From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
SACto mammaphobes try to squelch topfree protest
SUN's opinion: "Mammaphobia and femaphobia rule in Sacramento, as a federal judge refuses to shield topfree women peaceniks from gender discrimination and Stalinist repression by California Highway Patrol. "
[ Mammaphobic U.S. judge bans peace breasts.]
------------------
Saturday, November 5, 2005
(SF Chronicle)
SACRAMENTO/
Judge tosses a blanket on topless protest/
Breasts Not Bombs told nudity
not part of free-speech rights
Lynda Gledhill, Greg Lucas,
[SF] Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Copyright ©2005 SF Chronicle
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/11/05/BAGOLFJBB11.DTL
Sacramento -- A federal judge denied on Friday [ 4 Nov. 2005]
a request from a group of Mendocino women who
wanted to protest topless on the grounds of the [California] state
Capitol.
U.S. District Judge Garland Burrell said the group made no compelling
argument that showing their breasts constitutes free speech.
"Being topless is not inherently expressive" speech, Burrell said.
The group, Breasts Not Bombs, had scheduled a protest for noon Monday [ Nov. 7,
the day before a statewide special election].
The California Highway Patrol threatened to arrest anyone [* ]
who went topless.
Sherry Glaser, a leader of the group, said the protest may take place
without bare breasts.
"All we really have is the power of ourselves," she said.
"Our bodies bring attention."
Group members, whose protest on the west steps of the Capitol is intended
to contrast the "indecent" initiatives backed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on the November [8th ] ballot with their "natural and decent" breasts,
sought a temporary restraining order prohibiting CHP officers
from arresting women who protest topless.
The First Amendment protects their right to protest bare breasted, the
group argued. "The very act is a dynamic and fully expressive statement
worthy of constitutional protection," their brief asserts.
[..... etc.]
[ For the rest of this article,
please see:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/11/05/BAGOLFJBB11.DTL ]
.......
Copyright ©2005 SF Chronicle
.........
###
[ Comment by SUN:
" The California Highway Patrol threatened to arrest anyone [* ]
who went topless."
Really?
Would the Chips arrest a MAN who goes topless?
Or will they apply
a double standard,
discriminating against females? ]
......
------------------
Saturday, November 5, 2005
(SF Chronicle)
SACRAMENTO/
Judge tosses a blanket on topless protest/
Breasts Not Bombs told nudity
not part of free-speech rights
Lynda Gledhill, Greg Lucas,
[SF] Chronicle Sacramento Bureau
Copyright ©2005 SF Chronicle
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/11/05/BAGOLFJBB11.DTL
Sacramento -- A federal judge denied on Friday [ 4 Nov. 2005]
a request from a group of Mendocino women who
wanted to protest topless on the grounds of the [California] state
Capitol.
U.S. District Judge Garland Burrell said the group made no compelling
argument that showing their breasts constitutes free speech.
"Being topless is not inherently expressive" speech, Burrell said.
The group, Breasts Not Bombs, had scheduled a protest for noon Monday [ Nov. 7,
the day before a statewide special election].
The California Highway Patrol threatened to arrest anyone [* ]
who went topless.
Sherry Glaser, a leader of the group, said the protest may take place
without bare breasts.
"All we really have is the power of ourselves," she said.
"Our bodies bring attention."
Group members, whose protest on the west steps of the Capitol is intended
to contrast the "indecent" initiatives backed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on the November [8th ] ballot with their "natural and decent" breasts,
sought a temporary restraining order prohibiting CHP officers
from arresting women who protest topless.
The First Amendment protects their right to protest bare breasted, the
group argued. "The very act is a dynamic and fully expressive statement
worthy of constitutional protection," their brief asserts.
[..... etc.]
[ For the rest of this article,
please see:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/11/05/BAGOLFJBB11.DTL ]
.......
Copyright ©2005 SF Chronicle
.........
###
[ Comment by SUN:
" The California Highway Patrol threatened to arrest anyone [* ]
who went topless."
Really?
Would the Chips arrest a MAN who goes topless?
Or will they apply
a double standard,
discriminating against females? ]
......
