Publish to Newswire
Add an EventFrom the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature
UK Campaign aims to reduce the mountains of waste
The shrink-wrapped swede, bought from a London supermarket at the weekend, says it all. Why on earth add a skin to something that's got a tough enough skin of its own?
Wrapping that's entirely unnecessary is not confined to root vegetables: it's everywhere. And today The Independent launches a campaign to highlight how environmentally unfriendly, how problematic and - not least - how irritating the phenomenon of packaging and packaging waste has become.
We are asking readers to be at the forefront of it, to bring home to supermarkets and other major retailers how imperative is the need to slim down radically the avalanche of bags, trays, wrappers, boxes, parcels, cartons, cardboard, plastic, foil and clingfilm that is sweeping over our lives.
Packaging presents a problem for several reasons. Firstly, it uses up huge volumes of natural resources: oil for plastic trays, bags and wrappers; trees for paper, cartons, and cardboard; aluminium for tins and cans; glass for jars and bottles. About eight per cent of global oil production is used to make plastic, of which a quarter is thought to end up in packaging. Secondly, climate change is hastened by the greenhouse gas emissions from the energy used to make and transport the containers.
Thirdly, there is the problem of disposal. The packaging industry claims that, with the quadrupling of recycling rates in the past decade, 60 per cent of packaging is now recycled; but even so, it admits that five million tons of it is dumped in holes in the ground. The UK's landfill sites are filling up and finding new ones is a problem. In 2002, the Environment Agency warned that sites in the South-east would be full in seven years' time. New EU regulations require the UK to cut waste going to landfill by half by 2013, and to a quarter of the current level by 2020.
Fourthly, packaging itself is expensive and adds to retail prices. The Government's Waste Resources Action Programme (WRAP) says that families spend £470 on packaging each year, one-sixth of their food budget.
Finally, packaging is now often designed to encourage over-consumption, and it particularly angers consumers. Many people who have fancied an apple will have been irritated by the fact that they may only have been able to buy four of them, sitting on an unrecyclable plastic tray, surrounded by clingfilm. In market research, stores have picked up packaging as one of the issues that most grates with customers. The industry argues that, as products need to be protected in travelling to reach the shops, under-packaging creates more waste.
But packaging performs another, commercial, function: it engages and entices the customer, and often exaggerates the size of a product. This is particularly noticeable in the rapidly growing trend for seasonal merchandise, whether for Christmas toys, Easter eggs or Halloween masks.
We are launching the campaign at what is a key moment for deciding on how we handle our waste products in the future, for two reasons. Firstly, the Government will soon produce a national waste strategy, the first for seven years; we believe new measures to force a cutback in packaging should be part of it.
Secondly, most of the major supermarkets have begun to realise that they do have to act on packaging, and have signed an agreement to tackle it. Furthermore, only last week two of them, Marks and Spencer and Tesco, announced multimillion-pound environmental programmes that included packaging reductions. Yet we believe that all of them need to go further and faster, and to this end we are inviting Independent readers to highlight the worst, most unnecessary and most ridiculously over-packaged items they can find on supermarket shelves, or in other outlets: we will take them up with the retailer concerned, and see if they act on it. We feel the campaign will touch a nerve with the public; environmental and consumer groups such as Friends of the Earth and the Women's Institute are backing it strongly.
For whatever the promises of Tesco and its fellows, just a moderate shopping-bag full of supermarket groceries (with that swede at the top of our list) vividly illustrated how strongly wedded they still are to the packaging way of doing things.
The result is remarkable: of the 30 million tons or so of household rubbish we produce every year, about a quarter by weight, and as much as 60 per cent by volume, is packaging waste.
"There's still no room for complacency, but things are moving the right way," said Jane Bickerstaffe, the director of the Industry Council for Packaging and the Environment.
That's as may be - but the point of our campaign is simply to get retailers to use less of it.
Take that shrink-wrapped swede. We asked the supermarket chain Morrisons - not the only supermarket guilty of over-packaging - who had it on the shelves of their store in Camden Town, London, why they thought shrink-wrapping a swede was necessary. The company replied: "The packaging ensures the product is fresh and minimises potential damage."
Well, maybe you think that is reasonable. But maybe you don't.
So if you're the sort of person who thinks that shrink-wrapping a swede is verging on bonkers, have a look around your local supermarket and see if you can find anything just as bad - or even something to top it. We will take it up with the retailer.
How you can help
* Do you have an example of absurd packaging? Have you been infuriated by the waste that came with something you bought recently? If so, tell us the details and we will highlight it in 'The Independent' and take it up with the companies concerned. Send your examples to waste@ independent.co.uk
More
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2175016.ece
We are asking readers to be at the forefront of it, to bring home to supermarkets and other major retailers how imperative is the need to slim down radically the avalanche of bags, trays, wrappers, boxes, parcels, cartons, cardboard, plastic, foil and clingfilm that is sweeping over our lives.
Packaging presents a problem for several reasons. Firstly, it uses up huge volumes of natural resources: oil for plastic trays, bags and wrappers; trees for paper, cartons, and cardboard; aluminium for tins and cans; glass for jars and bottles. About eight per cent of global oil production is used to make plastic, of which a quarter is thought to end up in packaging. Secondly, climate change is hastened by the greenhouse gas emissions from the energy used to make and transport the containers.
Thirdly, there is the problem of disposal. The packaging industry claims that, with the quadrupling of recycling rates in the past decade, 60 per cent of packaging is now recycled; but even so, it admits that five million tons of it is dumped in holes in the ground. The UK's landfill sites are filling up and finding new ones is a problem. In 2002, the Environment Agency warned that sites in the South-east would be full in seven years' time. New EU regulations require the UK to cut waste going to landfill by half by 2013, and to a quarter of the current level by 2020.
