Feature Archives
Wolfgang Puck has refused to stop serving this inhumane and decadent item, and also serves foie gras, the artificially fattened livers of force-fed ducks. When representatives from Farm Sanctuary worked to educate Mr. Puck and his affiliates about the plight of veal calves, they responded with misinformation, excuses, and ultimately, silence. Read more
Recent crackdowns on the animal rights and environmental justice movements have left many activists feeling that their communities are under siege. From the prosecution of the SHAC 7 to the arrests of thirteen individuals for arsons committed over a ten-year span, a war is being waged against these movements by the U.S. government. While all of this may seem terrifying in its unfamiliarity to younger activists, the tactics being employed by the FBI and Joint Terrorism Task Force are anything but new. Whisperings of ‘COINTELPRO’ have appeared in various articles about the backlash against eco-activism, but what does this generation really know about the Counter-Intelligence Program aimed at groups such as the Black Panther Party (BPP) and the American Indian Movement (AIM)? Today’s activists are heirs to a history of social and political battles from wars that are not yet over. Without seeing today’s struggles for animal rights and environmental justice in a broader historical and social context, we run the risk not only of repeating painful lessons of the past, but of isolating ourselves and weakening our movements.
Read More in the April-May 2006 issue of Fault Lines
Recent Indybay Coverage of Grand Juries, Arrests, and Other Anti-Activist Actions: SF Grand Jury Targets G8 Protest | SHAC7 Convicted | Government's "Case" Against Rod Coronado | 11 Indicted in Latest Round of FBI Environmental Witch Hunt | Three Arrested in Auburn, Accused of Planning ELF Actions | Animal Activists Subpoenaed to Appear in San Francisco | Grand Jury in San Diego
“Mail time is often the brightest part of a prisoner's day," organizers of the event said. "Letters help show that there is a whole movement of support outside the prison walls — and that they are not alone.”
After Congressional hearings brought governmental pressure to bear, a New Jersey federal grand jury in 2004 indicted seven individuals and the organization Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA on charges of animal enterprise terrorism under the Animal Enterprise Protection Act of 1992 (formerly known as the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act). The law singles out property crimes against businesses that use animals and treats them more seriously than similar offences against other organizations. This is the first time anyone has ever been tried under the Animal Enterprise Protection Act. Many fear the convictions have set a precedent for animal protection campaigners throughout the country. In fact, numerous other environmental and animal activists are currently facing indictments and grand jury subpoenas in a recent massive governmental sweep in the U.S. that has come be known at the "Green Scare".
All of the SHAC defendants were involved in some capacity in the campaign to close Huntingdon Life Sciences. Originally, seven individuals were charged, along with the organization Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA. Charges against one activist were later dropped. None of those convicted are alleged to have carried out any of the substantive crimes laid out in the indictment — from property damage to intimidation. Rather, the six were convicted of running the SHAC USA website that allowed others access to information that could be used in such crimes. While one of those convicted now admits, "Some of the things I've done have been just rude, and I wouldn't do them again," all six remaining activists face years in federal prison for "crimes" in which no one was hurt. Four of the six are currently under house arrest while awaiting sentencing in June, and the SHAC7 Support Committee and attorneys are continuing to work to have the remaining two defendants released as well.
Recent Reports: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 · SHAC Video: Time for Action 2
Previous Indybay Feature on the Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty Case
In February, Foster Farms directly responded to EBAA's website by issuing a "cease and desist" order demanding that "EBAA immediately cancel or transfer the fosterfacts.net website to Foster Farms" and “refrain from any libelous or slanderous activity toward Foster Farms” by March 10. EBAA refuses to back down, claiming their documentation speaks for itself. While Foster Farms continues to threaten litigation, it has not as of yet actually filed as lawsuit. Unfortunately, earlier this year, one Foster Farms' employee was seriously injured and another was killed on the job. The workers' cause did move forward in early April, though, when a federal judge ordered Foster Farms to finally recognize the union at the company's Livingston plant.
Regardless of Foster Farms’ next move, EBAA will continue speaking out, and states that, “The mission of our organization is to reveal cruelty of agriculture in California, and we’ll continue to do that.”
Previous Indybay Features on Foster Farms' Treatment of Animals and Workers
Full Report and Photos · More Info: 1 | 2






