From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
SF Democratic Party's Opening Statements against Sheriff Mirkarimi Perpetrate More Lies
San Francisco City Attorney Democrat Dennis Herrera has made a case for having himself removed from office in wasting our tax dollars with his 27 page opening brief, his witness list and his 8 page letter on whether Sheriff Mirkarimi should cooperate with the city attorney all filed with the Ethics Commission on May 1, 2012 in the Democratic Party's frame-up of Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi.
San Francisco City Attorney Democrat Dennis Herrera has made a case for having himself removed from office in wasting our tax dollars with his 27 page opening brief, his witness list and his 8 page letter on whether Sheriff Mirkarimi should cooperate with the city attorney all filed with the Ethics Commission on May 1, 2012 in the Democratic Party's frame-up of Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi.
Our tax dollars are paying for these lies to be posted on the city attorney’s website at:
http://www.sfcityattorney.org/index.aspx?page=404
The “Mayor’s” witness list is at
http://www.sfcityattorney.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=1002
The “Mayor’s” 27 page opening brief is at
http://www.sfcityattorney.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=1003
The “Mayor’s” 8 page letter of April 30, 2012 claiming Sheriff Mirkarimi should or must cooperate with the lying, reactionary city attorney is at:
http://www.sfcityattorney.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=1004
The 5/2/12 Bay Guardian has a good summary of the lies that have been previously refuted at:
“City case speculates about Mirkarimi's interference with investigation” by Steven T. Jones
http://www.sfbg.com/politics/2012/05/02/city-case-speculates-about-mirkarimis-interference-investigation
While you read all this, keep in mind that all these domestic disputes have NOTHING TO DO WITH OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT AS SHERIFF. Please also keep in mind that all the Ethics Commission does is make a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors which decides to retain the Sheriff.
The witness list has an extraordinary, obviously prompted description of the proposed testimony of the beauty queen neighbor, Ivory Madison, in whom Mirkarimi’s wife confided. It claims “On January 1, 2012, Ms. Lopez and Ms. Madison met to talk about their goals for the coming year.” This is hilarious and has nothing to do with official misconduct of Ross Mirkarimi. These 2 women each have a baby in diapers who will spend the coming year in diapers at least part of the time (Lopez’ 2 year old should graduate from that phase this year) and each baby will do the usual endless whining that children do. These 2 women each have some other activity besides dealing with the endless demands of their children, but they are the primary babysitters.
We soon arrive at a sentence in Madison's proposed testimony that is an appalling insult to the intelligence of the reader and has no place in any legal statement: “Sheriff Mirkarimi responded by screaming at Ms. Lopez, saying fuck you, fuck you, and turning the car around, adding that Ms. Lopez didn’t deserve to eat.” Clearly, Dennis Herrera is showing off his “manhood” with this foul language in this witness list that mandates his removal from office as it certainly falls below the standard of decency, good faith and right action impliedly required of all public officers and he did this in his official capacity as city attorney. Sheriff Mirkarimi’s domestic problems were not in his official capacity as sheriff. They did mandate a trip to a marriage counselor, which is all Ivory Madison, a law school graduate who has not passed the California bar and thus is not licensed to practice law, should have recommended. If she had any sense, she should have kept out of this. Instead, she went to the trouble of making a video of a bruise that healed in a week and was an inadvertent bruise, not a deliberate violent attack.
Another person Herrera put on this witness list is Callie Williams, a neighbor who “sometimes heard fighting between Ms. Lopez and Sheriff Mirkarimi.” This is the stupidity of marriage as marital disputes are routine and sometimes ridiculous statements are made. It is outrageous that our tax dollars were spent recording a neighbor’s statements about a marriage that have absolutely nothing to do with official misconduct of Sheriff Mirkarimi.
What has been clear from the beginning is that a very unequal marriage is being used to frame a duly elected sheriff so as to remove him from office so he will not expose Mayor Ed Lee’s election fraud and so he cannot stop foreclosures and evictions. This marriage is unequal in terms of age, with Ross being essentially a grandparent and parent at age 50 to a 2 year old as age 35 is the last year one can be just a parent, he is some 14 years older than his wife, and they are culturally from different worlds with his wife having lived her life in Venezuela, speaking Spanish, and he has lived his life in this backward country, speaking English, each used to the customs of their respective native lands. Such a marriage is soon before a marriage counselor. This has nothing to do with official misconduct as sheriff.
The lies as to the domestic dispute in the 27 page brief have been previously refuted. City Attorney Democrat Dennis Herrera adds more lies. He states “The ultimate purpose of enforcement proceedings like this one is to protect the public, not to punish an officeholder.” (p. 16). THIS IS NOT PROTECTION; THIS IS GRAND LARCENY OF OUR TAX DOLLARS TO FRAME A DULY ELECTED SHERIFF IN THE INTERESTS OF AN ELECTION FRAUDING MAYOR AND THE CAPITALIST CLASS. If one is to “protect the public faith” as Herrera claims to be doing, then it is Herrera and Mayor Lee who should be removed from office immediately. City Attorney Herrera and Mayor Lee are punishing Mirkarimi by denying him his paycheck so now he cannot feed his family or support himself. Should their Democratic Party succeed in terrorizing the Board of Supervisors, Mirkarimi will be permanently unable to feed his family.
