From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Related Categories: U.S. | Government & Elections
Hank Skinners Ungodly Mistreatment By Texans Rick Perry & Greg Abbott Needs Our Prayers!
by Hillary's Agenda
Wednesday Sep 4th, 2013 10:57 PM
Governor Rick Perry's Texas Posse Stole Away Hank Skinner's Ability to Ever Defend Himself
Sadly there are some very devious folks in Rick Perry's Texas Demonic Posse that decided on their own to execute Hank Skinner,even if he never committed these 3 murders he was charged with.

When the State of Texas admitted losing but most likely destroyed Hank Skinner's most crucial exoneration DNA evidence after having possession of it for 16 yrs >Hank Skinner should have been set free !

This great country can not allow Texas Governor Rick Perry & State Attorney General Greg Abbott current+future executions or long term imprisonments while their State loses possible exculpatory evidence anytime the Supreme Court Justices spank their State Courts crazed legal decisions.

Just because Rick Perry & Greg Abbott hate the Federal Government telling them what to do concerning various other issues,does not equate to Texas having the ability to have Hank Skinner's crucial possible life~saving evidence trashed without even an investigation.

These 2 powerful Texas politicos sent Hank Skinner to be executed prior proper DNA tests, which resulted in our U.S. Supreme Court stopping the execution from taking place just one hour prior Hank Skinner losing his life..

***Obviously what both of these powerful Texas politicos are really saying to the rest of our country by claiming "States Rights with no Federal Oversights" *Only our Texas posse will decide who we want to wrongfully execute & imprison and Uncle Sam can go take a hike..
Hank Skinner,Who Says Being Handicapped is an Excuse 4 Executing Innocent Texans ?

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott Knows Having A Heart For Justice Does Not Take Legs.
Why Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott is Not Sleeping Nights ...
Balderdash to anyone saying Texas Governor Rick Perry's Demonic posse offered justice to Hank Skinner at his initial Trial !

Hank Skinner Death Penalty Case: Texas Jurors Reconsider Verdict

3 years ago


This story was reported by Rachel Cicurel, Gaby Fleischman, Emily Glazer, and Alexandra Johnson.

In March 1995, a jury left a Fort Worth, Texas, courthouse having unanimously decided that DNA testing and compelling testimony led to an inescapable verdict: Henry "Hank" Skinner deserved to die for the murders of his live-in girlfriend, Twila Busby, and her two adult sons in their home on New Year's Eve 1993.

Twila was bludgeoned to death; her sons were stabbed. The jury primarily based its decision on evidence that showed the victims' blood on Skinner's clothes and the testimony of a neighbor. They deliberated for less than two hours, and Skinner has been on Texas' death row ever since.

But the jurors were never presented with complete DNA results of the physical evidence, nor could they have imagined that the prosecution's star witness would recant her testimony and that subsequent developments would strengthen the case that another man may have been responsible for the murders.

Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it would take Skinner's case and determine whether he can bring a civil rights action to seek DNA testing of the remaining evidence found at the scene. The untested evidence includes vaginal swabs, bloodied knives, fingernail clippings, hair clutched in the female victim's hand, and a blood-stained windbreaker strikingly similar to one worn by the alternative suspect.

In April of our senior year, the four of us -- 22-year-old journalism students from Northwestern University's Medill Innocence Project -- arrived in Texas in search of the jurors. (The trial had been moved to the Fort Worth area from rural Gray County in the Panhandle because of massive pre-trial publicity.) The Medill Innocence Project investigates possible wrongful convictions in homicide cases. In the five days allotted for our reporting trip, we hoped to get in touch with at least one juror. We were pleasantly surprised, however, when more than half the jury opened their doors and memories.

In light of new developments that have surfaced in the 15 years since Skinner's trial, several of the original jurors are no longer sure of his guilt. Five say they might have had reasonable doubt at the time of the trial if they had known then what they know now. Seven are calling for DNA testing of all the evidence so they can be certain they convicted the right man. An eighth juror we contacted declined to comment.

Some jurors had followed developments in the case, searching the Internet and Texas newspapers for Skinner's name; others avoided it, hoping never to revisit this traumatic experience. In kitchens, livings rooms, garages, and eateries across Fort Worth and suburban Arlington, the jurors recalled the experience of being sequestered -- how detached they felt watching "Forrest Gump" rather than the news of the day.

But plugged back in 15 years later, they considered statements by two of Twila's friends that the alternative suspect -- Twila's uncle, Robert Donnell, who died in 1997 -- allegedly raped her on two occasions and stalked her at a party the night of the murders, as well as those by neighbors who said they had seen him tearing the carpeting out of his truck the morning after the crime and repainting the vehicle within a week.

They also took into account a new medical report indicating the likelihood that Skinner was barely conscious from drinking a mixture of alcohol and codeine at the time of the crime, and sworn statements by the prosecution's star witness, Andrea Reed, who repudiated her testimony. In the original trial, Reed, Skinner's ex-girlfriend who lived nearby, had testified that when Skinner came to her trailer shortly after the murders, he made incriminating statements and demanded that she not call the police. But in 1997, she recanted her testimony to a private investigator, claiming that law enforcement had intimidated her into falsely testifying. In 2000, she repeated that claim to another group of Medill Innocence Project students.

"I had no idea that she recanted her story, her testimony; that brings new light," said Tiffany Daniel, the youngest member of the jury. "That puts a lot of questions in my mind."

Sitting at her kitchen table, Daniel slowly reintroduced herself to an experience she had closed well over a decade ago. "We were responsible for sentencing," she said. "If we weren't presented with all the evidence that could potentially free a man or convict a man...if [he's put to death] and if this man didn't do that, that would be something I have to live with."

Many of the jurors interviewed were taken aback by the amount of untested evidence, stunned that even the blood on two of the murder weapons had not been analyzed. The seven jurors agreed that all the evidence should undergo DNA analysis. "That's the only way you can come to the right conclusion of if he's innocent or guilty," said Danny Stewart, the jury's foreman. "I would hate personally to put a man to death if he's innocent."

Lynn Switzer, the current district attorney of Gray County who is being sued by Skinner in the case before the Supreme Court, has refused to test all the remaining evidence. "If defendants are allowed to 'game the system' then we will never be able to rely on the finality of the judgments entered in their cases," Switzer said in a statement following the court's decision to take Skinner's case. "Mr. Skinner has been given plenty of opportunity to show that additional testing could prove his innocence, but he could not show that."

Texas courts have repeatedly denied Skinner's requests for DNA tests, ruling that he should have had the testing done at the time of the trial, a position Switzer supports.

Switzer was appointed district attorney by Texas Gov. Rick Perry after District Attorney Richard Roach was convicted of stealing and abusing methamphetamines. In January 2005, the FBI arrested Roach in the Gray County courthouse -- a place where he had both injected meth in front of an employee and made a career of prosecuting constituents for using the same drug. Roach had ousted the late John Mann, who served Gray County during Skinner's trial in 1995.

