SF Bay Area Indymedia indymedia
About Contact Subscribe Calendar Publish Print Donate
More
donate
$75.00 donated in past month

africa

canada

east asia

europe

latin america

oceania

south asia

united states

west asia

process

projects

regions

topics

U.S. | Labor & Workers | LGBTI / Queer

House OKs Bill to Ban Workplace Discrimination for Sexual Orientation but Ignores Transgender Workers
by via Mike Hall, AFL-CIO
Friday Nov 9th, 2007 7:54 AM
Thursday, November 8, 2007 : Legislation to ban workplace discrimination against millions of gay, lesbian and bisexual workers won approval from the U.S. House of Representatives last night (235-184). Lawmakers called the legislation historic and long overdue. Says Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.): This legislation was first introduced in the House in 1975, more than 30 years ago.
In the last three decades, gay, lesbian and bisexual Americans have waged a courageous campaign for their workplace rights. They should not have had to wait so long for this vote. This discrimination has no place in American society.

But the bill does not include protections for transgender workers, an omission that makes the bill “deeply flawed,” according to Pride At Work, the AFL-CIO constituency group for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) workers.

n a statement released last night, the group says:

The passage this evening by the House of Representatives of a deeply flawed version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is deeply disappointing. Both the removal of gender identity protections for the bill and the incorporation of the language of the infamous Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) into legislation that was supposed to free the LGBT community from discrimination are unacceptable to Pride at Work, the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender constituency group of the AFL-CIO.

Read More

LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
why no transgenderdanielMonday Nov 12th, 2007 5:42 PM