top
International
International
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Nepal's Maoists Morph for 21st Century

by New American Media (reposted)
By signing a peace treaty with the government and agreeing to come in from the cold, Nepal's Maoist rebels have shown a pragmatic, non-doctrinaire streak that surprised political observers and shocked their Maoist peers in India. Rene Ciria-Cruz is a New America Media editor.
Nepal's decade-old armed conflict recently ended when Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala and Maoist leader Prachanda signed a 10-point Comprehensive Peace Treaty, ending a conflict that had claimed over 14,000 lives. What's surprising is that Nepal's guerrillas, in agreeing to the pact, have deliberately veered from the Maoist doctrine of protracted people's war they had followed.

People's war is still espoused by Maoists such as Peru's the Sendero Luminoso (from which the Nepalese guerrillas say they drew their inspiration), India's Naxalites and the Communist Party of the Philippines.

Maoists in these countries won't be caught dead even hinting of giving up their surround-the-cities-from-countryside guerrilla strategy. Peru's Senderos became livid when the government insinuated that their captured leader, President Gonzalo, had agreed to peace talks.

In India, a Naxalite leader told Reuters, "Prachanda made a big mistake by deciding to share power" when "they should have killed King Gyanendra and taken power." The Naxalites were the Nepalese Maoists' closest allies.

Meanwhile, the Communist Party of the Philippines had split up in the 1990s after a faction began pushing for city-based uprisings, which the leadership deemed heretical. Critics of the Philippine Maoists believe the guerrillas don't take talks with the government seriously. The CPP, they charge, do talks only to gain propaganda points and certain practical advantages but not as a fundamental readjustment of strategy.

More
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=400b51365e2a4e804cc2eb1803d49284
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$115.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network