At his trial, Skinner was represented by Harold Comer, another former district attorney of Gray County. In that role, Comer had earlier prosecuted Skinner on charges of theft and assault. Although Comer resigned from office in 1992 before pleading guilty to criminal charges of embezzling cash confiscated in drug cases, he was later appointed by the judge to represent Skinner at his capital murder trial. To many jurors' current dismay, however, Comer didn't request DNA tests prior to trial, saying he did this to protect his client from potentially damaging results.

"All of it should have been tested," juror Stewart said. "All the DNA evidence should be tested. Period."

Some additional tests were done following Skinner's conviction. After being confronted on CourtTV in 2000, Mann had a change of heart. He ordered additional tests on head hairs clutched in Twila's hand, bloody gauze on the front sidewalk of her home, a cassette tape in the bedroom, and other items.

While some results put Skinner in the home -- where he indisputably was at the time of the crime -- the tests on one of the head hairs, the blood on the sidewalk, the cassette tape, and an unmatched fingerprint found on a plastic bag containing a bloodied knife all excluded Skinner. At that point, the district attorney's office -- led by Richard Roach when he took over from Mann -- halted further testing and returned the evidence to a storage locker, where it sits today.

It was this most recent round of DNA tests that prompted five jurors to say they could have reached a different verdict if they had known at the time of the trial what they know today. The two others said they really didn't know if the tests would have changed their minds.

"It would have been reasonable doubt," Daniel said, wiping away tears. "Especially if we had all that evidence, and another person's fingerprints was on it, or if someone else's skin was underneath Twila Busby's fingernails. That's reasonable doubt that it could be somebody else."

Douglas Keene, a jury expert and president of Keene Trial Consulting in Austin, said it is "not at all common" for jurors to question their original verdict. "Over time, they become more cemented into that original view because they can't even tolerate the view that they might have made a mistake on something so serious," he said.

Keene emphasized that jurors might feel anxiety that they may have come to the wrong conclusion, regardless of whether it was their fault. "Even if they didn't have an opportunity to know the exculpating evidence, jurors could become distraught that a man's life might have been taken in error."

But in Skinner's case, information suppressed during the trial and developed over the last 15 years has caused five jurors to contemplate their guilty vote in light of the high stakes Keene described. With someone's life on the line, Keene said, jurors take the burden of their responsibility very seriously.

In worn-in jeans and a T-shirt, juror Jerry Williams perched on a stool in his garage. He wonders now if DNA results could put the case to rest.

"What's right is right and what's wrong is wrong," Williams said. "It should have been tested before. ... Somebody's life is at stake."

Meanwhile, Hank Skinner remains on Texas' death row, within 47 minutes of execution on March 24 until the Supreme Court issued a stay. He has maintained his innocence since the night in 1993 that Twila Busby and her sons were murdered, and hopes the high court will give him the right to prove it.
Filed Under: Crime
Tagged: capital murder, death row, Hank Skinner, Medill Innocence Project, Texas, verdict

More articles from Medill Innocence Project »

Frightening that Texas Governor Rick Perry's and State Attorney General Greg Abbott's Demonic posse is still attempting to execute Hank Skinner even after denying him any ability to ever again be capable of properly defending himself without his most crucial DNA exoneration evidence !

Stand down Texas Project
Thursday, 14 June 2012

What's Next in the Hank Skinner DNA Testing

"Evidence Missing in Skinner Case," is Jordan Smith's post in the Austin Chronicle, our independent alt-weekly on the stands today.

Just two weeks after the state announced it would drop its opposition to the post-conviction DNA testing of evidence in the capital murder case that sent Hank Skinner to death row, comes news that at least one piece of evidence Skinner has been seeking access to for testing has been lost. Among the key pieces of evidence never before tested, and that Skinner has sought access to for more than a decade, is a blood- and sweat-stained windbreaker found near the body of his girlfriend Twila Busby. The windbreaker is now apparently missing. "We are pleased to have reached an agreement that finally secures DNA testing in this case, but there remains reason for grave concern," Skinner's attorney Rob Owen said in a press statement. "According to the State, every other piece of evidence in this case has been preserved. It is difficult to understand how the State has managed to maintain custody of items as small as fingernail clippings, while apparently losing something as large as a man's windbreaker. To date, the State has offered no explanation for its failure to safeguard the evidence in this case."

Indeed, in addition to 40 items of evidence that have never before been tested for DNA is the windbreaker found next to the body of Busby, who was slaughtered along with her two sons, in the Pampa home she shared with Skinner. There are photos of the windbreaker, a tan jacket with snap buttons down the front, but the windbreaker itself has disappeared – and no one seems to know how or when it was misplaced, or where it might've gone. The Gray County Sheriff's Office says it has never had custody of the jacket; Gary Noblett, from the Pampa Police Department, a 41-year law enforcement veteran who now manages the department's evidence, says that everything the Pampa PD had stored as evidence in the case was eventually transported for Skinner's original trial. After Skinner was convicted the evidence was moved back to Gray County, he said, but "somehow or another" the windbreaker never made it back. He says the PD has fielded questions about the missing windbreaker for three or four years – at some point including questions from the AG's office – but "as far as I know, no one's ever been able to find that thing."


All evidence is to be transported to the Texas Department of Public Safety lab in Lubbock, where it will be inspected by lawyers for both parties before any testing begins. Any unknown DNA profile found as a result of the testing will be run through state and national databases, if possible, and followed by the issuance of a report by DPS documenting the test results and DNA comparisons. Forty-five days after all of the data has been reported to the parties a hearing on the matter will be held in Gray County.

Earlier coverage of Hank Skinner and the Joint Motion for DNA testing in his case begins at the link.

Thursday, 14 June 2012 at 10:23 AM in Crime Lab, DNA, Innocence, Post-Conviction Review, Specific Case, Texas Court of Criminal Appeals | Permalink
Technorati Tags: 31st District Court, capital punishment, Capital Punishment Center, CCA, Chapter 64, Court of Criminal Appeals, crime lab, death penalty, DNA, DPS, GeneScreen/Orchid Cellmark, Gray County, Gray County, Hank Skinner, innocence, post-conviction access to DNA testing, post-conviction review, Rob Owen, Skinner v. Switzer, stay of execution, Texas, Texas Attorney General, Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Solicitor General, University of Texas School of Law
Calling All Inter+National Anonymous Members>Texas Greg Abbott Thinks Our USA is China !

U.S. Supreme Court Did Not Order Greg Abbott's Demonic Texas Posse To Destroy Hank Skinner's Crucial DNA Exoneration Evidence ?

Allowing Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott to Execute Hank Skinner after defying our countries U.S. Supreme Court order to test all of Hank Skinner's DNA legal case evidence,is a Demonic Horror that will have future national legal repercussions!

