Indybay
bar graph
Indybay Needs Your Help: Donate Now!
We need to raise $2,010 to continue operating.
All donations go directly to operating costs.
SF Bay Area Indymedia
indymedia
About Contact Subscribe Calendar Publish Print Donate

U.S. | Indymedia

Google Hands 12 Terabytes of Data to Viacom; How Much is About You?
by bright strangely
Monday Jul 14th, 2008 4:48 PM
Earlier this month Viacom demanded that Google hand over identifying information on Youtube users.
Why? Because 4.1 billion videos are there, about 38% of all videos online.
And some of them, are copyrighted. That means there is money to be made. Lots of it.
As, Mark Getty, founder of Getty Images, once said, "Intellectual Property is the oil of the 21st century."

PHOTO: Members of the Raging Grannies and Veterans for Peace campaign for Internet Freedom

*The Right to Anonymity*

Think for a moment, about how speech works in public. If you hear someone in a restaurant sing part of a commercial jingle, you might recognize the content. But would you recognize the person?

It's an interesting thing to think about online. Because suddenly, that's exactly what a few people can do online. On July 1st, Viacom demanded that Google hand over identifying information on Youtube users. Why? Because 4.1 billion videos are there, about 38% of all videos online.

And some of them, are copyrighted.

I'll leave you a moment to gasp in horror.

Then I'll ask you if that should matter. And why should it matter? After all, I see hundreds of thousands of images and words each day. Most of them are probably copyrighted. It would be almost impossible for any stranger to guess what I looked at on any given day. And then came the internet. And now it's possible for any number of companies to track my viewing habits, without my permission or knowledge.

The closest analogy I can think of, is if the Nielsens were entitled to peer into my windows, to see what I was watching and when I changed the channel on my TV. And that creeps me out. I do not belong to the market. If Viacom wants to know what I like watching, they can ask the Nielsen people, because that's what they're there for. I do not need the internet to become a window into my home and my habits retroactively.

There are many companies that would leap at the chance to know all our political ideas. Or how many socks I purchase a year. The fact is, I simply don't want to be followed like this. The expectation of privacy and anonymity in our day to day affairs is not something we should sacrifice without due consideration.

But its becoming resoundingly clear that it is not my choice to make. For an excellent examination of the legal details and implications of this decision, please see this article from the Electronic Frontier Foundation:

http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/07/court-ruling-will-expose-viewing-habits-youtube-us

And then consider joining the Youtube Revolution. At least if we name every video "Viacom Sucks" or "Colbert Report", they will have a harder time finding their own material.
http://www.media-alliance.org/article.php?story=20080708174812680