top
East Bay
East Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Beverage Company Attempt to Buy Berkeley Election Violates Sign Law

by Sharat G. Lin
Berkeley voters express outrage at the American Beverage Association spending over $20 per potential vote to crush Measure D (sweetened beverage tax) in the November 2014 election. "No on D" posters on city lamp posts violate Berkeley law.
800_md1.jpg
Beginning in the week of October 20, 2014, advertising went up on all allowable walls and floor space in the Ashby BART Station urging voters to vote "no" on Measure D. Every square inch of advertising space and more wall space that was never intended for advertising was covered with huge ads designed to sow doubts in voters' minds about the "soda tax". Every one of 16 advertisement boards at the rail platform level had also been purchased by the "No on D" campaign.

Measure D would enact a Berkeley city tax of $0.01 per ounce on most drinks containing added caloric sugar.

By Wednesday, October 22, wrap-around ads covering below-ground structural columns of the Ed Roberts Campus were partially torn off by Berkeley residents outraged at the overwhelming power of outside corporate money in a local election.

By Saturday morning, new posters for the "No on D" campaign had been taped to every city lamp post and utility pole around the Ashby BART Station on both sides of Adeline Street, Martin Luther King, Jr. Way, and Ashby Avenue. One Berkeley resident after another gradually removed the posters, indicating a widespread backlash against corporate money in what should be a democratic process among Berkeley voters. By Sunday evening, nearly every one of the scores of "No on D" posters had been completely or partially removed.

Each poster, bearing the name of the American Beverage Association, was posted in violation of the Berkeley Sign Ordinance No. 4291-NS, Section 4.1, which states: "No sign, poster, placard, card, sticker, banner or other device calculated to attract attention of the public shall be posted, printed, stamped, stuck or otherwise affixed to or upon any public sidewalk, crosswalk, curb, lamp post, hydrant, tree, utility pole, ..."

Temporary election signs are allowed by Section 4.7 on private property.

This makes the American Beverage Association liable to being fined for violating the Berkeley Sign Ordinance.

The North Berkeley BART Station was also targeted by huge "No on D" ads, but because of the lack of assigned advertising space on walls, the above-ground part of the station had only two giant floor ads.

There were no such ads in the Berkeley BART Station only because other advertising contracts had already been signed.

In advertizing mailers sent to Berkeley registered voters, the No on D campaign admits to spending $1.4 million on the Berkeley election, mostly funded by the American Beverage Association. While the ABA labels itself for this election as a "California PAC", the American Beverage Association itself is based in Washington, DC for the primary purpose of lobbying Congress.

Measure D proponents say that unofficially No on D spending will hit $1.7 million for Berkeley's approximately 81,000 registered voters, or nearly $21 per potential vote.

The election battle over the soda tax, also being fought in San Francisco as Measure E, is so important to the sweetened beverage industry because successful passage of soda taxes in the Bay Area could set precedents that will be felt across the country and eventually around the world.

Measure D in Berkeley and Measure E in San Francisco further illustrate the overwhelming power of corporate money in subverting democracy after the Citizens United ruling. The significance of the votes on these measures are not merely about taxing artificially-sweetened sodas, but about unlimited corporate money buying elections and subverting democracy in the United States. They remind us of the imperative to amend the U.S. Constitution to abolish "corporate personhood" once and for all.
§Election campaign violation
by Sharat G. Lin
md2.jpg
American Beverage Association sign taped to a lamp post on Martin Luther King Jr. Way in violation of the Berkeley Sign Ordinance (§4291-4.1).
§Sign violation
by Sharat G. Lin
md3.jpg
No on D" sign taped to a lamp post in violation of the Berkeley Sign Ordinance (§4291-4.1).
§Giant floor ad
by Sharat G. Lin
800_md4.jpg
American Beverage Association buys huge floor ads in the North Berkeley BART Station.
§Outside corporate money in local election
by Sharat G. Lin
800_md5.jpg
American Beverage Association buys out all ad space in the Ashby BART Station.
Add Your Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Stop Regressive Taxes
Sat, Nov 1, 2014 4:03AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$330.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network