Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
THURS, Oct 1st: Noam Chomsky, KALW, 91.7fm, 11:AM-Noon, Your Call show (also archived)
San Francisco radio interview announcement/reference regarding Noam Chomsky, livestream, audio archive, comments and highly suggested articles.
.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Announcement:
THURS, Oct 1st: Noam Chomsky on KALW, 91.7fm/kalw.org, 11:am-noon, "Your Call" radio show (yourcallradio.org).
Listen over the air at 91.7fm or online at http://yourcallradio.org/ (see right-hand column: Listen to the show online) or at http://www.kalw.org/ .
Studio call-in lines:
local line, 415-841-4134 ;
toll free line, 866-798-8255
Audio archives are usually posted by 2:/2:30pm PST.
(Addendum: Anyone who intellectually and morally knows me knows that this announcement is hardly an endorsement of Noam Chomsky.
Although history is no stranger to "liberal/progressive/leftist" racism [while we still recognize that there is often at least latent sexism on the left], even among white leftist intellectuals and philanthropists, I'm often surprised that I, as typically one of the very fewest Americans of color in most white progressive/leftist venues, that "liberal/progressive/leftist" racism from these "liberal/progressive/leftist" icons [as with Chomsky mentee Norman Finkelstein] is typically _invisible_ to their overwhelmingly white audiences.
And while there are numerous (if still not enough) extremely courageous and remarkable anti-Zionist Jews..., as for what I call 'anti-Occupation' *Zionists*, or left *Zionist* apologists, Jewish icons -- who dominate the national/international lecture and media circuit discourse on the left (even on Democracy Now) in the so-called "pro-Palestinian rights [but never equality] movement" in America -- and their refusal to renounce political Zionism (be anti-Zionist), or even to publicly debate Zionism (a repugnant racist ideology), the *reason* for the well-over 60-year oppression of the Palestinians, one Black friend of mine in the Oakland 'hood succinctly summed it up this way: "Whites 'never' want to get to the *root* of the problem.")
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Btw, Chomsky's previously stated reasons for his opposition to BDS against the white-/Jewish-supremacist settler-colonial state of apartheid Israel exactly mirrors that of white conservatives in the U.S. in their opposition to BDS against the then settler-colonial state of apartheid South Africa (to which Israel, which supplied arms to S.A., and the Reagan administration were apartheid S.A.'s closest allies). Of course, these are all just rationalized, white/Jewish(whether from the right or the left) supremacist _excuses_, meaning I just didn't/don't want to see whites/Israelis economically hurt (although it's not like they'd be starving or living in rubble/shanties -- unlike, often, respectively, their victims):
1) The majority of the Israelis oppose it.
[since when do we ask the _oppressors_ if they oppose BDS!?]
2) it would be seen as anti-white racism (in Chomsky's words, as anti-Semitism)
[decades of the most atrocious brutal white-supremacist (whether Christian or Jewish) oppression and Chomsky claims that it would be seen as, in effect, anti-oppressor racism!!???; would, hypothetically, Chomsky have worried about a then BDS campaign against Nazi Germany being seen as anti-Aryan racism???]
3) It would hurt the very people you're trying to help.
[even though the *victims* of the white/Jewish/(religio)ethnic-supremacist oppression are calling for it!]
4) It would be a gift to the right-wing.
[as Jeffrey Blankfort has said, "_Chomsky's position_ on BDS is a gift to the right-wing", in Israel and the U.S., and to the Israel lobby]
5) There's not a national consensus.
[see open email letter below.]
