How Come the "Price" of Bosses Keeps Soaring?
How Come
the "Price" of Bosses Keeps Soaring?
by Alex Walker
Next time a conservative ideologue launches into their patented condescension about your need for a remedial course in "Economics 101" for instruction on how "supply and demand" controls the price of goods, services, and labor, ask that learned person this question: How come even when an industry crashes and burns like the high tech bubble in Silicon Valley, the "price" of bosses keeps soaring?
In the words of San Jose Mercury News reporter Elise Ackerman: "Nearly everyone who invested in stocks suffered during last year's market collapse... it seems logical that corporate executives, whose compensation is supposed to be related to their companies' financial performance, would share the pain of their stockholders... didn't work out that way..." According to a Special Report published in the Merc appropriately titled "What the Boss Makes," the Bay Area's 807 top executives pocketed "more than $4.8 billion in the last fiscal year."
Once upon a time, the superrich were called "millionaires." Today, a mere million dollars is chump change. A quick review of the table below shows the level of executive compensation is wildly out of sync to a degree that is beyond belief. Download this page into your archives to pull it out next time somebody tells you top executives in the U.S. "need" more "incentives" and tax breaks.
Silicon Valley's Top 10 Bosses
| Name | Age | Position | Company | Cash | Option Gain | Total | |
| 1 | Raymond J. Lane | 53 | Pres, COO | Oracle | $3,180,000 | $230,718,859 | $233,898,859 |
| 2 | John T. Chambers | 51 | Pres, CEO | Cisco Systems | 1,324,819 | 155,980,290 | 157,305,109 |
| 3 | Dan E. Pettit | 53 | Sr. VP | JDS Uniphase | 382,631 | 121,256,988 | 121,639,619 |
| 4 | David Peterschmidt | 53 | Chrmn, Pres, CEO | Inktomi | 719,070 | 106,860,005 | 107,579,075 |
| 5 | Kevin Kalkhoven | 55 | Former CEO | JDS Uniphase | 738,078 | 106,171,030 | 106,909,108 |
| 6 | W. J. Sanders III | 64 | Chmn, CEO | Adv. Micro Dev. | 7,187,897 | 85,057,766 | 92,245,663 |
| 7 | Stephen P. Jobs | 46 | CEO | Apple Computer | 90,000,001 | - | 90,000,001 |
| 8 | Thomas M. Siebel | 48 | Chmn, CEO | Siebel Systems | 2,502,466 | 85,880,955 | 88,383,421 |
| 9 | Jeffrey O. Henley | 55 | Exec VP, CFO | Oracle | 2,167,500 | 76,314,260 | 78,481,760 |
| 10 | Lawrence J. Ellison | 56 | Chrm, CEO | Oracle | 208,000 | 75,024,427 | 75,232,427 |
Silicon Valley's savviest big shots locked in their gains by exercising "options" when their companies' stocks were at all-time highs during the heyday of the internet bubble. According to Dave Swinford, managing director of Pearl Meyer & Partners, "You really don't see executives exercising options in the normal case until they sense bad times are going to occur."
We are, of course, not supposed to notice that here in Silicon Valley, supposedly the meritocratic paradise, all ten of these guys, indeed the top twenty-nine, are white males. Furthermore, we are not supposed to notice anything funny about this table at all. Whenever we bring up this subject, we are always accused of engaging in the "politics of envy" and scolded about "Economics 101" and failing to appreciate how executives deserve extraordinary compensation. Maybe. And if you believe any mortal man "deserves" $233 million in a single year, you will surely get the government, economy, and society you deserve.
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Those executives listed above, a few of them I know personally, are responsible for creating their company's success. Of course, they are rampant egomaniacs, which is the key to their success.
Oracle, Apple Computer, and Cisco Systems have experienced unheard of growth, resulting in breakthroughs that seem commonplace by their constant use today. The decisions made by their executives hopefully enrich not just stockholders, but consumers as well. Very good, but why so much money?
Are you injured in any way because somebody else will make $50 million? You might be upset if you are a stockholder, and the company is losing money because of the executive. But trust me, your 200 or 300 shares may be upset, but the ones holding 3 million shares will be outraged and vote him out! Never mind that the 3 million shares people will vote in a frat buddy, their aim is make more money, not waste it.
Why did you choose Silicon Valley execs and not actors or sports figures? Is it fair that second-rate actors make millions or that athletes earn so much? Sure. There is only one Michael Jordan, and becoming the legend he is took enormous amounts of work and dedication. I view business success exactly the same way. There is only one Bill Gates, tough and smart enough to tell IBM executives that he will license his software, not sell it outright. He could have fallen flat on his ass with that act of hubris. A few members of the finance community take heroic places with me because of their ability to create new ways to finance start-up companies. One of the best bond dealers in the world made $550 million in one year because he had a skill NOBODY had, and everybody wanted a piece of his action.
So does their making $50 million take away from you would earn? It doesn't seem that way any more than Michael being a great ball player makes me a worse one. Of course I am by comparison, but he is not taking away my talent any more than Larry Ellison is taking money away from anyone. Did they earn it? I would say most do, and some don't. We sniff out the frauds real fast because we're tightwads, and we don't want some tenderfoot steering a multi-billion dollar ship into the ice.
It is incorrect to say that executives do not earn their salary because it is their decisions that determine the direction and health of the corporation. It is also incorrect to state that they are not workers, especially in light of the vast amounts of education and training they accumulate and the extensive hours they work. If you eliminate the profit motive, you also eliminate any incentive to risk and to invent. Silicon Valley, Golden Corridor, and Research Triangle all dry up because who wants to work his ass off, risk his career and get the same pay as a person who just shows up for work for the free coffee?
I know I exposed myself to numerous attacks, and I'll just sit back and watch the flaming assault.
I like your politeness, I bet you even say, "God Bless You" after a person sneezes.