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's misdirected anger is costing the State of Texas & Uncle Sam tens of million$ in various legal issue$ other than his unbalanced hatred towards a likely innocent>& persecuted man named Hank Skinner..
David ProtessPresident, Chicago Innocence Project

Texas Inmate Defies Death As Evidence of Innocence Mounts

Posted: 09/10/2013 9:02 am

Chicago News, Death Penalty, Rick Perry, Anthony McKinney, Hank Skinner, Texas Death Penalty, Timothy Cole, Dna Evidence, Dna Testing, Wrongful Conviction, Chicago News

Hank Skinner is in the final round of a fight against two heavyweights. One is the Texas lawmen who want him executed. The other is an often-fatal ailment that saps his strength and leaves him in constant pain. The odds makers give him little chance. Death, after all, is undefeated.

But Skinner, 51, is not about to throw in the towel. He is sustained by the love of his wife, Sandrine, and his daughter, Natalie. And, he is buoyed by the latest findings in his case, which support his steadfast contention for two decades -- that he is an innocent man.

It all began with a bloodbath on New Year's Eve in 1993. That is when Skinner's live-in girlfriend, Twila Busby, and her two adult sons were stabbed to death in their Panhandle home. Skinner was physically present at the time of the slayings and naturally became the prime suspect.

Local law enforcement scoffed at Skinner's claim that he was unconscious on the living room couch from drinking a vodka cocktail laced with codeine and anti-anxiety meds. They doubted he suddenly awoke to find the trio dead or dying, then stumbled to a neighbor's house for help. If that were true, why would the neighbor say that Skinner ordered her not to call the cops?

Believing from the start that Skinner was the killer, the cops failed to investigate alternative suspect Robert Donnell, Twila's uncle (now deceased). Donnell had molested her in the past, frightened her with crude sexual advances at a New Year's Eve party less than an hour before the murders and vanished after she headed home. He was next seen scrubbing his pick-up truck from top to bottom on a frigid New Year's Day.

The jury did not hear much of the exculpatory evidence. Convinced of Skinner's guilt by his presence at the scene and the neighbor's testimony, jurors unanimously recommended death. A Panhandle judge obliged them in 1995.

Five years passed before Northwestern University journalism students began looking into the case. They interviewed the neighbor, who said she was coerced into falsely testifying against Skinner, adding that he had mumbled incoherently and was barely able to walk. (A toxicology report later revealed that Skinner was likely semi-comatose and lacked the agility to kill three able-bodied adults.) They also interviewed a man who saw Skinner passed out on themcouch before the party.

Another neighbor, Deborah Ellis, told the students that Donnell, the uncle, had regularly worn a jacket that was strikingly similar to one found next to Twila's lifeless body. The jacket was covered with blood and hairs, ripe for DNA testing. So were hairs found clutched in Twila's hand. And, in a death row interview, Skinner said he wanted modern forensic tests conducted.

When the new evidence and Skinner's call for DNA were made public in 2000, the D.A. promised testing. But he reneged when the results began trickling in. Three items, including bloodied gauze found just outside the Busby home, excluded Skinner. There would be no more tests, the D.A. and his successors announced.

Skinner's lawyers unsuccessfully fought the no-test policy through the Texas and federal courts. Running out of appeals, they asked the Supreme Court to take the case. On March 24, 2010, Skinner was served the customary last meal next to the Texas death chamber. With less than an hour to spare, the high court finally weighed in. The justices ordered a stay of execution.

In a landmark decision the next year, the court ruled that Skinner was entitled under federal civil rights law to have access to the biological evidence in his case. It seemed the truth would finally be known. But the Texas Attorney General stubbornly refused to produce the evidence. By this time, Hank Skinner had been on death row for 16 years.

The A.G. relented only after a public tongue-lashing by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in 2012. At that point, the reason for the twelve years of stonewalling became apparent. The jacket found next to Twila's body? The single most important piece of physical evidence in the case? It had vanished. Poof! "Somehow or one's ever been able to find that thing," shrugged the lawman in charge of storing evidence.

But the hairs in Twila's hand had been preserved, and last month the results came back. They were a revelation. Three of the hairs genetically ruled out Skinner. More significant, they were microscopically different from the three victims' hair -- but belonged to the maternal side of their family. Since Robert Donnell was Twila's mother's brother, the hairs were genetically consistent with his DNA.

Will Skinner's lawyers ask a judge to exhume Donnell's body? Perhaps, though the next logical step is a hearing on the new DNA tests, which the Texas A.G. still says point to Skinner's guilt. (In a statement, a spokesman for the A.G. said the three hairs must have come from the victims, even though a state lab ruled out this possibility.)

Are there other ways to determine whether Donnell committed the crime? Witness Deborah Ellis thinks she has the answer. In a follow-up interview with a new group of journalism students, for the first time Ellis was shown a crime scene photo of the actual jacket. She gasped, saying she was "100 percent sure" that the jacket belonged to Donnell. Ellis went on to say in a sworn statement that she and Donnell's wife had searched everywhere for the jacket when Donnell had not been seen wearing it after the murders. But the jacket could not be found.

As for Hank Skinner, he should be contemplating a triumphant return to his family after a 20-year nightmare. But living 23 hours a day in a 6.5' by 10.5' cage, and eating processed food served through a metal slot, has proven hazardous to his health.

Last month, Skinner collapsed on the floor of his cell. "I was in pain so bad I passed out from it after it blinded me," he recalled in a recent letter. "The 'nurse' said nothing was wrong with me, that I was faking." When the symptoms persisted, Skinner says he was taken to the emergency room and given a CT scan. The diagnosis: acute pancreatitis.

Skinner was raced to John Sealy Hospital in Galveston. "I stayed in for three weeks, almost died twice," he wrote. "Came back to the unit 08.23 and was denied all meds, relapsed, almost died again." Sandrine Skinner confirmed that his blood pressure plummeted to 85/53 and a priest was called to administer last rites. "When I left [death row] I weighed 218, I now weigh 174, lost 44 - 47 lbs in 28 days...Couldn't eat the whole month," he recalled.

"Through a miracle I survived....I'm starting to eat solid food again and not puking. This ailment usually kills. My priest's niece died of it. The cause is unknown." He believes that his supporters "kept me from going in[to] darkness."

Today, Skinner is back on death row, where he soon learned of another tragedy. This time, it involved a prisoner whose case he has followed closely for a decade. His wife broke the news that Anthony McKinney had recently died, alone in an Illinois prison cell, before powerful evidence of his innocence could be heard. Skinner was shaken. "Another one gone," he sighed. And he has read everything about Texas inmate Timothy Cole, who was posthumously exonerated after DNA evidence proved his innocence -- a decade after he died of a heart attack while behind bars.

Since Skinner landed on death row, Texas has executed 414 prisoners, many of whom he knew.

Like these men and women, Skinner realizes he will not cheat death. But he still intends to defeat his mortal adversary, the Texas lawmen, and recover from his near-fatal illness. Dare he dream about life after exoneration? The pain stands in the way.

But Skinner clings fervently to every prisoner's cherished hope. He wants to die free.