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Suggested reading:
HOW CHOMSKY LIES -- actually TO PROTECT ISRAEL as an ideologically Jewish/Zionist state
by Joseph Anderson, Berkeley, CA
Wednesday Feb 20th, 2008 1:42 PM
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/02/15/18479413.php
HOW CHOMSKY LIES -- actually TO PROTECT ISRAEL as an ideologically Jewish/Zionist state:
OPEN EMAIL LETTER COPY:
>September 29, 2006
>
>Rose Aguilar
>Host
>Your Call Radio program
>KALW radio station
>San Francisco, CA
>
>Matt Martin
>General Manager
>KALW radio station (91.7-FM)
>San Francisco, CA
>
>Subject: ATTN: ROSE AGUILAR, MATT MARTIN -- RE NOAM
>CHOMSKY ON KALW'S "YOUR CALL" RADIO PROGRAM
>Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:42:40 -0700
>
>Dear Rose & Matt:
>
>I just wanted to follow up just for your own information (if helpful),
>regarding the KALW "Your Call Radio" program interview with Noam
>Chomsky on Tuesday, September 26, 2006, and my call to your show
>at 31:48 after the hour.
>
>Since, as my being a mere caller, I was at a distinct inherent
>disadvantage regarding Chomsky's ability to, frankly, just lie in
>response to my question about his opposition statements to a
>sanctions, boycott or divestment campaign against Israel for its
>continued brutal oppression against the Palestinian people, I wanted
>to follow up here if you don't mind.
>
>I want to regretfully say that Chomsky lied when he said that he
>never said that he opposed a divestment movement against Israel
>because (quote), "the majority of the population opposes it"
>(meaning, of course Israeli Jews). I said in my question beforehand
>that human rights activists don't first ask the *oppressors* if they
>would accept sanctions and accede to the *oppressors'* inevitable
>objection.
>
>Anyway, in addition to his speeches, Chomsiky said this in a May 10,
>2004, published interview with Harvard Professor Christopher J. Lee
>in "Safundi", a South African scholarly journal, an interview
>republished in Z Magaine in May, 2004. This was also documented
>and covered in detail in Jeffrey Blankfort's article, "Damage Control:
>Noam Chomsky and the Israel-Palestine Conflict" [available online].
>
>Chomsky also said that a sanctions movement would be "a gift to the
>utlra-right-wing" in Israel and the U.S., and would hurt the victims.
>But the *victims* -- the Palestinians -- *are* calling for an
>international sanctions/boycotts/divestment campaign against
>Israel. So, Chomsky is opposing what the victims themselves are
>asking for to help eliminate their oppression. In addition, Chomsky's
>colleague and sometimes co-author, Ed Herman, whom Chomsky
>alluded to in your interview, OPPOSES Chomsky's views on sanctions
>(and on Chomsky's dismissal of the Israel lobby) and finds
>Chomsky's views on these issues logically and morally inexplicable.
>
>
>[The late EDWARD SAID also DISAGREED WITH CHOMSKY's
>opposition to sanctions, boycotts and divestments; Chomsky's
>opposition to a secular, democratic, 1-state, re-unified historic >
Palestine, with equal rights and privileges for all regardless of
>religion and ethnicity, solution; Chomsky's opposition to an all-but
>-token Palestinian Right-of-Return; Chomsky's willingness to see the
>85% of historic Palestine that Israel has directly taken over for Jews
>finally ethnically cleansed of its approximately 1 million Palestinian
>citizens; and Chomsky's (the "Anarchist") willingness to see that
>85% of historic Palestine that was violently taken over by the
>Zionists -- largely through Zionist *Jewish* terrorism -- remain a
>Zionist state; as well >as other strong disagreements with Chomsky.
>
>Yet, icon AMY GOODMAN of, the generally very good, Democracy
>Now national radio program -- WHO'S ALWAYS PROTECTED
>CHOMSKY FROM LEFT DEBATE OR VALID CRITICISM with her
>progressive media 'empire' and left gate-keeping --
> JUST AS KPFA GENERALLY PROTECTS STEPHEN ZUNES -- never mentions
>such very strong disagreements when she pretends that there were
>none between Chomsky and Said, since, I guess, for her, Said has
>safely passed on (and therefore can be "beloved" by her and
>Chomsky without any 'problems'). And so, the false history re-writing
>begins or continues by some of the gate-keeper icons.]