For more information:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
NUDOPHOBIA
(gymnophobia),
*** breastphobia
(mammaphobia), ****
erotophobia,
femaphobia,
phallophobia,
torsophobia,
etc. --
IndyBay links,
2004 - 2005:
....
http://www.indybay.org/news/2004/09/1697160.php
(Did "nudophobia" cause SF death?,
30 September 2004)
.....
http://www.indybay.org/news/2004/10/1697972.php
(More nudophobia in SF's Castro,
05 October 2004)
......
http://www.indybay.org/news/2004/11/1704993.php
(FCC airheads create false "videality" of SF,
12 November 2004 )
......................
http://www.indybay.org/news/2004/12/1708219.php
(How fascists use nudophobia as a power tool,
03 December 2004 )
...
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/01/1712189.php
( Georgia nudophobes, 1 January 2005 )
.........
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/01/1712695.php
(Nudophobes threaten Hollywood, 4 January 2005)
.........
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/01/1714927.php
(Texas breastphobes vs. mural of topfree Eve, 15 January 2005)
...............
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/01/1715728.php
( Are redstaters nudophobic and homophobic? Green Bay?
19 January 2005 )
...........
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/01/1716313.php
(Powerful breastphobe quits FCC, 21 January 2005 )
..................
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/02/1723816.php
(Koko faces breastphobia, homophobia, gorillaphobia,
26 February 2005 )
...........................
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/05/1736124.php
( Phallophobia in Laramie, Wyoming,
5 May 2005)
...............................
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/05/1742612.php
( Sacrilege and stripping- "worse than death"?,
27 May 2005 )
...............................
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/06/1747079.php
( World Naked Bike Ride 2005,
12 June 2005 )
...........................
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/06/1748971.php
( political nakity meets nudophobia,
22 June 2005 )
.........................
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/06/1749954.php
( Pakistani jihadi claims women interrogators were naked,
28 June 2005 )
.......................
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/07/1755352.php
( Venice displays official torsophobia,
24 July 2005 )
........................
http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/11/1781488.php
( SACto mammaphobes try to squelch topfree protest,
6 November 2005 )
.........................
###
Then why is it such a common convention in advertising? Why the prevalence of topless bars? Why the popularity of breast implants? Was this judge bottle-fed?
at State Capitol Rally
Written for the web by
C. Johnson,
[ News 10] Internet News Producer
[ http://www.news10.net/storyfull2.aspx?storyid=14118 ]
The California Highway Patrol arrested two women
for baring their breasts at a State Capitol rally [ Nov. 7 ]
opposing initiatives the governor has backed on tomorrow's ballot.
[............]
At the conclusion of today's hour-long rally,
two protestors took off their tops.
CHP officers promptly arrested them.
State Senator Gloria Romero, D-Los Angeles, disagreed with the action.
"I would like for the legislature to clarify the law," she said.
"Exactly what it is that we are dealing with when we talk about the indecency of the breast?
If a woman were holding a baby here today and breastfeeding, would she have been arrested?"
The two women face possible charges of disorderly conduct and indecent exposure.
CHP Commissioner Mike Brown said that convictions on the latter charge could
technically mean the women would have to register as sex offenders and check in with local police.
..................
Created: 11/7/2005 3:27:16 PM
Updated: 11/7/2005 3:47:17 PM
...................
Nov. 7 (Monday): In Sacramento,
outside California state capitol building,
CHP busts Sheryl Glaser, 45, and Renee Love, 40,
for bare-breasted political demonstration.
Please see Tuesday SF Chronicle, or:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/11/08/BAGIEFKN801.DTL&hw=topless&sn=001&sc=1000
............
This story (unlike previously posted report)
gives the NAMES of the two women.
Glaser is the leader of the Mendocino County group,
"Breasts Not Bombs".
.......
California citizens:
PLEASE VOTE in the election today
(Tuesday, Nov. 8)
unless you've already voted.
Pay Arnold back
for letting his CHP
arrest these brave women!!!
[ I delivered my absentee ballot,
sealked in its envelope,
to SF City hal on Nov. 7. --- TBL ]
.........