SF Bay Area Indymedia indymedia
About Contact Subscribe Calendar Publish Print Donate

East Bay | Police State and Prisons | Racial Justice

BART Police Oversight Vs. Every Cop Union in the State; Police Chief Gee Out; and a Rumor
by dave id
Tuesday Aug 18th, 2009 12:41 AM
Just three days after the proposal was forwarded from the subcommittee on police oversight, the BART Board of Directors voted unanimously on Thursday, August 13th, in favor of submitting the new police oversight plan to the California legislature for approval. As legislators debate the plan's merits, or lack thereof, it is certain to be vehemently resisted by every police union in the state, as the Peace Officers Research Association of California (PORAC) has already threatened. The BART Board is currently lobbying legislators to pass the proposal, and undoubtedly statewide police representatives are lobbying for rejection of the plan. BART is hoping that the Board's unanimous support for the proposal will be enough to serve the police unions a rare defeat in the state legislature.
gee_dugger_johnson_lying_january122009.jpg
gee_dugger_johnson_lying_...

Over the weekend, as BART negotiated with its own labor unions to avoid a strike that would have shut down BART on Monday, Police Chief Gary Gee announced that he will be retiring from the force by December 30th of this year, two days short of the first anniversary of the murder of Oscar Grant.

The removal of Chief Gee has been a top priority for community activists since January after he declared in a press conference that all of the officers on the Fruitvale platform when Oscar Grant was murdered acted professionally and according to protocol. He said this despite having seen a high-quality video with audio and accounts of numerous eye-witnesses to the contrary. Chief Gee has failed to discipline a single officer for misconduct related to the murder on New Year's Day. It might be one of his very last acts as Chief to finally do so, according to rumors surfacing now.

Rumor has it, indirectly heard from two elected officials, one within BART and one within city government, that the long overdue Meyers Nave investigative report on the events of January 1st is set to be released in the very near future and that the report comes down hard on the extremely unprofessional behavior of the officers who detained Oscar Grant and his friends. If the report indeed makes such conclusions, it will validate what community activists have been saying all along. There is no advance word on whether the report will recommend criminal charges against at least Tony Pirone as activists have demanded.

If the Meyers Nave report does turn out to be critical of BART police behavior and not merely a public relations whitewash as some in the community have feared it might be, then it becomes obvious why Chief Gee announced his resignation on Saturday. If the report were to vindicate the BART police at Fruitvale, then it would have also vindicated Gary Gee for taking no action against them and he likely would remain on the force. But, if Gee's officers were out of control -- acting more like a racist, murdering gang than a professional police force -- and Gary Gee failed to hold them to account for their behavior, then he himself is culpable for his own gross negligence as their supervisor. And so his resignation ahead of the release of such a report makes sense.

Looking forward, General Manager Dorothy Dugger is just as culpable as Chief Gee for the failures of the BART police. She is the only one who currently has the authority to reprimand or fire Chief Gee (not even the BART Board legally can), and yet she has failed to do so. Likewise, she has made false statements in support of Gee and the officers involved on the Fruitvale platform. Dugger publicly has stood by Gee and the BART police, deflecting responsibility to Meyers Nave and NOBLE to tell her what to do. Additionally, Tony Pirone and Marysol Domenici need to be held to account for their actions on January 1st, not to mention the perjury they both committed during Johannes Mehserle's preliminary hearing. Why none of the other officers present on the Fruitvale platform felt compelled to check Pirone and Domenici as they assaulted Oscar Grant and his friends, and why they all apparently hesitated in calling for medical assistance after Oscar Grant was shot in the back, are more outstanding issues BART has yet to deal with.

While BART's Board-approved draft for police oversight is flawed for tying its citizen's board's hands with a supermajority requirement and by allowing BART's two police unions to appoint a "citizen" oversight board member, amongst other issues, it is unique in a state dominated by the Police Bill of Rights in that it actually allows civilians outside of BART's police force to have a say in discipline for officer misconduct. Hence the very strong police resistance to the plan -- they worry that it is a foot in the door to stronger civilian police oversight statewide. One can only hope...

Presumably the bill to create external police oversight at BART will pass through the California Assembly's Public Safety Committee, as did Tom Ammiano's AB312, which was an earlier legislative attempt to establish BART police oversight that was stymied by BART itself and statewide police unions. Assemblypersons Jerry Hill and Warren Furutani voiced support for AB312, but passage will also require convincing previously undeclared Assemblypersons Fiona Ma from San Francisco and/or Nancy Skinner from Berkeley in order to move the bill forward. Supporters of increased police oversight at BART should call or email these officials to enourage support for the plan. You can also show up at the offices of Fiona Ma and Nancy Skinner on Fridays when they are required to be in their local offices.

--------------------------------------------------

previous related post:

BART Anxious to Wrap Up Police Oversight Plan at Final Subcommittee Meeting: audio & PDFs
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/08/14/18615770.php


(2-page PDF)

BOARD MARKS MAJOR MILESTONE BY ADOPTING CITIZEN OVERSIGHT OF BART PD

State Lawmakers Urged to Finalize Citizen Oversight


OAKLAND, CA – In a unanimous vote, the BART Board of Directors reached a major milestone today in delivering on its commitment to improve police services and public confidence by approving independent citizen oversight of the BART Police Department.

