top
San Francisco
San Francisco
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Newsom Veto Undermines Black’s Campaign Message

by Beyond Chron (reposted)
At 5:00 p.m. on Friday, November 3, after most people had left for the weekend, Mayor Gavin Newsom vetoed the police foot-patrol legislation. Sponsored by Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, and co-sponsored by Chris Daly, the ordinance passed the Board by an 8-3 vote at their October 17th meeting. While it is unusual for the Mayor to veto a bill that passed by a veto-proof majority, Newsom’s stated reason for the veto carries an ironic twist – according to the Mayor, Supervisors shouldn’t tell the police how to do their job. Meanwhile, Chris Daly’s challenger, Rob Black, has attacked Daly for failing to address crime and other quality-of-life issues in District 6. But if we take the Mayor’s statement at his word, an individual Supervisor cannot do anything about these problems. If the Supervisors offer certain guidelines to law enforcement on how to deal with crime, says the Mayor, it creates a “dangerous slippery slope.”
As Daly explained at the October 17th Board meeting, police foot patrols is a simple reform that District 6 residents “have been clamoring for years.” It’s an issue that Daly himself raised when he first ran in 2000. The proposed legislation creates a one-year pilot program in the Tenderloin, South-of-Market, Western Addition and Bayview. It will direct the Police Department in these neighborhoods to have two daily shifts of foot patrols, with the discretion to expand the program if feasible. Police chiefs at various precincts will meet on a frequent basis to discuss the program’s effectiveness, and provide the Supervisors with regular progress reports. Due to concerns from the Police Chief about staffing shortages and emergency responses, the legislation would not go into effect until January 1, 2007.

In his Veto Message, Newsom wrote that it is “very dangerous for the Board of Supervisors to dictate where police officers are deployed … They know better than we do in City Hall what is required to protect residents, as well as ensure their officers’ safety.” Supervisor Sean Elsbernd essentially made the same argument at the October 17th Board meeting when he said “the Board of Supervisors should not tell a paramilitary organization on how to deploy its troops.” But if elected officials should be powerless to control what law enforcement does, why do we have a Police Review Commission? What can a Supervisor do when there’s a high crime rate in their District?

Supervisors who pushed the foot-patrol legislation were simply listening to the needs of their constituents who demanded this change. Tenderloin residents, for example, overwhelmingly agree that the police could do a better job dealing with basic quality-of-life concerns on the street if they got out of their cars and patrolled the sidewalk. Neighbors frequently complain about rampant drug dealing in front of their homes, as police squad cars zoom up and down the neighborhood’s one-way streets – only to stop if the problem becomes violent.

Read More
http://beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=3876#more
Add Your Comments
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network