Pamela Cytrynbaum contributed to this article.
Dear Lord,Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's Misdirected Anger Needs Change ..
It now has become very apparent to many around the World,that this too powerful wheelchair bound Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has been the focal point over the many years of making sure Hank Skinner never had the normal opportunity to prove his non~guilt of an accused crime using proper DNA testing !

Scary That Hank Skinner's Life Has Been Destroyed by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott & His Demonic Posse !

Dear Lord,Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's misdirected anger for being handicapped needs change,prior Hank Skinner's wrongful execution !


Texas Tribune

Bar Association: Texas Death Penalty System Falls Short

by Brandi Grissom September 18, 2013

Enlargegraphic by: Todd Wiseman

Texas has improved its criminal justice system following dozens of exonerations in recent years, but a new study the American Bar Association will release Wednesday finds that the death penalty system here still falls far short when it comes to fairness and eliminating the risk of executing the innocent.

"In many areas, Texas appears out of step with better practices implemented in other capital jurisdictions, fails to rely upon scientifically reliable methods and processes in the administration of the death penalty and provides the public with inadequate information to understand and evaluate capital punishment in the state," the report says.

The report, which outlines a host of recommendations to improve the criminal justice system, is part of the bar association's national project examining the implementation of the death penalty in states. While it praises Texas for recent improvements intended to increase fairness, the report says much work remains. The organization says its recommendations would restore public confidence in the system and help to ensure that Texans aren't wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death. Those include requiring the indefinite preservation of biological evidence in violent crimes, abandoning the evaluation of "future dangerousness," banning the execution of those with mental retardation and mental illness and establishing an innocence commission to examine the lessons of wrongful convictions.

"Texas has made some good policy decisions over the last couple of years," said Royal Ferguson, the founding dean of the University of North Texas at Dallas College of Law and a former U.S. district judge who served on the association's Texas Capital Punishment Assessment Team. "There are a lot more that need to be made."

Prosecutors contacted for this story declined to comment because they had not yet seen the embargoed report.

Since 1989, there have been 132 Texas convictions overturned, including those of 12 people who were on death row, according to the National Registry of Exonerations. In recent legislative sessions, lawmakers have passed new laws designed to prevent erroneous convictions. In 2007, lawmakers established a regional public defender's office for those accused of capital crimes. In 2009, legislators created the Office of Capital Writs to represent death row inmates. Two years ago, lawmakers required that local police agencies begin using better practices for photograph lineups. And this year, the Legislature approved the Michael Morton Act, which requires prosecutors to turn over police reports and witness statements to defense lawyers.

The report calls on lawmakers to require police agencies to preserve biological evidence in death penalty cases. Among the exonerations in Texas, 48 were based on the results of DNA testing. This year, lawmakers approved a law that requires testing of all biological evidence in death penalty cases. But in older cases, like that of death row inmate Hank Skinner, who was convicted in 1995 of murdering his live-in girlfriend and her two sons at their Pampa home, tracking down evidence to test can become challenging. Skinner fought for about a decade to obtain DNA testing he claims will prove his innocence in the brutal killings. The courts finally allowed the testing in 2012, but the state has been unable to locate a key piece of evidence, a man's windbreaker that Skinner argues could contain DNA that leads to the real killer.

A key recommendation in the report, Ferguson said, is the elimination of the use of "future dangerousness" as an element in the jury's decision-making in death penalty cases. In Texas, juries are asked to determine whether the defendant would commit violent crimes in the future before sentencing a person to death.

In 2002, then-Attorney General John Cornyn acknowledged that Texas had made a mistake in seven cases where prosecutors used testimony from a doctor who indicated to the jury that the defendants would present a bigger risk for future violence because they were black or Hispanic.

"It's impossible for anybody to try to predict the future," Ferguson said. "That part of the law needs to be repealed immediately."

The report also suggests that Texas lawmakers should specifically ban the death penalty in cases where the defendant suffers from mental retardation or mental illness. And it urges the state to require the use of current scientific standards in evaluating whether a defendant is mentally retarded or mentally ill.

The U.S. Supreme Court in 2002 ruled in Atkins v. Virginia that states could not execute the mentally disabled because it violates the constitutional ban on cruel and unusual punishment. But it allowed states to develop their own criteria for mental disabilities. Texas lawmakers, though, have been unable to agree on criteria, leaving it to the courts to decide how defendants should be evaluated.

The standards currently used to determine whether a Texan convicted of murder is mentally fit to be executed are called the "Briseño" standards — after the case that led to their development — and are based, in part, on the fictional character Lennie from John Steinbeck's classic novel Of Mice and Men.

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, in its Briseño ruling, wrote that "most Texas citizens would agree that Steinbeck's Lennie should, by virtue of his lack of reasoning ability and adaptive skills, be exempt from execution. But does a consensus of Texas citizens agree that all persons who might legitimately qualify for assistance under the social services definition of mental retardation be exempt from an otherwise constitutional penalty?"

The court's three-part definition requires the convicted inmate to have below average intellectual function, to lack adaptive behavior skills and to have had those problems prior to age 18.

Reform advocates argue the existing standards have resulted in the execution of some inmates who ought to have been classified as mentally retarded. And state Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, proposed legislation this year that he said would create more scientifically sound standards, calling the current ones "junk science."

But prosecutors have argued that the existing standards ensure that Texas doesn't violate the U.S. Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

Finally, the report calls on Texas to create a commission to investigate each of the state's wrongful convictions, identify the factors that contributed to them and consider ways to solve those problems through legislation or other policy changes.

Lawmakers have proposed such a commission in recent legislative sessions, but the measures have failed. State Sen. Joan Huffman, R-Southside Place and a former prosecutor and judge, was one opponent during the 2013 legislative session.

"Anyone listening to this could not argue we haven't made significant reforms in criminal justice," Huffman said during a legislative hearing in May. "We do not need yet another layer to go through this again."

Jennifer Laurin, a University of Texas School of Law professor and chairwoman of the team that prepared the report, said its goal was not to call into question the use of the death penalty in Texas. Instead, she said, it was to ensure that it is implemented fairly.

Former Texas Supreme Court Justice Deborah Hankinson, who also worked on the report, said lawmakers must take steps to restore public confidence in Texas' court system.

"For citizens to have confidence in the process, it requires transparency in every phase," she said.

Texas Tribune donors or members may be quoted or mentioned in our stories, or may be the subject of them. For a complete list of contributors, click here.
Frightening,Attorney General Greg Abbott and His Texan Demonic Posse,Also Want Hank Skinner's Blood, Even If He Is Innocent !

We will continue to ask International Anonymous members to help protect Hank Skinner from Greg Abbott and his Texas demon driven posse that takes no prisoners !

The Atlantic

Yes, America, We Have Executed an Innocent Man
ANDREW COHENMAY 14 2012, 11:01 PM ET

Carlos DeLuna was put to death in December 1989 for a murder in Corpus Christi. But he didn't commit the crime. Today, his case reminds us of the glaring flaws of capital punishment.