“Today’s Board action is truly historic,” BART Board Member Carole Ward Allen said. Ward Allen chairs the BART Police Department Review Committee, which Board President Thomas Blalock created following the January 1 shooting of Oscar Grant on the platform of Fruitvale Station by a former police officer. “What we approved today has one of the strongest components of citizen oversight in the state of California. The process now moves to the state legislature. We urge our state representatives to take swift action so we can implement citizen oversight this year as we continue to work to make the BART Police Department the best it can be.”

“We have a dedicated, professional and highly trained police force at BART and we want to keep it that way,” Director Joel Keller said. Keller is the vice chair of the committee. “Citizen oversight, if done properly, can help us achieve that.”

BART NEEDS CHANGE IN STATE LAW TO MOVE FORWARD

BART is a special district created by the state legislature and requires an amendment of the BART Act to create citizen oversight as adopted by the Board today.

The citizen oversight the Board adopted encompasses two major areas where legislative change is required to meet its stated purpose. The first area involves the creation of the position of independent police auditor. Because the auditor would report directly to the Board, the position requires an amendment to the BART Act.

The second area requires amending the General Manager’s authority to provide for a role for the auditor and the board in the discipline process for members of the police department. In BART’s newly adopted citizen review, both the independent auditor and the Board would each have a role in recommending discipline, which also requires an amendment to the BART Act.

“We are only seeking permissive changes to state law,” BART Board Member Tom Radulovich said. Radulovich has been a long supporter of BART Police citizen oversight and sits on the BART Police Department Review Committee. “The citizen oversight we adopted today is based on what members of the community have told us they want. It incorporates the community’s needs and the best elements of the various citizen oversight entities at police departments around the Bay Area and beyond.”

CITIZEN OVERSIGHT RESULT OF COMMUNITY INPUT

The Board adopted the citizen oversight model after months of careful study of existing citizen oversight entities and by hearing from the community at public meetings and through written comments.

“Today’s action sends a clear message that this Board is committed to fulfilling its promises,” BART Board Member Lynette Sweet said. Sweet also sits on the BART Police Department Review Committee. “We told the community we would adopt a strong citizen oversight of BART Police this year, and today we delivered on that promise. Now we need help from state legislators to amend the law so we can implement citizen oversight.”

The citizen oversight model adopted by the Board is available online at http://www.BART.gov

(52-page PDF)

Apparently, the BART Board was in such a hurry to vote the proposal up that it is unclear if they even had an actual finalized copy of their police oversight draft before them when they voted.

On their website several days later they still link to the copy of the draft that was released as the agenda for the July 30th public meeting (with a number of supporting documents such as a PPT summary of the proposal, guiding principles, and the NACOLE code of ethics) rather than the draft that was reviewed in the August 10th police oversight subcommittee meeting or a truly final BART version that incorporates the final edits agreed upon at that last subcommittee meeting. (http://bart.gov/news/articles/2009/news20090813.aspx)
Just this afternoon, BART released the public version of the Meyers Nave report...

Comments  (Hide Comments)

by Stan
Tuesday Aug 18th, 2009 12:59 PM
Useful , informative article . One suggestion though . Please don't refer to Police organizations as '' Unions''. Cops certainly do look after themselves , '' Blue wall of Silence '' and all that .
But they show no solidarity whatsover with genuine working class organizations. During strikes their ''job'' is to keep production/operation of whatver struck facilities going , escorting scabs across picket lines etc. They also often ''Moonlight '' and pick up another paycheck as open strikebreakers working directly for the struck corporation .
At BART once some years ago they even placed cops as Train Operators so they could solicit real train operators to sell them coke . After requested requests from a undercover cop one driver fell for this entrapment and sold them a tiny amount , resulting of course in his firing , arrest and conviction . So much for Solidarity with their ''fellow BART workers '' !
I think that Police organizations shouldn't be allowed in County Labor councils yet they are foolisly welcomed in every council that i'm aware of .
by ...
Tuesday Aug 18th, 2009 3:03 PM
That rumor definitely makes sense, Dave. Thank you for keeping us updated on these recent developments.

Here's an idea. Suppose they actually do create this civilian oversight board. What do you suppose their reaction would be if they got several hundred applications to be on that board? Even though the Oscar Grant Movement is no longer a major presence on the streets, I believe that the various organizations could still mobilize many, many people to fill out applications to be on this board.
by cp
Wednesday Aug 19th, 2009 9:56 PM
Obey the government, for God is the one who has put it there. There is no government anywhere that God has not placed in power.

2 So those who refuse to obey the laws of the land are refusing to obey God, and punishment will follow.

3 For the policeman does not frighten people who are doing right; but those doing evil will always fear him. So if you don't want to be afraid, keep the laws and you will get along well.

4 The policeman is sent by God to help you. But if you are doing something wrong, of course you should be afraid, for he will have you punished. He is sent by God for that very purpose.

5 Obey the laws, then, for two reasons: first, to keep from being punished, and second, just because you know you should.

6 Pay your taxes too, for these same two reasons. For government workers need to be paid so that they can keep on doing God's work, serving you.

7 Pay everyone whatever he ought to have: pay your taxes and import duties gladly, obey those over you, and give honor and respect to all those to whom it is due.
by agnostic
Thursday Aug 20th, 2009 12:11 PM
as for romans 13:1-7 quote above:

should they too be afraid for not following God's will?

or is their corruption part of God's will?

this bible stuff confuses me
by .
Thursday Aug 20th, 2009 7:08 PM
it says god determines our president and police chief. I think that Mehserle screwed up though and is a sinner.