From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
BART police evict homeless camp
RICHMOND -- A work crew escorted by BART police leveled a homeless encampment Monday that existed for a year near one of the city's busiest intersections.
Eight people lived at the encampment under the BART tracks just west of San Pablo Avenue that went largely unnoticed by the general public if not by nearby merchants.
A complaint by Home Depot, whose lot abuts the BART right-of-way, sparked Monday's action, said BART police Lt. Pamela Cherry. If not for the complaint, Cherry said, "We wouldn't have even known that they were there
Eight people lived at the encampment under the BART tracks just west of San Pablo Avenue that went largely unnoticed by the general public if not by nearby merchants.
A complaint by Home Depot, whose lot abuts the BART right-of-way, sparked Monday's action, said BART police Lt. Pamela Cherry. If not for the complaint, Cherry said, "We wouldn't have even known that they were there
RICHMOND -- A work crew escorted by BART police leveled a homeless encampment Monday that existed for a year near one of the city's busiest intersections.
Eight people lived at the encampment under the BART tracks just west of San Pablo Avenue that went largely unnoticed by the general public if not by nearby merchants.
A complaint by Home Depot, whose lot abuts the BART right-of-way, sparked Monday's action, said BART police Lt. Pamela Cherry. If not for the complaint, Cherry said, "We wouldn't have even known that they were there."
Duane Chapman, Contra Costa County ombudsman for the homeless, criticized the timing of the eviction, coming at the height of the winter's rainy season.
"They could have picked a better time," Chapman said. "I mean, it's raining. Now what are these eight people supposed to do?"
Chapman said many of those evicted lost their tarpaulins, tents and other possessions when the work crew cleared the site.
"They took everything that I had, clothes and an old tent," said Gloria, 46, who had lived at the site for six months. "All I got is a blanket. That's about it. I don't know where I'm going to stay tonight."
"It's a shame that BART police did not contact us," said Chapman, who heard about the impending eviction Thursday after BART officials put up signs ordering the site vacated. "If Home Depot had a problem, they could have contacted us."
Store officials at Home Depot declined to comment, citing company policy. They referred inquiries to the company's Southern California office, where no one was available to comment.
Cherry, the BART police officer, said she did not know there was a county ombudsman for the homeless until Chapman contacted BART and that she would contact him in future if a similar situation arises.
Chapman estimated there are 1,000 to 2,000 people living on the streets of West County but only about 200 shelter beds, including those in private shelters.
He said one of the people evicted Monday had found a shelter bed; another had found temporary accommodations with friends. The rest, he said, were on the streets.
Joaquin Lopez, manager of a Taco Bell near the encampment, said he had periodically complained about the homeless people to Richmond and El Cerrito police, to no avail.
The site is in Richmond, near the border of El Cerrito. But because it is on BART property, Richmond police have no jurisdiction, even though they are aware that homeless people have congregated there over the years, said Sgt. Enos Johnson.
A neighborhood homeowner, Sheila Place said she had mixed feelings about the eviction. "Your compassionate side wants to say they're in need, or they wouldn't be there," said Place, who walks by the site daily on her way to work. "But it's not a good feeling when it's 10, 11 o'clock at night when they follow you and yell at you."
"It's a very sad situation," she said. "It's unfortunate we're in an impoverished area."
Eight people lived at the encampment under the BART tracks just west of San Pablo Avenue that went largely unnoticed by the general public if not by nearby merchants.
A complaint by Home Depot, whose lot abuts the BART right-of-way, sparked Monday's action, said BART police Lt. Pamela Cherry. If not for the complaint, Cherry said, "We wouldn't have even known that they were there."
Duane Chapman, Contra Costa County ombudsman for the homeless, criticized the timing of the eviction, coming at the height of the winter's rainy season.
"They could have picked a better time," Chapman said. "I mean, it's raining. Now what are these eight people supposed to do?"
Chapman said many of those evicted lost their tarpaulins, tents and other possessions when the work crew cleared the site.
"They took everything that I had, clothes and an old tent," said Gloria, 46, who had lived at the site for six months. "All I got is a blanket. That's about it. I don't know where I'm going to stay tonight."
"It's a shame that BART police did not contact us," said Chapman, who heard about the impending eviction Thursday after BART officials put up signs ordering the site vacated. "If Home Depot had a problem, they could have contacted us."
Store officials at Home Depot declined to comment, citing company policy. They referred inquiries to the company's Southern California office, where no one was available to comment.
Cherry, the BART police officer, said she did not know there was a county ombudsman for the homeless until Chapman contacted BART and that she would contact him in future if a similar situation arises.
Chapman estimated there are 1,000 to 2,000 people living on the streets of West County but only about 200 shelter beds, including those in private shelters.
He said one of the people evicted Monday had found a shelter bed; another had found temporary accommodations with friends. The rest, he said, were on the streets.
Joaquin Lopez, manager of a Taco Bell near the encampment, said he had periodically complained about the homeless people to Richmond and El Cerrito police, to no avail.
The site is in Richmond, near the border of El Cerrito. But because it is on BART property, Richmond police have no jurisdiction, even though they are aware that homeless people have congregated there over the years, said Sgt. Enos Johnson.
A neighborhood homeowner, Sheila Place said she had mixed feelings about the eviction. "Your compassionate side wants to say they're in need, or they wouldn't be there," said Place, who walks by the site daily on her way to work. "But it's not a good feeling when it's 10, 11 o'clock at night when they follow you and yell at you."
"It's a very sad situation," she said. "It's unfortunate we're in an impoverished area."
For more information:
http://www.contracostatimes.com/community/...
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
in the future, please refrain from posting verbatim copies of stories from corporate news sources. besides the fact that the ContraCostaTimes.com terms and conditions prohibit redistribution without permission (which i doubt you got), this hardly qualifies as "independent" media.
in my opinion, if you must post this stuff, an original summary (perhaps with a bit of commentary) with a link to the original corporate news source would be more appropriate.
-md
i am glad that you took the time to let people know about this atrocity, though i would have rather heard your take on it.
As far as my opinion, I didn't actually witness the event, I was only lucky enough to notice the story and I posted it so that others in the area would know about it and and post any other info, etc.
as for what you think about whether you can copy the stuff from ContraCostaTimes.com without permission, you're wrong.
to quote from their Terms and Conditions page (http://www.contracostatimes.com/copyright.htm):
© 2001 Contra Costa Newspapers Inc. All rights reserved.
Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of
the contents of this service without the express written
consent of Contra Costa Newspapers is expressly
prohibited.
posting it publically with a LIVE LINK does not constitute "express written consent" to copy, redistribute, or retransmit it, as far as i know. that generally involves you asking the editor or someone else with the requisite authority and receiving an answer in the affirmative.
of course, if it came down to it, you could claim that their Terms and Conditions are in bad faith, since even viewing the document involves implicit copying, but i doubt a court would see that as a justification for ignoring their terms of copyright license.
While I would hope indepedent journalists could cover this enormously important story, I understand that our resources are limited. And when the corporate media is read through a discerning lense, it can be informative.