>
>
>Actually, it's Chomsky's, as America's leading leftist guru, opposition
>to sanctions and his dismissal of the Israel lobby that is "a gift to the
>ultra-right-wing" in Israel and the U.S. government.
>
>Finally, I regret to say that Chomsky also lied about the history of
>the, then, American anti-apartheid divestment movement against
>South Africa, when he said that some great public consensus had
>been built up and established *before* the American divestment
>campaign was begun.
>
>The anti-Apartheid sanctions/boycott/divestment campaign against
>South Africa was not begun ONLY *AFTER* some huge American
>public consensus had been established: it started out *very small*;
>it often started out in places (actually most of the country then)
>where most people didn't know all that much, if anything, about
>South African apartheid and its racial system of laws and
>restrictions; and the campaigns, along with the mock shanty towns
>on many campuses (often in small campustowns/cities), were used
>as an educational and consciousness-raising tool (precisely what
>Chomsky calls for with regard to Israel's oppression) to *BUILD UP*
>public awareness and support for economic divestment. And we
>activists certainly weren't able to change U.S. government policy first
>(Reagan was a *friend* of apartheid South Africa). In one sentence:
>The anti-Apartheid divestment movement against South Africa was
>*itself* a basis of the groundwork to build up and establish an
>international political anti-Apartheid movement in support of the
>oppressed black South Africans.
>
>The big establishment politicians that Chomsky claimed were all
>lining up to get arrested in protests (like in front of the White House)
>mostly happened toward the *end* of the divestment movement
>(when it was, of course, politically much safer in their perceived
>situation), *not* at the beginning.
>
>[Even Congressman Ron Dellums constantly opposed language criticizing Israel's alliance with the apartheid South African
>government.]
>
>If a divestment campaign against Israel would be seized upon as
>"anti-Semitic", I remember when the divestment campaign against
>apartheid South Africa was seized upon by many politicians and/or
>the mainstream media as "communist" and "supporting terrorism"
>and ironically "racist" (against *whites* in apartheid South Africa!),
>and that the black South Africans would have an anti-white bloodbath
>and throw all the white South Africans into the sea if apartheid fell --
>whites who claimed that, "Unlike Israeli Jews, we [whites] have no
>other place to go (have no American or >European suburbs and
>cities to go back to)."
>
>Since I was at a distinct inherent disadvantage as a caller, I hope
>that in some future interview with Chomsky or anyone else --
>especially anyone Palestinian -- on some related issue, I hope that
>you bring this up so that someone can correct Chomsky's protecting
>Israel (from an article of the >same name, "Protecting Israel:
>Chomsky’s Way"). I'm sure that it's not the first time that a white
>Western intellectual has become quite disengenous, diversionary,
>and inconsistent, and even immoral (Chomsky claims that Israel is,
>in effect, "just following orders" from the U.S. government -- where
>have we heard *that* echo before) when it hypocritically comes too
>close to home for the ethnic privileges of either him, his friends or
>relatives and/or *his* ethnic group. (And Chomsky has ducked
>*any* public debate, on the radio or in person, on this issue
>because he knows that he wouldn't just be able to cast off these
>kinds of lies and logical or moral inconsistencies, without being
>directly challenged.) Sad, but true.
>
>(Also see, "Gnome Chomsky" -- a *GREAT* little poem!,
>http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/133840/index.php, which
>nicely encapsulates Noam Chomsky on Israel.
>
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Joseph Anderson
>
>Berkeley, CA
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"The anti-war movement, peace movement, whatever one want to call it, has long been dominated by self-styled [']anti-zionist['] Jews who have made sure that no collective blame will fall on Jews for what Israel has done to the Palestinians which, despite mountains of evidence to the contrary, they insist is a goal of US policy. In effect,they have done and continue to do damage control for the Jewish establishment, as they have done over the years in keeping the Palestinian issue out of the movement's overall agenda that were reflected in major marches in SF during the 80s and at the start of the Afghan war."
