He talks about peace but wants to destroy the means the world has for real peace that risks an isolationist position for the US -- a huge liability for conflict.

"Perhaps one of the biggest prices that America and the world would pay under a Ron Paul America is the likely continued non-response to the impending disaster of Global Warming under Paul's strict adherence to not "subsidizing" anything in the public interests at all, under the belief that the market will solve everything. Here's the summary description of what Ron Paul's votes amount to on the issue of Global Warming:

'Strongly Oppose means you believe: There's no such thing as global warming - it's all natural climatic variation. And if there is a problem, it won't affect us much, and we can deal with the problems as they arise.'"
http://www.ontheissues.org/VoteMatch/q11_2006.asp
http://activote.ontheissues.org/AVA/Ron_Paul.htm

but a site to join Kucinich and Ron Paul supporters, who are peace loving, constitution abiding citizens to work together to run out the current incumbents in Congress and replace them with real Americans.

I am not sure if Ron Paul is peace-loving- it sort of seems from the stuff I've read like if a war were free he might want to fight it.

I don't like Ron Paul in large part because he would not defend a woman's right to choose abortion. It's not like he has to have one-- he just needs to keep it legal so we can choose one if we need or want one.

"I don't like Ron Paul in large part because he would not defend a woman's right to choose abortion."

Here, here. Not to mention the rest.

This is also a man who authored a book on gold with Neocon Lewis Lehrman. Imagine it.

Just a word of wisdom from the not to distant past. The Nuremburg Trials that took place just after the second world war were chaired by the U.S. judge Jackson, and he told the allies and the world that inciting, planning, and doing aggressive war is the supreme international crime and it is so whether Germany does it or the U.S.A does it. So the U.S. constitution also says reason for impeachment is such as high crimes and misdemeanors. The Nuremburg Charter, and Judgement is a treaty obligation of the United States, and as there is no higher, lower, or small or larger crime than aggressive war against a U.N. member, it sure enough indicates that impeachment is called for. The Bushco regime is guilty of lying and decieving the electorate (there really was no WMD) and thusly betraying the U.S. constitution and its obligations to uphold the U.N. Charter and the Nuremburg Trials and judgments as constitutional law . International law further states that the Geneva Conventions to which the U.S. government is sworn to uphold has been broken also by the Bushco regime. Three obvious war crimes are being committed, 1) targeting and killing of civilians, 2) torturing and killing POW's, 3) collective punishment, such as 'Shock and Awe', the bombing of hundreds of villages, towns, and cities to rubble because the people decided to take up arms to resist the illegal invasion and foreign occupation of their countries. The Geneva Conventions of war allows the armed resistence to foreign invasion to do so as a legitimate response. That covenant is signed on to by Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom, and the majority of the worlds countries as international anti-fascist law to be upheld and practiced world wide. It is late but national, and international law states clearly that impeachment and the world court of the hague and the international criminal court demands some due process, so the liberation side can win, and overcome the present unjust wars, and illegal aggressive violence that the Canadian, British, and American imperialist governments are doing while ignoring the anti-fascist covenants and thusly murdering millions of people throughout the middle east. The liberation side fights to end war globally. Re-tool to wind, tidal, and solar power and end the pollution wars of coal, gas, oil, and atomic energy.