top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Let each state allow same-sex weddings, or not

by ( says.. Guess Who)
[ Tortuga Bi LIBERTY comments:

Altho Cheney is generally a fascist,
his position on same-sex marriage is okay.

Marriage is indeed a state-by-state issue
(NOT federal).
Different states DO have different marriage rules
(on consanguinity, common-law, divorce, etc.).

Hey, nobody can be wrong ALL the time --
that would be a form of perfection;
unknown among humans.

Now, let's repeal the federal part of DOMA.]
...............................
[ excerpt from AP report,
on Dick Cheney speech,
Monday, June first, 2009:]
.......

Cheney on gay marriage: 'Freedom for everyone'


By PAMELA HESS,
Associated Press Writer



WASHINGTON –
Former Vice President Dick Cheney said Monday he
supports gays being able to marry
but believes states, not the federal government,
should make the decision.

"I think, you know, freedom means freedom for everyone,"
Cheney said in a speech at the National Press Club.
"I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish,
any kind of arrangement they wish."

Cheney, who has a gay daughter, said
marriage has always been a state issue.

"And I think that's the way it ought to be handled today,
that is, on a state-by-state basis.
Different states will make different decisions.
But I don't have any problem with that.
I think people ought to get a shot at that," he said.

Cheney spent most of his speech,
and during the questions and answers that followed,
defending the Bush administration's wartime policies.
[......]


[ for more, see AP]
......................

by Mike Novack
There is a problem with that and the description of the situation misleading. The issue is the clause of the Constitution which requires states to recognize each other's official acts. Take an example from that list, consanguinity. Yes indeed, state A might forbid cousins from marrying and state B allow that BUT in this situation if a couple married in state B moves to state A, state A considers them married whether they are cousins or not. Similarly with age. If state A says you have to be 18 and state B says 16, then a couple who gets married in state B are considered married in state A even if both are still 17.

In fact it HAS to -- and this was one of the issues leading to our Civil War when Taney's Court threw out the Missouri Compromise (the "Dred Scott" case).

Get it? The gays and lesbians aren't campaigning for more than this, would likely settle for having to travel a bit to get married in one of the states that allows it. IF their home state had to recognize that marriage once they returned home.

We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$140.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network