Carlos DeLuna (Corpus Christi Police Department)

Even for Justice Antonin Scalia, the crassest of the current United States Supreme Court justices, it was a particularly callous piece of writing. In 2006, in a case styled Kansas v. Marsh, the Court's five conservatives had just upheld a portion of Kansas' capital punishment law. The statute was interpreted to direct a sentence of death even if a jury found the "aggravating" and "mitigating" sentencing factors in equilibrium -- "equipoise," the Court lyrically called it. A tie, in other words, would mean death, not life.

For the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas had bent over backward to overturn a ruling by the Kansas Supreme Court that had declared the law unconstitutional. The High Court's four liberal justices had voted to uphold the Kansas ruling. Justice John Paul Stevens, the Ford appointee, chastised Thomas for reaching out so aggressively to overturn a state court on a matter of state law. And Justice David Souter, the Bush I appointee, wrote about how such "equipoise" necessarily precluded a death sentence.

Mocking the rationale of both, and unsatisfied with the scope of Justice Thomas' majority opinion, Justice Scalia wrote a concurrence he will have to live with the rest of his life. As he sought to destroy Justice Souter's argument about the doubts reasonable people have about the accuracy and reliability of America's death penalty regime, Justice Scalia described a criminal justice system unfamiliar to anyone who has ever covered a murder case, read a book about one, or watched television news. Justice Scalia wrote:

It should be noted at the outset that the dissent does not discuss a single case -- not one -- in which it is clear that a person was executed for a crime he did not commit. If such an event had occurred in recent years, we would not have to hunt for it; the innocent's name would be shouted from the rooftops by the abolition lobby.

And then...

Capital cases are given especially close scrutiny at every level, which is why in most cases many years elapse before the sentence is executed. And of course capital cases receive special attention in the application of executive clemency. Indeed, one of the arguments made by abolitionists is that the process of finally completing all the appeals and reexaminations of capital sentences is so lengthy, and thus so expensive for the State, that the game is not worth the candle.

The proof of the pudding, of course, is that as far as anyone can determine (and many are looking), none of cases included in the .027% error rate for American verdicts involved a capital defendant erroneously executed.

There are two obvious and basic explanations for Justice Scalia's strident concurrence. Either he truly believed that capital cases are "given especially close scrutiny at every level," in which case he hadn't been paying attention to his work all those years. Or he did not truly believe that "capital cases receive special attention in the application of executive clemency," in which case his concurrence was just a thoughtless, reflexive reaction to Justice Souter's compelling case. Either way, he was wrong. Terribly wrong.


The DeLuna case was flawed at virtually every level.
At 11 p.m Monday, the Columbia Human Rights Law Review (at Columbia University) published and posted its Spring 2012 issue -- devoted entirely to a single piece of work about the life and death of two troubled and troublesome South Texas men. In explaining to their readers why an entire issue would be devoted to just one story, the editors of the Review said straightly that the "gravity of the subject matter of the Article and the possible far-reaching policy ramifications of its publication necessitated this decision."

The article is titled "Los Tocayos Carlos: Anatomy of a Wrongful Execution" and it was written by James S. Liebman, Shawn Crowley, Andrew Markquart, Lauren Rosenberg, Lauren Gallo White, Lauren Rosenberg and Daniel Zharkovsky. Los Tacayos can be translated from Spanish as "namesakes" and the two men at the heart of the story were, indeed, named Carlos DeLuna and Carlos Hernandez.. On December 7, 1989, this intense piece establishes beyond any reasonable doubt, Texas executed the former for a murder the latter had committed.

The Review article is an astonishing blend of narrative journalism, legal research, and gumshoe detective work. And it ought to end all reasonable debate in this country about whether an innocent man or woman has yet been executed in America since the modern capital punishment regime was recognized by the Supreme Court in 1976. The article is also a clear and powerful retort to Justice Scalia in Kansas v. Marsh: Our capital cases don't have nearly the procedural safeguards he wants to pretend they do.

Soon to be published as a book, Los Tacayos Carlos is a seminal piece of online advocacy as well. Not only is the article itself now available on the web in its entirety (at but so are all of its supporting materials. "The web version of the Article contains approximately 3,469 footnotes," the Review editors tell us, which in turn "provide hyperlinks to view the cited sources," including a great deal of the evidence relevant to the case. Now, everyone in the world who is interested can learn how bad it all can go when human beings try to administer what's supposed to be a fair, just and accurate death penalty.


Kansas v. Marsh was decided on June 26, 2006. The very next day, on June 27, 2006, two decorated Chicago Tribune reporters, Steve Mills and Maurice Possley, published the last of a three-part, groundbreaking series about the legal and factual problems with the DeLuna case. The headline that day was: "The Secret That Wasn't" and here was their lede:

CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas -- It was a secret they all shared. Some kept it out of fear. Some because no one ever asked. Whatever their reasons, it was a secret that might have saved Carlos De Luna from the execution chamber. Twenty-three years after Wanda Lopez was murdered in the gas station where she worked, family members and acquaintances of another man, Carlos Hernandez, have broken their silence to support what De Luna had long asserted: Hernandez, a violent felon, killed Lopez in 1983.
A Tribune investigation has identified five people who say Hernandez told them that he stabbed Lopez and that De Luna, whom he called his "stupid tocayo," or namesake, went to Death Row in his place. They also say he admitted killing another woman, in 1979, a crime for which he was indicted but never tried. Although some aspects of De Luna's actions on the night of Lopez's killing remain suspicious, the Tribune uncovered substantial evidence that undermines his conviction.

I met Possley while we were both covering the McVeigh bombing trial. That was before his groundbreaking work a decade ago exposing the arbitrary and capricious nature of the death penalty in Illinois. Last year, when Illinois ended its experiment with capital punishment, it was in large part because of the Tribune and the work of Mills, Possley and fellow reporter Ken Armstrong. So why had he chosen back in 2005 to focus upon the DeLuna case? What had struck him? Last week, Possley told me via email:

When I reflect back on the series, what I think about most is how this case was a sensational case in a small arena. It didn't play out on a national stage and it happened so quickly -- so little time between arrest, conviction and execution. I remember that what really got me interested in the case was seeing the crime scene photos with all of the blood and then learning that there was no blood on DeLuna. It just didn't seem possible that he committed such a crime and was caught so quickly and had no blood on his clothing.That fact was so startling to me.

I really haven't changed my view of the case from back then. I thought it was a colossal, global failure of every corner of the criminal justice system. The media failed to question the case (not unusual in smaller markets where police and prosecutors are the best sources) as well.

Possley says the new piece "takes a giant step beyond our reporting because it's such a comprehensive and detailed account" of the DeLuna case. And why wouldn't it be? It was Liebman who first came to Possley and Mills, in November 2005, to see if the two veteran journalists couldn't independently investigate what his own team had discovered about the two Carloses. The resultant series became a finalist that year for a Pulitzer Prize in National Reporting. Someone was shouting from the rooftops, Justice Scalia.