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Gnome Chomsky" -- a *GREAT* little poem!
(which nicely encapsulates the cult of Chomsky on Israel)
http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/133840/index.php
The Left and the Israel Lobby
- by Joseph Anderson
http://peaceandjustice.org/article.php/20060612173054885 (best version)
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/06/18/18281217.php (with comments)
http://dissidentvoice.org/June06/Anderson08.htm
Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the
Israel-Palestine Conflict
- by Jeffrey Blankfort (very good interview)
http://www.voltairenet.org/article143519.html
Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the
Israel-Palestine Conflict
- by Jeffrey Blankfort (excellent article)
http://dissidentvoice.org/May05/Blankfort0525.htm (this copy's formatting is probably a little easier to read)
http://www.leftcurve.org/LC29WebPages/Chomsky.html
This author's articles
(other Jeffrey Blankfort articles/interviews at VoltaireNet)
http://www.voltairenet.org/auteur123803.html?lang=en
Chomsky on Oil and the Israel Lobby
-by M. Shahid Alam / January 31st, 2009
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2009/01/chomsky-on-oil-and-the-israel-lobby/#comment-37871
.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Announcement:
THURS, Oct 1st: Noam Chomsky on KALW, 91.7fm/kalw.org, 11:am-noon, "Your Call" radio show (yourcallradio.org).
Listen over the air at 91.7fm or online at http://yourcallradio.org/ (see right-hand column: Listen to the show online) or at http://www.kalw.org/ .
Studio call-in lines:
local line, 415-841-4134 ;
toll free line, 866-798-8255
Audio archives are usually posted by 2:/2:30pm PST.
(Addendum: Anyone who intellectually and morally knows me knows that this announcement is hardly an endorsement of Noam Chomsky.
Although history is no stranger to "liberal/progressive/leftist" racism [while we still recognize that there is often at least latent sexism on the left], even among white leftist intellectuals and philanthropists, I'm often surprised that I, as typically one of the very fewest Americans of color in most white progressive/leftist venues, that "liberal/progressive/leftist" racism from these "liberal/progressive/leftist" icons [as with Chomsky mentee Norman Finkelstein] is typically _invisible_ to their overwhelmingly white audiences.
And while there are numerous (if still not enough) extremely courageous and remarkable anti-Zionist Jews..., as for what I call 'anti-Occupation' *Zionists*, or left *Zionist* apologists, Jewish icons -- who dominate the national/international lecture and media circuit discourse on the left (even on Democracy Now) in the so-called "pro-Palestinian rights [but never equality] movement" in America -- and their refusal to renounce political Zionism (be anti-Zionist), or even to publicly debate Zionism (a repugnant racist ideology), the *reason* for the well-over 60-year oppression of the Palestinians, one Black friend of mine in the Oakland 'hood succinctly summed it up this way: "Whites 'never' want to get to the *root* of the problem.")
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Btw, Chomsky's previously stated reasons for his opposition to BDS against the white-/Jewish-supremacist settler-colonial state of apartheid Israel exactly mirrors that of white conservatives in the U.S. in their opposition to BDS against the then settler-colonial state of apartheid South Africa (to which Israel, which supplied arms to S.A., and the Reagan administration were apartheid S.A.'s closest allies). Of course, these are all just rationalized, white/Jewish(whether from the right or the left) supremacist _excuses_, meaning I just didn't/don't want to see whites/Israelis economically hurt (although it's not like they'd be starving or living in rubble/shanties -- unlike, often, respectively, their victims):
1) The majority of the Israelis oppose it.
[since when do we ask the _oppressors_ if they oppose BDS!?]
2) it would be seen as anti-white racism (in Chomsky's words, as anti-Semitism)
[decades of the most atrocious brutal white-supremacist (whether Christian or Jewish) oppression and Chomsky claims that it would be seen as, in effect, anti-oppressor racism!!???; would, hypothetically, Chomsky have worried about a then BDS campaign against Nazi Germany being seen as anti-Aryan racism???]
