top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

ENTERGY’S RADIOACTIVE RESERVOIR

by By Michael Steinberg
The story broke on October 9. New Orleans-based Entergy Corporation’s Indian Point nuclear plants, 24 miles north of New York City on the Hudson River, have a radioactive lake underneath them. The UPI reported that the body of radioactive water that has leaked into the ground “has grown to approximately the size of the Central Park Reservoir, the New York Daily News said.”
ENTERGY’S RADIOACTIVE RESERVOIR

By Michael Steinberg

The story broke on October 9. New Orleans-based Entergy Corporation’s Indian Point nuclear plants, 24 miles north of New York City on the Hudson River, have a radioactive lake underneath them. The UPI reported that the body of radioactive water that has leaked into the ground “has grown to approximately the size of the Central Park Reservoir, the New York Daily News said.”

The UPI story went on to report: “Dan Mayer, special projects director for Entergy, said the underground area has contaminated water between 50 and 60 feet deep, the Daily News said. Another area is about 30 feet wide and 350 feet long.”

Mayer also stated that the primary contaminants in the leaked water are strontium 90 and tritium [radioactive hydrogen], “both carcinogenic,” according to the UPI.

“Entergy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), both said drinking water tested two miles from the plant was found contaminant free,” the UPI said.

However, an NRC report released earlier this October concluded that “the potential exists for unplanned and unmonitored releases of radioactive releases [from nuclear plants] to migrate offsite into the public domain.”

Another NRC document reported that Entergy found levels of tritium exceeding the EPA’s standard for drinking water in a sample taken from a groundwater monitoring well on the grounds of Indian Point on October 5, 2005.

The same document reported levels of tritium in mid October last year in “samples from 5 shallow wells” near Indian Point Unit 2’s “spent fuel pool’s south wall leak.”

Spent fuel pools hold nuclear fuel rods removed from reactors. The fuel rods are commercially spent, as far as use in generating electricity, but remain highly radioactive for generations.

Indian Point consists of the permanently closed down Unit 1 reactor, and the still operating Units 2 and 3. Entergy’s Mayer said in the UPI story that the company would begin to clean up the leaked lake at the end of the month—just in time for Halloween.

Entergy bought up the 30+ year old Indian Point nukes during a fire sale splurge in recent years that made it the largest nuke plant owner and operator in the Northeast, and the second largest in the US.

Entergy refused to lend any aid to its bankrupt subsidiary Entergy New Orleans after the Katrina disaster, except to extend it a $200 million line of credit. But it continued to expand its nuclear empire last summer, when it bought the aged Palisades Nuclear Plant in Michigan for the bargain price of $350 million last July.

Entergy is also spending millions more planning to build new nuclear plants at its River Bend nuclear site in Louisiana and its Grand Gulf nuclear plant in Mississippi. The Department of Energy is subsidizing that effort by providing matching funds.

Meanwhile Entergy New Orleans had to resort to pandering for federal bailout funds, in the form of scarce Community Development Block Grants handed out by the state of Louisiana in disaster relief. Entergy ended up with $200 million, though it initially wanted over $700 million. ENO plans to raise more revenue by gouging what customers it has left in the Crescent City with steep rate hikes.

ENO’s parent company, Entergy Corporation, reported profits of $282 million for the second quarter of this year. According to the August 9, 2006 New Orleans Times-Picayune, the corporation had achieved “million in profits for the third quarter in a row.”
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by H. Springer
Part time Daily News writer Abby Luby has just stated in her article about Indian Point, that Entergy officials described the tritium plume beneath Indian Point as:
"The size of the Central Park Reservoir" I have checked my USGS Topo map, and I found it is a creative license granted by Ms. Abby Luby, to Ms. Abby Luby, to describe what is really a much smaller plume, in a way that makes it seem large.

If Entergy officials did not state that phrase, then how could any principled journalist
report that they said something they did not say?

Has Abby Luby become the Jayson Blair of the Indian Point issue?

The Jaqueline Onassis Reservoir, at 106 acres, containing a billion gallons of water, is considerably larger than the plume described by Entergy's hydrologist. The Onassis reservoir, is about 6000 times larger than the limited plume beneath Indian Point, and the plume, embedded in rock fissures, is only 1/2000 as dense as the water in the reservoir. Combining those two reduction factors, makes Indian Point's water mass one million, two hundred thousand times smaller than the Central Park reservoir's water mass. What gives? Is Ms. Luby carrying personal baggage in her reportage from her long association with avowed anti-nuclear spokepersons? If so, The Daily News ought to exercise executive quality control here, and report the truth, NOT a single misdirected writer's exaggerations.

Abby Luby, long employed as a press agent for the strongly antinuke PR shop "Kent Communications" , has "slipped a fast one" over on her sleeping bosses at the Daily News, and now the public at large.

Shame.

But-- all is not lost, at least we have a new anti-nuclear myth, with which to console ourselves, as the entire world builds the next generation of reactors.

by Harold H. Springer
what's the use of having a comment section, if you delete well written, pertinent comments? The use of the phrase " As large as the Central Park Reservoir" was a key part of the syndication of Abby Luby's original New York Daily News article. Now Entergy spokespersons deny ever using the phrase, and pajama-clad home bloggers are whipping out their USGS Topo Harlem Quadrangle southwest, checking on the relative sizes of both Indian Point and the reservoir.What is emerging is a vast size discrepancy between the Central Park reservoir and the Entergy plume.A factor of one million has been calculated. A 2-dimensional, shape-only discrepancy of 5000 to 6000 is very easy to see, while looking at the Topo maps.The fact that the Entergy plume is not a lake, is not solid water, but is only a small amount of water in the cracks of a rock formation dilutes the actual contaminated area to only 1/2000 of the permeated rock having any radioactivity, with the solid portion of the rock not affected.
So some have begun to call writer Abby Luby (not a career Daily News Staffer, but an antinuclear advocate and part-time submitter) the "Antinuclear Jayson Blair".
When, or if, this post is deleted, you will be making a secondary story larger than the original claim. My advice is to retain your blog's credibility, your own integrity, and let it run. A copy of all this has , of course, all been stored, inside your frame, just in case you prefer to run with the secondary story.

Your choice, good night and good luck.
by Harold H. Springer
640_xx002.jpg
Here's your stored pages, both before, and after submittal. Note that your site has accepted the post, and assigned it a url designation. Of course, Tertiary storage of this submittal is being made, even now, as we communicate.

Have a nice day.
by Paul E. Deeds Jr.
Just because something is written by UPI doesn't make it true.

First, while the area of contamination may be the physical dimensions of the Central Park Lake, it IS NOT a "lake" under Indian Point. Meaning, there are not thousands of gallons of contaiminated water sitting in a huge lake under Indian Point. The fact is, under Indian Point is solid bedrock marble. If the writer had taken time to come to Indian Point's Open House, OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, the writer would have seen the actual core samples drilled hundreds of feet into the ground around the Indian Point site, and they would have seen solid marble cores.

Second, while you might expect a realitive to help out another in times of need and to "give them money" legally, one Entergy company cannot just "give" another one of it's company's money, in time of need. Instead of saying tough find your own money or let the people in the dark, they lent that bankrupt company millions of dollars to assist in rebuilding the New Orleans power and gas grids.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$210.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network