The one video Herrera certainly can have as it is a matter of public record is the video of Mayor Lee’s election fraud team, perpetrating election fraud. See
http://www.sfbg.com/politics/2011/10/24/vote-fraud-video-primer
Here is more on the San Francisco Democratic Party’s election fraud:
http://www.brasscheck.com/stadium/
http://www.brasscheck.com/jonestown/
Your phone calls and faxes are needed now to all 11 members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors demanding that they vote to retain Sheriff Mirkarimi. They all have voice mail so you can leave a message at any time. For their phone and fax numbers, see:
http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=1616
Our tax dollars are paying for these lies to be posted on the city attorney’s website at:
http://www.sfcityattorney.org/index.aspx?page=404
The “Mayor’s” witness list is at
http://www.sfcityattorney.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=1002
The “Mayor’s” 27 page opening brief is at
http://www.sfcityattorney.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=1003
The “Mayor’s” 8 page letter of April 30, 2012 claiming Sheriff Mirkarimi should or must cooperate with the lying, reactionary city attorney is at:
http://www.sfcityattorney.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=1004
The 5/2/12 Bay Guardian has a good summary of the lies that have been previously refuted at:
“City case speculates about Mirkarimi's interference with investigation” by Steven T. Jones
http://www.sfbg.com/politics/2012/05/02/city-case-speculates-about-mirkarimis-interference-investigation
While you read all this, keep in mind that all these domestic disputes have NOTHING TO DO WITH OFFICIAL MISCONDUCT AS SHERIFF. Please also keep in mind that all the Ethics Commission does is make a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors which decides to retain the Sheriff.
The witness list has an extraordinary, obviously prompted description of the proposed testimony of the beauty queen neighbor, Ivory Madison, in whom Mirkarimi’s wife confided. It claims “On January 1, 2012, Ms. Lopez and Ms. Madison met to talk about their goals for the coming year.” This is hilarious and has nothing to do with official misconduct of Ross Mirkarimi. These 2 women each have a baby in diapers who will spend the coming year in diapers at least part of the time (Lopez’ 2 year old should graduate from that phase this year) and each baby will do the usual endless whining that children do. These 2 women each have some other activity besides dealing with the endless demands of their children, but they are the primary babysitters.
We soon arrive at a sentence in Madison's proposed testimony that is an appalling insult to the intelligence of the reader and has no place in any legal statement: “Sheriff Mirkarimi responded by screaming at Ms. Lopez, saying fuck you, fuck you, and turning the car around, adding that Ms. Lopez didn’t deserve to eat.” Clearly, Dennis Herrera is showing off his “manhood” with this foul language in this witness list that mandates his removal from office as it certainly falls below the standard of decency, good faith and right action impliedly required of all public officers and he did this in his official capacity as city attorney. Sheriff Mirkarimi’s domestic problems were not in his official capacity as sheriff. They did mandate a trip to a marriage counselor, which is all Ivory Madison, a law school graduate who has not passed the California bar and thus is not licensed to practice law, should have recommended. If she had any sense, she should have kept out of this. Instead, she went to the trouble of making a video of a bruise that healed in a week and was an inadvertent bruise, not a deliberate violent attack.
Another person Herrera put on this witness list is Callie Williams, a neighbor who “sometimes heard fighting between Ms. Lopez and Sheriff Mirkarimi.” This is the stupidity of marriage as marital disputes are routine and sometimes ridiculous statements are made. It is outrageous that our tax dollars were spent recording a neighbor’s statements about a marriage that have absolutely nothing to do with official misconduct of Sheriff Mirkarimi.
What has been clear from the beginning is that a very unequal marriage is being used to frame a duly elected sheriff so as to remove him from office so he will not expose Mayor Ed Lee’s election fraud and so he cannot stop foreclosures and evictions. This marriage is unequal in terms of age, with Ross being essentially a grandparent and parent at age 50 to a 2 year old as age 35 is the last year one can be just a parent, he is some 14 years older than his wife, and they are culturally from different worlds with his wife having lived her life in Venezuela, speaking Spanish, and he has lived his life in this backward country, speaking English, each used to the customs of their respective native lands. Such a marriage is soon before a marriage counselor. This has nothing to do with official misconduct as sheriff.
The lies as to the domestic dispute in the 27 page brief have been previously refuted. City Attorney Democrat Dennis Herrera adds more lies. He states “The ultimate purpose of enforcement proceedings like this one is to protect the public, not to punish an officeholder.” (p. 16). THIS IS NOT PROTECTION; THIS IS GRAND LARCENY OF OUR TAX DOLLARS TO FRAME A DULY ELECTED SHERIFF IN THE INTERESTS OF AN ELECTION FRAUDING MAYOR AND THE CAPITALIST CLASS. If one is to “protect the public faith” as Herrera claims to be doing, then it is Herrera and Mayor Lee who should be removed from office immediately. City Attorney Herrera and Mayor Lee are punishing Mirkarimi by denying him his paycheck so now he cannot feed his family or support himself. Should their Democratic Party succeed in terrorizing the Board of Supervisors, Mirkarimi will be permanently unable to feed his family.
The one video Herrera certainly can have as it is a matter of public record is the video of Mayor Lee’s election fraud team, perpetrating election fraud. See
http://www.sfbg.com/politics/2011/10/24/vote-fraud-video-primer
Here is more on the San Francisco Democratic Party’s election fraud:
http://www.brasscheck.com/stadium/
http://www.brasscheck.com/jonestown/
Your phone calls and faxes are needed now to all 11 members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors demanding that they vote to retain Sheriff Mirkarimi. They all have voice mail so you can leave a message at any time. For their phone and fax numbers, see:
http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=1616
For more information:
http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=1616
Add Your Comments
Latest Comments
Listed below are the latest comments about this post.
These comments are submitted anonymously by website visitors.
TITLE
AUTHOR
DATE
Recall Ed Lee Now! Poetic Justice!
Fri, May 4, 2012 12:26PM
Makes those phone calls now; only 3 votes needed; jury system rigged
Fri, May 4, 2012 7:10AM
Our Ross
Thu, May 3, 2012 5:25PM
San Francisco: Banana Republic by the Bay
Thu, May 3, 2012 11:08AM
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network