3) It would hurt the very people you're trying to help.
[even though the *victims* of the white/Jewish/(religio)ethnic-supremacist oppression are calling for it!]
4) It would be a gift to the right-wing.
[as Jeffrey Blankfort has said, "_Chomsky's position_ on BDS is a gift to the right-wing", in Israel and the U.S., and to the Israel lobby]
5) There's not a national consensus.
[see open email letter below.]
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Suggested reading:
HOW CHOMSKY LIES -- actually TO PROTECT ISRAEL as an ideologically Jewish/Zionist state
by Joseph Anderson, Berkeley, CA
Wednesday Feb 20th, 2008 1:42 PM
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/02/15/18479413.php
HOW CHOMSKY LIES -- actually TO PROTECT ISRAEL as an ideologically Jewish/Zionist state:
OPEN EMAIL LETTER COPY:
>September 29, 2006
>
>Rose Aguilar
>Host
>Your Call Radio program
>KALW radio station
>San Francisco, CA
>
>Matt Martin
>General Manager
>KALW radio station (91.7-FM)
>San Francisco, CA
>
>Subject: ATTN: ROSE AGUILAR, MATT MARTIN -- RE NOAM
>CHOMSKY ON KALW'S "YOUR CALL" RADIO PROGRAM
>Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:42:40 -0700
>
>Dear Rose & Matt:
>
>I just wanted to follow up just for your own information (if helpful),
>regarding the KALW "Your Call Radio" program interview with Noam
>Chomsky on Tuesday, September 26, 2006, and my call to your show
>at 31:48 after the hour.
>
>Since, as my being a mere caller, I was at a distinct inherent
>disadvantage regarding Chomsky's ability to, frankly, just lie in
>response to my question about his opposition statements to a
>sanctions, boycott or divestment campaign against Israel for its
>continued brutal oppression against the Palestinian people, I wanted
>to follow up here if you don't mind.
>
>I want to regretfully say that Chomsky lied when he said that he
>never said that he opposed a divestment movement against Israel
>because (quote), "the majority of the population opposes it"
>(meaning, of course Israeli Jews). I said in my question beforehand
>that human rights activists don't first ask the *oppressors* if they
>would accept sanctions and accede to the *oppressors'* inevitable
>objection.
>
>Anyway, in addition to his speeches, Chomsiky said this in a May 10,
>2004, published interview with Harvard Professor Christopher J. Lee
>in "Safundi", a South African scholarly journal, an interview
>republished in Z Magaine in May, 2004. This was also documented
>and covered in detail in Jeffrey Blankfort's article, "Damage Control:
>Noam Chomsky and the Israel-Palestine Conflict" [available online].
>
>Chomsky also said that a sanctions movement would be "a gift to the
>utlra-right-wing" in Israel and the U.S., and would hurt the victims.
>But the *victims* -- the Palestinians -- *are* calling for an
>international sanctions/boycotts/divestment campaign against
>Israel. So, Chomsky is opposing what the victims themselves are
>asking for to help eliminate their oppression. In addition, Chomsky's
>colleague and sometimes co-author, Ed Herman, whom Chomsky
>alluded to in your interview, OPPOSES Chomsky's views on sanctions
>(and on Chomsky's dismissal of the Israel lobby) and finds
>Chomsky's views on these issues logically and morally inexplicable.
>
>
>[The late EDWARD SAID also DISAGREED WITH CHOMSKY's
>opposition to sanctions, boycotts and divestments; Chomsky's
>opposition to a secular, democratic, 1-state, re-unified historic >
Palestine, with equal rights and privileges for all regardless of
>religion and ethnicity, solution; Chomsky's opposition to an all-but
>-token Palestinian Right-of-Return; Chomsky's willingness to see the
>85% of historic Palestine that Israel has directly taken over for Jews
>finally ethnically cleansed of its approximately 1 million Palestinian
>citizens; and Chomsky's (the "Anarchist") willingness to see that
>85% of historic Palestine that was violently taken over by the
>Zionists -- largely through Zionist *Jewish* terrorism -- remain a
>Zionist state; as well >as other strong disagreements with Chomsky.
