From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
Bradblog Calls Vote Fraud in NH
The pre-election pollster's numbers (NOTE: that's not Exit Polls, but Pre-Election Polls!) were dead-on, for the most part, on the Republican side, as well as on the Democratic side. Except in the do-or-die (for Hillary) Clinton v. Obama race. I'm watching MSNBC right now, and they all seem to agree that the results, for the moment, defy explanation.
NH Primary: Pre-Election Polls Wildly Different Than Results Announced for Clinton/Obama
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5530%20
Other Pre-Election Numbers, For Republicans and Rest of Dems,
Nearly Dead on the Money...
BLOGGED BY Brad Friedman ON 1/8/2008 8:49PM
[UPDATED several times at end of article, and still developing with new updates...]
I'm not sure why Obama would have conceded so soon, given the virtually inexplicable turn of events in New Hampshire tonight.
What's going on here? Before proceeding, I recommend you read the third section of the post I just ran an hour or so ago, concerning the way the ballots are counted in New Hampshire, largely on Diebold optical-scan voting systems, wholly controlled and programmed by a very very bad company named LHS Associates.
Those Diebold op-scan machines are the exact same ones that were hacked in the HBO documentary, Hacking Democracy. See the previous report, as I recommend, which also includes a video of that hack, and footage of the guy who runs LHS Associates.
That said, the pre-election pollster's numbers (NOTE: that's not Exit Polls, but Pre-Election Polls!) were dead-on, for the most part, on the Republican side, as well as on the Democratic side. Except in the do-or-die (for Hillary) Clinton v. Obama race. I'm watching MSNBC right now, and they all seem to agree that the results, for the moment, defy explanation.
I concur.
See:
http://www.bradblog .com/?p=5530
See these stories also:
--------------------------
Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results
By Lori Price 09 Jan 2008
http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news
(Note: this is not an endorsement for RPaul)
2008 New Hampshire Democratic Primary Results --
Total Democratic Votes: 286,139 - Machine vs Hand
(RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Hillary Clinton, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 39.618%
Clinton, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 34.908%
Barack Obama, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 36.309%
Obama, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 38.617%
Machine vs Hand:
Clinton: 4.709% (13,475 votes)
Obama: -2.308% (-6,604 votes)
2008 New Hampshire Republican Primary Results --
Total Republican Votes: 236,378 Machine vs Hand
(RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Mitt Romney, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 33.075%
Romney, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 25.483%
Ron Paul, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 7.109%
Paul, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 9.221%
Machine vs Hand:
Romney: 7.592% (17,946 votes)
Paul: -2.112% (-4,991 votes)
--------------------------
http://www.oilempire.us/hillary.html
http://www.oilempire.us/obama.html
http://www.oilempire.us/edwards.html
http://www.oilempire.us/elections.html
--------------------------
NH: "First in the nation"
(with corporate controlled secret vote counting)
http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5307
By Nancy Tobi
07 Jan 2008
81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as "Premier"). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots.
--------------------------
NYTimes Magazine story this week:
Can You Count on Voting Machines?
By CLIVE THOMPSON
Published: January 6, 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06Vote-t.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=vote+machines&oref=slogin
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5530%20
Other Pre-Election Numbers, For Republicans and Rest of Dems,
Nearly Dead on the Money...
BLOGGED BY Brad Friedman ON 1/8/2008 8:49PM
[UPDATED several times at end of article, and still developing with new updates...]
I'm not sure why Obama would have conceded so soon, given the virtually inexplicable turn of events in New Hampshire tonight.
What's going on here? Before proceeding, I recommend you read the third section of the post I just ran an hour or so ago, concerning the way the ballots are counted in New Hampshire, largely on Diebold optical-scan voting systems, wholly controlled and programmed by a very very bad company named LHS Associates.
Those Diebold op-scan machines are the exact same ones that were hacked in the HBO documentary, Hacking Democracy. See the previous report, as I recommend, which also includes a video of that hack, and footage of the guy who runs LHS Associates.
That said, the pre-election pollster's numbers (NOTE: that's not Exit Polls, but Pre-Election Polls!) were dead-on, for the most part, on the Republican side, as well as on the Democratic side. Except in the do-or-die (for Hillary) Clinton v. Obama race. I'm watching MSNBC right now, and they all seem to agree that the results, for the moment, defy explanation.
I concur.
See:
http://www.bradblog .com/?p=5530
See these stories also:
--------------------------
Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results
By Lori Price 09 Jan 2008
http://www.legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news
(Note: this is not an endorsement for RPaul)
2008 New Hampshire Democratic Primary Results --
Total Democratic Votes: 286,139 - Machine vs Hand
(RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Hillary Clinton, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 39.618%
Clinton, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 34.908%
Barack Obama, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 36.309%
Obama, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 38.617%
Machine vs Hand:
Clinton: 4.709% (13,475 votes)
Obama: -2.308% (-6,604 votes)
2008 New Hampshire Republican Primary Results --
Total Republican Votes: 236,378 Machine vs Hand
(RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Mitt Romney, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 33.075%
Romney, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 25.483%
Ron Paul, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 7.109%
Paul, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 9.221%
Machine vs Hand:
Romney: 7.592% (17,946 votes)
Paul: -2.112% (-4,991 votes)
--------------------------
http://www.oilempire.us/hillary.html
http://www.oilempire.us/obama.html
http://www.oilempire.us/edwards.html
http://www.oilempire.us/elections.html
--------------------------
NH: "First in the nation"
(with corporate controlled secret vote counting)
http://www.democracyfornewhampshire.com/node/view/5307
By Nancy Tobi
07 Jan 2008
81% of New Hampshire ballots are counted in secret by a private corporation named Diebold Election Systems (now known as "Premier"). The elections run on these machines are programmed by one company, LHS Associates, based in Methuen, MA. We know nothing about the people programming these machines, and we know even less about LHS Associates. We know even less about the secret vote counting software used to tabulate 81% of our ballots.
--------------------------
NYTimes Magazine story this week:
Can You Count on Voting Machines?
By CLIVE THOMPSON
Published: January 6, 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06Vote-t.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=vote+machines&oref=slogin
For more information:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5530%20
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network