top
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

BART police evict homeless camp

by Tom Lochner
RICHMOND -- A work crew escorted by BART police leveled a homeless encampment Monday that existed for a year near one of the city's busiest intersections.

Eight people lived at the encampment under the BART tracks just west of San Pablo Avenue that went largely unnoticed by the general public if not by nearby merchants.

A complaint by Home Depot, whose lot abuts the BART right-of-way, sparked Monday's action, said BART police Lt. Pamela Cherry. If not for the complaint, Cherry said, "We wouldn't have even known that they were there
RICHMOND -- A work crew escorted by BART police leveled a homeless encampment Monday that existed for a year near one of the city's busiest intersections.

Eight people lived at the encampment under the BART tracks just west of San Pablo Avenue that went largely unnoticed by the general public if not by nearby merchants.

A complaint by Home Depot, whose lot abuts the BART right-of-way, sparked Monday's action, said BART police Lt. Pamela Cherry. If not for the complaint, Cherry said, "We wouldn't have even known that they were there."

Duane Chapman, Contra Costa County ombudsman for the homeless, criticized the timing of the eviction, coming at the height of the winter's rainy season.

"They could have picked a better time," Chapman said. "I mean, it's raining. Now what are these eight people supposed to do?"

Chapman said many of those evicted lost their tarpaulins, tents and other possessions when the work crew cleared the site.

"They took everything that I had, clothes and an old tent," said Gloria, 46, who had lived at the site for six months. "All I got is a blanket. That's about it. I don't know where I'm going to stay tonight."

"It's a shame that BART police did not contact us," said Chapman, who heard about the impending eviction Thursday after BART officials put up signs ordering the site vacated. "If Home Depot had a problem, they could have contacted us."

Store officials at Home Depot declined to comment, citing company policy. They referred inquiries to the company's Southern California office, where no one was available to comment.

Cherry, the BART police officer, said she did not know there was a county ombudsman for the homeless until Chapman contacted BART and that she would contact him in future if a similar situation arises.

Chapman estimated there are 1,000 to 2,000 people living on the streets of West County but only about 200 shelter beds, including those in private shelters.

He said one of the people evicted Monday had found a shelter bed; another had found temporary accommodations with friends. The rest, he said, were on the streets.

Joaquin Lopez, manager of a Taco Bell near the encampment, said he had periodically complained about the homeless people to Richmond and El Cerrito police, to no avail.

The site is in Richmond, near the border of El Cerrito. But because it is on BART property, Richmond police have no jurisdiction, even though they are aware that homeless people have congregated there over the years, said Sgt. Enos Johnson.

A neighborhood homeowner, Sheila Place said she had mixed feelings about the eviction. "Your compassionate side wants to say they're in need, or they wouldn't be there," said Place, who walks by the site daily on her way to work. "But it's not a good feeling when it's 10, 11 o'clock at night when they follow you and yell at you."

"It's a very sad situation," she said. "It's unfortunate we're in an impoverished area."
by mike dillon
Tom-

in the future, please refrain from posting verbatim copies of stories from corporate news sources. besides the fact that the ContraCostaTimes.com terms and conditions prohibit redistribution without permission (which i doubt you got), this hardly qualifies as "independent" media.

in my opinion, if you must post this stuff, an original summary (perhaps with a bit of commentary) with a link to the original corporate news source would be more appropriate.

-md
by mike dillon
my apologies for having done nothing but bitch in the previous comment.

i am glad that you took the time to let people know about this atrocity, though i would have rather heard your take on it.
by the reporter
I think that once they post the article online, with a LIVE LINK, anyone can use it publicly as long as it's not for profit or sales...

As far as my opinion, I didn't actually witness the event, I was only lucky enough to notice the story and I posted it so that others in the area would know about it and and post any other info, etc.

by mike dillon
by "your own take" i didn't necessarily mean a first hand account. every your own summary of the posted article would have been original work, not in violation.

as for what you think about whether you can copy the stuff from ContraCostaTimes.com without permission, you're wrong.

to quote from their Terms and Conditions page (http://www.contracostatimes.com/copyright.htm):

© 2001 Contra Costa Newspapers Inc. All rights reserved.
Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any of
the contents of this service without the express written
consent of Contra Costa Newspapers is expressly
prohibited.

posting it publically with a LIVE LINK does not constitute "express written consent" to copy, redistribute, or retransmit it, as far as i know. that generally involves you asking the editor or someone else with the requisite authority and receiving an answer in the affirmative.

of course, if it came down to it, you could claim that their Terms and Conditions are in bad faith, since even viewing the document involves implicit copying, but i doubt a court would see that as a justification for ignoring their terms of copyright license.
by Mike
Seems to me that re-posting a story written by the corporate media is certainly justifiable. Knight Ridder, owner of the Contra Costa Times & a gazillion other papers, reaped $340 million in profit in 1999. They're stripping away the last remnants of insightful investigative journalism in the mainstream media with the aim of driving up their income as a percentage of revenue. They've sliced and diced my old paper, the Philly Inquirer--most recently firing 100 folks--to eke out another 2% in profit.

While I would hope indepedent journalists could cover this enormously important story, I understand that our resources are limited. And when the corporate media is read through a discerning lense, it can be informative.

by Chehotep (Dynasties [at] aol.com)
Its tottally unbelievable that the Bay Areas targeting Homeless camps. Who the hell gives them the right. Find someone your own wallet size to pick on! I dont have any tollerance for nonsence with homelessness abuse. Reason beeing that the world takes away peoples right to work when they are abused and on medication, recovering drug addicts, and paying their dues to society. I remember driving through San Francisco and seeing one of the 20 some closed churches with a mount of homeless people sleeping outside the church. Our government can only afford to collect money in return for funding. That is bullshit! What is the point in paying taxess when social issues should be payed for through mega taxes and little tax breaks for real working people. The sellouts and silverspoons pay only about ten to fifteen percent more and get most of the republican tax returns! I had to finish my Market street pizza one time inside of a fastfood resturant because I couldn't stand watching the teen eat out of the garbage can. Evicting homeless people is like picking on Jews in Nazis Germany. The San Pablo incedent in something you see in L.A. when homeless people don't snitch each other out to L.A.P.D.. Why cant the local governments take care of issues? This ballon of inflation created by interests and Real Estate idiots at the top won't mean shit when the economy sucks and everyone is done cashing out. The problem will only get worse. Case in general, the 1980's (republican boom time) put a million more homeless people in the street! Read a dam sociology book. Im gonna have to show up at that corporate media junkies house and stick it up his ass! One day I hope to see an end to homelessness but the system uses them as a picture or seen in a movie. This is a discrace to capitalism and is nothing that either Adam Smith or Karl Marx visialized in their ideological thinking.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$210.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network