>
>Yet, icon AMY GOODMAN of, the generally very good, Democracy
>Now national radio program -- WHO'S ALWAYS PROTECTED
>CHOMSKY FROM LEFT DEBATE OR VALID CRITICISM with her
>progressive media 'empire' and left gate-keeping --
> JUST AS KPFA GENERALLY PROTECTS STEPHEN ZUNES -- never mentions
>such very strong disagreements when she pretends that there were
>none between Chomsky and Said, since, I guess, for her, Said has
>safely passed on (and therefore can be "beloved" by her and
>Chomsky without any 'problems'). And so, the false history re-writing
>begins or continues by some of the gate-keeper icons.]
>
>
>Actually, it's Chomsky's, as America's leading leftist guru, opposition
>to sanctions and his dismissal of the Israel lobby that is "a gift to the
>ultra-right-wing" in Israel and the U.S. government.
>
>Finally, I regret to say that Chomsky also lied about the history of
>the, then, American anti-apartheid divestment movement against
>South Africa, when he said that some great public consensus had
>been built up and established *before* the American divestment
>campaign was begun.
>
>The anti-Apartheid sanctions/boycott/divestment campaign against
>South Africa was not begun ONLY *AFTER* some huge American
>public consensus had been established: it started out *very small*;
>it often started out in places (actually most of the country then)
>where most people didn't know all that much, if anything, about
>South African apartheid and its racial system of laws and
>restrictions; and the campaigns, along with the mock shanty towns
>on many campuses (often in small campustowns/cities), were used
>as an educational and consciousness-raising tool (precisely what
>Chomsky calls for with regard to Israel's oppression) to *BUILD UP*
>public awareness and support for economic divestment. And we
>activists certainly weren't able to change U.S. government policy first
>(Reagan was a *friend* of apartheid South Africa). In one sentence:
>The anti-Apartheid divestment movement against South Africa was
>*itself* a basis of the groundwork to build up and establish an
>international political anti-Apartheid movement in support of the
>oppressed black South Africans.
>
>The big establishment politicians that Chomsky claimed were all
>lining up to get arrested in protests (like in front of the White House)
>mostly happened toward the *end* of the divestment movement
>(when it was, of course, politically much safer in their perceived
>situation), *not* at the beginning.
>
>[Even Congressman Ron Dellums constantly opposed language criticizing Israel's alliance with the apartheid South African
>government.]
>
>If a divestment campaign against Israel would be seized upon as
>"anti-Semitic", I remember when the divestment campaign against
>apartheid South Africa was seized upon by many politicians and/or
>the mainstream media as "communist" and "supporting terrorism"
>and ironically "racist" (against *whites* in apartheid South Africa!),
>and that the black South Africans would have an anti-white bloodbath
>and throw all the white South Africans into the sea if apartheid fell --
>whites who claimed that, "Unlike Israeli Jews, we [whites] have no
>other place to go (have no American or >European suburbs and
>cities to go back to)."
>
>Since I was at a distinct inherent disadvantage as a caller, I hope
>that in some future interview with Chomsky or anyone else --
>especially anyone Palestinian -- on some related issue, I hope that
>you bring this up so that someone can correct Chomsky's protecting
>Israel (from an article of the >same name, "Protecting Israel:
>Chomsky’s Way"). I'm sure that it's not the first time that a white
>Western intellectual has become quite disengenous, diversionary,
>and inconsistent, and even immoral (Chomsky claims that Israel is,
>in effect, "just following orders" from the U.S. government -- where
>have we heard *that* echo before) when it hypocritically comes too
>close to home for the ethnic privileges of either him, his friends or
>relatives and/or *his* ethnic group. (And Chomsky has ducked
>*any* public debate, on the radio or in person, on this issue
>because he knows that he wouldn't just be able to cast off these
>kinds of lies and logical or moral inconsistencies, without being
>directly challenged.) Sad, but true.