Like a Karmic game of leapfrog, the two investigations have enabled one another. For their 2006 series, Possley and Mills got new information that Liebman initially had not uncovered. And now, today, Liebman has uncovered new information that in 2006 was unavailable to Possley and Mills. And what is the point of all? Why spend the inordinate time and energy writing about the guilt or innocence of a man dead now more than 20 years? In the Epilogue, Liebman makes it clear:

With the publication of this book, we make our voices heard. At the same time, we have attempted to present the case so that our readers can consider the evidence for themselves, reach their own conclusions about what happened, and let their own consciences dictate how much tolerance for doubt is allowable when human life is on the line. Whatever else is true, we owe it to the Carlos DeLunas of our nation, as well as the Wanda Lopezes, to ask these questions and to shout out the answers.

Carlos Hernandez (Corpus Christi Police Department)
Like Possley and Mills in 2006, I don't have the space here to do justice to the facts of the DeLuna case. But I will try. Carlos DeLuna was executed in December 1989 for murdering Wanda Lopez in a February 1983 robbery in Corpus Christi. A jury convicted him in an afternoon of deliberation and sentenced him to death shortly thereafter. No appellate courts came to his rescue. And the six years it took from crime to execution was surprisingly -- suspiciously -- fast; nationwide, it's usually twice that long.

Texas convicted and executed DeLuna, all right, despite the fact that there was no blood or DNA evidence linking him to the scene of the crime. The state executed him despite the fact that the only eyewitness to the crime identified DeLuna while the suspect was sitting in the back of a police car parked in a dimly lit lot in front of the crime scene. Texas executed him despite the lack of DeLuna's fingerprints at the crime scene and the lack of the victim's hair and fibers on DeLuna. From a bloody scene, there was nothing.

No one can ever say again with a straight face that America doesn't execute innocent men. No one.
Texas convicted and executed DeLuna despite the fact that the police and prosecutors knew or should have known that Lopez's real murderer was a man named Carlos Hernandez, a violent criminal who looked almost exactly like DeLuna. Why? Because Hernandez was known to use the sort of knife used as the murder weapon. Because he matched initial descriptions of the suspect. Because he was known to be violent toward women. Oh, and because he evidently couldn't stop bragging about how he had murdered Lopez and gotten someone else to take the fall for him.

"... [It] is no overstatement to call it 'common knowledge' in 1980s Corpus Christi that Carlos Gonzalez Hernandez killed Wanda Lopez," Liebman and Co. conclude. Yet Texas executed DeLuna despite the fact that key evidence in the case went missing both before and after trial; that DeLuna initially was appointed a lawyer without criminal law experience; and that law enforcement failed to provide the defense with exculpatory evidence. Any one of these factors might warrant a new trial. Taken together they portray appalling injustice.


Reading through the manuscript last weekend, jarred by what I was seeing, I began to jot down a list of things that went terribly wrong in the DeLuna case -- issues of fact, of evidence, of testimony, of motives, of incompetence, of indifference, of fraud, of morality, of integrity, of constitutionality -- that should have been raised and answered long before DeLuna was convicted, much less executed, back in the 1980s. I stopped when I got to 10. Here's the list.

1. There was no DNA or blood evidence on DeLuna despite bloody murder scene. There were no fingerprints. There was only one eyewitness and he was sketchy about what he had seen.

2. Police/prosecutors knew the whereabouts of another, more likely, suspect. But they didn't tell the defense this before or after the trial.

3. When the defendant identified the likely killer shortly before trial, the police and prosecutors did not reasonably follow up even though they knew that the man identified was capable of committing the crime.

4. Based upon early witness reports, the police at first sought another suspect. They did not share this information with the defense even though the two men (the two Carloses) looked eerily like one another.

5. The police officer collecting witness accounts relayed inaccurate and incomplete descriptions of suspects to the police dispatcher, who radioed them to officers in manhunt.

6. Police investigators botched the crime scene by turning it back to the store manager just two hours after the murder to be washed down and reopened immediately.

7. Evidence from the initial investigation was checked out by a prosecutor the day after the trial and was never returned. Any usuable DNA thus was lost.

8. The trial judge appointed a solo civil practitioner without any criminal trial experience much less any capital trial experience. The defense did not call a single "mitigating" witness in the sentencing phase of trial.

9. Police investigators did not measure a bloody footprint they photographed at the scene of the crime or test a cigarette butt they found on the floor of the store where the victim died.

10. A 9-11 dispatcher failed to quickly dispatch police to the scene of the crime, despite the fact that the victim had called for help. Later, the "manhunt tape" made by dispatchers was taped over and not turned over to the defense by the police.

Surely this epic malfeasance and misfeasance cannot be what Justice Scalia had in mind when he wrote in Marsh about capital cases getting "especially close scrutiny at every level." Indeed, as here, the opposite was true. The DeLuna case was flawed at virtually every level. And all it would have taken to do justice would have been for one prosecutor or cop, one judge or witness, to step up and tell the truth. That didn't happen. And when it did, thanks to Liebman, Mills and Possley, it was too late for Carlos DeLuna.

What do I think happened? All of the things that go wrong every day in capital cases in this country, all of the human failings and official, institutional biases and prejudices and self-justifications and self-delusions that turn Justice Scalia's Marsh concurrence into a farce. The bottom line? The criminal justice system decided, combustibly, that Carlos DeLuna was bad enough to be executed without a remotely fair process. The community was fine with the result. The media didn't care. And the rule of law "covered" it all.



Racial Bias in Death Penalty Cases: A North Carolina Test
The Looming Death of the Death Penalty
Why Lawyers and Judges Should Watch Executions
Why America's Death Penalty Just Got Us Sanctioned by Europe
The Appeal of Death Row
The answer to Los Tocayos Carlos, if there can be one, is that the case is so old its failings are now outdated and irrelevant. The district attorney lobbyists will argue that capital cases, in Texas and elsewhere, are handled much more professionally today than they were 30 years ago. And because both of the Carloses are now long dead, there isn't much of a media hook here, either. Posthumous exonerations don't give the cameras the just-out-of-prison "walk shot" television producers love.

But it would be a shame if we were to view the DeLuna case through the prism of legal history. There is nothing ancient about the lessons it teaches. DeLuna may be gone. But the problems his case represents still are here, in virtually every jurisdiction that still imposes capital punishment. So last week I asked some of the most prominent death penalty experts in the country to look at my DeLuna "list" and then identify pending cases that were similarly marked with such obvious reasonable doubts.

I asked Richard Dieter, at the Death Penalty Information Center, and Barry Scheck, co-director of the Innocence Project. I reached out to professors like Eric Freedman, Sean O'Brien and Bennett Gershman, to practitioners like George Kendall, and to earnest other lawyers who handle capital cases from more of a ground-level view. They all agreed that today in America there are plenty of more recent cases where these sorts of issues have arisen or could arise. Here are links to just a few of the cases they cited (again, I stopped at the count of 10)

D'Ambrosio v. Bagley (Ohio- faulty crime scene analysis, information withheld by law enforcement, other known viable suspects.)

