cameras, which
exist in uncounted numbers, are often installed in residential neighborhoods in partnership with law enforcement.

The schools, too. In San Francisco, the provocative webcam receives a lot of praise: following an article about him in The San Francisco Examiner, Jeff Webb says he received dozens of encouraging e-mails. \"It\'s brilliant,\"
says one of these messages. \"I have also had enough of the homeless problem in San Francisco, but I\'ve never found a way of attacking the subject in a active fashion.\" Other residents and a school have said that they will
install webcams of their own to surveill their respective neighborhoods. \"I have recently seen a dealer point the camera out and ask his clients to go several streets
down,\" Jeff Webb affirms.

Allergic to video surveiilance in all of its forms, the
anarcho-situationist collective Surveillance Camera Players (SCP) have many reasons for protesting directly in front of webcams. If a number of citizens have already filmed crime scenes taking place right in front of
their eyes (the beating of Rodney King in 1991 is the most famous example),
Jeff Webb\'s gadget raises several new questions. \"In principle, a webcam
pointing at the street threatens the privacy of those who walk by it,\" says
Dave, also known as \"Redmist,\" the founder of the SCP [sic] and its representative [sic] in San Francisco. But, in practice, I don\'t see how,
because Mr. Webb has tried to publicize the fact that his webcam is pointing at the street. On the other hand, if it wasn\'t known to the
public, it would constitute a threat to privacy. \"People wouldn\'t know that they were being observed, and by people on the World Wide Web.\"

Legal blurriness. In the legal point of view, blurriness reigns. According to the Privacy Foundation in Washington, American laws concerning the audio recording of private conversations are relatively clear, but those
concerning video recording of public places, webcams or not, are quasi-nonexistent. For \"Redmist,\" it would be more ethical and effective if
one \"took photographs of crimes as they were being committed, rather than
filming the entire street all the time.\"

The San Francisco Police have their own doubts about the effectiveness of the web cam of Stevenson Alley. Officer Anna Morales told The San Francisco Examiner that the camera can\'t distinguish details. Faces, in particular.
Where Jeff Webb sees a man who is crying and searching the sidewalk for crumbs of crack, a novice might see a shaking silhouette. The same can be said for his collection of Best Images. \"The people who smoke crack hold the pipe the
pipe in a certain fashion that is immediately recognizable.\"

The idea of webcams all over the United States bothers Bill Brown, co-founder of the Surveillance Camera Players. \"When webcams use face recognition software, they will capture faces very clearly,\" says the
guerilla of anti-videosurveillance. For him, clandestine webcams display
crime as if it were an entertainment, to the detriment of the criminals and
their victims. They banalise the use of surveillance cameras and incite voyeurism.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network