>
>(Also see, "Gnome Chomsky" -- a *GREAT* little poem!,
>http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/133840/index.php, which
>nicely encapsulates Noam Chomsky on Israel.
>
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Joseph Anderson
>
>Berkeley, CA
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"The anti-war movement, peace movement, whatever one want to call it, has long been dominated by self-styled [']anti-zionist['] Jews who have made sure that no collective blame will fall on Jews for what Israel has done to the Palestinians which, despite mountains of evidence to the contrary, they insist is a goal of US policy. In effect,they have done and continue to do damage control for the Jewish establishment, as they have done over the years in keeping the Palestinian issue out of the movement's overall agenda that were reflected in major marches in SF during the 80s and at the start of the Afghan war."
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"Gnome Chomsky" -- a *GREAT* little poem!
(which nicely encapsulates the cult of Chomsky on Israel)
http://dc.indymedia.org/newswire/display/133840/index.php
The Left and the Israel Lobby
- by Joseph Anderson
http://peaceandjustice.org/article.php/20060612173054885 (best version)
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/06/18/18281217.php (with comments)
http://dissidentvoice.org/June06/Anderson08.htm
Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the
Israel-Palestine Conflict
- by Jeffrey Blankfort (very good interview)
http://www.voltairenet.org/article143519.html
Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the
Israel-Palestine Conflict
- by Jeffrey Blankfort (excellent article)
http://dissidentvoice.org/May05/Blankfort0525.htm (this copy's formatting is probably a little easier to read)
http://www.leftcurve.org/LC29WebPages/Chomsky.html
This author's articles
(other Jeffrey Blankfort articles/interviews at VoltaireNet)
http://www.voltairenet.org/auteur123803.html?lang=en
Chomsky on Oil and the Israel Lobby
-by M. Shahid Alam / January 31st, 2009
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2009/01/chomsky-on-oil-and-the-israel-lobby/#comment-37871
.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$230.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
~55 minutes of interview time today -- hosted by KALW General Manager Matt Martin -- on the "Your Call" show, KALW-fm, and only *1* slight side/tangential comment by -- and no question (from host, or callers, or email) to -- Noam Chomsky about Israel (/Palestine)!!???
And I *know* there were caller questions about Israel/Palestine.
No questions about Chomsky's longggtime opposition -- which he used to actually and openly *brag* about in the past -- to the international anti-apartheid style BDS (boycotts, divestements, and sanctions) campaign against Israel to at least put Israel's *worst* human rights atrocities in check!!???
No question to Chomsky on today's show -- which I sent an email (*twice*, then and *this week* before today's show) to Rose Aguilar, Sandip Roy and Matt Martin -- about Chomsky's *LYING*, the last time he was on the show, about how the South African anti-apartheid BDS campaign was started!!???: *LYING* as a way for Chomsky to try to head off an international BDS campaign against Israel.
How can a radio host -- hosting *Chomsky* -- not ask or allow any substantive questions about *Israel/Palestine* and the central, urgent, moral and critical issues on that and the nature of the ideologically Jewish/Zionist state!?
(I didn't bother to call in -- to just have Chomsky use his microphone advantage to LIE AGAIN and then go on to the next caller.
Btw, the presence of the Klu Klux Klan on the right-wing in the South, attacking white racial liberalism in general, didn't prevent Martin Luther King from criticizing liberal white racism from the left. See "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" -- available online.)
-
CHOMSKY -- THE *LIBERAL*! And "leftists" are actually going to pay money to see this guy??
- by Joseph Anderson, Berkeley, CA
Friday Oct 2nd, 2009 3:01 PM
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/10/02/18624239.php
-