Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Brian Avery challenges Israeli military impunity
Press Release, International Solidarity Movement, 23 February 2005
On February 23 at 2:45 PM, Brian Avery will arrive in Tel Aviv from the U.S. in order to be present on February 28th when the Israeli Supreme Court hears his petition demanding a criminal investigation of his shooting.
Brian, an American human rights activist with the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), was shot in the face and critically wounded on April 5, 2003 by Israeli soldiers while standing in street with his hands in the air in the West Bank town of Jenin.
A bullet entered his face, shattering his jaw and his nose.� Since the incident he has been in rehabilitation and undergone a series of facial reconstruction surgeries.
Four other international activists from Denmark and Sweden who witnessed the shooting testify that Brian, along with another ISM activist, was standing under a street lamp on a quiet empty street wearing a high visibility medic vest with his hands in the air, clearly indicating he was an unarmed international.� An Israeli Armored Personnel Carrier approached at less than 30kmph and without warning opened heavy fire from a range of just tens of meters, and then carried on driving.
The Israeli army conducted an internal command inquiry and concluded there was no evidence that Brian was hit by shots fired by Israeli soldiers.
The inquiry did not include testimonies from the eyewitnesses and relied entirely on the testimonies of Israeli soldiers serving in the region.
In several cases Israeli military Internal command inquiries absolved the army, but subsequent military police investigations uncovered incriminating evidence and serious charges were brought.
This was the case in the killing of British ISM activist, Tom Hurndall, who was fatally shot in Rafah six days after Brian's injury. The internal command inquiry ruled that Tom was shot because of the presence of a Palestinian militant in his vicinity.� The criminal investigation of the military police discovered that the soldier who fired the fatal shot and another soldier had lied in the internal inquiry. Charges of killing and interfering with the investigative procedure were brought.
All requests made on behalf of Brian for a police criminal investigation have received no response.
On the 28th of February his appeal demanding a criminal investigation will be heard by the Supreme Court.
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3636.shtml
Brian, an American human rights activist with the International Solidarity Movement (ISM), was shot in the face and critically wounded on April 5, 2003 by Israeli soldiers while standing in street with his hands in the air in the West Bank town of Jenin.
A bullet entered his face, shattering his jaw and his nose.� Since the incident he has been in rehabilitation and undergone a series of facial reconstruction surgeries.
Four other international activists from Denmark and Sweden who witnessed the shooting testify that Brian, along with another ISM activist, was standing under a street lamp on a quiet empty street wearing a high visibility medic vest with his hands in the air, clearly indicating he was an unarmed international.� An Israeli Armored Personnel Carrier approached at less than 30kmph and without warning opened heavy fire from a range of just tens of meters, and then carried on driving.
The Israeli army conducted an internal command inquiry and concluded there was no evidence that Brian was hit by shots fired by Israeli soldiers.
The inquiry did not include testimonies from the eyewitnesses and relied entirely on the testimonies of Israeli soldiers serving in the region.
In several cases Israeli military Internal command inquiries absolved the army, but subsequent military police investigations uncovered incriminating evidence and serious charges were brought.
This was the case in the killing of British ISM activist, Tom Hurndall, who was fatally shot in Rafah six days after Brian's injury. The internal command inquiry ruled that Tom was shot because of the presence of a Palestinian militant in his vicinity.� The criminal investigation of the military police discovered that the soldier who fired the fatal shot and another soldier had lied in the internal inquiry. Charges of killing and interfering with the investigative procedure were brought.
All requests made on behalf of Brian for a police criminal investigation have received no response.
On the 28th of February his appeal demanding a criminal investigation will be heard by the Supreme Court.
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article3636.shtml
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
There's reason to believe the
Wed, Jul 20, 2005 10:57AM
Is it Good or Not to Die for Freedom?
Wed, Jul 13, 2005 1:46AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$215.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network