| Indybay | Contact | Newsletter | Calendar | Publish | Community |
|---|
Santa Cruz Indymedia | Global Justice and Anti-Capitalism | Health, Housing, and Public Services2030 North Pacific Vandalized Twice
On August 24, four windows and a glass door of the sales office of 2030 North Pacific were shattered with a hammer. Three weeks earlier, on the night before the "grand opening" (August 1), the walls were paintbombed by glass bottles filled with black paint. 2030 North Pacific is a monstrous four-story development that spans an entire city block of downtown Santa Cruz with upscale condos (selling for over $200,000) and storefronts for yet more shitty boutiques. Anyone who lives in Santa Cruz (who isn't a yuppie, that is) has probably seen this offensive gentrification and winced in disgust.
The triangular city block had been an abandoned lot in the years previous, and before that once hosted a community space called What is Art? "Development" is as good a euphemism as any for capitalism's process of transforming open spaces and anything with potential for life into dead commodities. We cannot wait for this city to crumble into ruins where human beings and animals might be able to breathe and feel sunlight and play again--and so we hasten to destroy these hated constructions in whatever small way we can. Next time, a mob armed with sledgehammers... This most recent attack is in solidarity with the people living at the "wood squat" of Guelph, Ontario who are facing eviction by that city today, August 25. A group of people there have been living for over a year on some forested land technically owned by the city, growing and foraging much of their food. And now, the perennial conflict arises again between those desiring to live freely and this civilization based upon "owning" and "developing" the land and suppressing all other ways of life.
Add Your Comments
Comments (Hide Comments)
Monday Aug 25th, 2008 11:27 AM
http://www.metroactive.com/metro-santa-cruz/08.22.07/news-0734.html
Unless there are a couple of mandated budget units in the building, this article says that most of those units are $500-700K. However, as they also point out here, even old post-WWII little houses in this region, or up in the Santa Cruz mountains, are running $600k and higher. Even though the rest of the state has seen its prices fall quite a bit, Marin, San Francisco, western San Jose etc. seem to have the greatest resistance to the price drop. Santa Cruz county has declined a bit, but at a slower pace than the working class areas. http://www.dqnews.com/Charts/Monthly-Charts/CA-City-Charts/ZIPCAR.aspx
Monday Aug 25th, 2008 11:55 AM
I really don't have much of an issue with it. What was once was a toxic lot is now generating badly needed funding for the city.
And I don't see the connection between breaking windows in new buildings in Santa Cruz and something that's happening 2000 miles away.
Thursday Aug 28th, 2008 2:35 PM
Real estate is expensive because the same people who decry high land prices also (hypocritically?) want to limit growth.
You can't have both, whether you like it or not, the population is growing -- Santa Cruz had 32,000 people in 1970, and 54,000 in 2000 -- Santa Cruz didn't magically grow more land.
Thursday Aug 28th, 2008 3:43 PM
You might as well paint bomb yourselves, because you are gentrification! What happened to the couple of dozen blacks I grew up here with in the 50's & 60's? (Want to see my photos/yearbooks from Gault through Santa Cruz High & Cabrillo?) They couldn't afford it here, because new people like you can! The potentially millions of people who just have to move here, is what fuels this thing. Any nice place highly desirable, with constraints on building is going to be high cost. To take yourselves out of the loop, & demonize others is childish bullshit! Look in the mirror to see the real problem!
( bradley [at] riseup.net )
Thursday Aug 28th, 2008 7:59 PM
![]() 2030pacific1_8-25-08.jpg This photo and the next one show the door to the sales office.
|