Global trade talks collapse

Last-ditch efforts to unblock the Doha round of global trade talks have collapsed, with fears it will take months for negotiations to resume.

A meeting of leading trading nations, the so-called G6 group, hit a stalemate after US trade negotiator Susan Schwab turned on Europe, reports suggest.

She is said to have refused to compromise over farm subsidies.

After 14-hours of talks on Sunday, discussions reconvened to see what could be salvaged, but to no avail.

'Serious setback'

World Trade Organization (WTO) director-general Pascal Lamy decided no more negotiations should be attempted.

Brazilian foreign minister Celso Amorim said: "This is a serious setback, a major setback."

European Union trade commissioner Peter Mandelson said he was "profoundly disappointed" that talks had stumbled.

He said that only the US had been unable to show flexibility in its negotiations.

However, Ms Schwab insisted that the US remained "fully committed to multilateral trading system".

She said that the collapse meant that countries were more likely to pursue trade disputes at the WTO.

Indian trade minister Kamal Nath warned that restarting negotiations "could take anywhere from months to years".

Sticking points

The EU, US, Brazil, Australia, India and Japan have been negotiating a deal to boost world trade in industrial and agricultural goods.

The talks have failed to advance on the key area of farm subsidies.

Negotiators had warned that if the current talks failed to make a breakthrough, there was little use for further discussions on 28 and 29 July.

more
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/5209010.stm

Global trade talks collapse, delay Doha

By BRADLEY S. KLAPPER, Associated Press Writer 58 minutes ago

WTO members called a halt to more than five years of commerce liberalization talks Monday as differences over farm aid proved unbridgeable.

Pascal Lamy, director-general of the World Trade Organization, said a deal billed as a recipe for lifting millions of people worldwide out of poverty would not be reached by the end of the year and there was no new timetable for completing the round.

"We are in dire straits," Lamy said after six of the WTO's most powerful members failed to agree on steps toward liberalizing trade in farm and manufactured goods. He said he did not intend to propose any new deadlines or a date for negotiators to resume meeting.

The 25-nation European Union criticized U.S. intransigence over agricultural subsidies for the breakdown, while the United States blamed Brazil and India for being inflexible on cutting barriers to industrial imports and the EU for refusing to make deeper cuts in its farm import tariffs.

Last week, presidents and prime ministers from the Group of Eight leading industrialized countries called a new trade deal a top priority. But that promise did not translate into real negotiating action during two days of meetings facilitated by Lamy between Australia, Brazil, the EU, India, Japan and the United States.

Now the whole process of agreeing to a binding treaty may have to be put on ice until after U.S. presidential elections in 2008 because President George W. Bush's "fast-track" authority to strike trade deals expires next year.

Without that measure, which requires an up or down vote without amendments, it would be much harder to gain congressional approval in the U.S., the world's largest trading nation.

Analysts have warned that a failure of the Doha round will lead to more bilateral trade pacts between nations, which are not expected to bring as many economic benefits as the multilateral deal.

Some ministers also warned Monday that the suspension of the Doha talks, which were launched in Qatar's capital in 2001, might also cause an increase in the number of trade disputes being brought to the WTO.

"This is a serious setback, a major setback," said Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim,

"It is somewhere between intensive care and the crematorium," India's Trade and Industry Minister Kamal Nath said of the Doha round, which aims to boost the global economy by lowering trade barriers across all sectors, with particular emphasis on helping poorer countries develop their economies through export growth.

Nath said "it could take anywhere from months to years" to restart the negotiations, which stalled as poorer countries demanded that the EU and United States offer greater cuts in support for their farmers.

The U.S. and EU in turn want major developing countries like Brazil and India to allow more foreign competition in their industrial and services sectors.

But at times, the almost incessant sniping between the EU and the U.S. has appeared the greatest obstacle.

"The United States judged that it would be better for the process to be discontinued at this stage," said EU trade chief Peter Mandelson, adding that he was disappointed that the flexibility Bush indicated at the G-8 summit was not realized in negotiations.

"Surely the richest and strongest nation in the world, with the highest standards of living in the world, can afford to give as well as take," Mandelson said, adding that the stoppage in negotiations "was neither desirable nor inevitable. It could so easily have been avoided."

But U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab said Lamy told U.S. negotiators there wasn't enough movement among other countries to put additional U.S. offers on the table. She said the EU was trying to protect itself by blaming the U.S.

"The finger-pointing can't hide the fact that their average tariff is twice as high as ours and that their farm subsidies are more than three times what ours are," Schwab said on a conference call.

U.S. Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns said proposals by other countries "appeared to be getting lighter and lighter in the last few weeks."

"There was just simply nothing there," Johanns said.

The U.S. indicated to its trading partners that it could make greater cuts in its agricultural subsidies, Johanns and Schwab said. But both declined to say whether Washington had made a concrete proposal.

Mandelson said the meeting broke down when the U.S. maintained its hardline stance on farm support programs after all others had outlined where they could compromise.

"The U.S. was unwilling to accept or indeed to acknowledge the flexibilities being showed by others in the room and as a result felt unable to show any flexibility on the issue of farm subsidies," he said.

Advocacy groups criticized both the EU and the U.S. for spending more time fighting one another and less time concentrating on the needs of poorer countries.

"You could give this four weeks, four months, four years or four centuries. It doesn't make a difference," said Matt Grainger, spokesman for international aid agency Oxfam. "The U.S. and the EU refuse to accept that they have to cut their agricultural support."

___

Associated Press writers Andrew T. Robotham and Sam Cage in Geneva and Libby Quaid in Washington contributed to this report.