Elmore v. Ozmint (South Carolina--ineffective counsel, no eyewitnesses, evidence fabricated)

Keith v. Bobby (Ohio-- no DNA, blood or fingerprint evidence, other known viable suspects)

Noling v. Bradshaw (Ohio--unreliable eyewitness identification, other known viable suspects)

Arkansas v. Howard (Arkansas -- DNA withheld)

Skinner v. Switzer (Texas -- DNA withheld following Supreme Court intervention.)
In Georgia, Troy Davis was executed last year despite a dearth of physical evidence and only a single eyewitness linking him to the crime. In Texas, Claude Jones was executed in 2000 because of DNA evidence we now know did not belong to him. In North Carolina, it took officials ten years to release Darryl Hunt after DNA tests exonerated him of murder. Justice Scalia is either kidding himself, or being disingenuous, when he proclaims the justice system goes out of its way to protect these people.


On the day, sooner than you think, when the United States Supreme Court again outlaws the death penalty, the justices will almost certainly cited the DeLuna case as one of the prime reasons why. It is not the first recent instance where smart, reasonable people have compellingly proven that an innocent man was executed in Texas. And it's certainly not the first time we've read the details of a capital case where the work of government officials -- police, prosecutors, judges -- was so profoundly and consistently shoddy.

But there is something especially compelling about the DeLuna case. It's what drew Possley to it. It's what haunted the lone eyewitness for all these years. A legendary case of injustice deserved -- it needed -- a legendary treatment. And it got one. No one can ever say again with a straight face that America doesn't execute innocent men. No one. Barry Scheck told me Friday: "If Carlos DeLuna were still alive, [the Article] would form the basis of a habeas petition that would have exonerated him."

Anyone who cares about the integrity of our justice system, and the constitutional values it is supposed to reflect, should expect Justice Scalia to read the Review article this summer -- and certainly before he writes another word for the Court about the death penalty. We'll see. I also especially recommend Los Tocayos Carlos to anyone and everyone -- judge, prosecutor, police official, witness, medical expert, etc -- who had anything at all to do with making the DeLuna case the symbol it will now become.

DeLuna was reportedly slow as a child and tested as mildly mentally retarded as a juvenile. Later, he was in and out of trouble with the law until he was found (and was perhaps beaten) by the police on the night of the Lopez murder. There is great doubt even today that he fully understood the magnitude of the trouble he was in, even as he was nearing the end in 1989, which is why he made such a perfect patsy for Carlos Hernandez.

The ultimate villain of this awful story, Hernandez died in prison, in 1999, boasting to the end that he had killed Wanda Lopez and allowed another man to take the fall for it. The cops knew this. The prosecutors knew or should have known it. Witnesses knew it. And yet no one did anything to stop the state executioners from carrying out their job. Why no one listened to Hernandez for all those years, and why no one hears the cries of others today, is a question Justice Scalia and many others have to answer for themselves.

International Anonymous Members Know This Texas Attorney General's Persecution Of Hank Skinner Must Not Prevail !

The Fat Lady Has Just Started to Sing About Greg Abbott's Ungodly mistreatment of Hank Skinner !

We invite all international Indymedia readers to also hook up with our daily update's on our Twitter blog when your feeling inspired ! Currently Hillary's Agenda on Twitter is focused on Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's continued persecution of Texan Hank Skinner!

We continue asking little American's Inter+National Anonymous members to please assist in protecting Hank Skinner from another of Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's wrongful execution's !

Since Greg Abbott's Demonic posse was stopped by our U.S. Supreme Court from executing Hank Skinner without proper DNA testing to prove his non~guilt,the State of Texas recently announced they have lost~destroyed Mr Skinner's most crucial piece of DNA exoneration evidence !

This Hypocrite Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott has been recently telling all his States little Texas voters how he will fight for little Texans if elected their next Governor,knowing he never even cared to investigate where Hank skinner's DNA exoneration evidence vanished to ?

Not until Hank Skinner is freed, will our group of Independent Hillary's Agenda bloggers stop singing out about this demon attached Texas Attorney General's persecution of this little Texas inmate,named Hank Skinner !

Hillary's Agenda*
Have elite financed Think Tanks created Hillary Clinton's 2016 Presidential political election Agenda? .....We do not work for the Have$,only blog about them !
FOLLOWERS Edit profile200

Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 5m
Hang in there Hank Skinner,Crazed Texan Greg Abbott is not sending you to Syria to be renditioned yet @democracynow
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 1h
Did Greg Abbott also get Billionaires & millionaires political$ 2 screw little Texans being awarded disability$ ?
View summary
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 1h
@HILLARYSAGENDA~Isn't it obvious already this man is now financially secure & will only screw little Texans again in the future for Elite$ ?
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 1h
@HILLARYSAGENDA~Millionaires & billionaires sending this so called working disabled millionaire Texas Attorney General big$ to do what ?
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 1h
@HILLARYSAGENDA~Apparently multi~millionaire Attorney General Greg Abbott's big$ 4 being disabled,but not disabled enough to take taxpayer$
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 1h
@HILLARYSAGENDA~Love to know what Greg Abbott thinks about millionaires like himself taking tax payers salaries while receiving disability$
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 1h
@HILLARYSAGENDA~And this type of mind states publicly how insurance companies are getting ripped off paying high fees to injured texans?
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 1h
@HILLARYSAGENDA~Taxpayer employed Texas millionaire Attorney General Greg Abbott gets disability$ & he helped cap insurance$ to other Texans
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 1h
Hypocrite Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott got his million$ and turned on other injured Texans to receive their'$..
View summary
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 3h
@YouTube~Frightening that these Texas demons binding Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott still have him out on limb executing Hank Skinner !
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 3h
@YouTube~So we ask Religious & Spiritual American's to please say a prayer of deliverance for Texas Attorney Greg Abbott & his demonic posse
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 3h
@YouTube~U.S. Supreme Court Justices ordered Greg Abbott's Texas posse 2 test Hank Skinner's DNA evidence,not destroy his exoneration DNA*
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 3h
@YouTube~Bar none,We have named Texan Greg Abbott the phoniest Attorney General in America & the most troubled man in USA law enforcement !
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 4h
@YouTube~Sadly,Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's demons pretend 2 be Godly,while allowing innocent Texans 2 be imprisoned & executed !
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 4h
@YouTube~ Texas prosecutor hid exoneration evidence in Michael Morton's horror & demonic Texas posse destroys Hank Skinner exoneration DNA !
View conversation
Dallas VideoFest ‏@videofest 6h
Thank you Marcy Garriott, producer of an An Unreal Dream: The Michael Morton Story for pointing out this article!...
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
View summary
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 6h
Hank Skinner imprisoned in Texas now has the World's Anonymous members to help him,unlike Michael Morton via @youtube
View media
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 18h
@YouTube~We call on little American protectors,International Anonymous members please watch video knowing Texas did it also to Hank Skinner<
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 18h
Both Michael Morton's Texas Horror & Hank Skinner's persecution, has Texas hiding exoneration evidence via @youtube
View media
NBC Los Angeles ‏@NBCLA 5 Sep
Thousands of inmates end 2-month hunger strike to protest CA prison system's isolation policies.
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
View summary
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 20h
@HILLARYSAGENDA~Father Sarducci says he Emailed the Pope & Catholic Church about his newly created starvation induced exorcism used in CA.
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 21h
@HILLARYSAGENDA~Father Guido Sarducci told TMZ he just left CA Terminator (girly men) isolation prison where he tested new type of exorcism
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 21h
@HILLARYSAGENDA~The Vatican says they are sending a unique man named Guido Sarducci 2 do the exorcism on Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott<
View conversation
Antifa Canada ‏@AntifaCanada 22 Sep
ANTIFA.CA #Antifa : We Introduce Europe to Satan's Lawyer From Hell > Texas Attorney General...
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 22h
@HILLARYSAGENDA~Relax Hank Skinner,we just asked the Catholic Church 2 send Satan's Lawyer form Hell (Texan Greg Abbott) their best exorcist
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 23h
This just in from Dalai Lama "If Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott continues persecuting Hank Skinner,he will have flaming monks in Texas"
Miladysa ‏@miladysa 17 Sep
Pod of pilot whales
Captive in Japan's Killing Cove
#tweet4taiji #tweet4dolphins
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
View photo
9 Hayes ‏@Ninehaze 22 Sep
"The Huffington Post Japan " should publish this report ( Pilot Whales ,mother and baby) of...
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
View summary
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 23h
@pallwright~When will the world also prosecute Japan 4 the scientific research fraud being perpetrated on the slaughter of God's whales ?
View conversation
John ‏@linnyitssn 6 Jan
Don't protest wrongful executions when it's too late. Tell @GregAbbott_TX his job is to do Justice, not to be stubborn! ...
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
View summary
Ronan Tésorière ‏@RonTesoriere 30 Aug
@GregAbbott_TX hello i'm a French Journalist ( ) Any comments on the new DNA testing results on the Hank Skinner case?
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
View summary
Mark Cicero ‏@1freetruth 10 Sep
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott Has Persecuted Hank Skinner like China Does Falun Gong #OccupyInfo #OWSinfo ...
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 22 Sep
For 11 yrs TX refused DNA testing in Hank Skinner's case. Now they agree, but can't find the evidence! #deathpenalty
#1-NIEUWS ‏@N1EUWS 20 Sep
#Satan's Lawyer From Hell Executing Hank Skinner After His Exoneration DNA... #NOs #journaal #dwdd #nIeuws #vandaag
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 22 Sep
@France24_en~China's Falun Gong told Hank Skinner's wife from France "We will send meditative prayers 4 Texas Attorney General
Greg Abbott".
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 22 Sep
@France24_en~TMZ also reports Hank Skinner's French wife is now in China reminding Falun Gong about her persecuted husband Hank Skinner!
View conversation
FRANCE 24 English ‏@France24_en 22 Sep
China's Bo Xilai sentenced to life in prison
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
View summary
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 22 Sep
@France24_en~TMZ reports Falun Gong stated their 100 million members in & out of prison meditating 4 Bo Xilai's life to be spared worked !
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 21 Sep
USA religious leaders get involved helping prevent Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's demonic posse from wrongfully executing Hank Skinner
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 21 Sep
@KamalaHarris~Twitter followers,take a look at this ladies Twitter account prior her being nominated 2 join our countries U.S. Supreme Court
View conversation
♔ Sir Yasin ❌ ‏@SoBasically12 21 Sep
Money & success don't change people; they merely amplify what is already there.
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
C. S. Lewis ‏@CSLewisDaily 21 Sep
We have to be continually reminded of what we believe. No belief will automatically remain alive in the mind. It must be fed. #CSLewis
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
Google Tips ‏@Thegooglefactz 21 Sep
The Netherlands is closing 8 prisons due to a lack of prisoners.
Retweeted by Hillary's Agenda*
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 21 Sep
Greg Abbott: Tort Reform Hypocrite | Farmington Hills Legal Examiner #legalexaminer
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 18 Sep
@TexasTribune~We say to World's Anonymous protectors,Greg Abbott's demonic Texas posse destroyed Hank Skinner's ability to exonerate himself
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 18 Sep
@TexasTribune~Sent this Texas judicial system report to the Twitter files of International Anonymous Members asking 4 Hank Skinner help !
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 18 Sep
Texas State Attorney General Greg Abbott knows the buck stops on his desk concerning Hank Skinner via @TexasTribune
View summary
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 18 Sep
@HILLARYSAGENDA~We assume millions of religious Texans want Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott walking the walk,not just talking the talk !
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
@HILLARYSAGENDA~We nominate Gregg Abbott as the most frightening State Attorney General in America,worried about unborn babies & denying DNA
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
@HILLARYSAGENDA~We assume millions of religious Texans want Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott walking the walk instead of talking the talk!
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
@HILLARYSAGENDA~What should Texas voters expect from Greg Abbott who says he is capable of running Texas as their future caring Governor ?
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
@HILLARYSAGENDA~Our U.S. Supreme Court Justices ordered Greg Abbotts demonic Texas Posse 2 test Hank Skinner's DNA evidence,not 2 Destroy it
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
@HILLARYSAGENDA~Bad sign State Attorney General wants to execute Hank Skinner without investigating Hanks lost crucial exoneration evidence
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
@HILLARYSAGENDA~If proven that others in Texas have also been imprisoned & executed with vanishing evidence,Texas voters need to know now !
View conversation
HillARY'S AGENDA~International outcry 4 Hank Skinner's DNA testing prior execution did not phase Greg Abbott 2 investigate missing evidence?
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
@HILLARYSAGENDA~WE can only assume the worst since Greg Abbott never called 4 investigation in2 Missing Exoneration Evidence of Hank Skinner
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
@HILLARYSAGENDA~Texas needs an Independent FBI investigation into state prison inmates who have had their exoneration evidence also vanish<
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
Worldwide Anonymous members can imagine if this ruthless Gregg Abbott persecuted Hank Skinner,many others in Texas also need your SOS !!
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
@YouTube~We ask International Anonymous members 2 please help defend Texan Hank Skinner from the ruthless Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott
View conversation Reply Delete Favorite More
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
@YouTube~Sadly this Texas man in real life has altered himself with his own misdirected anger 2 imitate this mean spirited action character!
View conversation
Hillary's Agenda* ‏@HILLARYSAGENDA 17 Sep
Texas Attorney General Gregg Abbott has seen this movie one 2 many times.He has become ruthless ! via @youtube
View media
#1-NIEUWS ‏@N1EUWS 11 Sep
#Texan Greg Abbott Is Praying Anonymous Does Not Defend Hank Skinner From... #NO
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's Demons should have known better to Expect U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to Vote to Persecute Hank Skinner ..

Praise the Lord U.S .Supreme Court Justice John Roberts saw the Forrest from the Trees in Hank Skinner's Texas persecution.. via @youtube