Fourthly, packaging itself is expensive and adds to retail prices. The Government's Waste Resources Action Programme (WRAP) says that families spend £470 on packaging each year, one-sixth of their food budget.
Finally, packaging is now often designed to encourage over-consumption, and it particularly angers consumers. Many people who have fancied an apple will have been irritated by the fact that they may only have been able to buy four of them, sitting on an unrecyclable plastic tray, surrounded by clingfilm. In market research, stores have picked up packaging as one of the issues that most grates with customers. The industry argues that, as products need to be protected in travelling to reach the shops, under-packaging creates more waste.
But packaging performs another, commercial, function: it engages and entices the customer, and often exaggerates the size of a product. This is particularly noticeable in the rapidly growing trend for seasonal merchandise, whether for Christmas toys, Easter eggs or Halloween masks.
We are launching the campaign at what is a key moment for deciding on how we handle our waste products in the future, for two reasons. Firstly, the Government will soon produce a national waste strategy, the first for seven years; we believe new measures to force a cutback in packaging should be part of it.
Secondly, most of the major supermarkets have begun to realise that they do have to act on packaging, and have signed an agreement to tackle it. Furthermore, only last week two of them, Marks and Spencer and Tesco, announced multimillion-pound environmental programmes that included packaging reductions. Yet we believe that all of them need to go further and faster, and to this end we are inviting Independent readers to highlight the worst, most unnecessary and most ridiculously over-packaged items they can find on supermarket shelves, or in other outlets: we will take them up with the retailer concerned, and see if they act on it. We feel the campaign will touch a nerve with the public; environmental and consumer groups such as Friends of the Earth and the Women's Institute are backing it strongly.
For whatever the promises of Tesco and its fellows, just a moderate shopping-bag full of supermarket groceries (with that swede at the top of our list) vividly illustrated how strongly wedded they still are to the packaging way of doing things.
The result is remarkable: of the 30 million tons or so of household rubbish we produce every year, about a quarter by weight, and as much as 60 per cent by volume, is packaging waste.
"There's still no room for complacency, but things are moving the right way," said Jane Bickerstaffe, the director of the Industry Council for Packaging and the Environment.
That's as may be - but the point of our campaign is simply to get retailers to use less of it.
Take that shrink-wrapped swede. We asked the supermarket chain Morrisons - not the only supermarket guilty of over-packaging - who had it on the shelves of their store in Camden Town, London, why they thought shrink-wrapping a swede was necessary. The company replied: "The packaging ensures the product is fresh and minimises potential damage."
Well, maybe you think that is reasonable. But maybe you don't.
So if you're the sort of person who thinks that shrink-wrapping a swede is verging on bonkers, have a look around your local supermarket and see if you can find anything just as bad - or even something to top it. We will take it up with the retailer.
How you can help
* Do you have an example of absurd packaging? Have you been infuriated by the waste that came with something you bought recently? If so, tell us the details and we will highlight it in 'The Independent' and take it up with the companies concerned. Send your examples to waste@ independent.co.uk
More
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2175016.ece
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!
Donate
$230.00 donated
in the past month
Get Involved
If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.
Publish
Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.
Topics
More
Search Indybay's Archives
Advanced Search
►
▼
IMC Network
A simple exercise by The Independent at the weekend illustrated a profound truth: that whatever the promises of supermarkets to change their ways, packaging, and over-packaging, are still an absolutely essential part of the deal they offer us.
We put together a bag of 14 household items and although they came from seven stores rather than one - to show how universal the phenomenon is - they made up a typical shopping bag. There were basic vegetables, fruit, breakfast cereal and cakes, washing powder, and one item for household odd jobs. Plus a small Valentine's gift - getting in early, as it were. Total cost: £23.44.
The first thing to say about the Indy's bag is that a generation ago, almost all of the items in it would have been sold loose. Even those which at one time had to be wrapped in some way, would have been wrapped less - once rather than twice, say. But now they all came swathed in clingfilm, plastic, paper and cardboard, to the extent that when it was eventually all discarded, it made a substantially bigger pile than the bare groceries themselves.
The second point to be made is that some packaging, as we shall see, was so unnecessary as to verge on the farcical.
More
http://news.independent.co.uk/environment/article2174984.ece
Packaging volume increased by 12 per cent between 1999 and 2005. It now makes up a third of the typical household's waste. The supermarkets are the worst offenders. Items such as sausages, cereals, pizzas are often packaged twice with plastic and cardboard. Visit a food branch of Marks & Spencer and you will find a pack of four pears covered in a thick plastic covering, each nestling on a moulded styrofoam base. We have chosen to illustrate our front page today with a shrink-wrapped swede - a vegetable that comes equipped by nature with its own protective casing - to illustrate the sheer lunacy of the phenomenon.
Such excess would be almost amusing were it not for the tremendous damage it is doing to the environment. The UK is fast running out of landfill sites in which to bury such unnecessary waste. If such packaging is incinerated, it releases greenhouse gasses. Recycling helps, but the process itself uses energy. Disposal is not the point. The solution is not to produce such items in the first place. Nor is the scandal of waste limited to packaging. Food waste is a significant problem too. Too many supermarkets encourage customers to buy more than they need.
There have been some small tremors of acknowledgement among supermarkets that this cannot continue. Sainsbury's has committed to making more of its packaging compostable. Marks & Spencer has promised to improve its act. Tesco is offering customer incentives to re-use their plastic bags and using more "retail-ready" packaging for soft drinks and flowers on its shop floors. But we need such commitments from the entire supermarket sector. And we must have them from other retailers such as toy and electronics vendors too.
More
http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article2174974.ece